SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Pathogenetics of Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins

advertisement

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Pathogenetics of Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary

Veins

Przemyslaw Szafranski, Tomasz Gambin, Avinash V. Dharmadhikari, Kadir Caner

Akdemir, Shalini N. Jhangiani, Jennifer Schuette, Nihal Godiwala, Svetlana A. Yatsenko,

Jessica Sebastian, Suneeta Madan-Khetarpal, Urvashi Surti, Rosanna G. Abellar, David

A. Bateman, Ashley L. Wilson, Melinda H. Markham, Jill Slamon, Fernando Santos-

Simarro, María Palomares, Julián Nevado, Pablo Lapunzina, Brian Chung Hon-Yin,

Wong Wai-Lap, Yoyo Wing Yiu Chu, Gary Tsz Kin Mok, Eitan Kerem, Joel Reiter,

Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Scott A. Anderson, David R. Kelly, Joseph Shieh, Taryn C.

Rosenthal, Kristin Scheible, Laurie Steiner, M. Anwar Iqbal, Margaret L. McKinnon,

Sara Jane Hamilton, Kamilla Schlade-Bartusiak, Dawn English, Glenda Hendson,

Elizabeth R. Roeder, Thomas S. DeNapoli, Rebecca Okashah Littlejohn, Daynna J.

Wolff, Carol L. Wagner, Alison Yeung, David Francis, Elizabeth K. Fiorino, Morris

Edelman, Joyce Fox, Denise A. Hayes, Sandra Janssens, Elfride De Baere, Björn Menten,

Anne Loccufier, Lieve Vanwalleghem, Philippe Moerman, Yves Sznajer, Amy S. Lay,

Jennifer L. Kussmann, Jasneek Chawla, Diane J. Payton, Gael E. Phillips, Erwin Brosens,

Dick Tibboel, Annelies de Klein, Isabelle Maystadt, Richard Fisher, Neil Sebire, Alison

Male, Maya Chopra, Jason Pinner, Girvan Malcolm, Gregory Peters, Susan Arbuckle,

Melissa Lees, Zoe Mead, Oliver Quarrell, Richard Sayers, Martina Owens, Charles

Shaw-Smith, Janet Lioy, Eileen McKay, Nicole de Leeuw, Ilse Feenstra, Liesbeth Spruijt,

Frances Elmslie, Timothy Thiruchelvam, Carlos A. Bacino, Claire Langston, James R.

Lupski, Partha Sen, Edwina Popek, Paweł Stankiewicz

Author affiliations

P. Szafranski, T. Gambin, A. V. Dharmadhikari, S. N. Jhangiani, C. A. Bacino, J. R.

Lupski, P. Stankiewicz

Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,

TX, USA

A. V. Dharmadhikari, P. Stankiewicz

Interdepartmental Program in Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine, Baylor

College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

P. Stankiewicz

Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland

S. N. Jhangiani, J. R. Lupski

Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

J. R. Lupski

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

K. C. Akdemir

Genomic Medicine Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

J. Schuette

Division of Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical

Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

N. Godiwala

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC,

USA

S. A. Yatsenko, U. Surti

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Medical

Genetics and Genomics, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA,

USA

U. Surti

Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of

Pittsburgh, PA, USA

J. Sebastian, S. Madan-Khetarpal

Division of Medical Genetics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh,

PA, USA

R. G. Abellar

Department of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

D. A. Bateman

Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

A. L. Wilson

Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA

M. H. Markham

Division of Neonatology, Division of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center,

Nashville, TN, USA

J. Slamon

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine,

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

F. Santos-Simarro M. Palomares, J. Nevado, P. Lapunzina

INGEMM, Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain

CIBERER, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain

B. H.-Y. Chung, W.-L. Wong, Y. W. Y. Chu, G. T. K. Mok

Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong,

Hong Kong, China

B. H.-Y. Chung

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Centre for Genomic Sciences, The

University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

E. Karem, J. Reiter

Pediatric Pulmonary Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah-Hebrew University

Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

N. Ambalavanan

Departments of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Cell Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham,

Birmingham, AL, USA

S. A. Anderson

Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Alabama at

Birmingham and Children's of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA

D. R. Kelly

Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Pathology and

Laboratory Medicine Service, Children's of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA

