NZQA registered unit standard
27056 version 1
Page 1 of 4
Title
Monitor and review risk in an aviation environment
Level
5
Credits
15
Purpose
People credited with this unit standard are, in an aviation
environment, able to: explain the aim and function of monitoring
and reviewing risk; demonstrate knowledge of the methods and
tools for monitoring and reviewing risk; develop a monitor and
review plan; and finalise the risk management process.
Classification
Aviation > Aviation - Core
Available grade
Achieved
Explanatory notes
1
Resources may include but are not limited to – Standards Australia/Standards New
Zealand. 2009. AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management – principles and
guidelines. Sydney and Wellington: Standards Australia and Standards New
Zealand.
2
All references to the CAA refer specifically to the Civil Aviation Authority of New
Zealand.
3
Industry standards are those set in place by the CAA.
4
Industry texts may include but are not limited to – AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009, CAA
Rules, CAA Advisory Circulars, operator exposition.
5
Definition
Knowledge refers to the knowledge, understanding, and application of the subject
matter.
Outcomes and evidence requirements
Outcome 1
Explain the aim and function of monitoring and reviewing risk in an aviation environment.
Evidence requirements
1.1
The terms ‘monitor’ and ‘review’ are defined in accordance with industry texts.
1.2
The function of monitoring and reviewing risks is described in accordance with
industry texts.
ServiceIQ
SSB Code 9068
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
NZQA registered unit standard
27056 version 1
Page 2 of 4
1.3
The purpose of the monitoring and reviewing processes is explained in
accordance with industry texts.
1.4
Stakeholders responsible for monitoring and reviewing risks are identified.
1.5
The characteristics of risks that will be monitored and reviewed are described in
accordance with industry texts.
Outcome 2
Demonstrate knowledge of the methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risk in an
aviation environment.
Evidence requirements
2.1
Methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risks are described in
accordance with industry standards and texts.
2.2
Methods and tools for monitoring and reviewing risk management process are
described in accordance with industry standards and texts.
2.3
Methods and tools to monitor and review risks and the risk management
process are utilised in accordance with industry standards and texts.
2.4
How monitoring and reviewing fits into each step of the risk management
process are identified and explained in accordance with industry standards and
texts.
Outcome 3
Develop a monitor and review plan in an aviation environment.
Evidence requirements
3.1
A plan to formally and informally review the risks and the risk treatment action
plan is developed. A performance measurement system by which to determine
if the risk treatment strategies are adequate in accordance with industry
standards and texts is included.
3.2
The reports from the ongoing review of the risks and risk treatment action plan
internally, and externally as required, are used in accordance with industry
standards and texts.
3.3
Review of the monitor and review plan is scheduled on a regular basis to
ensure its ongoing appropriateness in accordance with industry standards and
texts.
Range
ServiceIQ
SSB Code 9068
includes but is not limited to – timeliness of monitoring and
reviewing processes, identification of person(s) responsible for
monitor and review plan, measures to monitor and review risk
treatment and emerging risks.
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
NZQA registered unit standard
27056 version 1
Page 3 of 4
Outcome 4
Finalise the risk management process in an aviation environment.
Evidence requirements
4.1
A records system, which provides the foundation for improvement in the risk
management process, is described in accordance with industry standards and
texts.
includes but is not limited to – ease of access to records for
stakeholders, record identification system, version control,
historical data retention, periodic evaluation of record system, use
of technology.
Range
4.2
A records system for the risk management process outcomes is established in
accordance with industry standards and texts.
must include but is not limited to – risk assessments, risk
treatments plans, monitor and review plans.
Range
Planned review date
31 December 2016
Status information and last date for assessment for superseded versions
Process
Version Date
Last Date for Assessment
Registration
1
15 April 2011
N/A
Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMR) reference
0170
This CMR can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do.
Please note
Providers must be granted consent to assess against standards (accredited) by NZQA,
before they can report credits from assessment against unit standards or deliver courses
of study leading to that assessment.
Industry Training Organisations must be granted consent to assess against standards by
NZQA before they can register credits from assessment against unit standards.
Providers and Industry Training Organisations, which have been granted consent and
which are assessing against unit standards must engage with the moderation system that
applies to those standards.
Requirements for consent to assess and an outline of the moderation system that applies
to this standard are outlined in the Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMRs). The
CMR also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations wishing
to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for tutors
and assessors, and special resource requirements.
ServiceIQ
SSB Code 9068
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016
NZQA registered unit standard
27056 version 1
Page 4 of 4
Comments on this unit standard
Please contact the ServiceIQ qualifications@serviceiq.org.nz if you wish to suggest
changes to the content of this unit standard.
ServiceIQ
SSB Code 9068
 New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016