Uploaded by Shitiz Sehgal

Absorption Modes: Falling Film vs. Bubble Analysis

International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrefrig
Analytical investigation of two di€erent absorption modes:
falling ®lm and bubble types
Yong Tae Kang *, Atsushi Akisawa, Takao Kashiwagi
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16,
Nakamachi, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan
Abstract
The objectives of this paper are to analyze a combined heat and mass transfer for an ammonia±water absorption process,
and to carry out the parametric analysis to evaluate the e€ects of important variables such as heat and mass transfer areas
on the absorption rate for two di€erent absorption modes Ð falling ®lm and bubble modes. A plate heat exchanger with an
o€set strip ®n (OSF) in the coolant side was used to design the falling ®lm and the bubble absorber. It was found that the
local absorption rate of the bubble mode was always higher than that of the falling ®lm model leading to about 48.7%
smaller size of the heat exchanger than the falling ®lm mode. For the falling ®lm absorption mode, mass transfer resistance
was dominant in the liquid ¯ow while both heat and mass transfer resistances were considerable in the vapor ¯ow. For the
bubble absorption mode, mass transfer resistance was dominant in the liquid ¯ow while heat transfer resistance was
dominant in the vapor region. Heat transfer coecients had a more signi®cant e€ect on the heat exchanger size (absorption
rate) in the falling ®lm mode than in the bubble mode, while mass transfer coecients had a more signi®cant e€ect in the
bubble mode than in the falling ®lm mode. # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Refrigerating system; Absorption system; Absorber; Falling ®lm; Bubble; Performance
Comparaison de deux modes d'absorption: ®lm tombant et bulles:
falling ®lm and bubble types
ReÂsumeÂ
Le auteurs avaient deux objectifs en e€ectuant cette eÂtude: l'analyse des transferts de chaleur et de masse pour le
processus d'absorption ammoniac-eau, et l'analyse parameÂtrique a®n d'eÂvaluer les e€ets des variables importantes tels que
les surfaces d'eÂchange de chaleur et de masse, sur la vitesse d'absorption pour les deux modes d'absorption Ð aÁ ®lm
tombant et aÁ bulles. Un eÂchangeur aÁ plaques muni d'ailettes en ruban deÂcaleÂes (o€set strip ®n) installeÂes du coteÂ
refroidissant a eÂte utilise pour la conception du ®lm tombant et de l'absorbeur aÁ bulle. Les reÂsultats montrent que
l'absorption locale de l'absorbeur aÁ bulles est toujours plus eÂleveÂe que pour le ®lm tombantaÂ; ceci permet de reÂduire la taille
de l'eÂchangeur de chaleur de 48,7% laÁ ouÁ la l'eÂchange avec bulles est utiliseÂ. Pour le mode absorption par ®lm tombant, la
reÂsistance au transfert de masse dominait lors de l'eÂcoulement liquide, alors que les reÂsistances des transferts de chaleur
et de masse eÂtaient toutes les deux eÂleveÂes dans le cas de l'eÂcoulement de vapeur. Pour le mode absorption aÁ bulles,
la reÂsistance au transfert de masse dominait lors de l'eÂcoulement liquide, alors que la reÂsistance au transfert de chaleur
dominait dans la reÂgion de l'eÂcoulement de vapeur. Lors de l'utilisation du mode absorption par ®lm tombant, les
coecients de transfert de chaleur exercËaient un e€et plus signi®catif sur la taille de l'eÂchangeur de chaleur (vitesse
d'absorption) que le mode d'absorption aÁ bulles, alors que, lors de l'utilisation du mode absorption aÁ bulles, les coecients
* Corresponding author. School of Mechanical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, South Korea. Tel.: +82-331-201-2990; fax:
+82-331-202-8106.
0140-7007/00/$20.00 # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
PII: S0140-7007(99)00075-4
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
431
de transfert de masse exercËaient un e€et plus signi®catif que le mode d'absorption aÁ ®lm tombant. # 2000 Elsevier Science
Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
Mots cleÂs: SysteÁme frigori®que; SysteÁme aÁ absorption; Absorbeur; Film tombant; Bulle; Performance
Nomenclature
A
ai
ap
as
Cp
cM
Dcm
dB
do
d1
F
f
g
H
h
i
j
L
LMTD
:
M
N
No
Nu
Pr
Q
Re
Rw
S
Sc
St
T
t
U
V
x
area (m2)
interfacial area per unit volume (m2 m-3)
projected area (m2)
surface area (m2)
molar heat capacity (J kmol-1 K-1)
molar density, r/M, (kmol m-3)
diameter of the bubble column (m)
bubble diameter (m)
ori®ce diameter (m)
distance between two plates (m)
mass transfer coecient (kmol m-2 s-1)
friction factor
gravitational acceleration (m s-1)
enthalpy (J kmol-1)
heat transfer coecient (W m-2 K-1)
incremental number, 1,2,3 ...
