COURSE SYLLABUS Spring 2012 PH 662: Motivating Health Behavior Division of Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health College of Health and Human Services, San Diego State University COURSE INFORMATION Class Schedule: Wednesday 4:00-6:40 p.m. Office Hours & Location: Wednesdays 2:00-4:00p.m. and by appointment Instructor: Gregory A. Talavera, MD, MPH Professor, Division of Health Promotion San Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health Primary telephone at BACH (Sky Park): 619-594-4086 gtalaver@mail.sdsu.edu COURSE DESCRIPTION AND GOALS The purpose of this course is to complete an in-depth review of approaches to health promotion and behavioral science interventions in different settings, using varied strategies, and for different target audiences. The course will focus on how to develop and implement interventions and how these might vary across behaviors, settings, strategies, and target groups. The course will emphasize the careful exploration of examples of intervention creation, delivery and effectiveness. Emphasis will be placed on understanding the resources, and other practical considerations necessary to produce, deliver, monitor, and disseminate an intervention with demonstrated effectiveness. COURSE OBJECTIVES Following participation in PH662, students will be able to: 1) 2) 3) 4) Design interventions using different strategies. Design interventions in diverse settings. Design interventions that reach a specific audience, including diverse audiences. Describe the opportunities, advantages, and disadvantages for various interventions using different strategies, in different settings, and for diverse audiences. 5) Identify and obtain existing effective health promotion interventions. 6) Name and describe a selected set of widely employed intervention methods to reduce or eliminate major public health problems 7) List the resources required to create and deliver an effective health promotion intervention, including partners needed. 8) Explain the necessary working groups needed to design, create, deliver, and evaluate a health promotion intervention. 9) List and describe the community collaborations required to successfully deliver a health promotion intervention. 10) Identify the factors that will facilitate long-term adoption, dissemination, and maintenance of a health promotion intervention. REQUIRED READING All readings for PH 662 will be available on Blackboard (https://blackboard.sdsu.edu/) under “Course Documents.” Please bring weekly assigned readings and materials to class, as we may be using them in class. All lecture slides will be posted on Blackboard a minimum of 2 days prior to each lecture. Please see the instructor immediately if you do not have access to this class on Blackboard. 1 COURSE EVALUATION CRITERIA Your performance in the course will be evaluated on the following: Quizzes on readings: It is critical that students come prepared to class by reading the assigned materials and reviewing the lecture material. To encourage reading, over the course of the semester, quizzes will be administered at various times based on the weekly readings and lectures and totaling 20 points. The quizzes can cover the material that will be presented the same day or other articles that were assigned since the last quiz. The readings will be posted on Thursdays or sooner. Note: These quizzes will be unannounced and will be given at the beginning of the class. Quizzes cannot be made up. Group-based Intervention Development: Students will be asked to work in groups and develop intervention components targeting each of the levels of the ecological model. The assignments should include an intervention evaluation component and a description of the theoretical constructs that the intervention is targeting, but the majority should focus on the methods and strategies used to influence behavior (e.g., curriculum, pamphlets, scripts, etc.). The assignment should also be completed with the thought that it might be chosen for presentation at the end of the semester and should be no more than 30 minutes in duration. The intervention presented should NOT be a replica of an existing intervention. However, it can contain components that other interventions have utilized. Students will prepare materials for four intervention levels. Assignment 1: Individual--Health education materials & self-monitoring form (10 points) Assignment 2: Interpersonal--Curriculum design- should be train the trainer model (10 points) Assignment 3: Organizational--Organization restructuring (10 points) Assignment 4: Community/Environmental/policy change strategy (10 points) Class Participation and Group Member Assessment: Class participation is extremely important. Please be prepared to ask questions during lecture and following the guest speakers’ presentations. To ensure equal participation of all group members and to ensure that grading is based on member participation, each student will be given the opportunity to anonymously rate their group members’ performance toward the end of the semester (~Week 14). Note: If you are not physically present during the week that we anonymously rate each other, you cannot receive group participation points. Exam Total points possible Course grades will be assigned as follows based on total points accumulated for the semester: A 96-100 B 84-86 C+ 77-79 CA90-95 B80-83 C 74-76 F B+ 87-89 20 points. 