Energy Efficiency Budget Justification for Significant Increase in Energy Efficiency Utility Budget 1 August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Recommendations 2 Current Spending – $30.75 million / year Increase to $52.5 million in 2009 Transition to $85 million / year by 2011 August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Vermont Law Budget Must Capture All Reasonably Available Cost Effective Efficiency Savings as Rapidly as Possible Statutory Standards 30 V.S.A. § 209 “As circumstances and programs evolve, the amount of the charge shall be reviewed for unrealized energy efficiency potential and shall be adjusted as necessary in order to realize all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency savings.” 209(d)(4) 3 “Provide for delivery of these programs as rapidly as possible, taking into consideration the need for these services, and cost-effective delivery mechanisms.” 209(e)(9). August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Need for Increased Energy Efficiency Investment Statutory Standards PSB Decisions 4 “Ensure that the energy efficiency programs implemented under this section are designed to make continuous and proportional progress toward attaining the overall state building efficiency goals established by 10 V.S.A. s. 581, by promoting all forms of energy end-use efficiency and comprehensive sustainable building design.” 209(e)(15). Docket #5270 (1990) (potential of efficiency) Docket #5980 (1999) (Energy Efficiency Charge) Docket #6777 (2002) (Value of efficiency measures) Docket #6860 (2005) (Efficiency in transmission expansion) Docket #7081 (2007) (Efficiency in transmission planning) August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Need for Increased Energy Efficiency Investment 2006 EEU Budget Order 5 Recognized higher budget level justified “It would have been reasonable to increase the budget further” (EEU Budget Order at 39) Concern regarding short term rate impacts Recent Vermont Energy Legislation August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG DPS Avoided Cost Study Supports Increased Budget All energy efficiency resources that cost less than the avoided cost should be acquired. (EEU Budget Order at 18) 2007 Cost of Energy Efficiency: 2.6 cents/kWh saved DPS Avoided Costs: 5.8 cents/kWh to 8.9 cents/kWh Avoided costs of comparable electric supply as reported by Efficiency Vermont: 10.7 cents/kWh 6 August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Rising Energy Costs Justify Increase in Efficiency Budget 7 Rapidly rising fuel costs affect wholesale energy costs Price of oil has nearly doubled since 2006 when previous budget was approved Between 2006 and 2007, wholesale price of electricity in New England increased 20% from 6.8 to 8.2 cents/kWh August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Rising Electric Supply Costs 8 August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Volatility of Electric Costs Support Increase in Efficiency Budget Expiration of contract with Hydro Quebec Uncertain extension of Vermont Yankee license Volatility would be mitigated by proposed efficiency budget 9 Reliability problems Concerns about decommissioning funds, radiation levels and corporate restructuring Recommended budget of $85.5 million would supply equivalent to 6% of Vermont’s annual power at less than half the avoided cost of supply August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Increased Avoided Costs Winter Peak Winter Off Peak Summer Peak Summer Off Peak AESC 2005 0.064 0.052 0.061 0.045 Change from 05-07 0.032 0.018 0.040 0.025 Percent Change 49% 34% 65% 55% 10 August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Energy Efficiency Costs Have Been Decreasing 2006 2007 Avg. cost/kWh 0.035 0.037 0.026 120,000 60 100,000 50 80,000 40 60,000 30 40,000 20 20,000 10 0 0 2000 2001 2002 Incremental annual MWh savings 11 Yield 2005 MWh Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Yield - MWh savings per $10,000 invested August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Energy Efficiency Costs Have Been Decreasing 2006$/MWh CT IOUs 2000-2005 70 MA IOUs 2003-2005 60 Efficiency Vermont 2000-2006 SMUD 2000-2006 50 Seattle 2000-2005 PG&E 2000-2005 40 SDG&E 2000-2005 SCE 2000-2005 30 Mass. Electric 20002002 W. Mass. Electric 20002002 Boston Ed/Nstar 20002002 Cambr. Elec. 2000 20 10 0 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% Annual Incremental Savings as % in Annual Sales 12 August 6, 2008 2.5% Com. Elec. 2000 Fithb. G&E 2000-2002 CLF / VPIRG More Efficiency Resources Available Higher reductions may be achieved in targeted areas 13 Increased investments in targeted areas are providing additional efficiency savings and still costing below avoided costs Majority of state untapped New opportunities & technologies August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Change in Federal Efficiency Standards A significant portion of efficiency savings in 2007 came from CFLs New standards not in place until 2012 New technologies available and costs declining Many remaining efficiency measures still below avoided costs 14 Even if CFL’s were replaced with measures that cost 4 times more, they would still be cost effective August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Environmental Benefits 15 Environmental Need 2007 efficiency investments produced a 661,500 ton reduction in carbon dioxide, 562 tons in nitrogen oxides, and 1,103 tons in sulphur dioxides that would have otherwise been emitted by conventional electric generation. These also resulted in a savings of 4.7 million gallons of propane, 242 million gallons of natural gas, 3 million gallons of oil and 283 million gallons of water. PSB decisions have placed an economic value on environmental externalities of about 5% (Docket #5270 (1990) and $7.86 MWh for natural gas (Docket #6290 (2003). August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Scale of Investment Higher level of investment is justified 16 $52.5 million investment supported by previous recommendation. $85 million investment provides ramp up similar to past experience Investments made earlier will have greatest benefit as power contracts expire. Expanded scope of EEU services creates new opportunities August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG Conclusion 17 All cost effective investments are required, reasonable and prudent Efficiency resources continue to provide savings at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost of supply resources EEU Budget should be set at $52.5 million for 2009 and transition to $85 million for 2011 August 6, 2008 CLF / VPIRG