J. Shieh

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Institute for Human

Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

T. C. Rosenthal

Genetics Department, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA

K. Scheible

Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

L. Steiner

Division of Neonatology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

M. A. Iqbal

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester,

NY, USA

M. L. McKinnon, S. J. Hamilton, K. Schlade-Bartusiak, D. English

Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

G. Hendson

Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

E. R. Roeder, R. O. Littlejohn

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA

E. R. Roeder

Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, San

Antonio, TX, USA

T. S. DeNapoli

Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

D. J. Wolff

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South

Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

C. L. Wagner

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

A. Yeung, D. Francis

Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville,

VIC, Australia

E. K. Fiorino

Division of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, The Children's Heart Center Steven and

Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, New York, NY, USA

M. Edelman

Division of Pediatric Pathology, The Children's Heart Center Steven and Alexandra

Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, New York, NY, USA

J. Fox

Division of Medical Genetics, Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of

New York, New Hyde Park, New York, NY, USA

D. A. Hayes

Pediatric Cardiology, The Children's Heart Center Steven and Alexandra Cohen

Children's Medical Center of New York, New York, NY, USA

S. Janssens, E. De Baere, B. Menten

Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent,

Belgium

A. Loccufier

Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Fertility, AZ St Jan Brugge, Brugge,

Begium

L. Vanwalleghem

Department of Anatomopathology, AZ St Jan Brugge, Brugge, Begium

P. Moerman

Department of Pathology UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Y. Sznajer

Center for Human Genetics, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Universite Catholique de

Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

A. S. Lay

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MS, USA

J. L. Kussmann

Division of Clinical Genetics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MS, USA

J. Chawla

Division of Paediatric Respiratory & Sleep Medicine, Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital,

Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

D. J. Payton, G. E. Phillips

Division of Anatomical Pathology, Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, Children’s Health

Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

E. Brosens, A. de Klein

Clinical Genetics Department, Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands

E. Brosens, D. Tibboel

Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands

I. Maystadt

Centre de Génétique Humaine, Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Gosselies, Belgium

R. Fisher

James Cook University Hospital, Middlesborough, UK

N. Sebire

Department of Paediatric Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and

UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK

A. Male, M. Lees

Clinical Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL Institute of

Child Health, London, UK

M. Chopra, J. Pinner,

Department of Medical Genomics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW,

Australia

G. Malcolm

Department of Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

G. Peters

Cytogenetics Department, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW,

Australia

S. Arbuckle

Histopathology Department, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW,

Australia

Z. Mead

Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke’s NHS Trust Pathology Department,

Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK

O. Quarrell, R. Sayers

Department of Clinical Genetics, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK

M. Owens, C. Shaw-Smith

Molecular Genetics Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter,

UK

J. Lioy

Division of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of

Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

E. McKay

Department of Pathology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA,

USA

N. de Leeuw, I. Feenstra, L. Spruijt

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the

Netherlands

F. Elmslie

South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's University Hospital, London,

UK

T. Thiruchelvam

Critical Care and Cardiorespiratory Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust,

London, UK

C. A. Bacino, J. R. Lupski

Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

C. Langston, E. Popek

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,

USA

P. Sen

Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

METHODS

DNA isolation and sequencing

DNA was extracted from FFPE lung tissue or peripheral blood using MasterPure

Complete DNA & RNA Purification Kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA) or Gentra

Purgene Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), respectively. PCR products were treated with ExoSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, OH, USA), and directly sequenced by the Sanger method (Lone Star Labs, Houston, TX, USA). Sequences were assembled using

Sequencher v4.8 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

RNA isolation and RT-qPCR

Gene expression was measured by estimating relative levels of mRNA. Total RNA was isolated from normal or transfected human foetal lung fibroblasts IMR-90 (ATCC,

Manassas, VA, USA) using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA preps were treated with DNase using DNA-free Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and converted to cDNA using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA,

USA). RT-qPCR was performed using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied

Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) or Power SYBR Green kit (Applied Biosystems,

Warrington, UK). qPCR conditions included 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min.

For relative quantification of a transcript, the comparative CT method was used.