j factor, Nu Re-1 Pr-1/3)
length (m)
logarithmic mean temperature di€erence (K)
molar ¯ow rate (kmol s-1)
molar ¯ux (kmol m-2 s-1)
number of ori®ce
Nusselt number
Prandtl number
heat transfer (W)
Reynolds number
wall resistance (m2 K W-1)
volume ¯ux (m3 s-1)
Schmidt number
Stantan number
temperature (K)
thickness (m)
overall heat transfer coecient (W m-2 K-1)
velocity (m s-1)
molar concentration of ammonia (kmol
kmol-1)
1. Introduction
A compact heat exchanger incorporates a heat transfer surface and a heat transfer mode. The heat transfer
surface must have a high area density (generally higher
than 700 m2/m3) for a compact heat exchanger. The
heat transfer mode must be developed to have a high
overall heat transfer coecient, U, which will further
z
composition of ammonia in absorbing/desorbing vapor (kmol kmol-1)
Greek symbols
l
absorption/desorption heat (J kmol-1)
mass di€usivity (m2 s-1)
unit vector de®ned in Eq. (6)
"
gas hold-up
f
®n eciency
dynamic viscosity (Pa s)
kinematic viscosity (m2 s-1)
density (kg m-3)
surface tension (N m-1)
Subscripts
a/d
absorption/desorption
B
bubble
bl
large bubble
bs
small bubble
c
coolant
CM
column
h
heat
i
interface
l
liquid
lb
bulk liquid
m
mass
OSF
o€set strip ®n
o
ori®ce
senl
sensible liquid
senv
sensible vapor
t
total
trans transition
v
vapor
vb
bulk vapor
w
wall
wi
inner wall
wo
outer wall
reduce the heat exchanger size. For heat transfer in a
binary mixture such as ammonia±water absorption systems, the heat transfer mode should be carefully selected
to reduce heat and mass transfer resistance which exist
in both liquid and vapor regions. An absorption heat
pump cycle using ammonia±water as a solution pair has
been recommended for residential and small commercial
heating and cooling systems [1]. The generator absorber
432
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
heat exchange (GAX) cycle using ammonia±water is the
most suitable for residential heating and cooling with
COP of 1.03 for cooling and 2.03 for heating. The
ammonia±water solution pair is also an attractive alternative to ozone-depleting chloro¯uorocarbons (CFCs)
used in conventional vapor compression heat pump
systems. In the ammonia±water absorption heat pump
systems, falling ®lm heat transfer and bubble type heat
transfer have been recommended to enhance heat and
mass transfer performances [2]. Thin falling ®lm heat
transfer mode provides relatively high heat transfer
coecients and is stable during operation. However, the
falling ®lm heat transfer modes have wettability problems and need good liquid distributors at the inlet of
the liquid ¯ow. Bubble type heat transfer provides not
only high heat transfer coecients but also good wettability and mixing between the liquid and the vapor.
However, bubble type heat transfer does require vapor
distribution rather than liquid distribution. Generally,
vapor distribution is easier to accomplish than liquid
distribution. Fundamental characteristics of the bubble
and the falling ®lm modes are compared in Table 1. This
paper aims to compare the two di€erent absorption
modes in designing a plate heat exchanger as an absorber
by considering combined heat and mass transfer.
Over the last 10 years, many studies have extensively
investigated the falling ®lm absorption process numerically and analytically in ammonia±water absorption
systems [3±7]. However, most literature neglects the
mass transfer resistance through the liquid ®lm by
assuming very thin ®lm and well mixing. Furthermore,
no literature has been found on the combined heat and
mass transfer analysis considered in both liquid and
vapor regions. This paper considers the combined heat
and mass transfer in the liquid region as well as in the
vapor region during the falling ®lm absorption process.
Some literature has been found on heat and mass
transfer analysis of the bubble absorber[2,8,9]. Ferreira et
al. [8] developed a model for calculation of simultaneous
heat and mass transfer processes in vertical tubular bubble absorbers for ammonia±water absorption systems.
However, local values for important parameters such as
temperature and concentration could not be obtained
since only overall conditions were considered in the
model. Herbine and Perez-Blanco [9] described a design
model of the absorption process in an ammonia±water
bubble absorber with a vertical tube. The authors
obtained one dimensional temperature and concentration
pro®les along the absorber length using empirical correlation for local overall heat and mass transfer coecients
from literature. The mass transfer resistance inside the
bubble was neglected in the design model. Recently, Kang
et al. [2] developed a design model for a bubble absorber
by using combined heat and mass transfer analysis. They
consider the heat and mass transfer resistance not only in
the liquid region but also inside the bubble by solving
di€usion and mass balance equations simultaneously.
Various types of heat exchangers have been adopted
to increase heat and mass transfer performance in
absorption heat pump systems; tube in tube, tube in
shell, and plate heat exchangers. In this paper, a plate
heat exchanger is used in the absorber design for the
fundamental comparisons of the bubble and the falling
®lm absorption modes because it provides high heat
transfer coecients, good wettability, and liquid/vapor
mixing compared with plain tubes. In summary, the
objectives of this paper are to compare two di€erent
absorption modes in ammonia±water absorption heat
pump systems, to develop design tools for the falling
®lm and the bubble absorbers, and ®nally to provide a
criterion in designing heat exchanger components of the
ammonia-water absorption systems.
2. System description
Fig. 1 shows a fundamental GAX cycle used in
ammonia±water absorption systems. The internal heat
Table 1
Fundamental characteristics of the falling ®lm and bubble modes
Tableau 1
CaracteÂristiques des modes d'absorption aÁ ®lm tombant ou aÁ bulles
Heat transfer mode
Falling ®lm mode
Bubble modes
Con®guration
Interfacial area
Heat transfer Area
Mixing
Wettability
Liquid Distributor
Vapor Distributor
Flooding
Heat and mass transfer
Compactness
Horizontal tube bundles vertical tubes
Small
~ Interfacial Area
Poor
Critical
Yes Liquid management
No
Yes for counter No for cocurrent
Liquid and vapor
Good
Packed type plate HX
Large
Smaller than interfacial area
Excellent
Excellent
No
Yes/ori®ce vapor management
Yes
Liquid and vapor
Excellent
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
433
Fig. 1. System diagram of a fundamental GAX system using ammonia-water solution pair.
