RtI and High School A Comprehensive Student Engagement Intervention Model Session Roadmap Overview of RtI Check & Connect Model Implementation Example School’s Journey RtI RtI: Response to Intervention • Use of evidence-based practice, systematic data collection and data based-decision making • Tiered model of providing intervention services • Progress is monitored in order to provide information on the response of the student to the intervention implemented Tier I 80% Tier II 15% Tier III 5% Why INTERVENTION? • What happens if we don’t? …the larger scale Current Reality--Secondary • Students not connecting to school --relationships • Students not engaged with teaching strategies --lacking variety in terms of learning styles --not communicating the relevance (compelling purpose) --lacking the opportunity to capitalize on individual strengths Challenges—Secondary • • • • • • Departments Case load in a given day Student level of need (after x amount years of schooling) Communication/Resources Scheduling Tier I System Offerings: Literacy, Etc. Check and Connect Tiers 2 and 3 Check & Connect • A “mentoring” model of comprehensive and sustained intervention for promoting students' engagement with school and learning. Research-Based • What Works Clearinghouse, which conducts rigorous reviews of educational research identified 1 out of 2 programs having significant impacts on reducing dropout rates. Check & Connect Overview 1. Teacher mentor 2. Mentees identified based on need 3. Systematic monitoring (CHECK) 4. Timely, individualized intervention strategies (CONNECT) Balanced Model • Academic • Behavioral • Social & Emotional Key Features 1. Relationship communication Building — mutual trust and open 2. Routine Monitoring of Alterable Indicators — systemically checking warning signs of withdrawal (attendance, academic performance, behavior) Key Features 3. Individualized and Timely Intervention — support tailored to individual student needs 4. Long-Term Commitment — committing to students and families for at least two years Key Features 5. Persistence Plus — a persistent source of academic motivation 6. Problem-Solving — designed to promote the acquisition of skills to resolve conflict constructively and to look for solutions rather than a source of blame 7. Affiliation with School and Learning — facilitating students' access to and active participation in school-related activities and events Mentor • Persistence • Believe all children have abilities • Work closely with families using a non-blaming approach Mentor • Advocacy skills, ability to negotiate, compromise, and confront conflict • Organizational skills • Work well independently in a variety of settings Intended Outcomes • Demonstrated outcomes include: --attendance --behavioral referrals --grade reporting --credit accrual --higher “overall” achievement levels --dropout incidents Systems Understanding (Tier I) Implementation Step #1: Leadership Capacity COMPELLING NEED for intervention STAFF DEVELOPMENT in order to build knowledge and skill within those involved Step #2: Define Indicators Identification of INDICATORS of disengagement: ATTENDANCE TARDIES BEHAVIORAL REFERRALS ACADEMIC --D/F --CREDITS Step #3: Organize Align mentors and mentees Forms or Protocols Communication to parents Determine data collection process Step #4: Structure for Collaboration How can mentors come together to: --reflect upon mentee progress? --learn intervention strategies proven to be successful? Step #5: Alignment of Interventions HELPFUL RESOURCES: 1. Check & Connect --research-based strategies according to indicator 2. Best Practice (Teaching & Learning) 3. Peer Teacher Experience Step #6: Monitor and Evaluate Mentor Capacity Procedures: --data collection --collaboration Indicator progress Tier I --classroom instruction --extra curr. opportunities --relationships system-wide --academic support systems Example School Focus Team Team Members Function Administrator *Counselor Sped director Core teacher Noncore teacher Sped teacher Monitor the system: --data collection --mentoring needs --plan for staff development --reflection on progress --creation of tools What Has Worked • Focus Team (Check & Connect Leadership Team) • Check and Connect Coordinator • Implementation support (ongoing PD) What Has Worked • Guarded time for mentors to meet in teams to collaborate and problem solve & guarded time for mentors to mentor • Intervention Team Meetings: --Ongoing data collection and monitoring --Protocol to focus the work Data Collection Form Name: Month -- February Check M Tu W Th F M Tu W Th F M Tu W Th F M Tu W Th F M Tu W Th F 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3 4 5 Tardy Skip Absent Behavior referral Suspension/detention (in/out of school) Wednesday Recovery Behind in credits: Yes __________ No___________ #D #F Credits earned (this year) _________________ (total cumulative) _______________ High risk for month Protocol Roles Data trends Previous “connect” strategies Strengths/Areas for growth Targeted behavior Targeted intervention strategy • Intervention Details • Communication Plan • • • • • • Intervention Team Meeting Protocol Maryville High School Roles Date: Facilitator: Quarter: Timekeeper: Mentor: Recorder: Student: Data: Data Trends Tardies Why? Absent Why? Discipline Referrals Why? D/F Why? Social Isolation Why? Wed. School Why? Couns. Watch Why? Credits Why? Pregnancy Why? ELL Why? Missing Information: Connects: (Revisit and report out on previous month's "connect" efforts.) Targeted Intervention Behavior Targeted Intervention Strategy 1) 1) 2) 2) Intervention Details Targeted Strategy #1 Targeted Intervention Strategy #2 When will the strategy When will the strategy take place? take place? Where will the Where will the strategy take place? strategy take place? Who will be Who will be responsible for responsible for carrying out the carrying out the strategy? strategy? Communication Plan: (Indicate key individuals who will be communicating in order to reach success within the identified action steps.) With Parent With Student With Teacher Closure: Revisit key points here. Our Systems: Note any questions or "need for discussion" items that may benefit program implementation and/or Tier I. PD Support • Initial training of mentors and administrators • Monthly staff development to support mentors: Relationships, Rigor, Relevance, types of engagement • Implementation of intervention team meetings: facilitation support, individual conferencing with mentors • Data collection and analysis (mentees and system) Training “Content” • Strategies for engaging students in school • Skills of an effective Check & Connect Monitor/Mentor • How dropout risk factors may be altered • How Mentor works with students, families, and school staff • Basic and intensive dropout prevention interventions • Resources Systems Monitoring Absences by Month 1400.00 1200.00 1000.00 800.00 600.00 08-09 400.00 09-10 200.00 0.00 Systems Monitoring 40 35 30 25 20 Maryville HS 08-09 Maryville HS 09-10 15 10 5 0 % Absent % Absent % Absent % Absent % Absent 0 1-3 4-6 6-10 11+ Systems Monitoring HS Discipline Events by Month 4 3.5 3 2.5 HS 09-10 2 HS 08-09 1.5 1 0.5 0 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Systems Monitoring 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Event Totals Event Totals Maryville HS 08-09 Maryville HS 09-10 Event Type by Grade 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Grade09 Grade10 Grade11 Grade12 Tier I 80% Tier II 15% Tier III 5% Questions? jbarnes@nwmissouri.edu