Cloning of the 16q24.1 region deleted in patient 122 and of the FOXF1 promoter

To determine whether the deleted region can function as a promoter of LINC01082 , we cloned the deleted 4.1 kb DNA fragment and measured its transcriptional activity in the

IMR-90 cell line. For comparison, we also cloned the 3 kb FOXF1 promoter region, which exhibits residual promoter activity in the absence of enhancers. The 4.1 kb noncoding fragment (chr16:86,216,561-86,220,676) deleted in patient 122.3, was amplified from the normal human DNA using the following LR-PCR primers: 5`-

AAGGTACCGGCATTTCTGTCACTCATTCAACAATCTGA-3`

AAGCTAGCGAGGTATGTTAGAGGAATAGAAGGACTGCCTTG-3`, and 5`which included the restriction sites for Kpn I and Nhe I, respectively. PCR was performed using

LA Taq DNA polymerase, applying 25 cycles of incubation at 94°C for 30 sec and at

68°C for 4 min. The amplified region was cut with

Kpn I and Nhe I, and cloned into Kpn I and Nhe I sites of the multiple cloning site (MCS) of the promoter-less vector pGL4.10

(Promega) to generate the pGL4.10.122 construct.

An ~ 5.5 kb 16q24.1 region containing the FOXF1 promoter and the FOXF1

ATG initiation codon (chr16:86,538,679–86,544,175) was amplified from the normal human DNA using the LR-PCR primers: 5`-

CTAGCTAGCACATTTCCTCATATTCTGTGTAGAGAGCACCT-3` and 5`-

TTGCGCCGATTCGAACGGGTGGCTGCTG-3` that included the restriction sites for

Nhe I and Bst BI, respectively. PCR was run using LA Taq DNA polymerase in the presence of 20% betaine, applying 25 cycles of incubation at 94°C for 30 sec and at 68°C for 5 min. The amplified FOXF1 promoter region was subsequently cut with Bst BI, blunt ends generated with DNA polymerase Klenow fragment, cut with Nhe I, and cloned into the Eco RV and Nhe I sites of the MCS of the pGL4.10 to generate the pGL4.10FOXpr construct.

Transcriptional activity assay

Transfections of the IMR-90 cells, were performed on the sub-confluent cells grown in

12-well plates. The IMR-90 cultures were maintained in the Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and 10% FBS (ATCC). The cells were transfected with 1 μg of either pGL4.10.122, pGL4.10 (negative control), or pGL4.10FOXpr (positive control) using Lipofectamine 3000 with p3000 (Invitrogen).

Total RNA was prepared 48 h after transfection following lysis of the cells in Triazol, and converted to cDNA.

The transcriptional activity of the cloned fragments was assayed by qPCR by measuring relative quantity of Renilla luciferase ( Luc ) cDNA. At least three biological replicates for each construct were analysed. The Luc cDNA levels were normalized to cDNA levels of the pGL4.10 Amp gene. qPCR primers (lucF 5`-

GCACATATCGAGGTGGACATTA-3`, lucR 5`-CCACGATCCGATGGTTTGTAT-3`; ampF 5`-GCTGTCGTGATGCTAGAGTAAG-3`, ampR 5`-

AGAGTTGAACGAAGCCATACC-3`) were designed using PrimerQuest (IDT,

Coralville, IA, USA). cDNA synthesized using RNA isolated from IMR-90 cells transfected with the pGL4.10 plasmid was designated as a calibrator.

Bioinformatic analysis of the distant upstream enhancer region

Reference DNA sequences, chromatin modification, location of CpG islands, and ChIPseq data for the selected transcription regulators were accessed using the UCSC Genome

Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu, GRCh37/hg19).

High-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009) interaction datasets for Lymphoblastoid cell line from B-lymphocytes

(GM12878), Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC), Normal Human

Epidermal Keratinocytes (NHEK), and Human Mammary Epithelial Cells (HMEC), and human fetal lung fibroblasts (IMR-90) cell lines were downloaded from the GEO database (GSE63525). Normalized 25 kb resolution Hi-C interaction matrices of chromosome 16 for the aforementioned five cell lines were generated by multiplying

Knight and Ruiz normalization scores for two contacting loci and dividing raw observed values (MAPQGE30 filtered reads) at the interacting positions with this calculated normalization-score (Rao et al. 2014). IMR-90 cell line Pol2 ChIP-Seq was downloaded from UCSC Genome Browser ENCODE portal. Chromatin states calls (ChromHMM)

were downloaded from http://compbio.mit.edu/roadmap (REC 2015). HiCPlotter

(https://github.com/kcakdemir/HiCPlotter) was used to plot Hi-C data with chromatin states (Akdemir et al. 2015).