Fig. 1. ScheÂma du systeÁme GAX utilisant le couple actif ammoniac-eau.
exchange due to the temperature glide of a binary mixture provides the fundamental basis for the GAX cycle.
In the GAX cycle, the temperature ranges partially
overlap between the absorber and generator. The
``overlapped'' heat Ð this is the particular feature of the
GAX cycle Ð is transferred from the absorber to the
generator within the cycle leading to a higher COP. The
GAX cycle consists of the following components Ð
hydronically cooled absorber (HCA), solution cooled
absorber (SCA), GAX absorber (GAXA), gas ®red
desorber (GFD), solution heated desorber (SHD), GAX
desorber (GAXD), recti®er, condenser, evaporator,
precooler and air coils. In the GAX cycle, the absorber
components play important roles to improve the cycle
performance. Therefore, the bubble and falling ®lm
absorbers would be designed and compared based on
thermal conditions of the HCA in the GAX cycle. The
HCA was selected as a sample calculation because it is a
simple component (hydronic ¯uid in the coolant side).
However, the present model can also be applied to
design all absorbers and desorbers in ammonia±water
systems by changing the hydronic ¯uid to solution
liquid (SCA and SHD), ¯ue gas (GFD) and solution
pair (GAXA and GAXD). Table 2 summarizes the
thermal conditions used in the design of the HCA for a
typical 3RT GAX system.
Table 2
Thermal conditions of the HCA
Tableau 2
Conditions thermiques de l'absorbeur refroidi par eau
Liquid temperature (K)
Vapor temperature (K)
Coolant temperature (K)
Liquid mass ¯ow rate (kmol/h)
Vapor mass ¯ow rate (kmol/h)
Coolant mass ¯ow rate (kg/h)
Liquid concentration
Vapor concentration
System pressure (kPa)
Inlet
Outlet
347.6
285.3
319.5
3.91
2.42
1360.8
0.2795
0.9873
557.2
321.9
~
329.0
5.25
1.09
1360.8
0.4558
~
Fig. 2 shows the schematic diagram of the plate heat
exchangers with falling ®lm and bubble absorption
modes. Ammonia±water liquid solution ¯ows down
from the top inside of the plate heat exchanger while
vapor solution ¯ows up counter to the liquid ¯ow. The
hydronic ¯uid (ethylene glycol 35% aqueous solution)
¯ows up the counter to the liquid solution ¯ow. Therefore, there are two di€erent counter current ¯ows : one
is between the liquid and vapor solution ¯ows, and the
other is between the liquid solution and the hydronic
434
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of plate heat exchangers with falling ®lm and bubble absorption modes.
Fig. 2. ScheÂma des eÂchangeurs aÁ plaques utiliseÂs pour les modes d'absorption aÁ ®lm tombant et aÁ bulles.
Table 3
Geometric conditions of the plate heat exchanger
Tableau 3
GeÂomeÂtrie de l'eÂchangeur aÁ plaque
d1 (mm)
d2 (mm)
d3 (mm)
tw (mm)
do (mm)
6.223
7.643
12.723
0.71
2.54
Losf (mm)
Hosf (mm)
Sosf (mm)
Tosf (mm)
No
3.81
2.54
2.54
0.354
8
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the o€set strip ®n.
Fig. 3. ScheÂma des ailettes en rubans deÂcaleÂes.
¯uid (coolant). For the falling ®lm mode, a liquid distributor is required to provide a good wettability at the
top of the heat exchanger. However, for the bubble
modes, a vapor distributor (which has several ori®ces) is
required to obtain a good mixing rate between liquid
and vapor at the bottom of the heat exchanger. O€set
strip ®ns (OSF) are inserted to enhance the heat transfer
coecient in the hydronic ¯uid side. Fig. 3 shows the
schematic diagram of the OSF used in the present
paper. Table 3 summarizes the geometric dimensions
used in the plate heat exchanger for the HCA.
3. Analysis
In thin falling ®lm mode, mass transfer resistance
within the thin ®lm has been assumed to be negligible
[5,10]. In this paper, however, combined heat and mass
transfer is considered in the liquid region as well as in
the vapor region during the absorption process. The
bubble type mode has a di€erent absorption process. In
this mode, combined heat and mass transfer was also
considered in both liquid and vapor regions since there
is signi®cant mixing between the liquid and the vapor.
Based on the fundamental assumptions summarized in
Table 4, di€usion, concentration, mass and energy bal-
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
435
Table 4
Fundamental assumptions for analysis
Tableau 4
HypotheÁses utiliseÂes dans l'analyse
Falling ®lm mode
Bubble mode
a. The absorption process is steady±state, and the system
pressure is constant.
b. The liquid/vapor interface is in equilibrium state.
c. The heat transfer surface is completely wet.
d. The liquid ®lm is thin and well mixed.
e. No ¯ooding occurs
a. The absorption process is steady±state, and the system pressure
is constant.
b. All bubbles have the same size and velocity at each local
position.
c. Bubble coalescence and breakup are negligible.
d. There is no direct heat transfer between the vapor and the
hydronic ¯uid.
