Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Organization Worksheet Prompt 1
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
Outputs
4
Rating Rationale:
?
+
ORG Criterion 1:
Organization
demonstrates sufficient
capacity and authority
to effectively support
and sustain effective
educator preparation
programs.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Leadership interview
Faculty Focus Group (s)
1
2
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
3
4
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Organization Worksheet Prompt 2a & 2b
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
4
Outputs
Rating Rationale:
?
+
ORG Criterion 2:
Systems/structures
support collaboration
within departments and
across disciplines and
improve candidate
preparation.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Faculty Focus Group (s)
1
2
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
3
4
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Organization Worksheet Prompt 3
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
Outputs
4
Rating Rationale:
?
+
ORG Criterion 3:
Budgets support
ongoing educator
preparation program
sustainability and
allocate resources
according to the
organization’s goals.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Leadership interview
Faculty Focus Group(s)
1
2
Rating Rationale:

Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
3
4
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Organization Prompt 4
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
Outputs
Stakeholder Survey(s)*
4
Rating Rationale:
?
+
ORG Criterion 4:
All candidates,
regardless of program
or delivery model, have
equitable and
consistent access to
resources.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate/Completer Focus Group(s)
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
4
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Organization Worksheet Prompt 5a, 5b, &
5c
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
4
Outputs
Rating Rationale:
?
+
ORG Criterion 5:
Recruitment, selection
and evaluation
processes result in the
hiring and retention of
effective faculty/
instructors and staff.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Faculty Focus Group(s)
Candidate/Completer Focus Group(s)
Leadership Interview
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
4
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Organization Worksheet Prompt 6a & 6b
1
2
Rating Rationale:

3
4
Outputs
Rating Rationale:
?
+
ORG Criterion 6:
Faculty/instructors and
staff engage in
professional
development or work in
the field that has a
positive impact on the
quality of preparation
provided to candidates.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Faculty Focus Group(s)
1
2
Rating Rationale:

Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
3
4
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 6
Eval Tool 2016-2017
Domain: Organization (ORG)
Sponsoring Organization:
Reviewer:
Overall Domain Summary
Criterion
Offsite Output Onsite Commendation
Criterion
Met
Finding
1. Organization demonstrates sufficient capacity
and authority to effectively support and sustain
effect educator prep programs.
2. Systems/structures support collaboration within
departments and across disciplines and improve
candidate preparation.
3. Budgets support ongoing educator preparation
program sustainability and allocate resources
according to the Sponsoring Organization’s
goals.
4. All candidates, regardless of program or delivery
model, have equitable and consistent access to
resources.
5. Recruitment, selection and evaluation processes
result in the hiring and retention of effective
faculty/instructors and staff.
6. Faculty/instructors and staff engage in
professional development or work in the field
that has a positive impact on the quality of
preparation provided to candidates.
Domain Summary
Overall Domain Recommendation
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7