SGTF - Eval - Facilities Planning - 2011

advertisement
Shared Governance Committees
Evaluation Criteria
Facilities and Planning 2011
1.
Does the committee hold regularly monthly meetings?
According to the report that was turned in, yes, the committee
seems to be meeting regularly.
2.
Are the minutes and agendas of all meetings posted on the
website? All of the agendas for the year are not posted and May
and June’s minutes are missing.
3.
Are the committees’ prioritized goals within the scope of the
committee charter?
The priorities mentioned on report are within the scope of the
charter. I commend the committee for addressing the following
issues:
 Take adequate time to address the structure and goals of
the committee.
 Appoint leadership and set up regular meetings.
 Undertaking small but important issues regarding blinds,
restrooms conditions, air conditioning etc.
 Conversing about large projects such as the Family and
consumer studies building, Media Arts building, East campus,
etc.
 Attendance of a GSE representative.
 Reporting on all Prop moneys and how it affects
constructions costs.
 Committee members have moved forward and made some
strides since its inception of Fall 2010
Recommendation: The above mentioned activities are impressive
and key to the scope of this committee. Due to the their
responsibilities, I would recommend that when changes are being
made in any new building, that users are being brought into the
conversation. I would like to see more “small” task force structure
being used to pass along information.
4.
Did the committee make progress toward last year’s
recommendations from the SGTF?
There is no existing recommendation from last year.
5.
Are the members of the committee attending meetings regularly?
No minutes posted for the month of May 2011. Therefore, based
on a total of 8 minutes posted most members attended 7-8
meetings. Four members attended 3-4 meetings. The ASO
appointee did not attend any meetings in 2011.
See attached Chart
6.
Is the committee at full membership?
No the committee is not at full membership. The administer Vice
President of Administrative Services position is vacant. The
assigned administrator is not noted in the membership.
Information Technology (IT) is not a part of the membership. It is
recommended that IT be a part of the planning process of Mission
College and should be a voting member of this committee.
By Mary Lou Mendoza and Vilma Bernal
Download