Table 5
Information on bubble dynamics
Tableau 5
Informations sur la dynamique des bulles
Vv
Vsh
Gas hold-up
"v ˆ
Deckwer and Schumpe [11]
Vtrans Vv ÿ Vtrans
ˆ
‡
ifVv 5Vtrans
Vbs
Vbl
if Vv 4Vtrans
where
3 ÿ0:273 0:03
Vbs l
l
l
ˆ 2:25
v
g4l
ÿ0:077 0:077
Vbl l Vbs l
l Vv ÿ Vtrans † 0:757 3 l
l
ˆ
‡ 2:4
v
g4l
and
Vtrans
ÿ0:61 0:5 0:11
ˆ 0:5eÿ193v l Vbs
Bubble diameter
Bhavaraju et al. [12]
For low vapor ¯ow rates S5St ˆ
ˆ 0:32g1=2
dB ˆ
g 6do 4=3
for ReB 51:0
108l g
6do 5=6
for ReB 51:0
g
6do
g
1=3
For high vapor ¯ow rates
S5St
dB
0:21
ˆ 3:23Reÿ0:1
o;l Fro;v
do
where
Reo;l ˆ
4l S
S2
and Fro;v ˆ 5
do g
do l
2 0:5 3 2 0:1
1
gDcm l
gDcm l
"1:13
v
3Dcm
2l
Interfacial area
Akita and Yoshida[13]
ai ˆ
Slip velocity for
counter ¯ow
Vs ˆ
Vv
Vl
‡
"v 1 ‡ "v
436
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
ances are solved simultaneously for a given control
volume. For the bubble mode, some information on gas
dynamics such as gas hold-up, bubble diameter, interfacial area and slip velocity is required. This information is summarized in Table 5. Temperatures,
concentrations, heat transfer coecients, and absorption
rates are compared for the two di€erent absorption
modes. With these comparisons for given geometric
conditions, this paper provides a criterion to evaluate
which mode is better for absorbers or desorbers in
ammonia±water absorption heat hump systems.
4. Control volume analysis
The control volume analysis was carried out based on
the incremental section as shown in Fig. 4. For both
falling ®lm and bubble modes, the vapor moves up in
the counter direction to the liquid ¯ow which enters
from the top and leaves the heat exchanger to the bottom. The hydronic ¯uid ¯ows up counter to the liquid
¯ow inside the plate heat exchanger.
ÿ
NNH3 ‡ NH2 0
z ÿ xlb
z ÿ xvi
ˆ Fv ln
ˆ F1 ln
z ÿ xli
z ÿ xvb
where z is the molar composition of ammonia in the
absorbing/desorbing vapor, which is given by
zˆ
NNH
NNH3 ‡ NH2 0
The total molar ¯ux absorbed or desorbed, NNH3+
NH2 0 , is expressed as the following equation by considering the di€usion in the liquid and vapor regions [14].
2†
where F is the mass transfer coecient, and the molar
¯ux, N, is de®ned as positive for absorption and negative for desorption. The correlations for the mass transfer coecients used are summarized in Table 6 for the
falling ®lm mode and in Table 7 for the bubble mode.
Based on the control volume as shown in Fig. 4, concentration and mass balance equations are established as
follows.
5.1. Concentration balance
:
:
Mvb i†xvb i† ˆ Mvb i ˆ 1† ‡ vb : NNH3 ‡ NH2 0 †zAm
3†
and
5. Di€usion
1†
:
:
Mlb i†xlb i† ˆ Mlb i ‡ 1†xlb i ‡ 1†
ÿ lb NNH3 ‡ NH2 0 †zAm
4†
where Am is the mass transfer area between the liquid
and the vapor. The mass transfer area is the same as the
heat transfer area in the falling ®lm mode while it is
di€erent from the heat transfer area in the bubble mode.
Table 6
Heat and mass transfer coecients used in the design of falling
®lm absorber
Tableau 6
Coecients de transfert de chaleur et de masse utiliseÂs dans la
conception de l'absorbeur aÁ ®lm tombant
Heat transfer coecient
Liquid region Chun and Seban [15] for falling ®lm ¯ow
Vapor region Dittus and Boelter [16] for turbulent ¯ow
Hydronic ¯uid region (Webb [17])
sOSF ÿ0:154 tOSF ÿ0:15 tOSF ÿ0:068
j ˆ 0:652Reÿ0:54
Dh
hOSF
lOSF
sOSF
"
#0:1
0:51 tOSF 0:46 tOSF ÿ1:06
1:34 sOSF
ÿ5
1 ‡ 5:6310 ReDh
hOSF
lOSF
sOSF
where
4sOSF hOSF lOSF
Dh ˆ
‰2 sOSF lOSF ‡ hOSF lOSF ‡ tOSF bOSF † ‡ tOSF sOSF Š
Fig. 4. Control volume for an incremental section in the bubble absorption mode.
Fig. 4. Volume de calcul pour une section increÂmentielle en mode
absorption aÁ bulles.
Mass transfer coecient
Liquid region Heat and mass transfer analogy
(Chilton and Colburn[18])
Vapor region Heat and mass transfer analogy
(Chilton and Colburn[18])
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
Table 7
Heat and mass transfer coecients used in the design of bubble
absorber
Tableau 7
Coecients de transfert de chaleur et de masse utiliseÂs dans la
conception de l'absorbeur aÁ bulles
Heat transfer coecient
ˆ ‡1 if it flows into the control volume at ith section
ˆ ÿ1 if it flows out from the control volume ith section
6†
5.2. Mass balance
:
:
Mvb i† ˆ Mvb i ‡ 1† ‡ vb NNH3 ‡ NH2 0 †Am
7†
and
Liquid region (Deckwer [19])
ÿ0:25 l Vv dB ÿ0:25 V2v
l Cpl ÿ:05
Stl ˆ 0:1
l
gdB
kl
:
:
Mlb i† ˆ Mlb i ‡ 1† ÿ lb NNH3 ‡ NH2 O †Am
8†
5.3. Energy balance
where
hl
Stl ˆ
l Cpl Vv
The total energy transferred to the coolant is expressed as the following equation based on the control
volume as shown in Fig. 4.
