Renewable Energy Alternatives: A Best Practices Manual for Stantec Consulting Jenna Beatty, Jenny Lund, and Calvin Robertie Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Civil Engineering Advised By: Fred Hart, Suzanne LePage, and Klaas Rodenburg (Stantec Consulting) Abstract Methods/Process BPM Application The goal of this project was to develop a Renewable Energy Best Practices Manual for Stantec Consulting Ltd. The manual will be used by Stantec employees for assessing renewable energy alternatives at a specific location. The information researched for each option was current technology, best location, cost range, efficiency, and downsides/environmental impacts. The manual also includes a checklist and comparison table of each of the renewable energy alternatives, as well as fossil fuels. In this project the feasibility of future renewable and sustainable energy alternatives was analyzed. In order to reach the final goal of creating a BPM, the following steps were taken: • Research renewable energy alternatives, ensuring validity of the resources used. An arbitrary site was chosen to analyze using the BPM. The analysis process is as follows: •Determine most applicable system using comparison table. Solar panels and GSHP were eliminated, leaving micro-hyropower as the best option. •Determine power requirements necessary for a typical home by creating a load variation chart. Topic Biomass Subcategories Wood Waste-to-Energy Algae Landfill Gas Biodiesel Geothermal Background •Renewable energies increasingly need to be used to preserve our Earth. Despite the fact that renewables are being rapidly developed, traditional power generators still create most of the power consumed. Hydropower Solar Wind Ground Source (GSHP) Deep Well Micro-Hydro Tidal Wave Photovoltaic Concentrated Onshore Offshore • Determine the feasibility considerations of a particular renewable energy option. • Compile findings into a BPM • Develop a checklist to help determine which renewable energy option is most applicable in a particular situation. •On a 2030 timeline there is an expected increase in renewable used, however due to the growing population there is also an expected increase in traditional power usage. Results • Determine actual power generated knowing turbine efficiency •Perform a feasibility study to ensure the site is suitable for a microhydropower system. •Design system. •A BPM with detailed information on the topics listed above •A comparison table complies all of the technologies, as well as fossil fuel data, to compare data. Below is an example of the table. Landfill Gas • Various organizations and engineering firms are working to develop renewable energy technologies, Stantec included. •No document with a compilation of renewable energy information. •Stantec needed a resource to provide to it’s engineers to quickly bring them to speed on the current technologies available. •Determine power generated by the river using the stream flow and head differential. Open Loop GSHP PV Solar Technology Vertical Wells Well/Surface Water Single Crystal Location Existing Fills Near Surface Water Anywhere Cost $0.04/kW $2,500/ton of heating/cooling $0.10 /kW Efficiency 40% to 80% 300% to 600% 5% to 20% Downsides Low Heating Capacity Environmental Regulations Toxic Chemicals Used in Panels General Info. Clean Water Needed Expensive •The checklist allows an engineer to get a better understanding of the renewable energy alternative and can use it to determine if it is viable or not. Conclusions/Recommendations •All the World’s power could come from renewable resources •A huge financial investment is needed. •Hybrid power plants (a combination of traditional and renewable energy) should be considered.