MA in Creative and Critical Writing Handbook 2015-16 This handbook refers to the MA course in Creative and Critical Writing offered by the School of English at the University of Sussex The convenor of this course is Professor Nicholas Royle, N.W.O.Royle@sussex.ac.uk 1. Introduction The MA in Creative and Critical Writing at Sussex has developed out of longstanding teaching and research interests in creative writing as well as in psychoanalysis, cultural materialism, ecopoetics, postcolonialism, deconstruction, feminism and queer theory. This MA is designed to enable students to combine an interest in intellectually challenging critical and theoretical ideas with an interest in creative writing. It is based on the supposition that ‘theory’ and ‘practice’ are not opposites, though the relations between them may entail productive tensions and paradoxes. It is impelled rather by the sense that the critical and the creative are necessarily intertwined. Many great writers in English, at least since Milton, have also written important criticism. Good writers are invariably also good readers. The MA in Creative and Critical Writing offers students modules that combine ‘theory’ and ‘practice’, focusing on critical writings, for example, specifically with a view to encouraging and clarifying a sense of how to write creatively and well, and how to think creatively and differently about the possibilities of writing. Hélène Cixous is Honorary Professor of the Creative and Critical Writing Course at Sussex; J. H. Prynne is Visiting Professor. 2. Course structure and specifications For full-time students the course comprises four taught 12 week modules, two in the Autumn and two in the Spring. This is followed by the preparation and writing of a dissertation under supervision. Modules are normally taught by weekly seminar. Each module attracts 30 credits and the Dissertation 60 credits: the total number of credits constituting the course is 180. Each module is examined by a 5000-word term paper, to be submitted at the beginning of the term following that in which the module is taught. The dissertation length is 15,000 words and it is submitted at the start of September. For part-time students, the same requirements are spread over two years, with one module taken in each of the successive Autumn and Spring terms, and with the preparation and writing of the dissertation extended over two summer periods. In the Autumn and Spring terms CCW students are invited to attend reading and performance events which take place at regular intervals. There are numerous opportunities to hear and meet practising writers from outside Sussex, as well as (on occasion) publishers and literary agents. Creative and Critical Writing Students also have the chance to present their own work in this context. Students are also encouraged to attend other open seminars run by the English Department and indeed elsewhere in the Humanities. This year, the modules constituting the course are as follows: Autumn Term Psychoanalysis and Creative Writing Creativity and Utopia Spring Term Marxism and Creative Writing Deconstruction and Creative Writing Voices in the Archives: Writing from History Experimental Writing 3. Course learning outcomes A student who has completed the MA in Creative and Critical Writing successfully should be able to: demonstrate an ability to produce creative work stimulated and inflected by an encounter with issues in contemporary critical thinking and writing demonstrate an ability to produce critical work stimulated and inflected by experience and practice in creative writing demonstrate a specialised knowledge of selected key issues in the field of creative and critical writing; demonstrate a detailed knowledge of one or more leading topics in contemporary critical thinking; demonstrate oral and writing skills in which a clear, concise and exact use of language is brought to bear on a rigorous consideration of texts, ideas and controversies within the field; demonstrate an ability to understand and to use, when necessary, some of the specialist vocabularies associated with literary criticism and theory; cite relevant materials judiciously, and to good effect, in the construction of an overarching argument; read ‘literary’, ‘historical’ and ‘theoretical’ texts critically and attentively; demonstrate skill in time and work management, including the ability to read, write and research independently use electronic resources; put together well-presented and well-edited creative work and well-written, fullyreferenced, word-processed critical essays; carry out a substantial and original piece of research within the field. essays. 4. Course modules Autumn Term: Psychoanalysis and Creative Writing: Psychoanalysis has exciting and major implications for all kinds of writing, not least that sort called ‘creative’. This module will focus on some of the ways in which a close reading of psychoanalytic texts, especially those of Sigmund Freud himself, can be linked to the theory and practice of creative writing. We will look in particular detail at how Freud’s work illuminates the question of literature (and vice versa) in relation to such topics as the uncanny, fantasy and daydreaming, story-telling and the death drive, chance, humour, mourning and loss. Concentrating on detailed reading and discussion of a series of psychoanalytic, critical and literary texts, the module will lead students through to having an opportunity to submit a term-paper work that may include a creative writing as well as a critical component. Creativity and Utopia: This module explores the