Microarray analyses

In addition to custom aCGH, a number of probands were studied using various microarrays: Illumina CytoSNP-850k BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) (pt

120.3), Affymetrix Cytoscan 750K (pt 122.3), Affymetrix CytoScan HD array platform

(Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) (pts 125.3, 126.3, 135.3, and 136.3), 12x135K array (Roche-NimbleGen, Madison, WI, USA) (pt 127.3), ISCA v.1 180K (Agilent

Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (pts 128.3 and 133.3), and 4x180 K CGH-SNP array (Agilent Technologies) (pt. 139.3).

Whole exome sequencing

WES was performed at Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Center through the Baylor Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics as previously described (pts

114.3, 121.3) (Lupski et al. 2013) and at the University of California Los Angeles (pt

128.3) (Lee et al. 2014). WES in family 138 was performed as described [Reiter et al. manuscript submitted]. DNA sample, prepared into Illumina paired-end libraries, underwent whole exome capture using VCRome 2.1 design (Roche NimbleGen,

Madison, WI, USA), followed by sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform

(Illumina, San Diego, USA) with 78 paired-end reads coverage. Raw sequence data were post-processed using the Mercury pipeline (Reid et al. 2014), which performs conversion of raw sequencing data (bcl files) to the fastq format using Casava, mapping of the short reads against a human genome reference sequence (GRCh37) by the Burrows-Wheeler

Alignment (BWA), recalibration using GATK (McKenna et al. 2010), and variant calling using the Atlas2 suite (Challis et al. 2012). Variants were annotated using the in-housedeveloped “Cassandra” annotation pipeline (Bainbridge et al. 2011). Gene expression data were analysed through a gene annotation portal BioGPS (http://biogps.com).

To search for regions of absence of heterozygosity (AOH) in the WES data, we calculated B-allele frequency as a ratio of variants reads to total reads. These data were then processed using the Circular Binary Segmentation algorithm (CBS) (Olshen et al.

2004). To detect CNVs in families sequenced at BH-CMG (121, 124), we processed

WES data using CoNIFER software ( Krumm et al. 2012). Control set required by

CoNIFER was created based on WES data from 200 samples sequenced at BH-CMG using the same platform and processed with pipeline as ACDMPV families.

REFERENCES

Akdemir K, Chin L (2015) HiCPlotter integrates genomic data with interaction matrices.

Genome Biol 16:198

Bainbridge MN, Wiszniewski W, Murdock DR, Friedman J, Gonzaga-Jauregui C,

Newsham I, Reid JG, Fink JK, Morgan MB, Gingras M-C, Muzny DM, Hoang

LD, Yousaf S, Lupski JR, Gibbs RA (2011) Whole-Genome Sequencing for

Optimized Patient Management. Sci Transl Med 3:87re3

Challis D, Yu J, Evani US, Jackson AR, Paithankar S, Coarfa C, Milosavljevic A, Gibbs

RA, Yu F (2012) An integrative variant analysis suite for whole exome nextgeneration sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 13:8

Krumm N, Sudmant PH, Ko A, O'Roak BJ, Malig M, Coe BP; NHLBI Exome

Sequencing Project, Quinlan AR, Nickerson DA, Eichler EE (2012) Copy number variation detection and genotyping from exome sequence data. Genome Res

22:1525-1532

Lee H, Deignan JL, Dorrani N, Strom SP, Kantarci S, Quintero-Rivera F, Das K, Toy T,

Harry B, Yourshaw M, Fox M, Fogel BL, Martinez-Agosto JA, Wong DA, Chang

VY, Shieh PB, Palmer CG, Dipple KM, Grody WW, Vilain E, Nelson SF (2014)

Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders.

JAMA 312:1880-1887

Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A,

Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender

MA, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny LA, Lander ES,

Dekker J (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326:289-293

Lupski JR, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Yang Y, Bainbridge MN, Jhangiani S, Buhay CJ, Kovar

CL, Wang M, Hawes AC, Reid JG, Eng C, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA (2013) Exome sequencing resolves apparent incidental findings and reveals further complexity of SH3TC2 variant alleles causing Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Genome

Med 5:57

McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K,

Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA (2010) The Genome Analysis

Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20:1297-1303

Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R, Wigler M (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5:557-572

Prothro SL, Plosa E, Markham M, Szafranski P, Stankiewicz P, Killen SA (2016)

Prenatal Diagnosis of Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of

Pulmonary Veins.