h :
i
:
Qc ˆ Mlb i ‡ 1†Hlb i ‡ 1† ÿ Mlb i†Hlb i† ÿlb †
h :
i
:
‡ Mvb i ‡ 1†Hvb i ‡ 1† ÿ Mvb i†Hvb i† ÿvb †
h :
i
:
ˆ Mc i ‡ 1†Hc i ‡ 1† ÿ Mc i†Hc i† c †
Vapor region (Clift et al. [20])
0
11=4
as Cpv Scv 2=3 B
48 2v
C
hv ˆ 1:4
@
v A
ap cM Prv
2 dB l 2 ‡ 3 †
l
Hydronic ¯uid region (Webb [17])
sOSF ÿ0:154 tOSF ÿ0:15 tOSF ÿ0:068
j ˆ 0:652Reÿ0:54
Dh
hOSF
lOSF
sOSF
"
#0:1
0:51 0:46 tOSF
tOSF ÿ1:06
1:34 sOSF
ÿ5
1 ‡ 5:6310 ReDh
hOSF
lOSF
sOSF
9†
The sensible heat of vapor ¯ow is transferred from the
vapor to the interface due to the combined heat and
mass transfer, which is given by Kang et al. [22] as
where
4sOSF hOSF lOSF
Dh ˆ
‰2 sOSF lOSF ‡ hOSF lOSF ‡ tOSF bOSF †tOSF sOSF Š
Mass transfer coecient
Liquid region Volumetric mass transfer coecient
(Hikita et al. [21])
ÿ0:248 0:243 Fl ai cM Vv
Vv l 1:76 4l g
v
l ÿ0:604
ˆ 14:9f
g
t
l l
l 3
where f is equal to 1.0 for nonelectrolyte solutions
Mass transfer coecient in liquid region
(Akita and Yoshida [13])
0:5 3 0:25 2 3=8
Fl c M d B
Vl
gdB
gdB l
ˆ 0:5
V2l
l
l
Qsenv ˆ
Co;vb
‰hv Tvb ÿ Ti ŠAm
1 ÿ eÿco;vb
10†
NNH3 CPNH3 ‡ NH2 O CpH2 O
hvb
11†
where
Co;vb ˆ
The sensible heat of liquid ¯ow is also expressed as
the following equation.
Qsenl ˆ
Vapor region (Clift et al. [20])
0
11=4
Co;lb
‰hl Ti ÿ Tlb †ŠAm
1 ÿ eÿCo;lb
12†
The absorption/desorption heat transferred through the
interfacial area, Qa/d is expressed as
Fv cM ap
48 2v
B
C
ˆ 1:4@
v A
as
2
dB l 2 ‡ 3
l
Qa=d ˆ NNH3 ‡ NH2 O †la=d Am
In the bubble mode, the mass transfer area is given by
Am ˆ ai Ac L
437
5†
where ai and Ac are the speci®c interfacial area (m2/m3)
and the cross-sectional area of the plate heat exchanger,
respectively. In Eqs. (3) and (4), is a unit vector to take
into account the ¯ow direction (co-current or countercurrent ¯ows), which is de®ned as follows;
13†
where la=d is de®ned as
la=d ˆ Hvb i† ÿ Hlb i†
14†
Eq. (14) implies that the latent heat la=d , is the
enthalpy di€erence due to the phase change between the
bulk vapor and the bulk liquid (not between the vapor
and liquid at the interface).
438
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
5.4. Heat transfer equation
Now, heat transferred to the coolant is given by
Qc ˆ UAh LMTD
15†
where
UAh ˆ
1
1
1
‡ Rw ‡
hl Ah
hc Ao ‡ j Af †
16†
and
LMTD ˆ
Tlb i† ÿ Tc i†† ÿ Tlb i ‡ 1† ÿ Tc i ‡ 1††
"
#
Tlb i† ÿ Tc i††
ln ÿ
Tlb i ‡ 1† ÿ Tc i‡1†
17†
The correlations for the heat transfer coecients used
in Eq. (16) are summarized in Table 6.
de®ne each temperature and concentration clearly. Figs
6a and b shows the temperature pro®les for the falling
®lm and the bubble absorption modes, respectively. In
both the falling ®lm and the bubble modes, the bulk
liquid temperature, Tlb, is very close to the interface
temperature, Ti, which is the equilibrium temperature at
give concentration and pressure. For both absorption
modes, this implies that the heat transfer resistance in
the e€ective mass transfer region of the liquid ¯ow is
negligible compared with the total heat transfer resistance from the bulk liquid ¯ow to the wall. In the falling
®lm mode, the bulk vapor temperature increases gradually with the increasing length of the heat exchanger,
and is still lower than the coolant temperature at the
outlet of the vapor ¯ow.
In the bubble mode, the vapor temperature increases
rapidly from the bottom of the heat exchanger, where
6. Results and discussion
Temperature, concentration and total absorption rate
pro®les were obtained as a function of the length of the
heat exchanger by solving di€usion, mass, concentration, energy and heat transfer equations simultaneously.
Parametric analysis was performed to study the e€ects
of heat and mass transfer areas, heat transfer coecients
and mass transfer coecients on the absorption rate.
The typical temperature and concentration pro®les for
the counter-current absorption are shown in Fig. 5 to
Fig. 5. Typical temperature and concentration pro®les for the
counter-current absorption process.
Fig. 5. Pro®ls de tempeÂrature et de concentration typiques pour le
processus d'absorption aÁ contre-courant.
Fig. 6. (a) Temperature pro®les for the falling ®lm absorbtion
mode; (b) Temperature pro®les for the bubble absorption mode.
Fig. 6 (a) Pro®ls de tempeÂrature pour le mode absorption aÁ ®lm
tombant; (b) Pro®ls de tempeÂrature pour le mode d'absorption aÁ
bulles.
