Cynthia Chory PS/IS 187Hudson Cliffs 349 Cabrini Boulevard New York, NY 10040 Move from “good to great” by implementing Data Binders in each content area to record daily authentic assessment of each child, thus allowing for differentiated instruction. Learn to understand data and make decisions based on that understanding. Process Professional Development (on all levels – including administration) Established a flow of information Data Specialist Team formed by teachers who exhibited strong tech skills to begin to analyze test score data for patterns and trends. Tracked Student Progress. We decided to look at a small cohort of specific students and track their progress in Literacy. We soon realized that really using data requires leadership, training, and the development of a culture of use. Enter the data binder. Teachers, working in departments, in gradeteams, and as a staff, met periodically to discuss data, examine data binders to share best practices and sometimes to focus on the needs of a particular student based on the data accrued. During those meetings, they had to determine ways to gather evidence while keeping it manageable within a teacher’s busy day. Outcomes First and foremost, we learned that this process had to be streamlined to include: what the students will learn and be able to do what type of evidence will be accepted as indicators of success We are currently in the process of coming up with a list of “nonnegotiables” that will be a part of all teachers’ data binders in the future. 36 This is challenging because of different ways that teachers assess students (including Reading levels – according to TC, Fountas and Pinnell…). We have also seen that Content Area Teachers have different needs than those of Literacy Teachers so it’s difficult to create a “one size fits all” data binder. We have learned to use several technology programs to allow teachers to readily access data but this is still difficult. Teachers and administrators require more PD regarding data analysis, designing assessment instruments, implementing various forms of assessment, and understanding which assessment to use to provide the desired information. We also have scheduled several meetings (prior to the end of the year) where teachers will meet collaboratively (ex. Grade 7 teachers will meet with future Grade 8 teachers) to discuss information obtained about each student. By doing this, teachers will know where their work needs to begin. Lessons Learned I learned that the key assumption for effective distributed leadership is not which functions or task can be delegated completely to an individual or group of individuals, but what level of involvement in those functions or task is most appropriate and strategic for the principal to fulfill. I think I have to redefine leadership as relationships. The focus has to shift to how people interact with one another to make change happen – their personal connections, mutual respect, and shared knowledge. To be effective any strategy must be integrated with existing systems, and processes, rather than requiring new teams, additional meetings…etc. The focus of these systems and processes will then reflect a deeper understanding and discussion of people, potential, and most important results. 37