40 points 10points 30 points 100 70-73 <70 COURSE ATTENDANCE POLICY: Students are expected to attend all classes. Unexcused absences, tardiness, and failure to meet deadlines will have a negative impact on the student's final grade. Students who unavoidably miss a class are still responsible for getting that classes’ assignments in on time, getting any new assignments from other students, and completing the work by the assigned due date. Planned absences for religious observances and other reasons: By the end of the second week of classes, students should notify the instructor of planned absences for religious observances, work-related obligations, etc. The instructor will provide appropriate accommodations. 2 INCOMPLETE: Medical emergencies verified by practicing clinicians and limited other emergencies are the basis for an incomplete. STUDENT-INSTRUCTOR RELATIONS: Students and instructor must work collaboratively to establish and maintain a productive learning environment. To that end, a few ground rules will be observed: There are no bad ideas. All ideas are to be treated with respect for their creators and acknowledgement that ideas of all types can contribute to ultimate success. Nonetheless, it is always wise to mentally review any idea before vocalizing it. Constant student/instructor interaction and feedback are extremely important. Everyone is expected to contribute. Standard Procedures – Ground Rules: Cell phones and pagers are to be turned off before class. No laptops open during lectures No assignments will be accepted via email. No late or make-up assignments will be accepted. All assignments are due in hard copy at the beginning of class. If you are unable to attend class on the day an assignment is due, have someone bring the assignment to class for you or leave it in my GSPH mailbox BEFORE 10:00am on the due date. All assignments must be typed using Microsoft Word or a similar word processing program. Required format is double-spaced with a one-inch margin and 12-point font (Arial or Times New Roman is preferred). In addition to spelling, grammar, and writing style, your work will be evaluated based on professional appearance (examples of nonprofessional appearance: crinkled pages, stains, poor staple job). Please edit all written assignments and turn-in written materials that are error-free and meet the quality standards of the university. You are strongly encouraged to keep computer backups of your work to avoid losing information and time. If you have an Authorization for Accommodations form that indicates a need for academic accommodations, please let me know so we can discuss this. Student Disability Services is located in Calpulli Center, Suite 3100 (third floor), (619) 594-6473 and (619) 594-2929 (TDD/TTY). This syllabus may be subject to some change and adjustment throughout the semester in order to accommodate timely, late-breaking topics and events, the unique needs of each student and group of students. Students having any questions regarding assignments, schedules, and other course issues should immediately check with the instructor. ACADEMIC INTEGRETY Academic dishonesty is an affront to the integrity of scholarship at SDSU and a threat to the quality of learning. Violations of academic integrity are noted in the SDSU Statement of Student Rights and Responsibilities: 2.1 Cheating shall be defined as the act of obtaining or attempting to obtain credit for academic work by the use of dishonest, deceptive, or fraudulent means. Examples of cheating include, but are not limited to (a) copying, in part or in whole, from another’s test or other examination; (b) discussing answers or ideas relating to the answers on a test or other examination without the permission of the instructor; (c) obtaining copies of a test, an examination, or other course material without the permission of the instructor; (d) using notes, cheat sheets, or other devices considered inappropriate under the prescribed testing condition; (e) collaborating with another or others in work to be presented without the permission of the instructor; (f) falsifying records, laboratory work, or other course data; (g) submitting work previously presented in another course, if contrary to the rules of the course; (h) altering or interfering with the grading procedures; (i) plagiarizing, as defined; and (j) knowingly and intentionally assisting another student in any of the above. 2.2 Plagiarism shall be defined as the act of incorporating ideas, words, or specific substance of another, whether purchased, borrowed, or otherwise obtained, and submitting same to the University as one’s own work to fulfill academic requirements without giving credit to the appropriate source. Plagiarism shall include but not be limited to (a) submitting work, either in part or in whole, completed by another; (b) omitting footnotes for ideas, statements, facts, or conclusions that belong to another; (c) omitting quotation marks when quoting directly from another, whether it be a paragraph, 3 sentence, or part thereof; (d) close and lengthy paraphrasing of the writings of another; (e) submitting another person’s artistic works, such as musical compositions, photographs, paintings, drawings, or sculptures; and (f) submitting as one’s own work papers purchased from research companies. 