Agenda Item Action Request Apex Town Council CONSENT No. 16 Meeting Date: October 20, 2015 Requestor: Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Presenter(s): John M. Brown, Director Item Description Motion to approve contract to convert the soccer field at Hunter Street Park to synthetic turf, authorize Town Manager to execute all contracts related to the conversion, and approve the associated budget amendment. Information Detail The use of synthetic turf was identified as a priority by Council at their 2015 Retreat to allow for the expansion of current programs offered by the Town and to allow partnerships with area groups that need space for lacrosse and soccer. If approved, the retrofit would take place during the months of November-March so as not to impact existing programs. As discussed at the Retreat and in the Town’s CIP, funding would come from Recreation Subdivision Fees. That account currently has approximately $2,100,000 in uncommitted funds. Per Council’s direction at the retreat, staff has taken the following additional steps: 1) Met with Apex based, soccer and lacrosse groups to ascertain their needs and identified some potential scheduling opportunities at Hunter Street and other sites if the Hunter Street Park field is converted. 2) Analyzed the relative maintenance costs of natural and artificial turf. The recommended turf system has an anticipated lifespan of eight years. Over these eight years, we anticipate a net savings of $306,000 in maintenance costs. This amount should be close to the cost to re-turf the field at that time. 3) Made plans to add lacrosse to the Town’s programs offerings beginning in July 2016 pending funding in the 2016-2017 budget. 4) Identified a local partner (Triangle Football Club) who is interested in entering a multi-year agreement with an upfront payment of $25,000 plus rental fees paid in advance. Total Value: $37,875. 5) Designed to field for Youth and Adult Soccer / Youth and Adult Lacrosse Staff therefore recommends entering into contracts with the following for the project. Field Turf Inc. to supply and install the turf surface: $ 298,950 Nolan Thomas and Company to do site preparation and finishing work: $ 260,300 Frye Fence (Fencing) $ 61,300 $ 620,550 5% contingency $ 31,027 TOTAL $ 651,577 Tentative Schedule Nov 2-18 Grading Subgrade Nov. 16-30 Drainage Nov 16-20 Curb Nov-23-25 Nailer Board Nov-30-Dec 18 Fencing Nov-30-Dec-4 Base Layer Dec 7-18 Topping Stone Dec 21-Jan 8 Turf Installation, Maintenance Training and Close Out Recommend Approval: Yes Approved as to Form: Yes By: Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Resources Advisory Commission Attachments 1) Field Layout 2) Costing and Product Information 3) Budget Amendment Approved as to Form: Yes 74,000 sq.ft. 1170' ln.ft. PERIMETER: 1"=40' SCALE: FIELD AREA: J.B. CHECKED BY: D.H. 400' FIELDTURF LIMIT 360' SOCCER FIELD (O/O) 20' 20' 105' MINI SOCCER FIELD (O/O) 105' MINI SOCCER FIELD (O/O) GIRL'S LACROSSE COMPLETE COLOR NAME: BLACK PANTONE COLOR NUMBER:BLACK SOCCER COMPLETE COLOR NAME: RED PANTONE COLOR NUMBER: 185C FIELD LAYOUT NOTES (sports are in order of dominance) : SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: LEGEND: TITLE: DATE: GREEN FIELDTURF 74,000 sq.ft. 1. SOCCER MARKINGS ARE 4" WHITE NFHS STANDARDS. 2. BOY'S LACROSSE MARKINGS ARE 4" REFLEX BLUE. 3. GIRL'S LACROSSE MARKINGS ARE 4" RED. 4. MINI SOCCER MARKINGS ARE 4" RED. COLOR DASHED CIRCLES ARE TO INDICATE PLACEMENT OF THE 4" X 4" INLAID LACROSSE/FIELD HOCKEY TICK MARKS. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. ISSUE: PRESENTATION COMPLETE COLOR NAME: BLACK PANTONE COLOR NUMBER: BLACK APPROVED BY: DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2015 BOY'S LACROSSE COMPLETE COLOR NAME: REFLEX BLUE PANTONE COLOR NUMBER: RFXC LOGO COLORS: COMPLETE COLOR NAME: WHITE PANTONE COLOR NUMBER: WHITE APEX PARKS SOCCER APEX, NC SPORT COLORS: SOCCER COMPLETE COLOR NAME: WHITE PANTONE COLOR NUMBER: WHITE SHEET: 1/1 FIELD LAYOUT 45' 175' MINI SOCCER FIELD (O/O) 175' BOY'S LACROSSE FIELD (I/I) 175' GIRL'S LACROSSE FIELD (I/I) 175' SOCCER FIELD (O/O) 5' 185' FIELDTURF LIMIT 5' 105' MINI SOCCER FIELD (O/O) All Rights Reserved. Confidential Information: No portion of these drawings may be disclosed, used, reproduced, modified or shown, without prior written consent of FieldTurf. 330' BOY'S LACROSSE FIELD (I/I) DRAWN BY: 360' GIRL'S LACROSSE FIELD (I/I) QUOTATION Client: Field Turf Address: Attn: Rich Stucky Email: rich.stucky@fieldturf.com Nolan Thomas & Company, Inc. Sports Turf Contractors PO Box 369 Stovall, NC 27582 Ph: 919-693-6478 Fax: 772-365-6129 Web: www.ntandcoinc.com This Quotation, when properly executed, becomes a purchase order, subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations appearing herewith. This quotation is subject to availability of necessary labor, materials, and supplies to produce the items quoted. Date: 9/30/2015 Project: Apex Park Scope of Work: Install construction entrance. Install inlet protection around 7 inlets as shown on plans. Demo existing irrigation valves. Demo existing 12” HDPE and drainage structure as shown on plans. o Note: All non organic items to demo shall be disposed by NT and Co at offsite location. Remove hatched portion of sidewalks to meet new curb. Excavate field to subgrade. Haul only topsoil spoils to owner’s site approximately 2 miles from construction site. Prep existing drainage structures to be covered with stone base. Install 1 precast concrete yard inlet. Supply and install approximately 1,100 linear feet of 8” collector line. Backfill collector pipe with #57 stone. Supply and install approximately 3,700 linear feet of 1”x12” flat pipe, 20’ on center. Supply and install geotextile fabric over entire subgrade. Provide and install new 8”x12” concrete curb. Provide and install treated nailer boards. Provide and install 4” of #57 or #67 stone base. Provide and install 2” of #78 topping stone. Compact stone base. Laser grade stone base. Nolan Thomas and Company, Inc. Confidential Page 1 Remove inlet protection and construction entrance. Clean site of all NT and Co construction debris. Total Project: $260,300 Fencing To add removal of 4’ fence: Add $1,400 to above base price To add installation of 450’ of 4’ tall chain link fence per detail: Add $6,125 to above base price To add installation of 800’ of 8’ tall chain link fence with 10’ tall lacrosse net above fence with extended posts and cables per detail, 1-5’ wide walk gate, and 1-10’ double drive gate: Add $76,025 to above base price Fencing shall be installed outside of concrete curb with posts set in concrete per fencing details on sheet C7.2. Fencing can be set in curb, however our quote would need to be adjusted according to reflect a wider curb and more labor to work around the poles when the curb is poured. Unit Price Undercut excavation and backfill with fill material: $85 C/Y Exclusions/Exceptions: Permits and/or engineering fees. Fencing and netting not included in base price. Tap or impact fees of any kind. Soil Importing. Locating, relocation, removal, and/or repair of any utilities. Rock excavation or rock trenching. Temporary power, water, and/or washroom facilities. Construction and removal of any access road. Supply and installation of electrical conduit. Replacement of suitable soils/ABC stone on sub-grade. Terms of Payment: Net 15 A service charge of 1 ½% per month (effective annual rate of 18%) will be charged on all accounts not paid within thirty (30) days. Expiration of Acceptance: The prices quoted herein expire thirty (30) days from date of quote unless made effective as a purchase order prior to expiration, by proper approval and signature. Please print, sign, fax to (772) 365-6129 Accepted By: _____________________________ Date: ___________________________________ Company: _______________________________ Nolan Thomas and Company, Inc. Submitted By: Tim Grein Nolan Thomas & Company, Inc. Nolan Thomas and Company, Inc. Confidential Page 2 Mobile: 336-803-1108 Fax: 772-365-6129 Email: tim.grein@ntandcoinc.com Web: www.ntandcoinc.com Nolan Thomas and Company, Inc. Confidential Page 3 October 1, 2015 PRICING PROPOSAL FOR TOWN OF APEX FieldTurf is pleased to offer to supply and install the following high performance artificial infilled grass surface. Field Name Hunter Street Park Soccer Field Turf System FieldTurf Classic FTHD-2 Square Footage Approx. 74,000 Field Markings Soccer, U10-Soccer, Lacrosse Tick Marks, Center Field Logo Price $ 298,950.00 *Price is based on above-mentioned dimensions Product Details ______ FieldTurf, the worldwide leader in artificial turf, is pleased to offer the FieldTurf Classic FTHD-2 system, with the following product characteristics: Pile Height: Infill Weight: Pile Weight: Total System Weight: 2 Inches 6.25 lbs/ft2 30 oz/yd2 951 oz/yd2 The FieldTurf Quality Guarantee To achieve unmatched quality and level of performance, we have invested heavily in modernizing our plants with the latest fiber manufacturing, coating and tufting technologies along with top manufacturing talent, and specialized installation equipment. Our dedicated CAD-based design department supports customization for each client, and our experts ensure timely delivery and installation on every project. The world leader in artificial turf innovation is ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certified for its leadership in quality, environment and safety management systems. FieldTurf’s Calhoun 7445 Côte-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com facility represents the only artificial turf manufacturing operation in North America to have received these ISO certifications. FieldTurf has taken the necessary steps to ensure that your project will run smoothly and that the quality promised will be the quality delivered. Price Includes: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) Installation of the artificial in-filled grass surface upon a suitable base; An 8 year 3rd party pre-paid insured warranty on the FieldTurf artificial grass surface; Inlaid Soccer markings Inlaid U-10 Soccer markings Inlaid Boys Lacrosse Tick Marks Inlaid Girls Lacrosse Tick Marks Inlaid Center Logo (Standard, 2 colors, 30’ X 30’) Maintenance equipment: 1 GroomRight + 1 SweepRight + 1 GroomRight Brush Extension Wings. Price does not Include: a) The base upon which the FieldTurf field will be placed. FieldTurf shall not be responsible for the planarity, the stability, the porosity, nor the approval of the base upon which the FieldTurf surface will be installed, the drainage system, nor any construction or modification of existing installations around the fields. b) Any costs associated with necessary changes relating to delineation of the field. c) The supply or installation of the field edging. d) Unless otherwise specified, does not include any G-max testing. e) The supply of manholes or clean-outs or grates, or supply of the manhole covers. f) Any alteration or deviation from specifications involving extra costs, which alteration or deviation will be provided only upon executed change orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the offered price. g) Site security. h) Small vehicle to tow FieldTurf maintenance equipment. i) All applicable taxes, bonding fees, prevailing wages, union labor or other labor law levies. The price is valid for a period of 90 days. The price is subject to increase if affected by an increase in raw materials, freight, or other manufacturing costs, a tax increase, new taxes, levies or any new legally binding imposition affecting the transaction. 7445 Côte-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com Please feel free to reach out to any member of our project team with questions about our offer: Richard Leibl-Cote Project Manager 241-375-2599 Richard.Leibl-Cote@fieldturf.com Rich Stucky Regional Sales Manager 704-849-9030 Rich.Stucky@fieldturf.com Thank you again for your interest in FieldTurf, we look forward to working with you. Per: __________________________________________________________ Marie-Christine Raymond, Director of Project Management FieldTurf USA, Inc. /FieldTurf, Inc. 7445 Côte-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com Conditions Notwithstanding any other document or agreement entered into by FieldTurf in connection with the supply and installation only of its product pursuant to the present bid proposal, the following shall apply: a) This bid proposal and its acceptance is subject to strikes, accidents, delays beyond our control and force majeure; b) Final payment shall be upon the substantial completion of FieldTurf’s obligations; c) Accounts overdue beyond 30 days of invoice date will be charged at an interest rate of 10% per annum. d) FieldTurf requires a minimum of 21 days after receiving final approvals on shop drawings to manufacture, coordinate delivery and schedule arrival of installation crew. Under typical field size and scenario, FieldTurf further requires 28 days per field to install the Product subject to weather and force majeure. e) FieldTurf requires a suitable staging area. Staging area must be square footage of field x 0.12, have a minimum access of 15 feet wide by 15 feet high, and, no more than 100ft from the site. A 25 foot wide by 25 foot long hard or paved clean surface area located within 50 feet of the playing surface shall be provided for purposes of proper mixing of infill material. Access to any field will include suitable bridging over curbs from the staging area to permit suitable access to the field by low clearance vehicles. f) This proposal is based on a single mobilization. If the site is not ready and additional mobilizations are necessary, additional charges will apply. g) FieldTurf shall be accountable for its negligence but shall not be bound by any penalty clauses. h) FieldTurf shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses, including attorney fees, associated with collection procedures in the event that FieldTurf pursues collection of payment of any past due invoice. i) All colors are to be chosen from FieldTurf’s standard colors. 7445 Côte-de-Liesse Road Suite 200, Montreal, QC, Canada H4T 1G2 • Toll Free: 1-800-724-2969 • Website: http://www.fieldturf.com Town of Apex C/o Eric Battle 10/13/15 Hunter St. Park Soccer Field Apex, NC I. Furnish and install 441’ ft. of 4’ ft. tall vinyl coated chain link fencing. 9 gauge core chain link fabric 1-5/8” Sch 40 top rail 2” Sch 40 line posts 2 ½” Sch 40 terminal posts 7 gauge bottom tension wire $5,300.00 *Deduct 1500.00 from Item I to take out and reinstall 300’ ft. of existing 4’ ft. tall black vinyl coated chain link fencing (approximately 141’ of new and 300’ reinstalled – 2100.00 materials savings minus 600.00 to take out and haul away concrete). II. Furnish and install 791’ ft. of 8’ ft. tall vinyl coated chain link fencing with 10’6” tall netting above. 