2009 Leadership Academy Projects B&F Forum Review November 12, 2009

advertisement

2009 Leadership Academy Projects

B&F Forum Review

November 12, 2009

Administrative Guide for

Organizational Change(s)

Action Learning Team:

Cathy Handyside

Debora Talley

Kristie Beckon

Matthew Hicks

Denise Stegall

Project Summary

ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE(S)

Created an interactive guide using a layered checklist format that documents the websites, contacts, resources and other information available to those responsible for coordinating organizational change.

The guide is based on a three tiered checklist design for ease of navigation/usability.

MAJOR

SERVICE AREAS

TASKS BY

SERVICE AREA

RESOURCES BY

SERVICE AREA

Project Recommendation

The guide is published on key websites, i.e.

Business & Finance, UHR, Financial

Operations, ITS, Facilities & Plant Operations.

• A message from Tim Slottow or his senior lead team communicates the availability of the guide to campus using 3-D lists.

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value of Admin

Guide for Organizational

Changes

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.7

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to communicate about the Admin

Guide for Organizational

Changes

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.7

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Engaging Staff in

Cost Reduction Strategies

Action Learning Team:

Andrew Berki

Marjory Falconer

Brian Heldt

Mark Nelson

Mike Swanson

Project Summary

The University of Michigan is facing significant budget challenges over the next few years. Tuition rates are at market and do not offer an increased revenue stream to offset

State budget cuts. The University must find new sources of revenue, and at the same time reduce costs.

Many organizations in both the public and private sectors have turned to their employees for the best ideas to create efficiency and cost savings. Research suggests that best practices can be adopted and leveraged by gathering ideas from the frontline workforce, implement those ideas as quickly as possible, and recognize staff for their ideas so that they continue to generate more ideas.

Project Recommendations

1.

Implement a Business and Finance Employee Idea

Program to capture ideas

2.

Obtain Leadership Commitment for this program through alignment with Business and Finance strategic goals

3.

Implement as quickly as possible

4.

Use multiple communication tools to build awareness of the program

5.

Define goals and metrics, and require periodic reporting to leadership and the division as a whole.

UM Business & Finance we make

blue

go!

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value of

Engaging Staff in Cost Reduction

Strategies

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 4.2

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to complete the

Engaging Staff in Cost Reduction

Strategies

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 4.1

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Flexible Work Arrangement

Action Learning Team:

Mike Contrera

Jeanette Frost

Lukeland Gentles

Peggy Sheagren

Brandy Wood

Project Summary

•Project was initiated to examine ways that a flexible work system could support: organization/department goals, efforts to recruit/retain best/brightest staff, cost/space saving initiatives and the improvement of customer/employee satisfaction.

•B&F project team learned that a variety of tools and resources exist within B&F, yet managerial perception and consistency in application of tools was not known.

•Project charge was agreed upon by TeamFlex and sponsors with an emphasis on surveying managers, researching peer organizations and developing recommendations for consistent application and evaluation of tools/resources.

•Survey developed in conjunction with Work/Life Resource Center and Ross administered to all B&F Managers revealed:

• Flexible work arrangements (FWAs) were available but not well utilized

• Managers felt a toolkit and managerial support would help them better utilize

FWAs

•Peer research revealed successful organizations are able to generate quality and cost improvements through careful implementation and evaluation.

Project Recommendation

• Develop a flexible work arrangement (FWA) toolkit that is supported, sponsored and evaluated by executive leadership.

• Components of such a toolkit would include:

• FWA options

• FWA – is it right for me? (employee checklist)

• FWA process and forms (employee initiated)

• Employee responsibilities

• FWA frequently asked questions

• Toolkit w/leadership support would include baseline and follow-up metrics to determine impact in areas such as customer service, employee satisfaction, health care costs, space/energy costs, etc.

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value of the

Flexible Work Arrangement

Toolkit with Leadership Support

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.7

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to complete

Flexible Work Arrangement

Toolkit with Leadership Support

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.3

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Knowledge Transfer

Action Learning Team:

Terry Houser

Ted Makowiec

Kristin Miller-Brancheau

Crystal James

Project Summary

5-pronged approach to address the issues

Retirement Eligibility Toolkit

1

Talent Management

System

5

2

Retirement Survey

Implicit Knowledge Transfer

4

3

Explicit Knowledge

Transfer

20

Project Summary

•66% are “not familiar” or “somewhat familiar” with currently available tools

•93% receive reporting “never” or “not on a routine basis”

•71% “never use” or very occasionally use the reporting for succession planning or knowledge transfer

•87% indicated they would like individual level detail

•65% indicated this should be a topic in an annual review process

Project Recommendation

•A summary of the retirement eligibility reporting tools and resources that are currently available should be combined into one “Retirement Eligibility and Resources Toolkit” and placed on the

University of Michigan (UM) Human Resources

(HR) website in the Manager’s Toolkit sub-page

•This would create one point of contact for all of the retirement eligibility reporting resources that are available today

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value of the

Retirement Eligibility and

Resources Toolkit

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 4.2

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to complete

Retirement Eligibility and

Resources Toolkit

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.7

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Project Recommendation

•Currently available retirement eligibility tools and resources should be explained and used as a management aid during a manager or supervisor’s annual review process

•A simple question during a managers or supervisors annual review, such as; “Let’s discuss your succession planning and knowledge transfer plans for your employees/department” would make managers/supervisors consider the subject and develop plans.

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value to

Modify Annual Review Process

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.5

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to

Modify Annual Review Process

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 2.9

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Project Recommendation

•An explicit knowledge course, modeled after the Salt River Project format, should be developed and facilitated for B&F managers

•A specific course designed to teach manager/supervisors how to glean explicit knowledge could be offered and recommended to individuals who have potential retirees

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value to

Develop Explicit Knowledge

Course

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.5

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to Develop

Explicit Knowledge Course

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.0

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Project Recommendation

•A cross -functional team should create an on-boarding program for B&F.

•This program should be administered and managed consistently across all

B&F units

•Managers should be required to introduce new employees to the critical people this person will need to know in order to do their job efficiently and effectively (i.e. who are the top 5 people you need to know to do your job.)

•Each department should have a database that includes this list for each job title/position in their area.

•Making it a requirement that manager/supervisors meet specific individuals to help them perform their jobs more efficiently can make certain both impilcit and explicit knowledge is transferred

Business Value Rating

Rate the business value to

Develop B&F On-boarding

Program

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 3.4

1. Has little value

3. Interesting and has value

5. Critical and has strategic value

Urgency Rating

What is the urgency to Develop

B&F On-boarding Program

Scale 1-5

Forum Rating = 2.8

1. Should not be done

3. Should be started in the next year

5. Should have been done already – implement immediately

Energy Conservation

Incentives

Action Learning Team:

Colin Anderson

Debbie Gowan

Keith Johnson

Jarrod Van Kirk

Project Summary

Develop incentives for B&F units to conserve energy. Central units, unlike the schools and colleges, do not realize direct financial savings from reduced use. The program should be based on measurable activity levels, but the invectives do not necessarily need to be financial.

Project Recommendation

“A new Office of Campus Sustainability will serve as the focal point for sustainable operations at the university. ” President Mary Sue Coleman

[10/6/2009]

Download