Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Only ESE Staff Rate Here:
Only Applies To New Programs, Admin
Programs, and Professional Support
Personnel Programs – Existing Teacher
Programs Do Not Rate
Program of Study
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Program of Study meets
regulatory
requirements for
applicable licenses set
forth in 603 CMR 7.03
(3) (a) and (b) and 7.04
(2) (c) 5. b. i. or c. i.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Only ESE Staff Rate Here:
Only Applies To New Programs, Admin
Programs, and Professional Support
Personnel Programs – Existing Teacher
Programs Do Not Rate
Program of Study
SMK Matrix
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Only ESE Staff Rate Here:
MTEL Data
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Program of Study
addresses all SMK
requirements set forth
in 603 CMR 7.06, 7.07,
7.09, and 7.11at the
appropriate licensure
level (if applicable).
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Only ESE Staff Rate Here:
Only Applies To New Programs, Admin
Programs– Professional Support Personnel
Programs and Existing Teacher Programs
Do Not Rate
Program of Study
PST Matrix
1
2
3
4
Program Completer Survey*
Ed Eval Data*
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Program of Study
addresses all
Professional Standards
set forth in 603 CMR
7.08 or 7.10 at the
appropriate licensure
level (if applicable).
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Only ESE Staff Rate Here:
Only Applies To New Programs, Admin
Programs, and Professional Support
Personnel Programs – Existing Teacher
Programs Do Not Rate
Course Descriptions
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Course descriptions
clearly state what
candidates will know or
be able to do by the end
of the course.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:
Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Instruction Worksheet Prompt 2
1
2
3
Program Completer Survey*
4
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Program design results
in a coherent program
of study such that
connections among and
between courses are
evident.
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Arts & Sciences Faculty Focus Group (if
applicable)
Program Faculty Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Only ESE Staff Rate Here:
Only Applies To New Programs, Admin
Programs, and Professional Support
Personnel Programs – Existing Teacher
Programs Do Not Rate
Instruction Worksheet Prompt 3
Program of Study
SMK/PST Matrices
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

Program Completer Survey*
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Program of Study is
sequenced to support
the increased depth of
skills and knowledge
acquired and applied
over time.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Arts & Sciences Faculty Focus Group (if
applicable)
Program Faculty Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 6
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Instruction Worksheet Prompt 4
Program of Study
1
2
3
Program Completer Survey*
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Content is
differentiated by
subject area and level of
licensure being sought.
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Instruction Worksheet Prompt 5a & 5b
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Content delivery is
calibrated for
consistency within
programs (e.g. different
instructors of same
course, in satellites,
online, etc.).
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group (Satellite group)
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 8
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
MTEL Data
Educator Evaluation Data*
Program Completer Survey*
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:

Criterion:
Candidate
understanding and
application of MA
Curriculum frameworks
is an embedded
expectation in
preparation
coursework.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Supervising Practitioner Focus Group
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Partners Focus Group
1
2
3
4
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 9
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Program Completer Survey*
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Faculty/instructors
model effective
pedagogical and
content practices of
discipline.
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 10
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Program Completer Survey*
1
2
3
4
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Faculty/instructors
model practices and
strategies to meet the
needs of diverse
learners.
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Program Supervisor Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 11
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Instruction Worksheet Prompt 6
1
2
3
Program Completer Survey*
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Faculty/instructors use
course formative and
summative assessment
data to target areas of
candidate need.
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 12
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
1
2
3
Outputs
4
Rating Rationale:
-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Areas for follow-up onsite:
Courses assess what
candidates know or are
able to do by the end of
each course.
ONSITE
Arts & Science Faculty Focus Group
Program Faculty Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 13
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
OFFSITE
Offsite Submission
Outputs
Instruction Worksheet Prompt 1
1
2
3
Program Completer Survey*
4
Rating Rationale:

-
?
+
Rating Rationale:
Criterion:
Candidates receive
targeted feedback
linked to appropriate
SMK and/or
Professional Standards
(i.e. Professional
Standards for Teachers)
that improves their
practice.
Areas for follow-up onsite:
ONSITE
Candidate Focus Group
Completer Focus Group
Criterion Overall Rating
Commendation
Criteria Met
Finding
1
2
3
4
Criteria Overall Rating Statement:
Rating Rationale:

Professional Suggestion:
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 14
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
Overall Domain Summary
Criterion
Offsite Output Onsite Commendation
Criterion
Finding
Met
Program of Study meets regulatory requirements for
applicable licenses set forth in 603 CMR 7.03 (3) (a)
and (b) and 7.04 (2) (c) 5. b. i. or c. i.
Program of Study addresses all SMK requirements set
forth in 603 CMR 7.06, 7.07, 7.09, and 7.11at the
appropriate licensure level (if applicable).
Program of Study addresses all Professional Standards
set forth in 603 CMR 7.08 or 7.10 at the appropriate
licensure level (if applicable).
Course descriptions clearly state what candidates will
know or be able to do by the end of the course.
Program design results in a coherent program of
study such that connections among and between
courses are evident.
Program of Study is sequenced to support the
increased depth of skills and knowledge acquired and
applied over time.
Content is differentiated by subject area and level of
licensure being sought.
Content delivery is calibrated for consistency within
programs (e.g. different instructors of same course, in
satellites, online, etc.).
Candidate understanding and application of MA
Curriculum frameworks is an embedded expectation
in preparation coursework.
Faculty/instructors model effective pedagogical and
content practices of discipline.
Faculty/instructors model practices and strategies to
meet the needs of diverse learners.
Faculty/instructors use course formative and
summative assessment data to target areas of
candidate need.
Courses assess what candidates know or are able to
do by the end of each course.
Candidates receive targeted feedback linked to
appropriate SMK and/or Professional Standards (i.e.
Professional Standards for Teachers) that improves
their practice.
Domain Summary
Overall Domain Recommendation
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 15
Eval Tool 2015-16
Domain: Instruction
Program:
Sponsoring Organization:
Unsatisfactory
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 16