9 gauge core chain link fabric 1-5/8” Sch 40 top, middle and bottom rail 2 ½” Sch 40 line posts 4” Sch 40 intermediate posts (40’ ft or less apart) One 5’ ft. wide walk gate One 10’ ft. wide double door gate 6-5/8” Sch 40 end and corner posts $56,000.00 The World Leader In Artificial Turf April 2012 FTNA Corp Brochure_2014.indd 1 1/6/2014 1:50 PM THE GREATEST TURF ON EARTH. How The Legend Was Born FieldTurf comes from humble beginnings. Its debut in the sport surfacing industry was in 1988 with the introduction of a synthetic grass system for tennis courts and a synthetic grass surface used to minimize wear and tear around golf practice tees. The company then began developing synthetic turf surfaces for other sports installations including soccer, lacrosse, football and baseball. FieldTurf focused on perfecting a sports field system with a sand and rubber infill, which provided superior athlete safety, high performance and extreme durability. The infilled artificial turf industry was born when, in 1994, FieldTurf installed its first full size soccer field. The Installation That Changed The Industry As the story goes, Tom Osborne, Nebraska Cornhuskers coaching legend, travelled to a high school installation in Pennsylvania with a recently installed FieldTurf field and walked across the field to meet FieldTurf representatives. “So, where is this stuff everyone’s talking about,” he asked. The truth was he had just walked across it. Osborne thought he was walking on natural grass. Upon recommendation from Osborne, Nebraska’s athletic department installed FieldTurf at one of their practice facilities in 1999. Husker players were so enthusiastic that the school decided to install FieldTurf in its stadium a year early. The Huskers finished with an incredible 12-1 record and a virtually injury-free season their first year on FieldTurf. It was the Nebraska installation that propelled FieldTurf forward, as top teams from around the world began to play on FieldTurf. University of Nebraska - Memorial Stadium [2] The Sports World Chooses FieldTurf Since the installation at Nebraska, FieldTurf has grown exponentially. Throughout the last decade our engineered, infilled artificial turf systems became the first to host two Super Bowls, the World Series, the World Baseball Classic, a Major League Soccer Cup final and College Bowl games from coast to coast. Today, FieldTurf continues to thrive as the global market leader in synthetic sports fields with more than 7,000 fields installed. Cities and schools have been benefitting from our ability to provide the very best value for the short and long term, allowing organizations at all levels to be able to forecast the amount of money they will save by installing FieldTurf, the safest, longest lasting and highest performing artificial turf system. The Future Of Artificial Turf With the best and most exclusive fiber manufacturing technology in the market today, FieldTurf has become one of the most vertically integrated companies in the industry. All four of FieldTurf’s manufacturing facilities are ISO certified and state-of-the-art. FieldTurf also has permanent R&D centers set up at Penn State University and at each and every one of FieldTurf’s manufacturing plants across the globe. At FieldTurf Headquarters, our Innovation & Performance Center has already led to some promising new discoveries that will once again revolutionize the artificial turf industry. Super Bowl XLVI on FieldTurf Heritage [3] Premium Price. Best Value. What Separates FieldTurf From All The Rest? Here are the Top 10 Benefits: 1. FieldTurf has the most innovative product offering. 2. Independent testing has proven that FieldTurf is the safest turf system when compared to natural grass. 3. FieldTurf is one of the most vertically integrated companies in the world. 4. When it comes to playability and performance, FieldTurf is the clear market leader. 5. No other long pile, artificial turf system has lasted longer than FieldTurf. 6. FieldTurf may be priced higher, but it costs less. 7. For peace of mind, FieldTurf provides clients with the best insured warranty in the business. 8. FieldTurf is the clear choice of the pros. 9. FieldTurf offers First Class Customer Service. 10. When combining all these benefits it’s clear that FieldTurf is simply …the best investment. These are not empty marketing claims, they are backed by science and facts. Keep reading to find out more… FieldTurf Is The Best Investment When compared to natural grass and competing turf systems, FieldTurf has time and again proven to be the better investment. It’s all about long term savings. FieldTurf may be priced higher but it costs less FieldTurf vs. Competing Artificial Systems: Best Value Analysis Competition FieldTurf Base Preparation $320,000 $320,000 Materials* $4.00 per sq ft = $320,000 $4.75 per sq ft = $380,000 Maintenance** $10,000 x 8 yrs = $80,000 $5,000 x 10 yrs = $50,000 Total Cost $720,000 $750,000 Turf Life* 6-8 years 8-10 years Average Cost Per Year $90,000 $75,000 *Material per square foot price difference and turf life figures are based on the last 10 years of industry data. For calculations, 8 years was used for 6-8 yrs range and 10 years was used for 8-10 yrs range. ** Yearly maintenance cost is an average figure based on the last 10 years of industry data - cost difference mainly due to increased infill work and repairs associated with competitor fields. All figures based on average sized fields of 80,000 square feet. A guaranteed return on your investment FieldTurf vs. Natural Grass: Costs Over 10 Years Natural Grass FieldTurf Base Preparation $150,000 $320,000 Materials $2.75 per sq ft = $220,000 $4.75 per sq ft = $380,000 Maintenance $20,000 x 10 yrs = $200,000 $5,000 x 10 yrs = $50,000 Total $570,000 $750,000 Scheduling Possibilities 25 hrs x 25 wks x 10 yrs = 6,250 hrs 68 hrs x 44 wks x 10 yrs = 29,920 hrs Average Cost Per Hour of Use $91.20 $25.07 Figures based on 80,000 square foot fields and average costs and usage rates across North America. [4] Did You Know? A Positive Contribution When it comes to carbon footprints, there’s simply no comparison between natural grass and FieldTurf fields. By choosing FieldTurf, you’re becoming part of an environmental movement that not only saves clean drinking water, but also: n n n n n n n A typical full size FieldTurf field saves 1 million gallons of water per year, utilizes 20,000 recycled tires, and eliminates the use of over 8,000 pounds of chemicals per year. Eliminates impact on water resources, saving billions of gallons of water each year Eliminates the use of billions of pounds of chemicals Removes millions of tires from landfill sites each year Significantly lowers the use of natural gas and other fossil fuels Eliminates fuel-powered mowing, aerating, and re-seeding Eliminates grass clippings Can contribute toward numerous Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) credits Largest artificial turf project in the world. Golden Eagle Regional Park - Sparks, NV 1,400,000 sq ft Costs Less “We chose FieldTurf because of the combination of value and quality associated with the FieldTurf product and company. It was a 2-year evaluation process of studying artificial turf products and companies. We visited fields all over the West Coast and spoke with numerous Athletic Directors and Parks & Recreation Directors. It was a consensus among those that we spoke with that FieldTurf had the best product and the best value.” Stan Sherer -Director of Parks & Recreation, City of Sparks [5] The most innovative turf offering. The FieldTurf Elite System Difference. When it comes to safety, performance and durability, nothing compares to the FieldTurf Elite system. Patented Infill Layering System: Often imitated, but never equaled, FieldTurf’s patented infill mixture delivers unmatched player safety with published peer-reviewed studies to prove it! Highest Quality Materials: Not all materials are created equal. FieldTurf uses the best ingredients – round, clean and durable silica sand coupled with the cleanest and roundest cryogenically processed rubber. Heavyweight System: Don’t be fooled by pile weight – focus on the total system weight. With FieldTurf’s heavyweight infill system the total carpet weights of most Elite systems eclipse 1300 oz/sq yd. Most Durable Fibers: When it comes to durable fibers, FieldTurf’s Elite systems feature some of the most durable fiber systems available in the market today. Just ask us for the testing! Unmatched Drainage: FieldTurf’s patented finger coating system provides 40% more porosity than competing perforated turf systems. [6] THE FIBERS The Most Durable Fibers – for Longest-Lasting Performance The ideal turf fibers should provide grass-like aesthetics and unmatched durability. FieldTurf’s systems have done just that. FieldTurf has the most innovative fiber options to choose from. Here are the fiber options for the Elite system: FieldTurf Revolution - Manufactured in FieldTurf’s own fiber plant, FieldTurf Revolution features a proprietary polymer formulation that reduces splitting and degradation and includes a leading ultraviolet inhibitor technology. A state-of-theart extrusion process provides intricate concave and ridged construction to eliminate breaking points. Classic HD - The gold standard in slit-film durability and technology, Classic HD is the ideal combination of softness and stiffness, designed to be the most player-friendly and resilient slit-film fiber in the marketplace. Its unique extrusion and inline precision cutter eliminates excess splitting, for longer-lasting performance. FieldTurf Revolution Classic HD THE INFILL A Patented Infill System - for Superior Playability FieldTurf’s infill is installed in 3 layers – a base layer of sand for ballast, a middle layer of silica sand / cryogenic rubber, and a top layer of larger sized cryogenically processed rubber particles. This patented system is the secret behind the safety and playability of FieldTurf. While fiber provides aesthetic value, it is the infill that delivers what the athlete needs to perform. FieldTurf infill is made of the highest quality materials. Unlike ambient rubber, FieldTurf uses only cryogenic rubber, the cleanest and highest grade of rubber granule. Similarly sized particles of washed silica sand and rounded cryogenic rubber hold each other in suspension - compress and expand to provide stability, long life resiliency and proper energy restitution. A top layer of rubber particles provides athletes with a non-abrasive cushion. FieldTurf’s Elite systems offer the heaviest infill systems in the industry – with up to 9.2 lbs of infill per sq. ft. Silica Sand Cryogenic Rubber THE BACKING SureLock Coating - for the Most Durable Product When designing the ideal turf backing three aspects must be considered – tuft bind strength, stability, and drainage. FieldTurf’s SureLock Coating delivers the ultimate in all 3 categories. Tuft bind is the strength of the attachment of the yarn to the backing material. FieldTurf’s industry-leading tuft bind is achieved by using strong fibers secured with the SureLock Coating System. The fibers are tufted into a backing of permeable woven and non-woven polypropylene fabrics at a patented row width of 3/4” for optimal cleat interaction. Our patented finger unit seals only the row of fibers, leaving the backing 40% porous, for unmatched drainage. Our competitors coat the entire backing, then burn holes into the turf to allow drainage. SureLock Coating Technology [7] The most innovative turf offering. FieldTurf Prestige Systems FieldTurf’s world class technology …with less of the cost. THE FIBERS Natural Aesthetics - for a Grass-Like Surface FieldTurf XM6 - developed with strict adherence to the 3 pillars of fiber development - Polymer, Process, and Geometry (PPG). The result is a resilient fiber that has been designed to provide excellent long-term durability. FieldTurf XT - High performance slit-film fibers are fibrillated to encapsulate infill and provide a dense fiber appearance. THE INFILL Two-Layered Infill System - for All Sports and Ages XM6 This traditional two-layer infill is comprised of ballast layers of sand and top layers of recycled ambient rubber granules for proper shock absorption and world class performance. Prestige systems also include alternative infill options such as Nike Grind, TPE, and Cork. THE BACKING Durable Coating - for Trustworthy Drainage Ambient Rubber Silica Sand Prestige series systems feature a traditional two-layer, dimensionally stable backing, coated and perforated at FieldTurf’s manufacturing facility. The result is exceptional tuft bind strength along with excellent drainage. Backing [8] XT FieldTurf CoolPlay: High Performance. Low Temperature. -35°F The CoolPlay system delivers the same behavior and overall stability as FieldTurf’s patented layered system. CoolPlay takes nothing away from performance …except the heat! 200 Temperature (°F) FieldTurf’s exclusive cork top dressing performs just like the very best FieldTurf Elite system, found in the world’s most famous stadiums. Laboratory tested to be 35ºF cooler than traditional sand/ rubber systems. 160 120 80 n CoolPlay n Sand / Rubber Mix 40 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Exposure time (minutes) Alternative Infill Offering In addition to our standard crumb rubber infill, FieldTurf also offers a complete line of turf systems with the following alternative infill options: Nike Grind: Consists of recycled athletic shoes and Nike manufacturing scrap which are ground up and turned into infill crumb. Nike Grind is also a non-marking rubber, leaving balls, shoes and uniforms clean from any markings. TPE: Produced by using prime raw materials which offer a stable shock absorption for synthetic turf fields. FieldTurf offers an innovative high grade, high performance TPE option. Nike Grind Rubber TPE Granules Cork: Cork, a totally organic product harvested from cork oak trees, is 100% recyclable with no waste by-products. Due to its natural structure, cork’s low thermal conductivity will allow the turf to remain cooler. Cork FieldTurf Fire Fighters FieldTurf’s revolutionary fire retardant materials and systems can meet and exceed any indoor or outdoor flame test or building code. FieldTurf’s fire retardant offering includes a fire retardant fiber (FieldTurf FR), along with two infill options (FlameGuard and FlameGuard Green). FlameGuard FlameGuard Green Did You Know? Innovation FieldTurf was one of the first companies in the world to use TPE infill and has over 25 FIFA recommended fields using the material. [9] FTNA Corp Brochure_2014.indd 9 1/7/2014 9:09 AM The safest turf system. The Ultimate In Safety, Performance And Durability The most important attributes of a turf system are Safety, Performance, and Durability. FieldTurf is proud to be at the top of the class in all 3 categories. Independent testing proves its safety; player preference confirms its performance; and its durability is proven day in and day out at thousands of installations around the world. What makes FieldTurf the safest system? The answer is simple. FieldTurf works just like natural grass. On a natural grass field the athletes cut, plant and release in the earth – not in the blades of grass. On an artificial turf field, the infill is the earth. FieldTurf’s infill provides the same biomechanical properties as natural grass, as athletes cut, plant and release. Like in natural grass, athletes play in the infill, not on the turf fibers. FieldTurf’s infill system contains up to 9.2 lbs. per square foot. It’s the “heavyweight” in the turf industry. All other turf systems contain a lightweight infill system, typically no more than 6 lbs. per sq. ft. Stitch “gauge” refers to the distance between the rows of fibers in a turf carpet. FieldTurf is a “wide gauge” turf system. The rows of fiber are 3/4” apart for ideal cleat interaction. This spacing allows for proper cleat penetration of the infill. Proper penetration enables the athlete to plant, twist and release just like they do on natural grass - without undue torque transmitted to the knees and ankles. As a result, chances of injuries are greatly reduced. All other turf systems use a very “narrow gauge” usually 3/8” or 1/2”. This narrow gauge results in turf that is overly dense, preventing the same penetration and positive biomechanical functions found on FieldTurf and natural grass. The result is that the athlete plays on or in the fibers - not in the infill. This causes the fibers to wear faster and makes it more difficult for the athlete to get solid footing, causing slippage. We call this “The Skate Effect.” FieldTurf was built by athletes for athletes. Our team has taken the time to design and produce a patented turf system that is engineered