J Pediatr 170:317-318

Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, Sanborn

AL, Machol I, Omer AD, Lander ES, Aiden EL (2014) A 3D Map of the Human

Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping. Cell

159:1665-1680

Reid JG, Carroll A, Veeraraghavan N, Dahdouli M, Sundquist A, English A, Bainbridge

M, White S, Salerno W, Buhay C, Yu F, Muzny D, Daly R, Duyk G, Gibbs RA,

Boerwinkle E (2014) Launching genomics into the cloud: deployment of

Mercury, a next generation sequence analysis pipeline. BMC Bioinformatics

15:30

Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518:317-330

Supplemental Fig. S1 Differential methylation of a CpG island at the promoter region of the LINC01081 might contribute to epigenetic control of FOXF1 expression. The upper panel represents an example of array CGH plot of a deletion on maternal chromosome

16q24.1 (pt 119) that removed a portion of the FOXF1 upstream enhancer, including part of LINC01081 .

Supplemental Fig. S2 Comparison of transcriptional activities, of the basal FOXF1 promoter and the region deleted in patient 122.3 in fetal lung fibroblasts IMR-90.

Promoterless vector, pGL4.10, was used as a negative control.

Supplemental Fig. S3 Schematic representation of the proposed molecular mechanism of formation of the complex genomic rearrangement within the untranslated portion of the FOXF1 1 st

exon (pt 124.3). ( a ) The position of a copy the translocated region is indicated by a red bar. ( b ) The deleted fragment is shown as a red frame.

Supplemental Table S1 Genomic characteristics and parental origin of 42 reported and novel de novo deletion CNVs on chromosome 16q24.1 pathogenic for ACDMPV, and additional non-lung clinical features in ACDMPV patients. Thirteen novel cases are shaded

Patient

D1

Genomic coordinates

(GRh37/hg19)

Deletion size (kb)

85,148,264-

86,646,503

1,498

Location

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Breakpoints proximal distal

Alu Sq Alu Sq

Microhomology Mechanism of formation

17 bp MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

D2

D3

49.3 (D4)

D5

21.6 (D8)

-

-

-

-

90.3

104.3

85,717,653-

87,718,253

85,816,707-

86,719,506

85,845,070-

86,878,211

84,350,698-

87,847,575

86,600,342-

86,731,402

~85,890,261-

87,257,585

85,108,709-

86,720,212

~85,728,812-

86,831,579

~85,881,691-

87,882,985

81,094,654-

86,636,753

2,001

903

1,033

3,497

1,830

~1.370

1.612

~1.1

2.001

5,542

85,390,350/373-

87,964,597/620

2,574

Parental origin

Maternal

Cardiac

PDA

Clinical features in organs other than lungs

Gastrointestinal Genitourinary

Esophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula, abnormal placement of anus

-

-

Dilated renal pelvices

Other

SUA

Reference

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

L1ME1

Alu Sx

Alu Sx

Alu Sx

Alu Sx

ND

ND

ND

ND

FLAM_C

MER1

Alu Sx

Alu Sg1

Alu Sx

Alu Sx

ND

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Uniq AT-rich Alu Ya5

ND

ND

ND

Alu Sc5

4 bp MMBIR/FoSTeSx1 ND HLHS - Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

18 bp

8 bp

12 bp

43 bp

ND

ND

ND

ND

24 bp

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

ND

25 bp

AT-rich insertion

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1 or NHEJ

ND

ND

ND

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

Maternal

Maternal

ND

Maternal

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Maternal rs2113236

ToF; PDA Duodenal atresia with annular pancreas, imperforate anus

-

Bilateral hydronephrosis, mod right, severe left

SUA

HLHS

IAA, dilated PA, large PDA, decreased size left ventricle

HLHS

-

Duodenal atresia with ileal cyst (Duodenal narrowing with massive dilation of the third and fourth portion of the duodenum; duplication of distal ileum and malrotation; stomach and initial part of intestines were malformed and tubular in nature). Annular pancreas

Right renal cyst extending into the abdomen.

