APPENDIX 19.1
KEY TO MAP OF SITES INCLUDED IN THE STUDY (FIGURE 19.2)
AND REFERENCES FOR THEM
Map
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
20
21
22
23
24
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Site Name
TREMPER
MCKENZIE
LIBERTY-HARNESS
MOUND CITY
HOPETON
HOPEWELL
ATER
P0RTER
BOURNVILLE
SEIP
ROCKHOLD
LOWER TWIN RD.
WEST
TURNER
ERTLE FARM
FORT ANCIENT
STUBBS
H.H. HILL Col.
15Mm137
MARIETTA
LITTLE MUSKIGAN
HAZLET
NORTH BENTON
ESCH
CRIB
MANN
RUTHERFORD
VOGEL
BEDFORD
MARION CO., KY
PETE KLUNK
GIBSON
SNYDERS
KNIGHT
MERRIGAN
SCHWERT
FLUCKE
MARANTETTE
Earspools
Reported
4
6
>88
23
1
>672
24
58
9
72
12
1
6
95
2
12
1
1
2
3
1
2
6
3
1
19
10
6
2
5
2
6
4
2
1
5
2
2
Reference(s)
Mills 1916
Moorehead 1899
Putnam 1887; Moorehead 1897; Mills 1907
Squier & Davis 1847; Mills 1922; Wayman et al. 1992
Brose 1976
Moorehead 1922; Shetrone 1926; Greber & Ruhl 1989
Baby 1948
Moorehead 1892
McBeth 1960; Porter & McBeth 1960
Mills 1909; Shetrone & Greenman 1931
Greenman 1929
Private Collection
Porter & McBeth 1957, 1958
Willoughby & Hooten 1922; Putnam 1886
Metz 1886
Mills 1920; Morgan 1946
Genheimer 1997
Clarke 1876a
Richmond 2001b
Atwater 1820; Putnam 1883
Atwater 1820
Mills 1921
Magrath 1945
Greenman 1930
Seeman 1979
Ruby 1997
Fowler 1957
Thomas 1894
Struever 1968
Knott Coll., acc. no. 12812
Perino 1968
Perino 1968, Buikstra 1976
Braun et al. 1982
Griffin et al. 1970
Struever 1970
McKern 1931
Thomas 1894
Quimby 1944
49
GOODALL
50
WILLIAMS
51
DENNY
52
GLASS
53
FRANKLIN, TN
54
GRASSY COVE
55
TN (not mapped)
60
SAVANNAH
61
HARDIN CO., TN
62
FISHER
63
YEARWOOD
64
WRIGHT
65
HESTER
66
TICK ISLAND
67
LAUDERDALE
68
WALLING
69
HAMPTON CAVE
70
GUNTERSVILLE
71
TUNACUNNHEE
80
PHARR
81
BYNUM
82
MILLER
83
MCQUORGODALE
84
MANDEVILLE
Sites in Louisiana-not mapped:
90
CROOKS
91
CORAL SNAKE
a
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
11
1
1
1
5
1
4
15
5
9
2
1
14
Quimby 1944
Putnam 1882
Fewkes 1928
Putnam 1882
Thruston 1897
Myer 1928c
Stratton Coll.
Thruston 1897
Site location unknown
Webb & DeJarnette 1942
Butler 1977
Webb & DeJarnette 1942
(see footnote d)
Webb 1939
Webb 1939
Walthall 1973
Thomas 1894e
Acc. no. 14255
Jeffries 1976
Bohannon 1972
Cotter & Corbett 1951
Jennings 1941
Wimberly & Tourtelot 1941
Kellar et al.1962, Smith 1979f
6
4
Ford & Willey 1940g
McClurkan et al. 1966
H. H. Hill Collection
This artifact in the Gilcrease Museum is labeled “H. H. Hill, Cincinnati”. Dr. Hill was an
advocational archaeologist active in the Cincinnati area in the late 19th century. The
provenience of this artifact is uncertain but it is probably from a site in Hamilton Co. Ohio.
b
15Mm137
Cultural Resource Analysts Inc., under the auspices of the Division of Environmental
Analysis of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, excavated a small pit feature containing
a tetrapodal Connestee Series jar, a pair of earspools, and plant remains. No burial was
associated with this deposit.
c
Grassy Cove
Grassy Cove is a little town located in southeastern Tennessee. Smithsonian records
indicate nothing more specific than this place name as the provenience of a single earspool,
a gift from Lorenzo Stratton in 1875. Myer (1928), whose maps indicate the locations of
known mounds and caves, shows no nearby mounds, but there is a burial cave near Grassy
Cove. The connection of the Grassy Cove specimen with a possible burial cave is,
however, very speculative.
d
Hester Site
This site has not been published. The earspool was found in the plow zone between a pair
of mounds (Personal communication with Mound State Monument, 1995).
e
Hampton Cave
The Smithsonian catalog description of earspool 83442 from Hampton Cave matches one
from which the layer of corrosion product has been removed by heating. Although the
earspool lacks a catalog number on the artifact, the Hampton Cave attribution seems quite
likely.
f
Mandeville Site
Thirteen earspools are recorded from the dated Feature 5, including one with an iron
overlay (Kellar et al. 1962). Deposition of artifacts in this feature is said to constitute a
final Hopewellian ceremony at this site (Smith 1979). A single earspool is reported from
Feature 4. The University of Georgia loaned ten copper earspools from Feature 5 to C.
