Program Assessment Report PROGRAM INFORMATION Degree Program(s): Creative Arts Department: Department Chair: Chris Jochim Phone: 924-4463 Johanna Movassat Phone: 924-4481 Program Coordinator E-mail: movassat@email.sjsu.edu Report Prepared by: Next Program Review? Humanities 2011-2012 Note: Schedule is posted at: http://www.sjsu.edu/ugs/programplanning/ ARCHIVAL INFORMATION Location: Person to Contact: Clark Hall 419 Johanna Movassat (Bldg/Room #) 924-4481 (Name) (Phone) Does the information (e.g., Mission, Goals, and/or Learning Outcomes) posted on the web (see, http://www.sjsu.edu/ugs/assessment/programs/ ) for this program need to be updated? Yes, the Program Coordinator of Creative Arts will be changing as of July 2008; the new coordinator is Dr. Shannon Riley. Yes If yes, please submit changes to jacqueline.snell@sjsu.edu No SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES* Please complete the schedule of assessment activities below by listing all program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) by number down the left column and indicating when data were/will be collected (C) and when they were/will be discussed (D) by your faculty. You can also schedule/track program changes resulting from your assessment activities by indicating an “I” (implemented changes) where relevant. This schedule is meant to be fluid; providing a proposed schedule for future assessment while at the same time, providing a record of your efforts as the program planning cycle progresses. ↓Semester after Program Review SLOs 1 2 3 4 5 F06 C I D D S07 D C C C Semester before next Program Review↓ F07 S08 C D D D D I I I F08 C I S09 D C C C F09 I C D D D S10 D I I I F10 C I S11 D C C C *Note: This template is based on a five-year program planning cycle. If your program planning follows another cycle (e.g., based on accreditation), please feel free to add (or subtract) columns as necessary. Page 1 of 6 Revised: 04/07/2008 Program Assessment Report Student Learning Outcome #1 Be able to explain clearly and precisely relationships between the various arts, connections and commonalities as well as differences in written and oral communications. RECORD OF ASSESSMENT Begin generating a record of assessment for this Student Learning Outcome in which you record the following areas of assessment activity. Start each entry with the semester in which the activity(s) occurred followed by a description of the activity(s).These dates and activities should correspond with the “Schedule of Assessment Activities” on the first page of this report. I. Data Collection: a. [Fall 06, Data Collection] – For this assessment cycle, how were the data collected and what were the results? CA 172 (one section, 40 students): Data collected in fall 06 was discussed in spring 07. Data included an oral final exam, written assignments and classroom discussions. The final exam called for contrasting art works from different media. This took an oral format, and students had to indicate the difference in medium, focus, and structure between arts forms. Written assignments in relation to field trips to the King Library and to the San Jose Museum of Art gave the students the opportunity to write about definitions of art and how the limitations of those definitions are broken in contemporary forms. Classroom discussion comparing the blues and jazz musicians to Jack Kerouac’s prose style in On the Road also addressed distinctions and overlaps between various arts. The next set of data will be collected in fall 08. II. What have you learn about this Student Learning Outcome? [Spring 07, Data Discussion ] – Based on the results in part I., briefly summarize the discussion surrounding this outcome, i.e., what does the faculty conclude about student learning for this SLO? Students were excited to see the connections between the various arts, especially those in contemporary form. Although most of them were unfamiliar with Jack Kerouac, they began to appreciate the importance of his writings and the influence his style still has on modern arts. III. SAction Item(s) (if necessary): [Fall 08] Based on the discussion in part II., what actions will the department take to improve student learning, e.g., program changes, changes in pedagogy, process changes, resources requests, etc? Starting in fall 08, there will be a new professor for the class. Page 2 of 6 Revised: 04/07/2008 Program Assessment Report Student Learning Outcome #2 Be able to create class projects that demonstrate innovative thinking. RECORD OF ASSESSMENT Begin generating a record of assessment for this Student Learning Outcome in which you record the following areas of assessment activity. Start each entry with the semester in which the activity(s) occurred followed by a description of the activity(s).These dates and activities should correspond with the “Schedule of Assessment Activities” on the first page of this report. I. Data Collection: [Fall 07, Data Collection] – For this assessment cycle, how were the data collected and what were the results? CA 100W (one section, 25 students): Data collected in fall 07 was discussed in spring 08. Data was taken from written assignments which included short essays on works of art in local museums (including San Jose Museum of Art, Cantor Museum, Legion of Honor, De Young Museum, the Asian Art Museum, and MOMA), interviews with local artists (from gallery shows in the Art Building to open studios), research projects on artists/works of art, and essays on various readings in the arts. Quizzes and short in-class essays also added to the data. II. What have you learn about this Student Learning Outcome? [Spring 08, Data Discussion] – Based on the results in part I., briefly summarize the discussion surrounding this outcome, i.e., what does the faculty conclude about student learning for this SLO? Data analysis shows that many students still have difficulties with basic grammar issues and the organization of final essays. Faculty discussed ways in which specific exercises or assignments can address these issues, using a five-step process towards building up final essays, including various pre-writing exercises. The class was not taught in spring 08 and will have a new professor in fall 08. III. Action Item(s) (if necessary): [Fall 08, Implementation] – Based on the discussion in part II., what actions will the department take to improve student learning, e.g., program changes, changes in pedagogy, process changes, resources requests, etc? The class will have a new professor in the fall, one who has taught 100W successfully many times in the past. It is felt that this will enhance the learning of the students. Page 3 of 6 Revised: 04/07/2008 Program Assessment Report Student Learning Outcome #3 Be able to demonstrate an understanding of the diversity of the arts of various world cultures. This would include the ability to explain relationships between the arts within a particular culture and between the arts of various cultures. RECORD OF ASSESSMENT Begin generating a record of assessment for this Student Learning Outcome in which you record the following areas of assessment activity. Start each entry with the semester in which the activity(s) occurred followed by a description of the activity(s).These dates and activities should correspond with the “Schedule of Assessment Activities” on the first page of this report. I. Data Collection: [Spring 07, Data Collection] – For this assessment cycle, how were the data collected and what were the results? CA 173 (one section, 40 students): Data collected from spring 07 was discussed. Data included material from written assignments, class discussions, written responses to the class discussions, and the final take home exam. The written assignments included discussions/analyses of the various visiting lectures presenting on such arts as Taiko drumming, South African Contemporary Music, Silk Road and the Movement of Silk, African Masks, Islamic Architecture and the Infinite, Modern Film including Central Station (Brazil) and Children of Heaven (Iran), Chinese painting and Japanese woodblock prints, and the Loss of Threatened Heritage (UNESCO and the World Heritage Sites), to name a few. One of the written assignments, for example, asked students to explain the relationships of apartheid and the present political situation to the development of musical forms in South Africa over the past century (i.e. Gumboot music and dance), and how it has been affected to international, specifically American, musical trends (i.e. Rap) and instrument innovation (the computer and the synthesizer). II. What have you learn about this Student Learning Outcome? [Fall 07, Data Discussion] – Based on the results in part I., briefly summarize the discussion surrounding this outcome, i.e., what does the faculty conclude about student learning for this SLO? Because of the fluid nature of this course, and the need for it to include the latest information regarding such things as UNESCO and World Heritage sites, it is imperative that students be exposed to a continually updated and extensive list of readings, that guest lecturers from a wide variety of the arts be included, and that topics on the “cutting edge” of the arts be included. III. Action Item(s) (if necessary): [Spring 08] – Based on the discussion in part II., what actions will the department take to improve student learning, e.g., program changes, changes in pedagogy, process changes, resources requests, etc? At this time, no changes have been made or will be made until it is apparent who will be teaching the class in spring 09. Page 4 of 6 Revised: 04/07/2008 Program Assessment Report Student Learning Outcome #4 Demonstrate the ability to collaborate effectively with other students in the completion of teach projects assigned in Creative Arts courses. RECORD OF ASSESSMENT Begin generating a record of assessment for this Student Learning Outcome in which you record the following areas of assessment activity. Start each entry with the semester in which the activity(s) occurred followed by a description of the activity(s).These dates and activities should correspond with the “Schedule of Assessment Activities” on the first page of this report. IV. Data Collection: [Spring 07, Data Collection] – For this assessment cycle, how were the data collected and what were the results? CA 173 (one section, 40 students): Data collected from spring 07 was discussed. Data included evaluations and responses to the various oral presentations made by teams of students. Each team presented on some aspect of the arts and the affects of globalization. The topics ranged as broadly as the evolution of Taiko drumming in Japan and its American development, 16th century woven silk and its affect on the European market as an example of globalization of the art world in the past, preservation and its affect on local economies of World Heritage sites by UNESCO, the development of graphic design in Europe and its development in America, art of puppetry from Thailand, and international “food fusion”, to name a few. V. What have you learn about this Student Learning Outcome? [Fall 07, Data Discussion] – Based on the results in part I., briefly summarize the discussion surrounding this outcome, i.e., what does the faculty conclude about student learning for this SLO? The oral presentations done by teams of students has proven to be an excellent way for students to demonstrate their understanding of the issues brought up in the various class discussions and by the guest lecturers. Because students are also required to evaluate their performance as well as that of other students, it makes them aware of additional issues that students may or may not have included in the presentations. VI. Action Item(s) (if necessary): [Spring 08] – Based on the discussion in part II., what actions will the department take to improve student learning, e.g., program changes, changes in pedagogy, process changes, resources requests, etc? At this time, no changes will be made until it is apparent who will be teaching the class in spring 09. Page 5 of 6 Revised: 04/07/2008 Program Assessment Report Student Learning Outcome #5 Unique to Teacher Preparation Majors. Be able to identify the connections between the arts and other core subjects taught in California classrooms. RECORD OF ASSESSMENT Begin generating a record of assessment for this Student Learning Outcome in which you record the following areas of assessment activity. Start each entry with the semester in which the activity(s) occurred followed by a description of the activity(s).These dates and activities should correspond with the “Schedule of Assessment Activities” on the first page of this report. VII. Data Collection: [Spring 07, Data Collection] – For this assessment cycle, how were the data collected and what were the results? CA 177 (one section, 40 students): Data collected from spring 07 was discussed. As this was the first time such data collection was done, materials discussed included written assignments, quizzes and a midterm, group chapter teaching, class participation, and a service learning final. The written assignments included the creation of lesson plans based upon identifying the connections between the arts and core subjects taught in California classrooms. Field trips to visit classrooms and analyze teaching methods were also addressed in the group chapter teaching project, in which students demonstrated effective teaching methods as presented in the visited classroom. VIII. What have you learn about this Student Learning Outcome? [Fall 07, Data Discussion] – Based on the results in part I., briefly summarize the discussion surrounding this outcome, i.e., what does the faculty conclude about student learning for this SLO? No changes to be made to this particular format. IX. Action Item(s) (if necessary): [Spring 08] – Based on the discussion in part II., what actions will the department take to improve student learning, e.g., program changes, changes in pedagogy, process changes, resources requests, etc? Because of a change in the organization of the class in spring 08, in which another section was introduced and two lecturers took part in organizing the two sections, sharing the class time, one focusing on the visual arts, and the other focusing on the performing arts, new data will not be collected on this format until spring 09. This new format has the advantage of exposing students to more aspects of the arts; however, it will remain to be seen if this format will be maintained with current budget restrictions. Page 6 of 6 Revised: 04/07/2008