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
the inlet of the vapor ¯ow is, and approaches to the
interface temperature. This implies that the heat transfer
resistance in the vapor region is considerable for both
falling ®lm and the bubble modes. In the bubble mode,
the vapor temperature starts to be higher than the coolant temperature when it is about 4 cm from the length
of the heat exchanger (from the bottom).
The temperature pro®le of the bulk vapor ¯ow is
completely di€erent between the falling ®lm and the
bubble absorption modes. This di€erence is due to the
following combined heat and mass transfer characteristics of two di€erent absorption modes. First, the liquid
and vapor are mixed well with each other in the bubble
mode while they are completely separated in the falling
®lm mode. Therefore, the heat transfer resistance within
the vapor ¯ow is more signi®cant in the falling ®lm
mode than in the bubble mode. Second, the pro®le of
the bulk vapor temperature depends on the characteristic of the bubble dynamics. Fig. 7 shows the pro®les of
bubble diameter, gas hold-up, heat and mass transfer
areas during the bubble absorption process. The bubble
size and gas hold-up decrease with the increasing length
of the absorber, and have similar decreasing trends. This
is reasonable because the mass ¯ow rate of the vapor
decreases along the length due to the absorption process
resulting in a decreasing bubble size. The same explanation can be applied to the trend of the gas hold-up.
Theses pro®les change rapidly up to the length of about
6.0 cm, thereafter the pro®les change gradually along
the length. These pro®les are mainly a€ected by the
combined heat and mass transfer characteristics such as
mass transfer direction. During the bubble absorption
process, the heat transfer area is constant while the mass
transfer area is varied with the length of the heat
exchanger, which is in¯uenced by the bubble dynamics
such as bubble diameter and the gas hold-up. In the
439
current bubble absorption process, the mass transfer
area was always larger than the heat transfer area. This
is one of the main reasons for having a smaller size of
the heat exchanger for the bubble mode rather than the
falling ®lm mode. In the falling ®lm mode, both heat
and mass transfer areas are constant through the entire
length of the heat exchanger. The design results are
summarized in Table 8. As can be seen in Table 8, the
bubble absorption mode has about 48.7% smaller size
of the heat exchanger than the falling ®lm mode.
Fig. 8a and b show the molar concentration pro®les
for the falling ®lm and the bubble absorption modes,
respectively. The molar composition of the absorbing
vapor, z, is determined by solving the di€usion and the
mass balance equations simultaneously. For the counter-current absorption process, it was found that the
composition of the absorbing vapor should be larger than
xvb, i. e. xvb<z. Kang et al. [7] generated a general map of
the molar composition of absorbing/desorbing vapor for
every component in ammonia±water absorption heat
pump systems. In the current falling ®lm absorption process, the molar composition, z, was always less than 1.0
through the entire length. However, the molar composition was found to be larger than 1.0 up to the 10.0 cm from
the bottom in the bubble mode. Thereafter, it was less
than 1.0, which means that both ammonia and water
components are absorbed in the same direction from the
vapor into the liquid region. When z became larger than
1.0, ammonia was absorbed into the liquid region while
water was desorbed into the vapor region; opposite
direction of mass transfer between ammonia and water
components. Herbine and Perez-Blanco [9] also found
the initial water desorption phenomenon during a cocurrent ammonia±water absorption process.
It was found from Fig. 8a that the bulk liquid concentration was somewhat lower than the interface concentration while the bulk liquid temperature is very
close to the interface temperature. This implies, in the
falling ®lm mode, that the liquid ¯ow is in a subcooled
state due to the mass transfer resistance within the
e€ective mass transfer region of the liquid ¯ow. It was
found from Fig. 8b that the bulk vapor concentration
was almost equal to the equilibrium concentration while
Table 8
Design results of the falling ®lm and bubble absorbers
Tableau 8
CriteÁres retenus pour la conception des absorbeurs aÁ ®lm tombant
et aÁ bulles.
Fig. 7. Bubble diameter, gas hold-up, heat and mass transfer
area pro®les for the bubble absorption mode.
Fig. 7. DiameÁtres des bulles, reÂtention de gaz et zones de transfert de
chaleur et de masse pour le mode d'absorption aÁ bulles.
Mode
Falling ®lm
Bubble
Length (cm)
Width (cm)
NCM
Depth (cm)
72.40
12.7
4
4.33
37.14
12.7
4
4.33
440
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
the bulk liquid concentration was somewhat lower than
the equilibrium concentration. This implies that in the
bubble mode mass transfer resistance is dominant in the
liquid region rather than in the vapor region. The bulk
liquid is in a subcooled state (xlb<xli) due to the considerable mass transfer resistance within the e€ective
mass transfer region in the bubble absorber. By comparing Figs. 6a and 8a, for the falling ®lm absorption
mode, it should be concluded that the mass transfer
resistance is dominant within the e€ective mass transfer
region in the liquid ¯ow while both heat and mass transfer
resistances are considerable in the vapor ¯ow. From Figs.
6b and 8b, for the bubble absorption mode, it should be
concluded that heat transfer resistance is dominant in the
vapor region while the mass transfer resistance is domi-
Fig. 8. (a) Molar concentration pro®les for the falling ®lm
absorbtion mode; (b) molar concentration pro®les for the bubble absorption mode.
Fig. 8. (a) Concentrations molaires pour le mode absorption aÁ
®lm tombant; (b) Concentrations molaires pour le mode absorption aÁ bulles.
nant within the e€ective mass transfer region in the liquid
¯ow. These are unique outputs from this paper.