Mild uretero-pelvic caliectasis

Bilateral renal pelviectasis

T11 butterfly vertebra, cleft lip, cleft palate, brachycephaly, SUA

Posterior rib fusions:

10/11 (right side),

9/10 and 11/12 (left side)

-

PDA ligated, structurally normal heart by echocardiogram

HLHS, hypoplasia of mitral valve and left ventricle, pulmonary valve atresia, subaortic VSD with overriding of aorta, PDA, proximal left PA stenosis,

PFO, and a persistent left superior vena cava

AVSD with a dysplastic tricuspid valve and two mitral valve leaflets. Small

PA

N/A

Adhesions between bowel loops, second part of duodenum and gallbladder, no malrotation seen at laparotomy

-

Annular pancreas with duodenal dilation proximal to the pancreas

N/A

-

Moderate to severe hydronephrosis, tortuous dilated ureters and thickened urinary bladder wall, suggesting possible posterior urethral valves.

Hypospadias

Bilateral dilation of the renal pelvocaliceal system with bilateral ureteral stenosis

Partial atrioventricular canal defect; ASD; VSD; PDA

ToF with severe right ventricular outflow tract obstruction

-

Pleural effusion, polyhydramnios. hypertelorism, broad flat nasal bridge. Hypotonia

-

N/A

-

Left kidney with moderate hydronephosis and hydroureter. Hypospadias.

Septated cystic hygroma, fetal hydrops, and SUA

(ultrasound). Limited autopsy

Prominent nasal bridge; deep-set eyes; mild retrognathia. segmental abnormality of T10 vertebral body

-

-

Prenatal. SUA. Trunk and head edema. Thickened nuchal fold (3.7 mm).

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

Yu et al. (2010)

Zufferey et al (2011)

Garabedian et al. (2012)

Handrigan et al. (2013)

Sen et al. (2013b)

Sen et al. (2013b)

118.3 86.027,015/033-

87,198,727/745

1,172 Enhancer &

FOXF1

Alu Sx Alu Jb

120.3

125.3

133.3

86,010,039/061-

87,847,731/753

1,838

86,182,703/738-

87,651,485/531

1,469

83,666,375-

87,300,195

3,634

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Alu

Alu

Y

Y

MER41B

Alu

Alu Jb

Alu

Y

Y

135.3

140.3

D6

~85,728,498-

87,322,987

~86,220,144-

87,277,604

86,493,531-

86,596,413

~1,596

~1,057

103

Enhancer &

FOXF1

Enhancer &

FOXF1

FOXF1

ND

ND

Alu Y

115.3 86,505,450-

86,575,461

70 FOXF1

ND

ND

Alu Y unique unique

129.3

122.3

86,545,491-

86,546,265

86,216,561-

86,220,676

1

4

Intronic

Enhancer

28.7 (D10) ~86,140,499-

86,285,499

~145 Enhancer

Unique unique

Unique unique

ND ND

19 bp

21 bp

35 bp

Absent

ND

ND

19 bp

41.4

59.4

94.3

~86,530,499-

86,541,499

86,539,362-

86,554,368

86,541,294-

86,690,004

~11

15

149

FENDRR , promoter

FOXF1

FOXF1

ND ND

Low complexity

GC-rich

Unique

SINE MIR hAT-

Charlie1a

ND

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

Absent

ND

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

ND

ND

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

ND

ND AVSD Suspected bowel obstruction (large loop persistent prenatally). Not evaluated postnatally.

Intestinal malrotation Maternal 15xGA microsatellite,

86,256,052/82

Maternal 15xGA microsatellite,

86,231,351/80

Maternal rs1704502

Aortic coarctation with arch hypoplasia and a bicuspid aortic valve

AVSD

Coarctation of aorta.

Aneurysmal dilatation of

PDA, PFO, Small mitral valve, bicuspid aortic valve, persistent left superior vena cava with suggestion of noncompaction cardiomyopathy

Coarctation of aorta Maternal

SNP array

Maternal,

SNP array

ND

-

-

Malrotation with in utero perforation, annular pancreas with duodenal stenosis/constriction

-

-

AVSD, ostium primum ASD, small VSD, PDA, mild

HLHS, bicuspid AV

Possible duodenal atresia, possible intestinal malrotation

ND N/A N/A

-

-

Bilateral hydroureter and bilateral hydronephrosis

-

Hydronephrosis

Bilateral hydronephrosis

Prenatal

Bilateral cerebellar heterotopia

-

Hypoglycaemia, SUA, deep set eyes with posterior nuchal webbing, bilateral choroid plexus cysts

Prenatal. Hygroma colli.