and quite unlike any other. The combination of our heavyweight infill system and our wide gauge turf spacing are two unique inventions that set FieldTurf apart from the rest. The result is proven player safety and performance that is simply unmatched. FieldTurf’s performance enhancing artificial turf provides a surface that allows athletes to focus on skill and execution. [10] Did You Know? FieldTurf’s heavyweight infill system is constructed using up to 9.2 lbs of infill material per square foot, which is quite similar in weight to the root zone of a high quality natural grass field. Playing In The Safety Zone Long term study of FieldTurf fields provides evidence of the proven safety of the heavyweight infill system. Data collected from 11 FieldTurf fields located in California confirmed the long term safety of FieldTurf fields as it relates to field hardness (Gmax). FieldTurf fields with heavyweight infill systems maintain safe Gmax ratings over time, dispelling any myth of field compaction. In accordance with MSP (Maximum Safety and Performance) fields must be within a Gmax range of 120-180 to be considered safe. All the FieldTurf fields analyzed were in this range. Published reports have indicated that lightweight turf systems can achieve Gmax levels above 200. Heavyweight infill systems have a minimum of 8 pounds of infill per sq. ft. while lightweight systems typically have a high face weight (high fiber density) a term commonly described as “Fiber Loading” and only 3 to 6 pounds of infill per square foot. School Field Age Gmax Francis Parker High School 7 127 Sycamore Valley Park 6 Mission Hill Middle School 6 Riverside Comm. College 6 Piner High School Montgomery High School School Field Age Gmax Tamalpais High School 7 128 165 Granada High School 6 142 149 Andrew Hill High School 7 134 131.9 Piedmont Hills High School 7 143 7 136 Milpitas High School 7 163 7 122 Independent Testing Proves FieldTurf’s Safety With FieldTurf, safety is not an empty claim or marketing jargon. We’ve put our product to the test in the most accurate testing possible – real life epidemiological testing of athletes. Here are the highlights of two published, peer reviewed studies: FieldTurf was proven safer than natural grass in a 5-year high school football safety study: n n n n 44% Fewer Concussions 33.4% Lower ACL Trauma 26.6% Fewer Severe Injuries 33.4% Fewer Ligament Tears Source: American Journal of Sports Medicine HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL SAFETY STUDY: FIELDTURF VS. NATURAL GRASS, A 5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY Safety FieldTurf was proven safer than natural grass in a 3-year college football safety study: n n n n 12% Fewer Concussions 40% Lower ACL Trauma 20.6% Fewer Severe Injuries 31.4% Fewer Ligament Tears Source: American Journal of Sports Medicine COLLEGE FOOTBALL SAFETY STUDY: FIELDTURF VS. NATURAL GRASS, A 3-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY FieldTurf’s heavyweight infill system and wide gauge design result in fewer concussions and reduced lower extremity injuries. [11] The longest lasting turf. Period. Longest-Lasting Performance Since its inception, FieldTurf has proven to be the most durable turf system in the world, with more fields that are 8 years or older than all other competitors combined. All of FieldTurf’s components are made from the highest quality materials. FieldTurf fields are manufactured and installed with a level of attention to quality control that has changed the industry forever. No other artificial turf manufacturer in the world can measure up. 6+ yrs 5+ yrs 2442 fields 1072 fields 7+ yrs 1847 fields 8+ yrs 693 fields 9+ yrs 374 fields 249 fields YEARS OF CONTINUOUS USE 10+ yrs NUMBER OF FIELDS IN DAILY USE Detroit Country Day School Selects FieldTurf Again, After First Field Lasts Thirteen Years! Detroit Country Day School also chose to install FieldTurf in their impressive new indoor athletic complex that will serve the football, boys and girls soccer, boys and girls lacrosse and field hockey teams. “We looked at many different products in the industry and the same holds true today as it did more than a decade ago – nothing in the marketplace compares to what the FieldTurf product offers in terms of safety and playability. When we originally decided to install FieldTurf on our Stadium Field, we expected an excellent level of service and product and that is exactly what we experienced over the last 13 years. We are excited to continue our longstanding relationship with the world leader in artificial turf.” Glen Shilling - Headmaster, Detroit Country Day School [12] Detroit Country Day School, MI “For the last 8 years FieldTurf has been part of Wesley College athletics and we could not be more satisfied with our decision. Over this time, our 47-3 home record is not only a testament to our players and coaches, but also to the surface we play on – FieldTurf.” Mike Drass - Athletic Director and Head Football Coach, Wesley College Keys To A Long-Lasting Turf System There are 4 keys to a long-lasting turf system – a durable fiber system, high quality infill materials, proper infill depth and strong seam technology. 1 Durable Turf Fibers 2 High Quality Infill Materials 3 Proper Infill Depth While an artificial turf system’s infill performs well for up to twenty years, it is the fiber system that wears first. Finding a durable fiber system is key when selecting your turf system. Independent testing on the durability of various fiber types is available at Penn State University. For more information on the study, contact your FieldTurf representative. Low grade rubber materials can cause premature wear of a turf field. There are two types of rubber material – high grade cryogenic rubber and low grade ambient rubber. Cryogenic rubber works to promote effective and consistent drainage by eliminating the potential for migration caused by water. The cryogenic rubber’s smooth and rounded shape facilitates a consistent flow of water through the infill without raising and displacing any rubber. The loose and jagged rubber strands found in ambient rubber make it vulnerable to migration and floatation caused by the air bubbles in water. Infill depth will ensure proper playability and longevity of the fiber, while also maintaining a grass-like appearance. The infill is the athlete’s source for cutting, planting, shock absorption and energy restitution. The critical mistake regardless of the type of infill used, is the under filling or over filling of the turf system. Proper Infill Level: Infill at approximately 2/3 (two-thirds) depth of the fiber height will provide the necessary fiber support for a longer lasting field along with less maintenance and a very minimal amount of infill displacement. 3/4” 2 1/2” Proper Infill Level Over Filled: Too much infill depth in a turf system leads to rooster tails following ball roll and running, along with the potential for severe infill displacement. Under Filled: An infill level that is too low can cause wrinkling and/or buckling of the turf surface and fails to protect the turf fibers from premature wear and abrasion. 4 Over Filled Under Filled Strong Seam Technology When it comes to the longevity of field seams, there is only one answer – FieldTurf’s heavy duty sewn seams. Simply put, glued seams will not stand the test of time. The number one maintenance problem associated with synthetic fields is that of loose unglued turf seams. Glued seams may be easier to install and less expensive as they require no special equipment or expertise. But sewn seams are the only way to ensure a trouble-free seam and a long lasting, safe field. FieldTurf ’s panel seams are sewn with a double lock stitch. FieldTurf fields do not experience seam problems because FieldTurf settles for nothing less than the best materials and most thorough seam installation. Durability [13] The #1 Choice For Football. Designed For Football FieldTurf is clearly the #1 choice of football. Whether it is at the professional level where 22 of 32 NFL teams have selected FieldTurf, or the NCAA where over 100 universities play their home games on FieldTurf, or even at the high school level where dozens of state champions have played on our surface. FieldTurf’s safety, performance and durability levels are far superior to any other system. As the world’s largest synthetic turf company, FieldTurf is installed in most major stadiums. But there is no difference between a high profile FieldTurf field and one installed in a small town. For every pro or college field we build, we install the same quality field at 150 schools and municipal facilities. NFL Players Prefer FieldTurf When it comes to surface preference, NFL Players have voted FieldTurf as the top artificial surface. Every two years, the NFL Players Association conducts a survey of its players where all of the league’s playing surfaces are rated and ranked on many performance-based factors. In 2010, the NFL Players voted FieldTurf as the best artificial surface in the league - for the 10th year in a row! A total of 1619 active NFL players from all 32 teams completed survey forms. 2010 Artificial Turf Surface Rankings 1. Indianapolis (FieldTurf) 2. New York Giants/Jets (FieldTurf) 4. Seattle (FieldTurf) 6. Atlanta (FieldTurf) 7. New England (FieldTurf) 8. Detroit (FieldTurf) 10. Cincinnati (FieldTurf) Players perform with more confidence on FieldTurf - not only because it is a safer surface - but because it is the most consistent, stable and athlete friendly artificial turf system in the world. FieldTurf is the Fastest Surface In addition to its renowned safety benefits, the FieldTurf system has gained a reputation across the industry for its high performance and speed. At the 2008 NFL Combine, Chris Johnson ran a record 4.24 40-time on FieldTurf. Since 2000, nine of the fastest twelve times at the NFL Combine have been on FieldTurf. [14] “I like it (FieldTurf) a lot… just because the footing is so good and you can really push off and drive the ball, and the receivers can cut really well. I think everybody really likes the surface.” Tom Brady - QB, New England Patriots Below are just some of the teams that have chosen FieldTurf: NFL n n n n n n n n n n n n Atlanta Falcons Denver Broncos Detroit Lions Green Bay Packers Indianapolis Colts New England Patriots New York Giants Oakland Raiders San Diego Chargers Seattle Seahawks Tennessee Titans Washington Redskins NCAA n n n n n n n n n n n n n n High School Air Force Falcons Boise State Broncos Cincinnati Bearcats Fresno State Bulldogs Illinois Fighting Illini Kansas Jayhawks Louisville Cardinals Michigan Wolverines Minnesota Gophers Mississippi Rebels Missouri Tigers Navy Midshipmen Nebraska Cornhuskers Nevada Wolf Pack n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Northern Illinois Huskies Ohio State Buckeyes Oregon Ducks Oregon State Beavers Rutgers Scarlet Knights Syracuse Orange Texas Longhorns Texas Tech Red Raiders Tulsa Golden Hurricane Utah Utes Washington Huskies Washington State Cougars West Virginia Mountaineers Wisconsin Badgers n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n New England Patriots - Gillette Stadium Seattle Seahawks - CenturyLink Field Bergen Catholic (NJ) Blue Springs South (MO) Celina (TX) Colerain (OH) Don Bosco Prep (NJ) Jenks (OK) Lake Oswego (OR) Loyola (CA) Mater Dei (CA) Memphis University (TN) Plano (TX) St. Peter’s Prep (NJ) St. Thomas Aquinas (FL) Torrey Pines (CA) Valley Christian (CA) Wayzata (MN) Wheaton-Warrenville South (IL) Wimberley (TX) Xaverian Brothers (MA) Atlanta Falcons - Georgia Dome Detroit Lions - Ford Field Did You Know? Football In 2012, Super Bowl XLVI took place on FieldTurf. This was only the second time that a Super Bowl has been played on a heavyweight infilled surface. The first one? Super Bowl XL on FieldTurf at Ford Field in Detroit. [15] THE WORLD CLASS SOCCER SURFACE. Designed For Soccer The FieldTurf product was designed for soccer by focusing on four key soccer-related requirements: Ball Performance, Energy Restitution, Shock Absorption and Playability. FieldTurf is ideal for soccer because of its fiber technology (ball performance), heavyweight infill system (energy restitution and shock absorption) and wide gauge tufting (playability). Why Is FieldTurf The Best Surface For Soccer? most Grass-Like Playability The 2012 study conducted by Prozone, an independent consulting firm specializing in soccer performance, confirms that there are “No Major Differences” in playability on FieldTurf or natural grass. Prozone installed a player tracking system on 2 fields – one at Luzhniki Stadium (FieldTurf) and the other at Khimki Arena (natural grass). Since 2006 Luzhniki has had FieldTurf installed for their pitch and the results in key playability categories indicate FieldTurf is equal to natural grass when it comes to playing soccer. n n n n Distance run during match was 113.9 km on FieldTurf vs. 112.1 km on grass, indicating teams are confident to play very similar styles on both surfaces. Ball touches per player were 2.01 on FieldTurf vs. 2.06 on grass, indicating players are just as comfortable with the possession of the ball on FieldTurf as on natural grass. Passes played forward increased on FieldTurf, indicating more offense and more entertaining games are played on it. Tackles per player rose by 0.70 on FieldTurf, illustrating that players are just as comfortable defending on FieldTurf and do not feel a greater risk of playing on the surface. The Soccer Reference With over 3,000 FieldTurf soccer installations, FieldTurf has the most FIFA Recommended fields in the world! Some of the most prestigious clubs worldwide practice or play on FieldTurf, including Real Madrid, FC Barcelona, and Manchester United. In the U.S., FieldTurf is the choice for 16 MLS teams for practice facilities, with New England Revolution, Portland Timbers and Seattle Sounders picking FieldTurf for their stadiums as well. New England Revolution - Gillette Stadium [16] FTNA Corp Brochure_2014.indd 16 1/7/2014 9:10 AM Did You Know? Soccer-Smart System Design Over 75% of all teams in the English Premier League, Spain’s ‘La Liga’ and France’s ‘Ligue de Football Professionnel’ train on FieldTurf systems. FieldTurf has invested in developing the ideal system for soccer with the following soccer specific attributes: The Most Natural Ball Performance: The knock on synthetic turf has been unrealistic ball roll. On competitors’ fields, fibers have laid over or become matted within just 1 or 2 years, causing the ball to roll too rapidly - informally referred to as “quickroll”. FieldTurf has solved this problem with the introduction of our FieldTurf Revolution fiber. With unmatched memory to return each fiber to the upright position, ball roll remains natural, even over time. Ball bounce on an artificial turf field is another concern that only FieldTurf has been able to properly address. Ball bounce is linked to the infill composition of the turf system. FieldTurf’s patented layered infill system provides the right amount of softness to absorb the ball’s impact in a natural way for the life of the field. Optimal Energy Return: Energy restitution is the amount of energy that goes back into your legs when running on a surface. FieldTurf’s layered system of sand and rubber provides the optimum level of energy restitution. Other all-rubber or lightweight surfaces are spongier which accelerate fatigue and muscle / joint stress. This effect is magnified on fields that will be used for both training and matches. Proven Safety: During the Men’s 2007 FIFA U20 World Cup in Canada, where the majority of the matches on artificial turf were played on FieldTurf, medical officer Dr. Rudy Gittens noted… “There were an average of 2.8 injuries per game through the first 48 games - 3.3 per game on natural grass and 