Fig. 9 shows the heat transfer coecient pro®les for
the falling ®lm and bubble absorption modes. The
overall heat transfer coecient, U, which is de®ned in
Eq. (16), was calculated from hl and hc in both absorption modes. In the falling ®lm mode, the heat transfer
coecient in the coolant ¯ow was slightly smaller than
that in the liquid ¯ow. In the bubble absorption mode,
however, the heat transfer coecient in the coolant ¯ow
was a dominant factor in determining the overall heat
transfer coecient. The heat transfer coecient in the
vapor ¯ow was much larger in the bubble mode than
that in the falling ®lm mode. This is one of the main
reasons to have a smaller size heat exchanger in the
bubble mode rather than in the falling ®lm mode. The
parametric analysis was performed to evaluate the e€ect
of each heat transfer coecient on the heat exchanger
size in the next section. Fig. 10 shows the pro®les of
total absorption rate for the falling ®lm and the bubble
modes. The local absorption rate (gradient of the pro®le) increases gradually in the falling ®lm mode, which
can be explained by the temperature and the concentration pro®les as shown in Figs. 6a and 8a. For the bubble
mode, however, the local absorption rate is the highest
near the vapor inlet, decreases suddenly at the length of
5.0 cm, and increases again gradually along the length.
The local absorption rate of the bubble mode is always
higher than that of the falling ®lm mode. This is mainly
due to the larger mass transfer area, a better mixing
between the liquid and the vapor and the higher heat
transfer coecients from the bubble mode than those
from the falling ®lm mode.
Fig. 9. Heat transfer coecients during the absorption
processes.
Fig. 9. Coecients de transfert de chaleur lors des processus
d'absorption.
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
7. Parametric analysis
This paper performed parametric analysis to investigate the e€ects of important variables such as heat and
mass transfer areas, heat transfer coecients and mass
transfer coecients on the absorption rate (heat
exchanger size). Fig. 11 shows the e€ect of heat and
mass transfer areas on the size of the heat exchanger for
both falling ®lm and bubble modes. The horizontal axis
represents a modi®ed factor, MF, which is a multiplying
factor of the original values of the heat and mass transfer areas. To investigate the e€ect of the mass transfer
441
area on the size of the heat exchanger, the mass transfer
area was changed by varying MF from 0.5 to 1.5 while
all the other conditions were kept constant (MF=1.0).
For the falling ®lm mode, the heat and mass transfer
areas were varied at the same time because they are
exactly the same in practical heat exchangers. For the
bubble mode, however, the mass transfer area was varied for a given heat transfer area because they can be
changed separately in practical cases. This is why the
e€ect of heat and mass transfer e€ect from the falling
®lm mode is more signi®cant than that of mass transfer
area and that of heat transfer area from the bubble
absorption mode. During the bubble absorption process, the e€ect of mass transfer area was found to be
more signi®cant than that of the heat transfer area.
Fig. 10. Total absorption rate pro®les for the falling ®lm and
bubble modes.
Fig. 10. Taux d'absorption totale pour les modes aÁ ®lm tombant
et aÁ bulles.
Fig. 11. The e€ects of heat andmass transfer areas on the heat
exchanger size.
Fig. 11. E€ets des zones de transfert de chaleur et de masse sur la
taille de l'eÂchangeur de chaleur.
Fig. 12. (a) The e€ects of heat transfer coecients on the heat
exchanger size in falling ®lm mode; (b) the e€ects of heat
transfer coecients on the heat exchanger ize in bubble mode.
Fig. 12. (a) E€ets des coecients de transfert de chaleur sur la
taille de l'eÂchangeur de chaleur pour le mode aÁ ®lm tombant; (b)
E€ets des coecients de transfert de chaleur sur la taille de
l'eÂchangeur de chaleur pour le mode aÁ bulles.
442
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
8. Conclusions
In this paper, two di€erent absorption modes with a
binary mixture (ammonia±water) were analyzed and
compared. Parametric analysis was carried out to
investigate the e€ects of heat and mass transfer areas,
heat transfer coecients and mass transfer coecients
on the heat exchanger size. The following conclusions
were drawn from the present paper.
Fig. 13. The e€ects of mass transfer coecients on the heat
exchanger size during the absorption processes.
Fig. 13. E€ets des coecients de transfert de masse sur la taille
de l'eÂchangeur de chaleur lors des processus d'absorption.
Fig. 12a and b shows the e€ects of the heat transfer
coecients in liquid (hl), vapor (hv) and coolant (hc)
regions on the heat exchanger size for the falling ®lm and
the bubble modes, respectively. In the falling ®lm mode
as shown in Fig. 12a, the heat transfer coecient in the
coolant ¯ow has the most signi®cant e€ect on the heat
exchanger size and hl has the second, which has a slightly
smaller e€ect than hc. The heat transfer coecient in the
vapor ¯ow has the smallest e€ect on the heat exchanger
size, but has a considerable e€ect. In the bubble mode as
shown in Fig. 12b, the heat transfer coecient, hc has
also the most signi®cant e€ect on the absorber size, hv
has the second, and hl has the third. By comparison of
Fig. 12a and b, it could be concluded that the heat
transfer coecients have a more signi®cant e€ect on the
heat exchanger size in the falling ®lm mode than in the
bubble mode.