SUA

Prenatal

Moderate bilateral pelvicaliectasis, mild to moderate proximal urethral dilatation, probable mild to moderate distal ureteral dilatation

N/A

Absent spleen, transverse orientation of the liver, compatible with abdominal heterotaxy

N/A

Prothro et al. (2015) this study this study this study this study this study

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

Maternal Large ASD, PDA - - - Szafranski et al. (2013a)

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

Maternal

Maternal

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

ND

Maternal

Paternal rs8061995 rs12444199 rs276991

Maternal

Hypoplastic aortic arch.

Large PDA (which allowed perfusion to the descending aorta and left subclaviar artery; ASD and VSD.

-

Intestinal malrotation

Imperforate anus (low rectal atresia), marked malrotation of the large intestines with loss of peritoneal fixation, shortened mesenteric root with kinking and luminal narrowing of the small intestine.

N/A N/A

Bilateral hydronephrosis

-

N/A

PDA

Small PDA

-

-

-

- none

-

N/A

-

-

Sen et al. (2013b) this study

Szafranski et al. (2013b) this study

Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

47.4 (D9) 85,867,768-

86,392,161

524

57.3

60.4

64.5

77.3

81.3

82,014,639/716-

86,300,403/481

83,673,382/476-

86,298,284/378

86,147,527/566-

86,287,120/159

86,212,041/067-

86,448,132/158

~86,194,972/195

,808-

86,354,712/355,

161

4,286

2,625

140

236

~160

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

ND ND

LINE L1

LINE L1

Alu Sz

Alu Sc

ND

LINE L1

LINE L1

Alu Sx

Alu Sq2

ND

95.3

96.3

86,118,131/141-

86,287,054/064

85,979,487-

86,361,223

169

382

Enhancer

Enhancer

Alu Jb

Unique

Alu Sx

Unique

99.3

111.3

117.3

119.3

126.3

84,764,628/647-

86,238,601/620

86,077,955/958-

86,271,915/918

86,055,159/200-

86,288,226/267

1,474

194

233

86,148, 250-

86,301,591

Insertion at the

BP: GCACGCA

84,875,483/490-

86,386,861/868

153

1,511

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

Enhancer

Alu Sc8

LTR ERVL

LTR16C

Alu Sp

Alu Y

LINE

L1PA3

Alu Sp

Alu

Alu

Y

Sx1

LINE

L1PA2

Alu Sx

127.3 86,209,157/194-

86,301,558/595

92 Enhancer

136.3

139.3

~85,146,556-

86,393,283

~85,877,026-

86,282,104

~1,250

~405

Enhancer

Enhancer

ND, not determined; BP, breakpoint

L1PA5

ND

ND

L1PA2

ND

ND

1 bp

77 bp

96 bp

41 bp

28 bp

ND

12 bp

Absent

19 bp

3 bp

41 bp

Absent

7 bp

37 bp

ND

ND

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1 or NHEJ

NAHR or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

NAHR or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

ND

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

NHEJ or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

NAHR or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal

Maternal 15xGA microsatellite,

86,231,351/80

Maternal 15xGA microsatellite,

86,256,052/82

-

-

N/A

N/A

-

PDA with a right to left shunt, small pericardial effusion, right ventricular dilatation and hypertrophy, mitral valve had a parachute configuration with mild dilation of the left ventricle

Significant R/L shunt. Open ductus Botalli. Normal pulmonary vein connections

Small muscular VSD

Suspected intestinal malrotation, imperforate anus

-

N/A

N/A

-

-

-

-

PDA, dilated right ventricle with depressed function

-

Omphalocele with a diameter of 6 cm only intestines present, no involvement of liver.

-

-

-

Bicornuate uterus with cervical duplication

-

-

-

-

N/A

N/A

-

-

-

Bilateral hydronephrosis due to urethra valves

Multiple butterfly vertebrae Stankiewicz et al. (2009)

-

N/A

N/A

-

Unilobar left lung

-

-

-

-

Limited autopsy

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2013a)

Szafranski et al. (2014)

Szafranski et al. (2014) this study

- - - - this study

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1 Maternal 15xGA microsatellite,

86,231,351/80

NAHR or

MMBIR/FoSTeSx1

ND

ND

Maternal 15xGA microsatellite,

86,256,052/82

Maternal

SNP array

Maternal rs190442964

Balanced AVSD

PDA and PFO

-

-

Intestinal malrotation

-

-

-

Uterus didelphys

Mildly dilated right ureter

-

-

-

-

-

-

- this study this study this study this study

Download