2.4 on artificial turf. From these particular figures it would appear that artificial turf might be safer.” FIFA Preferred Producer: FieldTurf is a select member of the FIFA Preferred Producer Program having met the rigid obligations and reporting requirements. A FIFA Preferred Producer goes beyond the traditional supplier / installer scenario by continually improving the quality of their product and assuming responsibility for the production, installation and maintenance of the turf from inception to completion. Seattle Sounders - CenturyLink Field Portland Timbers - Jeld Wen Field Did You Know? Soccer FieldTurf surfaces have played host to Champions League matches, Euro Cup qualifiers, MLS Cup finals, an MLS AllStar game, the Men’s and Women’s FIFA U20 World Cup final, UEFA Cup qualifiers, World Cup qualifiers and NCAA D-I League finals. [17] Baseball’s home run. Did You Know? The 2008 World Series was played on FieldTurf while over 25 NCAA D-I teams continue to play and / or practice on FieldTurf baseball systems. Designed For Baseball FieldTurf is far and away the industry leader in artificial turf systems designed specifically for baseball – at all levels of competition. What better proof is there than the reduction of error rates? Many Division I baseball programs have reported a reduction of up to 50% in fielding errors after switching to FieldTurf. Why Is FieldTurf DoublePlay The Best Surface For Baseball? The launch of FieldTurf’s DoublePlay baseball systems signify the greatest technological advancement in baseball surfacing in decades. FieldTurf combines the beneficial biomechanical properties of natural grass, with the best attributes of a durable synthetic system - all weather playability, low maintenance, safety and high performance. FieldTurf DoublePlay Systems DOUBLEPLAY CLASSIC n n n n Patented infill Extremely durable slit-film fiber Ball pace mimics the best real grass fields Over 20 NCAA Division I installations DOUBLEPLAY n n n n SBR Rubber and Silica Sand infill mix Extremely durable slit-film fiber Fastest ball pace of any SBR Rubber/Silica Sand baseball system Different pile heights for infield and outfield DOUBLEPLAY LASER n n n n [18] SBR Rubber and exclusive Flexsand infill mix Fiber is an extremely durable slit-film Fastest ball pace of any baseball-specific infill system Different pile heights for infield and outfield DOUBLEPLAY Tuning The Speed Of Play FieldTurf offers its clients the ability to ‘tune’ the speed of play of the infield and outfield to slow, medium, or fast - depending on preference. The speed of play is set through a combination of infill materials, infill depth and underlying base materials. Each of these components are tailor-made to meet the pace of play required by each client. Here are the five (5) pillars of FieldTurf baseball-specific product development: 1 2 Penn State Comparative Testing Coefficient of Restitution (COR) is defined as a ratio of two velocities: the velocity of a baseball after impact with the surface divided by the velocity of the ball prior to impact. The COR value is the only way to accurately measure and compare ball speed levels on different types of surfaces. The higher the COR value, the faster the surface. Penn State University tested over 20 different surfaces, including natural grass and the top competitive artificial turf surfaces. The objective was to find which surfaces delivered slow, medium or fast ball pace. Here is a snapshot of the results. Coefficient of Restitution .575 .572 .565 .563 .550 .516 .506 .491 .485 .316 s y ix D er er er sic nd nd ras Pla as s3 bb bb as sa rM Sa eG Cl yL ble ras % Ru Ru be lex a u / u y l 0 l F b G d a % o P 10 0 Pl Ru ay yB an 0% fD ble 10 d/ ck xs ble 10 eD ur ou tu an Fle ou am ldT xs en fD d D e r e G i e l K f u r f F F ur ur ye er ldT ldT La oT ay Fie str Fie 3L *A Natural Grass Playability & Aesthetics *Data taken from an NCAA Division I game field. For DoublePlay and DoublePlay Laser systems, a taller fiber blade height is used for the green-colored areas on the baseball field – outfield, foul areas, and green infield area. A slightly shorter fiber blade height is used for all basepath areas. This small fiber height difference allows for a perfect replication of grass and clay area transitions on natural ball fields. FieldTurf also offers its clients the option to use colored infill to match the color of a natural field and the turf installed. In green areas, the infill will be dirt-colored. In rust areas, the infill will be rust-colored. Should the basepaths be a tan color, the infill will be tan-colored. 3 Warning Track Technology 4 Coach Approved 5 Removable Bases FieldTurf warning tracks are installed with a special, durable lavarock infill. This ensures there is a distinct difference in feel and sound, for a player who is tracking a ball near the fence, without having to look down. During a FieldTurf installation, coaches have a chance to validate the performance of the surface. This is our way of ensuring that the field is tailored to the speed and performance that meets each customers’ needs. Our ‘ExtraBase’ program ensures that high wear areas on a FieldTurf field are taken care of for the long-term. FieldTurf offers its clients the option of having removable or serviced replacement home plate and base areas. The replacement of these high-traffic areas can be done periodically as a simple ‘do-it-yourself’ option, with easy fastening and removal methods, or by one of FieldTurf’s experienced local installation crews. Baseball University of Oregon - PK Park University of Texas - Disch-Falk Field [19] The ultimate multi-use solution. Turf For All-Reasons & All-Seasons With over 2500 municipal and county installations, the FieldTurf system has proven to deliver the best value when compared to all other artificial turf systems – and even to the very best natural grass fields. This is thanks to FieldTurf’s ability to deliver a pro-caliber and world-class playing surface that provides many measurable benefits to communities across the nation. FieldTurf continues to transform previously inefficient municipal properties into long-lasting and lush playing fields that make positive environmental contributions. FieldTurf fields help municipalities save enough money, resources and time in order to re-invest in other areas of the community that are lacking. Below are just some of the larger multi-field projects FieldTurf has completed: Golden Eagle Regional Park - Sparks, NV n 13 Fields - 1,400,000 sq. ft. Medford Sports Park - Medford, OR n 11 Fields - 968,000 sq. ft. Starfire Sports Complex - Tukwila, WA n 8 Fields - 632,000 sq. ft. Ripken Experience Myrtle Beach - Myrtle Beach, SC n 6 Fields - 630,000 sq. ft. Chino Hills Community Park Field - Chino Hills, CA n 6 Fields - 615,000 sq. ft. City of Medford, OR Regional Athletic Fields - Lacey, WA n 6 Fields - 552,000 sq. ft. Warhill Sports Complex - Williamsburg, VA n 6 Fields - 510,000 sq. ft. Mass Youth Soccer Association - Lancaster, MA n 5 Fields - 445,000 sq. ft. Warhill Sports Complex, VA “A few of us went on trips to view turf fields in Southern California. We went to college sites, a few parks, and some recreation sites. We knew by our research that FieldTurf was considered to be the premier turf on the market and we wanted the best turf available. As advertised, FieldTurf was the best. The surfaces look great, and from other sites we visited, FieldTurf held up under significant use. The athletes that use our field love it, the city staff loves it, it drains well, it is generally low maintenance, all while being environmentally sound. It’s a consistent surface day in and day out compared to natural turf after heavy usage.” Peter Rogers - Mayor, City of Chino Hills [20] Chino Hills, CA Military Projects FieldTurf is the turf of choice for the military. Among others, FieldTurf has numerous high profile installations for the U.S. Military Academy, U.S. Naval Academy and U.S. Air Force Academy, making us the most trusted name in turf for military projects. Below are just some of the larger military field projects FieldTurf has completed: n n n n n n n n n n n Fort Huachuca Army Base Fort Lee Military Reserve Fort Lewis Army Base Great Lakes Navy Base - Constitution Field Great Lakes Navy Base - Softball Field Guantánamo Bay Naval Base - 3 Fields Hanscom Air Force Base Miramar Air Station - MCAS & MCRD MWR Miramar Sports Complex (4 fields) Sasebo Naval Base U.S. Air Force Academy - Baseball Field n n n n n n n n n n n U.S. Air Force Academy - Football Stadium U.S. Air Force Academy - Indoor Practice Field U.S. Air Force Academy - Soccer Field U.S. Merchant Marine Academy U.S. Military Academy - Baseball Field U.S. Military Academy - Howze Stadium U.S. Military Academy - Michie Stadium-Blaik Field U.S. Military Academy - Rugby Field U.S. Naval Academy - Baseball Field U.S. Naval Academy - Halsey Field House U.S. Naval Academy - Jack Stephens Field Organizations can now obtain FieldTurf through the federal government’s General Services Administration (GSA) program without having to endure the lengthy and at times misleading bid process. Visit www.gsaadvantage.gov and enter the FieldTurf contract holder number in the search box: Guantánamo Bay Naval Base Contract Holder GS-07F-9631S U.S. Naval Academy - Jack Stephens Field “When we saw FieldTurf’s latest technology, FieldTurf Revolution, we knew we had to have it on our stadium field. We felt that upgrading to FieldTurf Revolution and having the absolute best in turf technology was the right thing to do for our program. This represents another first-class upgrade for Navy athletics.” Chet Gladchuk - Athletic Director, Naval Academy Military [21] VERTICAL INTEGRATION = QUALITY ASSURANCE. The Quality Standard FieldTurf, the worldwide leader in quality, remains focused on three pillars, all of which are supported by our triple ISO certification. 1 - Better Materials 2 - Manufacturing Excellence 3 - World Class Installations Better Materials Better materials make better fields. It’s that simple. The two main materials in a turf system are fiber and infill and FieldTurf has invested heavily in selecting only the highest grade materials. Fiber For years, the belief throughout the industry has been that the shape of the fiber dictates its performance and durability. While this is partly true, the real key to fiber performance is a combination of Polymer, Process, and Geometry. This is FieldTurf’s PPG philosophy. FieldTurf has spared no expense in using the best – and now exclusive – polymer and processing technology available on the market today. Here are the three keys to producing high quality artificial turf fibers: Polymer Proprietary polymer formulation to resist splitting and degradation, complete with an industry leading ultraviolet inhibitor technology. Process State-of-the-art extrusion process for precision manufacturing that ensures the production of an exceptionally strong fiber with a radical reflection feature built into each artificial grass blade. Geometry Intricate concave and ridged construction eliminates breaking points and provides the most natural looking fiber. Infill Cryogenic rubber is a rare grade of clean and finely rounded rubber. For improved safety and performance, cryogenic rubber is the only grade of rubber that FieldTurf uses in its Elite system fields. Others use ambient rubber, a cheaper grade of mass produced rubber. Ambient rubber is a jagged grade of particle and has the propensity to migrate resulting in low filled areas which can be more dangerous to athletes and contribute to premature fiber wear. While most turf companies use low grade sand products, FieldTurf uses a more expensive washed silica sand. This silica sand has the ideal shape and hardness to ensure proper performance and long term durability. Before being installed, our washed silica sand and cryogenic rubber is tested for shape, size, safety, consistency and durability. [22] Manufacturing Excellence During the manufacturing process there are three aspects to turf construction – Fiber Production, Tufting, and Coating. What’s important to know is that FieldTurf controls all three aspects of the value chain. Nothing is left to a third party. Nothing is left to chance. This provides FieldTurf clients with a level of quality assurance that simply cannot be matched. Fiber Production: FieldTurf’s fibers are produced at our very own facility in Germany. This state-of-theart facility was opened in 2010 and as a result has turned FieldTurf into one of the most vertically integrated companies in the world. The quality control process at the facility includes stringent testing of the yarn properties (tensile strength, uniformity, color verification). FieldTurf Fiber Production Plant Absteinach, Germany Tufting and Coating: Once the fiber is produced it is ready for tufting and coating which takes place at FieldTurf’s 500,000 square-foot facility in Calhoun, Georgia. Our triple ISO certification ensures rigorous quality control and inspection under World Class Manufacturing (WCM) principles. FieldTurf Tufting & Coating Plant Calhoun, GA World Class Installations In the turf industry, good materials aren’t enough. A world class installation team is needed to assemble the materials properly. FieldTurf ensures the longevity and overall quality of our surfaces by taking the following measures: Experienced Installation Crews - By using only crews who have experience with the FieldTurf product, FieldTurf is able to assure its customers that only those who fully understand the product and its construction requirements handle the installation. Sewn Seams - With so much riding on the quality of the seam construction job, FieldTurf has chosen to invest in sewn seams rather than the cheaper glued alternative. FieldTurf’s panel seams are sewn with a double lock stitch and FieldTurf has a proven record for fields without seam problems. When it comes to the quality and safety of your field, you can be certain that FieldTurf settles for nothing less than the best materials and most thorough seam installation around. There is no compromise for quality. Make sure that your supplier meets the following criteria: Quality n Self performs all fiber manufacturing, tufting, and coating n Is ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 certified n Sews all turf seams [23] The World Leader In Artificial Turf. Why Do Customers Choose FieldTurf? Doing business with FieldTurf is more than just about a high end product. It’s about dealing with a company that goes above and beyond to provide its clients with a service and peace of mind that is unmatched by any other company in the industry. This is achieved through: n n n n n n n Financial Strength The Best Warranty Protection A Strong Commitment to the Environment Leadership in Innovation First Class Customer Service Turf Purchasing Made Simple Financial Strength With one of the strongest equity bases in the industry, there is no better partner than FieldTurf. Through Tarkett, in operation since 1872, FieldTurf enjoys a bonding capacity of over $75,000,000 and has the financial strength of a company with over 130 years of experience in the surfacing business. In 2008, renowned investment firm KKR (Kohlberg, Kravis, & Roberts Co.) purchased 50% of Tarkett. KKR, with over $60 billion in assets, is known in all circles of the world as a company that is among the world’s elite in strengthening businesses and creating value. n The Best Warranty Protection Even though you’ll probably never need to use it, you can rest easy knowing that you’re protected by the industry’s best third-party insured warranty in the unlikely event something goes wrong with your field. It’s peace of mind that sets FieldTurf apart. n n n n [24] Yearly Aggregate Claim Limit of $32,000,000 Per Claim Limit of $32,000,000 