An Introduction to Reserving and Financial Reporting Issues for Non-Traditional Reinsurance

advertisement
An Introduction to Reserving
and Financial Reporting Issues
for Non-Traditional Reinsurance
Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar
September 14, 2004
Derek Jones, FCAS, MAAA
Finite Re Basics
Milliman
Overview

Customized deals to address specific
issues of cedant

Limited risk transferred by cedant

Limited upside for reinsurer
Milliman
Common Uses





Deferral of taxes
Discounting
Earnings stabilization
Risk management
Surplus protection
Milliman
Types of Deals
Retroactive

Adverse development cover

Loss portfolio transfer
Prospective

Aggregate stop-loss

Finite quota share

Spread loss
Milliman
Loss Portfolio Transfer




Covers prior written business
Move reserves off balance sheet
Premium = PV (reserves) + provision
for potential adverse development
Tends to cover smaller segments
Milliman
Adverse Development Cover



Cedant retains portfolio
Premium is based on potential for
adverse development and related
timing of future payments
Tends to cover larger groupings of
business than LPTs
Milliman
Aggregate Stop-Loss




Stabilize earnings
Typically multi-year deals
Loss ratio corridor above plan ratio
Fixed premium
Milliman
Finite Quota Share
Primary benefit = surplus relief
Differences from traditional QS





Loss ratio cap
Loss corridor
Lower net cost
Milliman
Common Features





Time value of money (via experience
account)
Cedant participation
Sub-limits of liability
Multiple years
Cancellation, commutation provisions
Milliman
Reserving Issues
Milliman
Understand Deal Structure






Line(s) of business, coverage type
Limits, sub-limits for reinsurer
Reinsurance or deposit accounting
Loss reserve discounting
Experience account
Commutation provision
Milliman
Experience Account

EAB = premium – margin – loss
payments + interest credit

What if EA is exhausted?
Milliman
Monitor Emergence
Issue 1: temporary speed-up

–
Could exhaust EA too quickly
Issue 2: actual > expected

–
–
Initial estimate of nominal loss may be
understated
Under-reporting will delay triggering
additional premium
Milliman
Interest Credit


Based on risk-free rate (e.g., U.S.
Treasury spot rates)
Spread is larger for deals on a funds
withheld basis
Milliman
Sensitivity Testing
Both magnitude and timing of
reinsurer payment are key
Nominal loss amounts


–
–

Retroactive: usually use more simplistic
approach to produce range
Prospective: stochastic simulation
Use alternative payout patterns to
evaluate impact of timing
Milliman
Bulk Reserves

Law of large numbers doesn’t apply

How is best estimate determined
(mode, mean, confidence level)?

Not commonly used in practice
Milliman
Financial Reporting
Issues
Milliman
Type of Accounting
Reinsurance treatment is based on
SFAS 113 or SSAP 62

–
–

Reinsurer must assume significant risk
It must be reasonably possible to realize
a significant loss
Deposit accounting is required unless
both conditions are met
Milliman
Prospective vs. Retroactive
Reinsurance
The following exceptions should be
treated as prospective reinsurance




Structured settlements
Novations
Reduced participation in reinsurance
treaties
Intercompany agreements that do not
produce gain in surplus
Milliman
Deposit Accounting



No initial impact on balance sheet or
income statement for cedant or
reinsurer
Emerges in financial statements as
actual payments are made/received
Note: deposit liabilities are not part of
lines 1 or 3 on statutory balance
sheet
Milliman
http://www.casact.org/pubs/forum/04fforum/
04ff073.pdf
derek.jones@milliman.com
646.473.3416
Download