Carr for study. Another group of three, catalog 8620, were reportedly from Feature 4, but
this group includes the only iron overlay in either group. It seems quite possible that this
group of three is actually from Feature 5 also. This assumption would provide the correct
number and composition of the earspool assemblage as reported for the feature. A single
earspool from Mandeville, without provenience, may then be suggested as the solitary
specimen from Feature 4. These assumptions have been made for the purposes of this
study.
g
Crooks Site
A pair of earspools, reportedly from the Crooks site in Louisiana, do not correspond in any
way with the descriptions or drawings published by Ford and Willey (1940). The
provenience of these artifacts must be seriously questioned.
REFERENCES
Atwater, Caleb
1820 Description of the Antiquities Discovered in the State of Ohio and Other Western States.
Archaeologia Americana I.
Baby, Raymond S.
1948 Field notes, Ohio State Museum Archaeological Expedition, Raymond Ater Mound:
RO63. Ms. on file, Columbus: Department of Archaeology, Ohio Historical Center.
Bohannon, Charles F.
1972 Excavations at the Pharr Mounds, Prentiss and Itawamba Counties, Mississippi and
Excavations at the Bear Creek Site, Tishamingo County, Mississippi. Washington, DC:
U.S. Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Division of Archaeology and
Anthropology.
Braun, David P., James B. Griffin and Paul F.Titterington
1982 The Snyders Mounds and Five Other Mound Groups in Calhoun County, Illinois.
Museum of Anthropology, Technical Reports No. 13. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Brose, David S.
1976 An Historical and Archaeological Evaluation of the Hopeton Works, Ross County, Ohio.
Report to the National Park Service. Lincoln: Midwest Archaeological Center.
Buikstra, Jane E.
1976 Hopewell in the Lower Illinois Valley. Northwestern University Archeological Program,
Scientific Papers 2. Evanston.
Butler, Brian M.
1977 The Yearwood Site: A Specialized Middle Woodland Occupation on the Elk River.
Tennessee Anthropologist 2:1-15.
Clarke, Robert
1876 The Prehistoric Remains which were Found on the Site of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio,
with a Vindication of the “Cincinnati Tablet.” Cincinnati.
Cotter, John L. and John M. Corbett
1951 Archaeology of the Bynum Mounds, Mississippi. Washington, DC: National Park
Service, U. S. Department of the Interior Archaeological Research Series No. 1.
Fewkes, J. Walter
1928 Forty-First Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1919-1924, Pp. 89.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ford, James A. and Gordon R. Willey
1940 Crooks Site, a Marksville Period Burial Mound in LaSalle Parish, Louisiana.
Anthropological Study No. 3. New Orleans: Department of Conservation, Louisiana
Geological Survey.
Fowler, Melvin L.
1957 Rutherford Mound. Scientific Papers, No. 7. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.
Genheimer, Robert A.
1997 Stubbs Cluster: Hopewellian Site Dynamics at a Forgotten Little Miami River Valley
Settlement. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, W. Dancy and P. Pacheco eds.
Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
Greber, N'omi B. and Katharine C. Ruhl
1989 The Hopewell Site. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Greenman, Emerson F.
1929 Department of Archaeology Museum Echoes 2:31-32.
1930 The Esch Site: Report and Field Notes. Ms. on file, Columbus: Department of
Archaeology, Ohio Historical Society.
Griffin, James B., Richard E. Flanders, and Paul F. Titterington
1970 The Burial Complexes of the Knight and Norton Mounds in Illinois and Michigan.
Museum of Anthropology Memoirs 2. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Jeffries, Richard W.
1976 The Tunacunnhee Site. Anthropological Papers of the University of Georgia 1. Athens:
University of Georgia.
Jennings, Jesse D.
1941 Chickasaw and Earlier Indian Cultures of Northeast Mississippi. Journal of Mississippi
History 3(3):155-226.
Kellar, James H., A. R. Kelly and E. V. McMichael
1962 The Mandeville Site in Southwestern Georgia. American Antiquity 27:336-355.
McBeth, Donald
1960 Bournville Mound, Ross County, Ohio. Ohio Archaeologist 10(1).
McClurkan, Burney B., William T. Field, and J. Ned Woodall
1966 Excavations in Toledo Bend Reservoir, 1964-65. Papers of the Texas Archaeological
Salvage Project 8, Austin.
McKern, William C.
1931 A Wisconsin Variant of the Hopewell Culture. Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee,
Bulletin 10(2). Milwaukee.
Magrath, Willis H.
1945 The North Benton Mound: A Hopewell Site in Ohio. American Antiquity 11:40-46.
Metz, C. L.
1886 Notes on file for accession 86-46. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum, Harvard
University.