All fields are automatically covered upon issuance of the Warranty Certificate Pre-Paid for 8 years “After having FieldTurf for 10 years, we can honestly say that this is the best turf system on the planet. FieldTurf obviously spends a lot of time on R&D as their newest product that will be installed on our field is expected to last even longer than the previous field we had which is incredible. In our minds FieldTurf is the safest and most durable turf on the market.” “All the savings in time and money that were promised to us from the start continue to remain true today. Even after 10 years we continue to see a return on our investment as we maximize usage out of our all weather FieldTurf field. We have gone from a philosophy of keeping people off our field to save the grass, to a philosophy of putting everything on the field that we can.” Brother Murphy - President, Bergen Catholic High School Tex Nolan - Longtime Athletic Director, Amarillo ISD Did You Know? n Strong Commitment to the Environment The environmental benefits of artificial turf have been well documented for years. Hundreds of studies have been completed to discover the truth about any potential risks of artificial turf. In every case, new generation artificial turf has been found to be completely safe. FieldTurf was the first artificial turf company in the world to fully recycle a turf field. It happened in 2010 at War Memorial Stadium in Arkansas. FieldTurf was one of the first companies to introduce “lead free” products and to this day continues to use only lead free fibers. FieldTurf Recycles FieldTurf is 100% recyclable. When a FieldTurf installation finally comes to the end of its long life – it continues to help our planet. FieldTurf was the first company in the industry to remove entire turf systems and recycle them. After removal, old turf fields can now be turned into new turf infill and backing, as well as other products, such as crude oil, custom bi-products and artificial lumber. FieldTurf proudly offers a “Take Back” program for both sports fields and landscape applications, whereby FieldTurf will provide customers with the option, in writing, that fields will be recycled at the end of their useful life when replaced with another FieldTurf system. FieldTurf’s 3-step recycling process Field Removal Grinding Pelletizing Commitment [25] The World Leader In Artificial Turf. n Leadership In The Field Of Innovation It’s no secret that FieldTurf pioneered what is now commonly accepted as “artificial turf.” What started with our invention of long pile, infilled artificial turf has continued with numerous industry-changing innovations. FieldTurf has introduced engineered products that are tailor made for each segment of the business and owns more than 30 patents that protect the company’s product offering for sporting and non-sporting applications. FieldTurf Innovation & Performance Center All of FieldTurf’s systems are tested using the latest equipment in our Innovation and Performance Center. Located at the company’s headquarters the center ensures that any and all of FieldTurf’s existing and new systems set superior standards for performance in their respective classes. Penn State Center for Sports Surface Research Center for Sports Surface Research FieldTurf & Penn State University joined forces to mark a historic industry first in sports surface research. The Center for Sports Surface Research is an intercollegiate program managed within the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences. It is headed by Dr. Andrew McNitt, who is regarded as a pioneer in the world of sports surface research, particularly as it relates to natural and synthetic turf. For more information on the Penn State Center for Sports Surface Research, please visit: ssrc.psu.edu n First Class Customer Service Providing a high quality product and outstanding customer service has been a part of FieldTurf’s successful business model since day one. Our customers are our number one priority, which is why we have taken the time to assemble an experienced and dedicated customer service department. We follow up with each and every one of our customers to ensure complete and consistent satisfaction. In addition, our customer service department has assembled a comprehensive manual that covers all field care issues. Each FieldTurf customer receives a main guide that covers everything from field maintenance to field protection. Our devotion to our customers and their fields can be further confirmed by the extensive line of field care products and equipment designed and catered specifically for a FieldTurf field. FieldCare The ‘FieldCare’ national maintenance program is geared towards making our synthetic turf field systems perform at their optimal level for even longer. The FieldCare program is comprised of complete field inspections and regular maintenance done by FieldTurf authorized maintainers. The company’s large network of skilled maintainers has enabled us to focus on longer lasting fields, greater savings and an expanded potential for our customers to generate revenue from their fields. [26] “Using the SmartBuy Purchasing Program was a big time saver for our staff. We did not have to use our time to write specifications and do all the extra research. We got the Beynon running track and FieldTurf field we wanted and saved time.” Janice Essenberg - Director of Administrative Services, David Douglas School District n Turf Purchasing Made Simple Aside from finding the right products for our customers, we’ve also taken the necessary steps to make the turf purchasing process as easy as possible. Just follow the 4 key steps to our Simplified Purchasing Program: SmartBuy Purchasing Program: With our SmartBuy purchasing program, our customers get what they want without the expensive and time-consuming bid process. Experienced Project Administrators: FieldTurf’s in-house project administrators take responsibility for guiding our customers through the construction process. On-Site Construction Managers: With over 4,000 fields worth of experience, our construction team is responsible for building your field of dreams. Exceptional Customer Service: Contrary to how some of our competitors operate, we pride ourselves on being a partner with our clients for the life of their field. School and municipal improvement projects can be a very long and costly process, with many unforeseen delays. Organizations have to go through the hassle of advertising, investigating, obtaining designs, writing specifications, conducting bid meetings and dealing with potentially inexperienced contractors – all while managing and coordinating the installation process. Due to the countless steps associated with the bid process, it is not unusual for six months to go by before even breaking ground on a facility improvement project. Our objective has not only been to make the best sports surfaces in the world, but also to improve the purchasing process. With that in mind, we are proud to introduce The SmartBuy Purchasing Program. This program encompasses the highest quality sports surfacing products in the industry from FieldTurf and Beynon. Whether it’s artificial turf, running tracks or court surfaces, it has never been as simple or cost-effective to obtain the highest quality sports surfacing products. Hundreds of organizations have chosen to purchase through one of the cooperatives under the SmartBuy Purchasing Program because it: n n n n n n n n Osseo Senior High School, MN Simplifies the ordering process Prevents duplication of the bid process Carries the industry’s best products Guarantees the best value Satisfies bid laws in many states Provides owner with project control Provides turnkey product solutions Offers preferential pre-negotiated pricing Service Bergen Catholic High School, NJ [27] The World Leader In Artificial Turf. Information (800) 724-2969 info@fieldturf.com www.fieldturf.com Synthetic Turf Safety Proven With Science Synthetic Turf Safety Proven With Science The Mother of Invention The motivation for the invention of FieldTurf was twofold – improve the health and safety of players; and protect the planet. When FieldTurf was just an idea, athletes were being beat up playing on the dangerous carpet surfaces of that era. Keeping grass fields in good condition required tons of harmful pesticides and chemicals, while irrigation wasted millions of gallons of clean water. Health and safety was, is and always will be FieldTurf’s DNA. Because we don’t just make turf. We make a difference. Over the past decade, our invention has improved player safety, reducing and preventing injuries around the globe. Our turf has eliminated millions of pounds of pesticides and harmful chemicals from the environment and saved billions of gallons of fresh water. Recent news reports citing a possible link between crumb rubber and cancer have rightfully caused great concern to all. Unfortunately, these reports do not consider the decades of science studying exactly this subject. Ongoing research continues the efforts to ensure that artificial playing fields reduce health and safety concerns. Not create them. Before the acceptance of crumb rubber as an approved, safe, infill material for artificial turf, hundreds of studies had been commissioned and executed by health and safety experts worldwide. The following pages look at some of their findings. 2 CRUMB RUBBER Crumb rubber, made from reclaimed tires, is an important part of the industry’s premiere infill option for synthetic turf fields. It has been safely used in many products since being introduced in the early 1990s, and in playgrounds and tracks for much longer. The notoriously resilient SBR rubber material provides enhanced durability and cushioning to prevent injuries and keeps playing surfaces safe. Aside from its use in synthetic turf sports fields, SBR (Styrene-butadiene) rubber, referred to as crumb rubber, is also used in a variety of products from children’s rubber toys to surgical gloves to food packaging, and even in chewing gum. With the growing popularity of synthetic turf, questions have surfaced about the safety of the little black rubber pellets that protect our athletes. Hundreds of studies have been completed to understand any potential risks of artificial turf and its components. Government health ministries and environmental bodies in the U.S. and Europe have commissioned extensive research. So have world health organizations, leading universities and independent scientific committees. Elected officials have reacted to the concerns of their constituents by commissioning studies to get the facts. The research has been done. The studies exist. Read what the experts have said in independent testing, studies and reports on the potential health and environmental impact of artificial turf. ‘crumb rubber is also used in a variety of products from children’s toys to surgical gloves to food packaging, even chewing gum’ 3 Ingestion/ Inhalation “The SVOCs identified based on library matches of their mass spectra were not present in toxicological databases evaluated and many are ubiquitous parts of consumer products. Similarly, the metal concentrations measured in field samples indicate that the risk would be de minimis among all populations expected to use artificial turf fields” Brian T. Pavilonis, Clifford P. Weisel, Brian Buckley, and Paul J. Lioy., “Bioaccessibility and Risk Exposure to Metals and SVOC’s in Artificial Turf Field Fill Materials and Fibers (2013)” “The uptake of PAH of football players active on artificial grass fields with rubber crumb infill is minimal. If there is any exposure, then the uptake is very limited and within the range of uptake of PAH from environmental sources and/or diet.” Joost G. M. van Rooij, Frans J. Jongeneelen, “Hydroxypyrene in urine of football players after playing on artificial sports field with tire crumb infill (December 2008)” “Genotoxicity testing of tire crumb samples following solvent extraction concluded that no DNA or chromosome-damaging chemicals were present. This suggests that ingestion of small amounts of tire crumb by small children will not result in an unacceptable hazard of contracting cancer.” Enviro-Test Laboratories, Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, July 2003, ‘Toxicological Evaluation for the Hazard Assessment of Tire Crumb for Use in Public Playgrounds’ “Based upon the current evidence, a public health risk appears unlikely. A variety of governmental bodies including Norway, Sweden, New Jersey and California have recently reviewed the health issues; their assessments have not found a public health threat. Sources of exposure unrelated to artificial turf fields are likely more important than the turf fields for many chemicals.” Connecticut Department of Public Health, October 2007, ‘Artificial Turf Fields: Health Questions’ ‘sources of exposure unrelated to artificial turf fields are likely more important than the turf fields’ “Based on the minimal concentrations of chemicals detected, it is considered very unlikely that any significant adverse vapor (inhalation) exposures would occur to humans in close proximity to where crumb rubber is used in outdoor applications.” New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science, Research, and Technology, June 2007, ‘Environmental Assessment and Risk Analysis - Preliminary Assessment of the Toxicity from Exposure to Crumb Rubber: its use in Playgrounds and Artificial Turf Playing Fields’ 4 DERMAL CONTACT “Tire crumb does not contain chemicals with high vapour pressures, exposure via inhalation deemed low risk. Oral ingestion deemed low risk because ingestion not likely, furthermore, question of how effective stomach acids and enzymes are at extracting toxic chemicals from tire crumb and transporting them into the blood stream.” D.A. Birkholz, Director, Research & Development, ALS Laboratory Group, Edmonton, Alberta, October 2006, ‘Assessing the Health and Environmental Impact from the Use of End-of-Life Tire Rubber Crumb as Artificial Turf in Sports Arenas’ “Based on the available literature on exposure to rubber crumb by swallowing, inhalation and skin contact and our experimental investigations on skin contact we conclude that there is not a significant health risk due to the presence of rubber infill from used car tyres.” INTRON, commissioned by two tyre associations, and supervised by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment and by the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment in the Netherlands, April 2008, ‘Follow-up study of the environmental aspects of rubber infill’ “Dermal exposure deemed low risk because carrier solvent is needed to extract toxic chemicals from tire crumb and to penetrate protective skin layers” D.A. Birkholz, Director, Research & Development, ALS Laboratory Group, Edmonton, Alberta, October 2006, ‘Assessing the Health and Environmental Impact from the Use of End-of-Life Tire Rubber Crumb as Artificial Turf in Sports Arenas’ “The uptake of PAH by athletes who have contact with crumb rubber synthetic turf is negligible. As far as dermal contact is concerned, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Radium Hospital (2006) carried out an extensive analysis of possible health concerns. The study found that there was no evidence to suggest that allergic reactions were caused by exposure to crumb rubber and speculated that latex in car tires was either - less available for uptake or was - deactivated as an allergen.” University of California, Berkeley and the Corporation for Manufacturing Excellence (Manex), February 2010, ‘Review of the Impacts of Crumb Rubber in Artificial Turf Applications’ ‘there is not a significant health risk due to the presence of rubber infill’ 5 AIR QUALITY “Levels of chemicals in the air at synthetic turf fields do not raise a significant health concern. “ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation & New York State Department of Health, May 2009, ‘An Assessment of Chemical Leaching, Releases to Air and Temperature at Crumb-Rubber Infilled Synthetic Fields’ “Twenty air samples were collected above and around two synthetic turf playing surfaces in Connecticut. Ten of the samples were analyzed for volatile nitrosamine content and 10 were analyzed for benzothiazole and 4-(tert-octyl) phenol content. The samples were collected on warm, late summer days during periods of light to calm winds. In one case, the synthetic turf surface had been groomed three days prior to the sampling. The sampling was conducted during periods when the temperature of the crumb rubber in-fill material was elevated due to exposure to the sun. The combination of air temperatures, surface temperatures, wind speed and, the recent maintenance of one of the fields, are believed to be conditions favorable for generating maximum concentrations of the analytes in the air column above and around the playing surfaces. This study determined that under favorable conditions for vapor generation, no detectable concentrations of volatile nitrosamines or 4-(tert-octyl) phenol existed in the air column at a height of four feet above the tested synthetic playing surfaces or in the air either upwind or downwind of the fields.” Milone & MacBroom, engineering, landscape architecture, and environmental science firm based in Connecticut, December 2008, ‘Evaluation of the Environmental Effects of Synthetic Turf Athletic Fields’ ‘larger granules used in artificial turf will have even less potential for emissions.’ “The majority of the studies have been on higher surface area particles and have concluded they are currently acceptable. Therefore the larger granules used in artificial turf will have even less potential for emissions. For example a study undertaken by the Danish Ministry of the Environment concluded that the health risk on children’s playgrounds that contained both worn tyres and granulate rubber was insignificant. The available body of research does not substantiate the assumption that cancer resulting from exposure to SBR granulate infills in artificial turf could potentially occur.” Prof. Dr. Jiri Dvorak, FIFA, July 2006, ‘An Open Letter concerning the potential cancer risk from certain granulate infills from artificial turf’ 6 Air Quality/ VOCs “It is unlikely that any losses could occur to air or water in concentrations that would pose serious human or environmental risk. This opinion is supported by the reports and academic studies reviewed, which have shown insignificant environmental effects of such chemicals or release of volatiles and particulates into the atmosphere.” British Standards Institute (BSI), the Sports and Play Construction Association (SAPCA), March 2007, ‘Twenty Questions [and Answers] on Rubber Granulate’ “The results of the INERIS Health Risk Evaluation, based on the concentration of the substances and worst-case scenarios, indicate that the VOC and aldehyde emissions from the three types of artificial grass fields studied in small and poorly ventilated indoor gymnasium situations are of no cause for concern for human health, for the workers installing the surfaces as well as for the general public, professional or amateur athletes, adults and children. In conclusion to its study, the INERIS stipulates that the health risks associated with the inhalation of VOC and aldehydes emitted by artificial grass fields in outdoor situations give no cause for concern towards human health.” Aliapur & Ademe (Environmental French Agency), 2007, ‘Environmental and Health Evaluation of the Use of Elastomer Granulates (Virgin and from Used Tyres) as Filling in Third-Generation Artificial Turf’ ‘indoor gymnasium situations are of no cause for concern for human health’ 7 WATER Quality “The artificial (FieldTurf) field at Tabor Academy does not pose a threat to water quality or aquatic life. Water samples taken from the field in 2013 were tested for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury and zinc.” Camp, Dresser, McKee and Smith, Inc, “Tabor Academy – Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Evaluation (March 2014)” “There is no significant threat from chemicals leaching into surface water and groundwater. While some chemicals can be released from crumb rubber over time, they are in small concentrations and are reduced by absorption, degradation and dilution - resulting in no significant impact on groundwater or surface water.“ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation & New York State Department of Health, May 2009, ‘An Assessment of Chemical Leaching, Releases to Air and Temperature at Crumb-Rubber Infilled Synthetic Fields’ “The evaluation of the stormwater drainage quality from synthetic turf athletic fields included the collection and analysis of eight water samples over a period of approximately one year from three different fields, the collection and analysis of samples of crumb rubber in-fill from the same three fields plus a sample of raw crumb rubber obtained from the manufacturer, and the evaluation of the effect of the stone base material on the pH of the drainage water. The results of the study indicate that the actual stormwater drainage from the fields allows for the complete survival of the test species called Daphnia pulex. An analysis of the concentration of metals in the actual drainage water indicates that metals do not leach in amounts that would be considered a risk to aquatic life as compared to existing water quality standards. Analysis of the laboratory based leaching potential of metals in accordance with acceptable EPA methods indicates that metals will leach from the crumb rubber but in concentrations that are within ranges that could be expected to leach from native soil.” Milone & MacBroom, engineering, landscape architecture, and environmental science firm based in Connecticut, December 2008, ‘Evaluation of the Environmental Effects of Synthetic Turf Athletic Fields’ ‘no basis for health or environmental concern due to leaching of hazardous materials’ “Given that undiluted runoff is not likely and that three months is an outside estimate of the duration of toxicity, it is doubtful that tire crumb would present a significant risk of contamination in receiving surface waters or groundwater.” Enviro-Test Laboratories, Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, July 2003, ‘Toxicological Evaluation for the Hazard Assessment of Tire Crumb for Use in Public Playgrounds’ “Several recent studies explored this concern in great depth and found no basis for health or environmental concern due to leaching of hazardous materials from synthetic turf installations, similar to the one at Maple Park. REAC believes that there is sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the field design at Maple Park poses no risk to the local environment in Ridgewood.” Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC) January-October 2009, ‘Assessment of Environmental, Health and Human Safety Concerns Related to the Synthetic Turf Surface at Maple Park in Ridgewood, NJ’ 8 PAHS / CANCER RISK “The SVOCs identified based on library matches of their mass spectra were not present in toxicological databases evaluated and many are ubiquitous parts of consumer products. Similarly, the metal concentrations measured in field samples indicate that the risk would be de minimis among all populations expected to use artificial turf fields” Brian T. Pavilonis, Clifford P. Weisel, Brian Buckley, and Paul J. Lioy., “Bioaccessibility and Risk Exposure to Metals and SVOC’s in Artificial Turf Field Fill Materials and Fibers (2013)” “The uptake of PAH of football players active on artificial grass fields with rubber crumb infill is minimal. If there is any exposure, then the uptake is very limited and within the range of uptake of PAH from environmental sources and/or diet.” Joost G. M. van Rooij, Frans J. Jongeneelen, “Hydroxypyrene in urine of football players after playing on artificial sports field with tire crumb infill (December 2008)” “…risk is well below the di minimis level of 1 x 10-6 (one in one million), generally considered an acceptable cancer risk due to its small magnitude compared to the overall cancer rate” Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment / California Integrated Waste Management Board, “Evaluation of Health Effects of Recycled Waste Tires in Playground and Track Products (January 2007)” “Genotoxicity testing of tire crumb samples following solvent extraction concluded that no DNA or chromosome-damaging chemicals were present. This suggests that ingestion of small amounts of tire crumb by small children will not result in an unacceptable hazard of contracting cancer.” Enviro-Test Laboratories, Alberta Centre for Injury Control and Research, Department of Public Health Sciences “Toxicological Evaluation for the Hazard Assessment of Tire Crumb for Use in Public Playgrounds (July 2003)” ‘‘the uptake is within the range of uptake of PAH from other environmental sources or diet’’ 9 PAHS / CANCER RISK “The uptake of PAH by athletes who have contact with crumb rubber synthetic turf is negligible.” University of California, Berkeley and the Corporation for Manufacturing Excellence (Manex), “Review of the Impacts of Crumb Rubber in Artificial Turf Applications (February 2010)” “Based upon the information reviewed on PAH exposure in humans and the results of the PAH air testing performed by J.C. Broderick & Associates, the potential for exposure to PAHs during normal use of the athletic field at Schreiber and Comsewogue appears to be minimal or insignificant.” J.C. Broderick & Associates, commissioned by Schreiber High School and Comsewogue High School (NY), October 2007, ‘Ambient Air Sampling for PAH’s’ “The studies to date have concluded that PAHs (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons) are not released or at most negligibly released from tyre abradate (The University of Dortmund Institute for Environmental Research 1997). Epidemiological studies conducted by the Health Effects Institute, The World Health Organisation and other investigators do not implicate tyre wear particles in ambient air as contributing to human health effects (respiratory and cardiovascular diseases).” Prof. Dr. Jiri Dvorak, FIFA, July 2006, ‘An Open Letter concerning the potential cancer risk from certain granulate infills from artificial turf’ “The majority of the studies have been on higher surface area particles and have concluded they are currently acceptable. Therefore the larger granules used in artificial turf will have even less potential for emissions. For example a study undertaken by the Danish Ministry of the Environment concluded that the health risk on children’s playgrounds that contained both worn tyres and granulate rubber was insignificant. The available body of research does not substantiate the assumption that cancer resulting from exposure to SBR granulate infills in artificial turf could potentially occur.” Prof. Dr. Jiri Dvorak, FIFA, July 2006, ‘An Open Letter concerning the potential cancer risk from certain granulate infills from artificial turf’ 10 MRSA/Staph The spread of MRSA has prompted parents and other concerned citizens to rightfully question why their children are getting sick. Recent research has proven that synthetic turf does not play a role in promoting MRSA/staph and the concerns are often brought on by companies or lobbyists with a vested interest in antimicrobial products. Research at Penn State confirms that Staph is not an issue on turf and that natural grass harbors more bacteria. http://plantscience.psu.edu/research/centers/ssrc/research/synthetic-turfresearch-penn-state In conclusion, there are generally lower numbers of total microbes present in the infill or fibers of the synthetic turf systems tested compared to natural turfgrass rootzones and Staphylococcus aureus bacterium were not found on any of the playing surfaces. Staphylococcus aureus bacterium were found on towels and other devices used by athletes. Under non-extreme temperature and very limited light conditions present during the indoor portion of this study, S. aureus survived on both synthetic and natural turfgrass for multiple days. However, the bacteria do not appear to thrive under these conditions as the numbers of surviving bacteria decrease significantly with time. http://plantscience.psu.edu/research/centers/ssrc/documents/human-healthissues-on-synthetic-turf-in-the-usa.pdf Based on the findings of the S. aureus survey, concern that infilled synthetic turf harbours and provides a breeding ground for S. aureus bacteria is unwarranted within the context of this study. S. aureus bacteria were found on a number of surfaces that athletes commonly come into contact with, such as towels and blocking pads; however, the tested synthetic turf did not contain any S. aureus. It is important to note that synthetic turf is more abrasive than natural turf grass and, as a result, breaks in the skin are more common, creating a pathway for infection when in contact with an infected surface. The “Recommended Practices for the Maintenance of Infill Surfaces for NFL Games” states that “Clubs should not use antimicrobial agents on infill turf surfaces. The medical and scientific communities have not documented any benefit of using such agents on infill turf surfaces and there may be potential disbenefit to doing so.” 11 RP 4: Anti-Bacterial Agents Recommendation recap: MRSA/Staph The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not recognize infill turf as a significant source of MRSA infections. [See Appendix E] As the CDC has stated “[t]here is a lack of evidence that large-scale use (e.g., spraying or fogging rooms or surfaces) of disinfectants will prevent MRSA infections more effectively than a more targeted approach of cleaning frequently-touched surfaces.” [See Appendix E] This RP should not be interpreted as preventing the use of cleansing agents such as detergents and soaps to clean infill turf surfaces provided that such cleaning is performed in accordance with the recommendations of the applicable turf and cleaning agent manufacturers. References on the Use of Anti-Bacterial Agents: Aureden, K. and S. Garber. 2003. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections Among Competitive Sports Participants --- Colorado, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Los Angeles County, 2000– 2003. MMWR 52(33);793-795. http://www.apic.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Reports1&Template=/CM/ ContentDisplay.cf m&ContentFileID=4262 Begier et al. 2004. A High-Morbidity Outbreak of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Players on a College Football Team, Facilitated by Cosmetic Body Shaving and Turf Burns. Clin Inf Dis;39:1446–53. Kazakova et al. 2005. A Clone of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Professional Football Players. N Engl J Med;352:468-75. McNitt, A.S. 2005. Synthetic turf in the USA - Trends and issues. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10:27-33. McNitt, A.S., D.M. Petrunak, and T.J. Serensits. 2008. A Survey for the Presence of Staphylococcus aureus in the Infill Media of Synthetic Turf. Acta Horticulture. 