intimate relationship between creativity and utopia, as it is played out in literary and theoretical texts from More to the present day. It examines the extent to which the art work can create new worlds (brave or otherwise), and traces the historical changes in the utopian function of literature, in its various philosophical, literary and theoretical manifestations. After an initial grounding in More's Utopia, the module moves through some key eighteenth and nineteenth century utopias, before focusing on the ways in which utopian thought is refashioned in modernist and contemporary writing. In paying attention to the changing function of utopian thinking in twentieth century literature, the module also explores how the theoretical developments of the modern and contemporary period have inherited a utopian legacy. How has Marxist utopian thinking informed modern and contemporary utopianism? How does the Frankfurt school investment in utopian thought relate to Derridean and Deleuzian conceptions of utopian possibility? The relationship between creativity and utopia will be explored both through the reading of several key utopian texts, and through reflections on the practice of creative writing. Spring Term: Deconstruction and Creative Writing: This course focuses on deconstruction, especially in relation to the work of Jacques Derrida, and on the theory and practice of creative writing. Following a preliminary discussion of the question ‘what is deconstruction?’, we will explore a series of topics including the gift, madness, secrets and drugs. There will be texts by Kafka, Borges, Katherine Mansfield, Blanchot and Harry Mathews, for example, as well as work by Derrida and Cixous. Concentrating on detailed reading and discussion of a range of deconstructive, critical and literary texts, the course will lead students through to having an opportunity to submit a term-paper that can (if the student wishes) include a creative writing as well as a critical component. Marxism and Creative Writing: In the wake of the end of the Cold War and especially since ‘September 11’, as neoconservatives replaced Marxism with ‘terrorism’ as their new and irrational enemy, many writers in America and Europe sought with redoubled commitment to revitalise elements of Marxist thinking in their creative practice: to confront the new dominant form of rationality with a creative rationality of the dominated. This module will investigate the history and present significance of that commitment in several ways: through study of the tradition of Marxist thinking about the relation of aesthetics to social and political life; through consideration of mainstream trends in contemporary literature and the economic and political interests they reflect and fortify; and through the evaluation of theoretical claims made by contemporary writers themselves, both in creative writing and in criticism, about their own strategies of opposition and the problem of their potential efficacy. Students will be asked to reflect on the significance of these problems for their own creative and critical practice. Voices in the Archives: Writing from History: This module invites you to consider the ways creative writing uses history, from pragmatic research strategies to theoretical implications. We think about how different literary genres engage with the past through form, narrative and literary language, looking at the cultural impact of contemporary historical fiction, and also considering work by poets and film-makers. Authors studied may include Sarah Waters, Ian McEwan, Toni Morrison, Hilary Mantel, David Dabydeen, Mario Petrucci, George Szirtes and Michel Hazanavicius. Creative workshops introduce key research skills, exploring the methodological implications of using physical and virtual archives. Working with historical newspapers, letters, diaries, prints, photographs and other documents, we immerse ourselves in old-fangled vocabularies, and experiment with using language from the past to inflect our contemporary voices. Topics for discussion include the critical and ethical implications of writing about real historical events and characters. We consider how contemporary writing is founded on a long tradition of writing from history - often re-visiting the past with a particular political or creative agenda - from Shakespeare and Dickens onwards. Additionally, we explore how recent historical fiction interacts with other genres, for example in the fantasies of Susanna Clarke and Angela Carter. We consider theoretical work on memory and nostalgia by critics such as Mieke Bal and Svetlana Boym. Experimental Writing: This module considers why and how writers produce new forms. It explores the historical and current uses of a variety of names for writing that defies generic expectations ('innovative,' 'avant-garde,' 'experimental,' 'difficult,' and 'cross-genre,' to name a few). The module will require that students read a wide range of exemplary texts (likely but not necessarily chosen from the modern and contemporary periods) that eschew easy generic categorisation. A particular theme or problem may be selected by the tutor each year (e.g., cross-genre writing, innovative poetics, documentary writing, speculative fiction). Readings might include work by Walter Benjamin, Andrea Brady, Anne Carson, Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, Renee Gladman, Bernadette Mayer, Fred Moten, Harryette Mullen, Maggie Nelson, Raymond Queneau, Charles Resnikoff, Sophie Robinson, Fran Ross, Muriel Rukeyser, Monique Wittig. Critical inquiry will focus on the effects of formal techniques within specific literary historical and social contexts. Students will also develop their own writing, and up to 50% of class time may be devoted to workshopping student work. As writers, students may be asked to identify the tensions or contradictions that animate their writing and to work up, in structured, experimental, or procedural fashion, a set of formal mechanisms for reframing these tensions. The module will help students to bring creative writing and critical practice together in order best to navigate their aims and objectives for writing. Final assessment will involve a critical/creative dissertation of 6,000 words. 