Mills, William C.
1907 The Explorations of the Edwin Harness Mound. Ohio Archaeological and Historical
Quarterly 16:113-193.
1909 Explorations of the Seip Mound. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 18:269321.
1916 Exploration of the Tremper Mound. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
25:262-398.
1920 Map and Guide to Fort Ancient. Columbus, Ohio.
1921 Flint Ridge. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 30:146-161.
1922 Exploration of the Mound City Group. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
31:423-584.
Moorehead, Warren K.
1892 Primitive Man in Ohio. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
1897 Report of Field Work Carried on in the Muskingum, Scioto, and Ohio Valleys During the
Season of 1896. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 5:165-274.
1899 Report of Field Work in Various Portions of Ohio. Ohio Archaeological and Historical
Quarterly 7:110-203.
1922 The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio. Field Museum of Natural History Anthropological
Series 6:73-184.
Morgan, Richard G.
1946 Fort Ancient. Columbus: Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society.
Myer, William E.
1928 Indian Trails of the Southeast. Bureau of American Ethnology, 42nd Annual Report,
1924-25. pp. 727-857.
Perino, Gregory
1968 The Pete Klunk Mound Group, Calhoun County, Illinois: The Archaic and Hopewell
Occupations. In Hopewell and Woodland Site Archaeology in Illinois, J. Brown, ed.
Illinois Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, Bulletin 6:9-124. Urbana.
Porter, Tom and Donald McBeth
1957 Preliminary Report on the West Mound. Ohio Archaeologist 7(3).
1958 Report on the West Mound. Ohio Archaeologist 8(1).
1960 An Additional Note on the Bournville Mound, Ross County, Ohio. Ohio Archaeologist
10(4).
Putnam, Frederick W.
1882 Notes on Copper Objects from North and South America, Contained in the Collections of
the Peabody Museum. Collections of the Peabody Museum, 15th Annual Report 3:83-148.
1883 Iron from the Ohio Mounds. Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society n.s. 2.
1886 Explorations in Ohio: The Marriott Mound, No. 1 and Its Contents. Peabody Museum,
Harvard University, 18th and 19th Annual Reports 3(5, 6).
1887 Report of the Curator. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, 18th and 19th Annual
Reports 3(5, 6).
Quimby, George I.
1944 Some New Data on the Goodall Focus. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts
and Letters 29:419-443.
Richmond, Michael D.
2001 A National Register Evaluation of Sites 15Mm137, 15Mm139 and 15Mm140 and Deep
Testing Along Sycamore Creek in Montgomery County, Kentucky. Cultural Resource
Analysts, Inc. Contract Publication Series 01-106.
Ruby, Bret J.
1997 The Mann Phase: Hopewellian Subsistence and Settlement Adaption in the Wabash
Lowlands of Southwestern Indiana. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University. Ann Arbor:
University Microfilms.
Seeman, Mark F.
1979 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere: The Evidence for Interregional Trade and Structural
Complexity. Indiana Historical Society, Prehistory Research Series 5(2).
Shetrone, Henry C.
1926 Exploration of the Hopewell Group of Prehistoric Earthworks. Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Quarterly 35:1-227.
Shetrone, Henry C. and Emerson F. Greenman
1931 Explorations of the Seip Group of Prehistoric Earthworks. Ohio Archaeological and
Historical Quarterly 40:343-509.
Smith, Betty A.
1979 The Hopewell Connection in Southwest Georgia. In Hopewell Archaeology, D. Brose
and N. Greber, eds. Pp. 181-187. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
Squier, George E. and E. H. Davis
1847 Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge
1, Washington, DC.
Struever, Stuart
1968 A Re-examination of Hopewell in Eastern North America. Unpublished Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Chicago.
1970 Pioneer Archeology in an Illinois Middle Woodlnd Mound. Wisconsin Archeologist
51(2):49-56.
Thomas, Cyrus
1894 Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology. Bureau of American
Ethnology, 12th Annual Report, 1890-1891.
Thruston, Gates P.
1897 The Antiquities of Tennessee. Cincinatti: Robert Clarke Co.
Walthall, John A.
1973 Copena: A Tennessee Valley Middle Woodland Culture. Ph.D. dissertation, University
of North Carolina. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.
Wayman, M. L., J. C. H. King and P. T. Craddock
1992 Aspects of Early North American Metallurgy. British Museum Occasional Paper 79.
Webb, William S.
1939 An Archaeological Survey of Wheeler Basin on the Tennessee River in Northern
Alabama. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 122.
Webb, William S. and David L. DeJarnette
1942 An Archaeological Survey of Pickwick Basin in the Adjacent Portions of the States of
Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 129.
Willoughby, Charles C. and Ernest A. Hooten
1922 The Turner Group of Earthworks, Hamilton County, Ohio. Papers of the Peabody
Museum 8(3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Wimberly, Steven B. and Harry A. Tourtelot
1941 The McQuorquodale Mound: A Manifestation of the Hopewellian Phase in Southern
Alabama. Museum Paper 19. University, AL.