783:567-572. http://cropsoil.psu.edu/ssrc/research/microbial “Outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant strains of staph last year gained significant media attention, resulting in the temporary closing of school buildings and athletic facilities. Our research found that infilled synthetic turf systems do not harbor significant populations of staph bacteria to warrant concern.” Dr. Andrew McNitt, Associate Professor of Soil Science at Penn State University, June 2007, ‘A Survey of Microbial Populations in Infilled Synthetic Turf Fields’ 12 MRSA/Staph The California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment conducted a review of available literature entitled, Chemicals and Particulates in the Air Above the New Generation of Artificial Turf Playing Fields, and Artificial Turf as a Risk Factor for Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). The review concluded that “there is a negligible human health risk from inhaling the air above synthetic turf and it is unlikely that the new generation of artificial turf is itself a source of MRSA.” California EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, July 2009, ‘Chemicals and Particulates in the Air Above the New Generation of Artificial Turf Playing Fields, and Artificial Turf as a Risk Factor for Infection by MethicillinResistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)’ “This confirms what we thought all along,” Cole said. “The speed with which we obtained the results is a testament to how clean things are there.” Allegheny County Health Department, October 2007 “There is no data to suggest that turf will ever spread MRSA. We sampled the turf for the Rams’ investigation and didn’t find it. We actually observed the game. We mapped where the contact on the turf occurred. We sampled those areas where the players were tackled. And then we sampled areas where there wasn’t any direct contact to the turf. We didn’t find any Staph or MRSA.” Jeff Hageman, Centers for Disease Control, May 2006 ‘there is no connection between current generation synthetic surfaces and MRSA infections’ “In the outbreaks of MRSA, the environment has not played a significant role in the transmission of MRSA. MRSA is transmitted most frequently by direct skin-to-skin contact. You can protect yourself from infections by practicing good hygiene (e.g., keeping your hands clean by washing with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand rub and showering after working out); covering any open skin area such as abrasions or cuts with a clean dry bandage; avoiding sharing personal items such as towels or razors; using a barrier (e.g., clothing or a towel) between your skin and shared equipment; and wiping surfaces of equipment before and after use.” Centers for Disease Control, February 2005 “We have an injury reporting tracking system and it’s limited by sample size, but we haven’t had any linkage to turf,” said the NCAA’s David Klossner. “I know there have been some reports in the media. The CDC continues to tell us that the turf is not a harbor for this MRSA/staph infection. And if things are handled appropriately as far as hygiene practices, common sense, and wound cleaning and coverage, then a lot of these things can be prevented.” NCAA Director of Health and Safety, David Klossner, November 2006 “MRSA infection has never been reported in connection with the synthetic surface at Maple Park or similar field designs. Several studies have proven that there is no connection between current generation synthetic surfaces and MRSA infections.” Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC) January-October 2009, ‘Assessment of Environmental, Health and Human Safety Concerns Related to the Synthetic Turf Surface at Maple Park in Ridgewood, NJ’ 13 In most climates, heat on synthetic turf fields is not an issue. But on a hot summer day, things outside can get hot. HEAT OVERVIEW Dr. Andy McNitt, head of the Penn State Center for Sports Surface Research, advises trainers to be aware of the heat when practicing in the summer on clear days. He recommends cutting down on practice times, considering pulling players off fields earlier and taking more breaks to cool down. Collected data indicated that the air temperature as measured at a distance of two feet above the synthetic turf surface ranged from one to five degrees greater than the observed ambient air temperature, while the temperature at the same height above the natural turf ranged from 3° F lower to 1° F greater than the ambient air temperature. The measured air temperature at a height of five feet above the synthetic turf more closely approximated the ambient air temperature. Measured air temperatures ranged from 2° F lower to 2° F greater than the ambient air temperature. ‘measured air temperatures ranged from 2° F lower to 2° F greater than the ambient air temperature’ Natural Grass Synthetic Turf Time of day (hrs) Ambient Temperature ̊F ̊F ̊F ̊F ̊F 12:00 101 99 101 103 101 12:30 101 99.7 101 104 101 13:00 103 100 103 104 101 13:30 102 101 102 103 101 14:00 101 100 101 103 101 14:30 99 97 99 104 101 15:00 99 100 99 104 101 Air Temperature 2 feet above surface Air Temperature 5 feet above surface Air Temperature 2 feet above surface Air Temperature 5 feet above surface “The results of the temperature measurements obtained from the fields studied in Connecticut indicate that solar heating of the materials used in the construction of synthetic turf playing surfaces does occur and is most pronounced in the polyethylene and polypropylene fibers used to replicate natural grass, rather than the crumb rubber particles. Rapid cooling of the fibers was noted if the sunlight was interrupted or filtered by clouds. Significant cooling was also noted if water was applied to the synthetic fibers in quantities as low as one ounce per square foot. The elevated temperatures noted for the fibers generally resulted in an air temperature increase of less than five degrees even during periods of calm to low winds.” Milone & MacBroom, engineering, landscape architecture, and environmental science firm based in Connecticut 14 HEAT OVERVIEW “The study entitled ‘Incidence, Mechanisms, and Severity of Game-Related College Football Injuries on FieldTurf versus Natural Grass - A Three Year Prospective Study’, shows that there were double the amount of heat-related illnesses on natural grass playing surfaces compared with FieldTurf artificial turf fields.” Michael C. Meyers, PhD, FACSM, Department of Health and Human Development Montana State University “The ambient air above both surfaces differed by only 3ºF at 12” above the surface and approximately 2ºF at 39” (the approximate chest height of a typical youth athlete). The differences in the ambient air were undetectable without a thermometer. In both cases, the ambient air temperature above the surfaces was slightly higher than the general air temperature.” Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC) January-October 2009, ‘Assessment of Environmental, Health and Human Safety Concerns Related to the Synthetic Turf Surface at Maple Park in Ridgewood, NJ’ ‘there were double the amount of heatrelated illnesses on natural grass playing surfaces compared with FieldTurf artificial turf fields’ 15 LEAD In April 2008, some synthetic turf fields in New Jersey were shut down by the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services for elevated levels of lead. However, test results have since indicated there was no lead in the air, soil or in the dust created by the removal of one of the fields. Both fields were subsequently re-opened. Lead chromate is not lead carbonate, the lead formerly found in paint. This inorganic substance is used to color the synthetic turf fiber. In synthetic turf, the silica-coated, encapsulated pigment particles are used to improve performance characteristics and reduce toxicity. Bioavailability of lead from pigment is extremely low. It is almost completely insoluble, not an inhalation hazard and not readily absorbed by the body if ingested. 16 LEAD “In July 2008, a U.S. Product Safety Commission staff report concluded that synthetic turf fields are OK to install and play on for people of all ages. The evaluation of older and newer synthetic turf fields concluded that ‘young children are not at risk from exposure to lead in these fields.’ The report showed that newer fields had no lead or generally had the lowest lead levels. Although small amounts of lead were detected on the surface of some older fields, none of the tested fields released amounts of lead that would be harmful to children.” U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, July 2008, “CPSC Staff Finds Synthetic Turf Fields OK to Install, OK to Play On” “Testing on FieldTurf fields have consistently shown 10-20 ppms or less than 5% of the lead level regarded as problematic. No cases of elevated blood lead levels in children have been linked to artificial turf on athletic fields in New Jersey and elsewhere.” Center for Disease Control (CDC), June 2008, “Potential Exposure to Lead in Artificial Turf: Public Health Issues, Actions, and Recommendations” “Based on existing HUD Guidelines and EPA standards, lead hazard risk assessments at these four DPR synthetic turf fields did not identify lead hazards.” New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, January 2008 “Lead chromate levels are well below that necessary to cause harm to children and athletes using the popular playing field surfaces. No acute health risks due to use of artificial turf fields, and risks due to chronic and repeated exposure are unlikely.” New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS), April 2008 “A sample of stormwater was collected from the drainage system of two fields on April 28, 2008, and July 24, 2008, respectively. The results showed that lead was not detected in the drainage from either field.” Milone & MacBroom, engineering, landscape architecture, and environmental science firm based in Connecticut, December 2008, ‘Evaluation of the Environmental Effects of Synthetic Turf Athletic Fields’ ‘young children are not at risk from exposure to lead in these fields’ “Because the lead chromate is encapsulated in the fibers, it is presumed not to be bioavailable (is not released through contact) and cannot be absorbed by humans or other living systems. Research shows that contact with, or incidental ingestion of, the fibers or rubber infill poses no health risk.” Ridgewood Environmental Advisory Committee (REAC) January-October 2009, ‘Assessment of Environmental, Health and Human Safety Concerns Related to the Synthetic Turf Surface at Maple Park in Ridgewood, NJ’ 17 what the experts say “The lead levels that were discovered are isolated to the core samples of the turf, and did not appear in the samples of dust, wipes and blades of artificial grass taken from the field - in other words, the lead is encapsulated in the fibers inside the turf and not leaching out to the surface to be ingested.” Patrick Guilmette – PMT Group; premier environmental and consulting engineering firm in NY, NJ, CT, PA “If a green synthetic turf field containing lead chromate is still green, then the lead chromate is still in the yarn. If the Yellow Chromate had leached out, the field would likely be blue. Lead chromate is stable when encapsulated in the fiber into which it is extruded. Being encapsulated in the fiber, the lead in the lead chromate is not readily bio-available - meaning that even if the yarn breaks down, the lead in the complex compound which is lead chromate is not readily absorbed by the body.” Dr. Davis Lee, Ph.D, Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Executive in Residence at the Georgia Institute of Technology School of Polymer, Textile, and Fiber Engineering, April 2008 “In interpreting the health risk from these results, it is important to recognize that people do not ingest the actual turf fibers. The NJ and EPA soil standards of 400 mg/kg are based on an assumption that small children may ingest approximately 100 mg of soil per day through hand to mouth activity. Thus, comparing the concentration of lead in the turf fiber to an acceptable soil lead concentration is not an accurate way to evaluate the human health risk from exposure to lead in turf fibers and is likely to overestimate risk, because the turf fiber is unlikely to be ingested (if at all) to the same extent as lead in soil. The best way to evaluate exposure to lead on synthetic turf fields is to evaluate the dust present on the surface of the field. When people play on the field, they may get dust onto their hands or other exposed skin, and transfer the dust into their mouth through normal hand to mouth activity. Thus, the primary route of exposure we are concerned with is ingestion of dust. Lead has no appreciable absorption through the skin, and the inhalation of dust from the field is expected to be minimal, as any dust is likely to adhere to the turf fiber or rubber crumb padding rather than becoming airborne.” Toxicologist Dr. Barbara D. Beck, a lecturer in Toxicology at Harvard; Former Chief of Air Toxics Staff in Region I EPA; Fellow, Interdisciplinary Programs in Health at the Harvard School of Public Health, May 2008 ‘none of the tested fields released amounts of lead that would be harmful to children’ 18 Concern for a safe and healthy environment is always of paramount importance. Going Green. Eco-friendly. Environmentally safe. These are common phrases heard over and over as we push for a clean, sustainable future. CONCLUSION The recent spate of media coverage concerning artificial/synthetic turf is more hype than fact. It is important to first get the truth from the science. We are not aware of an injury or sickness diagnosed as a result of inhalation, ingestion, or of exposure to any of the components in the FieldTurf system. Research and testing has been and continues to confirm that properly manufactured synthetic turf surfaces are a safe and sizeable contributor to an eco-friendly lifestyle. Many countries have commissioned extensive studies to identify any potential dangers of crumb rubber (SBR). Throughout the years such research and testing has been carried out by world health associations, national health departments, municipal and federal groups, sporting associations, environmental protection groups, government ministries and official bodies. These studies originated mostly in countries where environmental issues are of paramount importance. When the potential dangers were first presented, some countries even prohibited the use of SBR rubber in artificial grass fields. To our knowledge, the countries that originally restricted or prohibited the use of SBR have reversed their position since reviewing the data and results of the comprehensive studies they instituted. The research has been done. The studies exist. Get the facts and find out for yourself. 19 Synthetic Turf Safety Proven With Science Information (800) 724-2969 info@fieldturf.com www.fieldturf.com Annual Maintenance Costs Whether you have been involved in a sports facility management role or not, the process of bringing an artificial turf field to life can be a tricky one. There are many steps and stages that need to be considered in order to ensure that the best interests of your facility, finances and future are being taken care of. In an industry notorious for company bankruptcies and worthless warranties, FieldTurf stands apart. It has always been both innovative AND profitable. Through Tarkett, in operation since 1872, FieldTurf enjoys the strongest equity base in the entire industry. Profitable year after year, the sound financials of the company ensure that our customers’ investments are fully and carefully protected. When it comes time to making a decision which will have a significant and direct impact on the future of your facility, being well informed is the best way to ensure success. Some people with their own agenda attempt to sway people from purchasing synthetic turf citing various unfounded reasons. The research has been done. The studies exist. Get the facts and find out for yourself. 