3.0 Academic and Punitive Sanctions: Cheating and plagiarism in connection with the academic program at The University may warrant two separate and distinct courses of disciplinary action that may be applied concurrently in response to a violation of this policy: (a) academic sanctions, such as grade modifications; and (b) punitive sanctions, such as probation, suspension, or expulsion. SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES The social and behavioral sciences in public health address the behavioral, social and cultural factors related to individual and population health and health disparities over the life course. Research and practice in this area contributes to the development, administration and evaluation of programs and policies in public health and health services to promote and sustain healthy environments and healthy lives for individuals and populations. Competencies: Upon graduation a student with an MPH should be able to… 1. Identify basic theories, concepts and models from a range of social and behavioral disciplines that are used in public health research and practice. 2. Identify the causes of social and behavioral factors that affect health of individuals and populations. 3. Identify individual, organizational and community concerns, assets, resources and deficits for social and behavioral science interventions. 4. Identify critical stakeholders for the planning, implementation and evaluation of public health programs, policies and interventions. 5. Describe steps and procedures for the planning, implementation and evaluation of public health programs, policies and interventions. 6. Describe the role of social and community factors in both the onset and solution of public health problems. 7. Describe the merits of social and behavioral science interventions and policies. 8. Apply evidence-based approaches in the development and evaluation of social and behavioral science interventions. 9. Apply ethical principles to public health program planning, implementation and evaluation. 10. Specify multiple targets and levels of intervention for social and behavioral science programs and/or policies. 4 CLASS SCHEDULE AND WEEKLY REQUIREMENTS Week Content WK 1 1/18 WK 2 1/25 Individual level Review of theory and how to incorporate into HP practice Review of program planning models WK 3 2/1 Individual level Review principles of individual level Applied Behavioral Analysis Self Monitoring Biofeedback WK 4 2/8 Individual level Motivational Interviewing (Hugo Salgado) Literacy level of print materials Introduction to the course Review syllabus Assign groups Skill Development Activity Notes Readings Evaluating Intervention Articles In class review of an article provided by professor Review abstraction article by Stephanie Zara, pages 44-74 +Brownson et al (2009) Designing materials for individual level interventions Groups begin working on assignment #1 + Elder Ch 12 (Changing the Health Behavior of Individuals) + Delavan-Plomer Ch 9 (Developing and selecting print materials) Readability assessment Literacy assessment +Sevick et al (2008) + Freeman et al (2004) +Jonsson et al (2008) Assignment 1 due WK 5 2/15 WK 6 2/22 TBN Interpersonal: Family & Peers o Review principles of social support and social influence o Design of peer and familybased interventions Designing curriculum pt.1; getting ready for assignment #2 WK 7 2/29 Interpersonal: Family & Peers o Lay health advisor interventions o Health education curriculum design Designing curriculum pt.2; Assign assignment #2 WK 8 3/7 Interpersonal: Family & Peers o Group methods: Support and other groups Assessment of each other’s curriculum 5 +Green et al (2009) + Levensky et al (2007) (MI as evidence-based) +Resnicow et al (2002) (MI in HP) + MI Handout + SMOG readability assessment + Bensley Ch 6 (Support Groups) + Eggers Ch 4 (Focus on Groups) Possible guest speaker + Elder Ch 13 (Modifying the health behavior of groups) +Elder Ayala (2005) (LHA intervention) + NCI’s Trainers Guide for Cancer Education + Bensley Ch 11 (Facilitating Groups) Assignment 2 due in class – bring copies for group members & professor WK 9 3/14 Organizational: Worksites, Schools, & Clinics Review principles of organizational change Worksite Wellness WK 10 3/21 Organizational: Worksites, Schools, & Clinics School-based interventions WK 11 3/28 Spring Recess WK 12 4/4 WK 13 4/11 Training of trainers; assign assignment #3 + Engers et al (2005) (Worksite HP) + Elder Ch 14 (Org Health Promotion) + Elder Ch 9 (Training) + Sharma (2006) +Katz (2009) (School-based HP Interventions) Organizational: Worksites, Schools, & Clinics o Changing primary care practice o Church-based interventions Assessment of each other’s intervention approach Community/Environment/Policy o Review principles of community organizing and social change Intersecting interventions at multiple levels of influence Assignment 3 due in class – bring copies for group members & teacher + Campbell et al (2007) (Church-based HP interventions) +Elder Ayala (1999) (primary care) +Review Body & Soul materials on Blackboard + Bensley Ch 12 (Building and Sustaining Coalitions) + Eggers Ch 6 (Community Org and Development) + Elder Ch 15 (Communitylevel Health Promotion) Assign assignment #4 WK 14 4/18 WK 15 4/25 Presentations of group projects Group presentations/assignments chosen by professor None WK 16 5/2 Presentations of group projects Group presentations/assignments chosen by professor None WK 17 5/9 Exam -- Wed MAY 16TH 1600-1800 + Bensley Ch 13 (Using advocacy to affect policy) + MacDougall Ch 14 (Healthy Public Policy) + Eggers Ch 7 (Environmental adaptation) Community/Environment/Policy o Public health policy o Review principles of environmental change Scheduling Note: The course schedule was created considering the breadth of information available for us to review, the number of weeks available to cover this content, and other factors competing with our schedules (your other classes; holidays, etc). Thus, we are likely to modify this a bit as we progress through the semester. 6