Fig. 13 shows the e€ects of the mass transfer coecients in the liquid (Fl) and the vapor (Fv) regions on the
heat exchanger size for both the falling ®lm and the
bubble modes. As can be seen in Fig. 13, mass transfer
coecients have more signi®cant e€ect on the heat
exchanger size in the bubble mode than in the falling
®lm mode. For the falling ®lm mode, Fl has a more signi®cant e€ect on the heat exchanger size than Fv for MF
ranges larger than 1.0. For the bubble absorption mode,
the mass transfer coecient in the liquid region has a
more signi®cant e€ect on the heat exchanger size than
that in the vapor region. Therefore, it can summarized
that the heat transfer coecient has a more signi®cant
e€ect on the heat exchanger size in the falling ®lm mode
than in the bubble mode, while the mass transfer coecient has a more signi®cant e€ect in the bubble mode
than in the falling ®lm mode.
1. The local absorption rate of the bubble mode is
always higher than that of the falling ®lm mode
due to the larger mass transfer area, a better mixing and the higher heat transfer coecients from
the bubble mode. The bubble absorption mode
has about 48.7% smaller size of heat exchanger
than the falling ®lm mode.
2. The temperature pro®le of the bulk vapor ¯ow is
completely di€erent between the falling ®lm and
the bubble absorption modes. This di€erence is
due to the combined heat and mass transfer characteristics from two di€erent absorption modes
and the characteristics of the bubble dynamics
form the bubble mode.
3. For the falling ®lm absorption mode, mass transfer resistance is dominant in the liquid ¯ow while
both heat and mass transfer resistances are considerable in the vapor ¯ow. For the bubble
absorption mode, mass transfer resistance is
dominant in the liquid ¯ow while heat transfer
resistance is dominant in the vapor region. These
are unique outputs from this paper.
4. In the falling ®lm mode, hc has the most signi®cant
e€ect on the heat exchanger size andhl has the second, and hv has the smallest e€ect on the heat
exchanger size. In the bubble mode, the heat transfer
coecient, hc has the most signi®cant e€ect on the
absorber size, hv has the second, and hl has the third.
5. Heat transfer coecients have a more signi®cant
e€ect on the heat exchanger size (absorption rate)
in the falling ®lm mode than in the bubble mode,
while mass transfer coecients have a more signi®cant e€ect in the bubble mode than in the falling ®lm mode.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by Japan Science and
Technology Corporation (JST).
References
[1] Phillips, BA. Development of a high-eciency, gas ®red
absorption heat pump for residential and small-commercial applications. Phase I ®nal report, Report prepared by
Y. Tae Kang et al. / International Journal of Refrigeration 23 (2000) 430±443
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Phillips Engineering Company for Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, September, 1990.
Kang YT, Christensen RN, Kashiwagi T. Ammonia±
water bubble absorber with a plate heat exchanger. ASHRAE Transactions 1998;104(1):956±66.
Perez-Blanco H. A model of an ammonia±water falling
®lm absorber. ASHRAE Transaction 1988;94(1):467±83.
Arman B, Panchal CB. Absorption analysis of ammonia
in an aqueous solution. 28th IECE Conference Proceedings 1993;1:873±8.
Kang YT, Christensen RN. Development of a countercurrent model for a vertical ¯uted tube GAX absorber.
Proceedings of The International Absorption Heat Pump
Conference, ASME, AES-31, 1994, 7±16.
Lu DC, Lee CC. Investigation of condensation heat transfer of nonazeotropic refrigerant mixtures in a horizontal
tube. In: Proceedings of 10th International Heat Transfer
Conference, Brighton, UK, 1994. Vol. 3, p. 353±8.
Kang YT, Chen W, Christensen RN. A generalized design
model by combined heat and mass transfer analysis in NH3±
H2O absorption heat pump systems. ASHRAE Transaction
1997;103(1):444±53.
Ferreira CA, Keizer C, Machielsen CHM. Heat and mass
transfer in vertical tubular bubble absorbers for ammonia±water absorption refrigeration systems. International
Journal of Refrigeration 1984;7(6):348±57.
Herbine GS, Perez-Blanco H. Model of an ammonia-water
bubble absorber ASHRAE. Transactions 1995;10(16):1324±
32.
Price BC, Bell KJ. Design of binary vapor condensers using
the Cloburn-Drew equations. AIChE Symp 1973;Ser. No.
138(70):163±71.
443
[11] Deckwer WD, Schumpe A. Improved tools for bubble
column reactor design and scale-up. Chemical Engineering
Science 1993;48(5):pp. 889±911.
[12] Bhavaraju SM, Russell TWF, Blanch HW. The design of
gas sparged devices for viscous liquid systems. AIChE
Journal 1978;24(3):454±66.
[13] Akita K, Yoshida F. Bubble size, interfacial area and
liquid phase mass transfer coecient in bubble columns.
Ind Eng Chem, Process Des Develop 1974;13(1):84±91.
[14] Treybal RE. Mass Transfer Operations. 3rd ed. Tokyo:
McGraw Hill, 1980 (Chapter 5)..
[15] Chun KR, Seban RA. Heat transfer to evaporating liquid
®lms. Journal of Heat Transfer 1971;91:391±6.
[16] Dittus FW, Boelter LM. Publications on Engineering
1930;2:443.
[17] Webb RL. Principles of enhanced heat transfer. New
York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1994. (Chapter 5)
[18] Chilton TH, Colburn AP. Mass transfer (absorption)
coecients. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
1934;26:1183±7.
[19] Deckwer WD. On the mechanism of heat transfer in bubble column reactors. Chemical Engineering Science
1980;35:1341±9.
[20] Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, 1978. New York, Academic Press.
[21] Hikita HS, Tanigawa K, Segawa K, Kitao M. The volumetric liquid phase mass transfer coecient in bubble
columns. Chemical Engineering Journal 1981;22:61±7.
[22] Kang YT, Chen W, Christensen RN. Design of ammonia±
water condenser with a ¯uted tube. ASHRAE Transaction
1996;102(2):587±95.