1 2 3 Proven Performance - FieldTurf has what every athletic program needs. The most durable and the safest turf on earth. That reputation was built at America’s Schools one field at a time. Customer Service Track Record - FieldTurf maintains the only fully functioning and self-sufficient team in the business. Financial Stability & Insured Warranty - FieldTurf enjoys the strongest equity base in the entire industry. 4 5 6 Performance Infill - By implementing a three layered silica sand and cryogenic rubber system, FieldTurf fields have been praised as the closest thing to natural grass. True Monofilament Fibers - Featuring a unique and durable spine within each fiber, FieldTurf’s monofilament fibers have been built to last. Quality Control - From the beginning, FieldTurf’s founders recognized that total quality control could only be guaranteed by being masters of their own destiny. FieldTurf’s plants ensure a consistent high quality product and uniform installations around the globe. Design Capabilities - Using FieldTurf’s design/build structure, you can assure that the best team is assembled - the best supplier with the best design team. 7 8 9 10 Installation Experience and Seaming Technology - With so much riding on the quality of the seam construction, FieldTurf has chosen to invest in sewn seams rather than the cheaper glued alternative. (Based on Field Size of 80,000 Square Feet) Natural Grass Field Cost per Use: Natural Grass vs. FieldTurf Maintenance: Base: Incl.; herbicides, pesticides, re-sodding, water, mowing Initial Capital Cost Excavation, preparation, engineering Scheduling possibilities: Year 1 Estimated cost Materials: Average cost per hour of use Sod sq. ft.) Year ($2.75 2 FieldTurf ($5.00 sq. ft.) Year 3 Testing - A long-term, ongoing testing program has proven that FieldTurf is safer than any other turf system and equal to, if not better than, natural grass in most critical areas of player safety. Natural Grass Field $52,500.00 x 10 yrs $525,000.00 Natural Grass Field $1,065,000.00 $540,000 40 hrs x 25 Same weeks x 10 years New Sod, Drainage, Irrigation $320,000.00 = 10,000 hours $52,500 FieldTurf $5,000.00 x 10 yrs Field $50,000.00 FieldTurf Field $770,000.00 $720,000 Same x 10 years 68 hrs x 44 weeks $320,000.00 = $5,000 29,920 hours $220,000.00 $52,500 $5,000 $400,000.00 $5,000 $106.50 $52,500 $25.74 Year 4 Maintenance: Incl.; 5herbicides, pesticides, re-sodding, water, mowing Year Scheduling possibilities: Year 6 Initial Capital Cost Year 7 Average cost per hour of use Year 1 Year 8 Year 9 Year 2 Year 10 Year 3 Ten Year Total $5,000 $52,500.00 $52,500 x 10 yrs $525,000.00 $5,000.00 x 10 yrs $50,000.00 $1,065,000.00 $770,000.00 $52,500 $5,000 Natural Grass Field FieldTurf 40 hrs x 25 weeks x 10 years 68 hrs x 44 weeks Field x 10 years $52,500 $5,000 = 10,000 hours =$720,000 29,920 hours $540,000 $52,500 $5,000 $25.74 New Sod, $106.50 Drainage, Irrigation $5,000 $52,500 $5,000 $52,500 $52,500 $5,000 $52,500 $5,000 Size of 80,000 $52,500Square Feet) $5,000 $52,500 $5,000 10 Year Cost Analysis (Based on Field $1,065,000* Year 4 $52,500 Natural Grass Field *Does not include downtime for re-sodding/ seeding, or unplayable field conditions. Year 5 $52,500 Initial Capital Cost $540,000 Year Year 6 1 New Sod,$52,500 Drainage, Irrigation $770,000 $5,000Field FieldTurf $5,000 $720,000 $5,000 $5,000 Year 7 $52,500 $5,000 Year 8 2 $52,500 $5,000 Year 9 3 $52,500 $5,000 Year 10 4 $52,500 $5,000 $1,065,000* $52,500 $770,000 $5,000 Ten Year 5Year Total Long-Term Cost Savings - Despite having a higher initial sticker price, FieldTurf still offers potential savings of almost $1,000,000.00. FieldTurf Field Mowing Equipment $7,068.00 Labor Cost ($20/Hour) $6,000.00 $1000.00 Clipping Removal $2,861.00 Fertilization $4,856.00 Overseeding $466.00 Coring $2,848.00 Topdressing $9,565.00 Thatch Removal $185.00 Natural$846.00 Grass Field FieldTurf Field Monitor Irrigation Equipment Depreciation and Fuel $3,500.00 $1,500.00 Mowing Equipment $7,068.00 Labor $6,000.00 $1000.00 Water Cost ($20/Hour) $5,400.00 Clipping Removal $2,861.00 Re-Striping Field Lines: $1000.00 Labor $5,800.00 Fertilization $4,856.00 $1500.00 Material $3,105.00 Overseeding $466.00 Coring $2,848.00 Total $52,500.00 $5,000 Topdressing Natural$9,565.00 Grass Field FieldTurf Field Thatch Removal $185.00 Mowing Equipment $7,068.00 MonitorCost Irrigation $846.00 Labor ($20/Hour) $6,000.00 $1000.00 Equipment Depreciation and Fuel $3,500.00 $1,500.00 Clipping Removal $2,861.00 Water Cost $5,400.00 Fertilization $4,856.00 Re-Striping Field Lines: Overseeding Natural$466.00 Grass Field FieldTurf Field $1000.00 Labor $5,800.00 Coring $2,848.00 Base: $1500.00 Material $3,105.00 Topdressingpreparation, engineering $9,565.00 Excavation, Same Same TotalRemoval $52,500.00 $5,000 Thatch $185.00 Estimated cost $320,000.00 $320,000.00 Monitor Irrigation $846.00 Materials: Equipment and Fuel $3,500.00 $1,500.00 Sod ($2.75 Depreciation sq. ft.) $220,000.00 Water Cost $5,400.00 FieldTurf ($5.00 sq. ft.) $400,000.00 Re-Striping Field Lines: (Based on Field Size of 80,000 Feet) Maintenance: $52,500.00 x$5,800.00 10 yrs Square $525,000.00 $5,000.00$1000.00 x 10 yrs $50,000.00 Labor Incl.; herbicides, pesticides, re-sodding, water, mowing $1,065,000.00 $770,000.00 $1500.00Field Material $3,105.00 Natural Grass Field FieldTurf Scheduling possibilities: 40 hrs x 25 weeks x 10 years 68 hrs x 44 weeks x 10 years Total $52,500.00 $5,000 Base: = 10,000 hours = 29,920 hours Excavation, preparation, engineering Same Same Average cost per hour of use $106.50 $25.74 Estimated cost $320,000.00 $320,000.00 Materials: Sod ($2.75 sq. ft.) $220,000.00 FieldTurf ($5.00 sq. ft.) $400,000.00 Year 6 *Does not include downtime for re-sodding/ seeding, or unplayable field$52,500 conditions. Year 7 $52,500 $5,000 $5,000 Year 8 $52,500 $5,000 Year 9 $52,500 $5,000 Year 10 Ten Year Total $52,500 $5,000 $1,065,000* $770,000 *Does not include downtime for re-sodding/ seeding, or unplayable field conditions. 1-800-724-2969 | email: info@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com Profitability Study – FieldTurf vs. Natural Grass Many of our current clients selected FieldTurf despite low-ball offers of almost $100,000 less from other turf companies. Why are they so happy with spending more? Because they did their research and opted for the long-term durability and consistency that only the FieldTurf system can bring to their programs. Years after installing FieldTurf, our clients are not only thrilled with their purchase but many have enjoyed a significant return on their investment – even after 10 years! Playable hours per year 68 hours/week X 44 playable weeks Total: Average field rental rate/hour 2,992 hrs/year $100.00/hour Potential field income/year Playable hours/year Average field rental rate/hour Potential field income/year 2,992 $100.00 $299,200 These figures are based on average playable hours in a year and typical field rental costs across different climates and locations. Historically, FieldTurf fields have been rented for a higher dollar amount than grass fields. Natural Grass Playable hours per year 40 hours/week x 25 playable weeks (Downtime, re-sodding) Total: Average field rental rate/hour FieldTurf was not engineered to be the lowest bid. It was engineered to be the best product. As the years go by, the FieldTurf system will not only be safer and play more consistently, but will need less maintenance and will last much longer than our competitors’ fields. Many in the industry like to make such claims, but simply have no proof to support it. FieldTurf fields have been in the ground for over 10 years of consistent play, season after season. Quality is the primary determinant for the return on your investment. Artificial Grass Fields Still in Daily Use FieldTurf Competition Combined 5 + years old 1087 90 6 + years old 765 35 7 + years old 538 14 8 + years old 360 7 9 + years old 235 1 10 + years old 116 0 11 + years old 54 0 12 + years old 15 0 13 + years old 4 0 Statistics as of June 2009 1,000 hours/year $75.00/hour Potential field income/year Playable hours/year Average field rental rate/hour Potential field income/year 1,000 $75.00 $75,000 1-800-724-2969 | email: info@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com FieldTurf and the Environment Bio-Mechanical Properties for Safety & Performance FieldTurf uses only approved and tested materials in all of its products. These have been tested to confirm yet again that FieldTurf’s products are safe for all players, coaches and anyone else who steps on a FieldTurf field. A long-term, ongoing testing program has proven that FieldTurf is safer than any other turf system and equal to, if not better than, natural grass in most critical areas of player safety. No other company can make such a claim. Independent safety tests and in-house performance testing have been an integral part of our business philosophy since the very first field we installed. Testing proves that on FieldTurf: Traction, from a sports medicine standpoint, is better. Torsional release, critical to minimize non-contact knee and ankle injuries, is quicker. Shock attenuation properties are ideal - in fact, vs. natural grass, FieldTurf reduced neural injuries by 55% and cranial/ cervical injuries by 47%. The installation of FieldTurf eliminates the use of harmful pesticides, fertilizers, herbicides and fungicides, while at the same time removes thousands of tires from landfill sites. FieldTurf requires no mowing, fertilizing, reseeding or watering and promotes a healthy lifestyle. FieldTurf helps organizations earn the necessary points needed for U.S. Green Building Council LEED certification. FieldTurf’s reused rubber content and water use reduction, among other factors, can contribute multiple points towards LEED certification. The components in the FieldTurf system, installed on more than 3500 fields worldwide, have a positive impact on the environment. The FieldTurf system has worked wonders for organizations all over the world as a product that reduces water consumption and pollution caused by chemical use, while increasing playing time, reducing injuries and promoting a healthy lifestyle. FieldTurf saves a billion gallons of fresh water every year. Coupled with reduced labor costs related to maintenance, equipment and elimination of costs for supplies such as fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides, many of our clients report a reduction in maintenance costs of as much as $60,000 per field, per year. “We’re very happy to have FieldTurf join the GreenScapes team in our efforts to help to prevent pollution and conserve resources in our landscapes,” stated U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Greenscapes Program Manager, Jean Schwab. Hundreds of studies have been completed to discover the truth about any potential risks of artificial turf. Government health ministries and environmental bodies around the world have commissioned extensive research. So have world health organizations, leading universities and independent scientific committees. Elected officials have reacted to the concerns of their constituents by commissioning studies to get the facts. The research has been done. The studies exist. Get the facts and find out for yourself. Read what the experts have to say in independent testing, studies and reports on the potential health and environmental impact of artificial turf. For more information on FieldTurf and the Environment, please visit www.fieldturf.com/environmental-responsibility • • • We’re committed to your safety! No one tests like FieldTurf. Our safety is a proven fact, not an empty claim. INJURY INCIDENCE, ETIOLOGY, AND SEVERITY OF GAME RELATED HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL INJURIES ON FIELDTURF VERSUS NATURAL GRASS: New England Journal of Medicine - October, 2004 55% Fewer Neural Injuries Type of Tissue Injured - Based on the total percentage of injuries reported on each playing surface, a significantly greater percentage of neural injuries were reported on Natural Grass vs. FieldTurf. (16.8% Natural Grass vs. 7.5% FieldTurf) 47% Fewer Cranial / Cervical Injuries Anatomic Location of Injury - More cranial / cervical injuries were reported on Natural Grass than on FieldTurf. (19.2% Natural Grass vs. 10.2% FieldTurf) 45% Less Time Lost to Injury Injury Time Loss / 22+ Days - Injuries which resulted in a time loss of 22 days or more were reported more frequently on Natural Grass than on FieldTurf. (13.6% Natural Grass vs. 7.5% FieldTurf) 38% Fewer 3rd Degree Injuries Injury Grade - More 3rd degree injuries were reported on Natural Grass than on FieldTurf. (12.8% Natural Grass vs. 7.9% FieldTurf) 35% Less Time Lost to Injury Injury Time Loss / 1 - 2 Days - A significantly greater percentage of injuries resulting in a 1-2 day time loss were reported on Natural Grass vs. FieldTurf. (28.0% Natural Grass vs. 18.4% FieldTurf) Over a five year period of competitive play, significant differences in the incidence, type and severity of game-related injuries were observed between playing surfaces. In regards to reducing the number of game-related, high school football injuries, current findings suggest an advantage in selecting FieldTurf over Natural Grass. A FIVE-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY - MARCH 2003; - Bill S. Barnhill, MD; Michael Myers, PHD FASCAM Comparing The Head Impact Response of Three Artificial Turf Systems Laboratory impact tests compared the head response of three artificial turf systems: the FieldTurf system; a system comprised of rubber and sand infill; and a system of all-rubber infill. Drop tests were done from various heights, with impacts to the rear of an instrumented anthropomorphic mannequin headform. The greatest difference was observed at the lower drop heights. Peak headform acceleration was recorded for both helmeted and bare head hits. In helmeted tests, FieldTurf showed the lowest headform Gmax. In bare head tests, FieldTurf showed the lowest headform peak acceleration Gmax. BIOKINETICS AND ASSOCIATES - DECEMBER 2004 City of Sparks, Nevada - Record-Breaking installation of 13 FieldTurf fields 1-800-724-2969 | email: info@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com So you want FieldTurf? Here are the important next steps: • Ask us for our Field Building Handbook that is a comprehensive guide into the world of artificial turf. Everything you need to know about all major facets of the process are explained in this Handbook. • Ensure the assembly of a Planning team that will be able to work with FieldTurf’s representatives and technical experts. A good planning team can make the difference between a poorly executed facility improvement and a well-planned operation. • After obtaining budget numbers, secure funds and/or consider putting together a fund raising team that will drive the campaign and ensure the successful attainment of financial goals. • Consider FieldTurf’s financing option. In order to help make your program’s dreams come true a little quicker, FieldTurf Financial has established a unique financing plan. • Familiarize yourself with typical construction schedules to avoid delays. The sooner you get everything organized the less of a chance the construction will be delayed. • Study the FieldTurf warranty and compare it to other warranties in the artificial turf industry. You will see for yourself that your investment is carefully protected by the largest sports surfacing company in the world. • Educate your team on the maintenance involved with FieldTurf fields. Ensuring that the level of playability remains consistent will depend entirely on your dedication to maintenance and the equipment that you incorporate into your maintenance program. • We will be happy to guide you through the rest of the process - give us a call today to get started on making your field of dreams a reality. (800) 724-2969 | info@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com