5. Teaching and learning Depending on where you were an undergraduate, you may find that you have either fewer or more teaching hours as an MA student than you did when you were studying for your BA. Fulltime students will normally be doing two modules at any one time (plus the writing workshop): each of these will involve a weekly seminar of just under two hours. You are also strongly encouraged to attend The Wing, plus any other relevant open seminars that are brought to your attention. In addition, you should spend at least 15 hours a week in individual study. The University and the School of Humanities provide certain facilities and resources – most notably, a library, the use of computers, and a space where learning is constantly pursued. Your tutors will direct your study with reading lists and all kinds of informal advice. Your ideas and conclusions will be put to the test in seminars, where you will be expected to have reached some views of your own and to be able to argue for them. Your written work will be formally assessed to determine your degree result, and you will receive feedback on your term papers as you go along. We will help you as much as we can, but what you get out of your study will depend on how much you put into it: your mastery of the subject is primarily something for you to achieve. Though the structures we put in place will assist you in this endeavour, they cannot do the work for you. Individual Study The largest, and in many ways the most important, part of your working time will be spent on your own, or discussing problems with your fellow-students. It is important to organise your time effectively, and to plan your use of the library, especially if you have to do paid work as well as your academic work. A word of advice: always set yourself specific and realistic targets when you work, and take regular breaks. Set yourself to read a particular article or chapter of a book, or to work for a pre-determined length of time (say one and a half hours) and then pause when you have completed this task. A few periods of intense concentration, separated by short breaks, will serve you far better than any amount of time spent sitting at a desk but not really concentrating. Module seminars The focus of your work for each module will be a weekly seminar. You should be in command of the reading set, and be prepared to try out your own ideas and to defend them in discussion. Module seminars are compulsory. In many seminars, some form of presentation will also be required: your tutor will give you guidance on the form which presentations are expected to take and how to prepare them. Training sessions The Graduate Centre in Humanities organises several training sessions for all MA students in the Humanities in the course of the year, on generic topics like ‘writing a term paper’ and ‘writing a dissertation’. These sessions will be advertised to you in advance and we strongly advise you to attend them. Fuller details are given in the Graduate Centre in the Humanities Postgraduate Handbook. Essays We require that your essays be professionally presented: typed or word-processed, with full scholarly references and a bibliography. Pay particular attention to matters of spelling, style and punctuation. Poor punctuation is one of the commonest failings in student essays, even at graduate level. If you are unsure about correct punctuation, get hold of a guide: there are several cheap and readable such guides on the market. You can find further information about how to research and write term papers and dissertations at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/cssd/info_for_MA_students/index.shtml. Module Evaluation Student evaluation forms are issued at the end of each module and are scrutinised by the tutors associated with the module before it is taught again. These forms are anonymous, and are an opportunity for you to tell us what you felt about all aspects of the module, including the material covered, teaching methods, and the adequacy of library and web resources. We take your comments and suggestions for improvement very seriously. We do not, of course, guarantee to be able to meet all student requests, first because we have to operate within tight financial constraints, and second because we have to exercise our own academic judgement about the desirability of any change. In addition, some key areas – notably the library – are beyond the immediate control of the Graduate Centre. But we do guarantee to give active consideration to all serious suggestions for change and improvement. 6. Assessment Criteria Band Distinction Percentage 70-100% Variation 80-100% 70-80% Qualities Truly exceptional work that could be published with little or no further development or alteration on the strength of its original contribution to the field, its flawless or compelling prose, its uncommon brilliance in argument and its demonstration of considerable knowledge of the topics and authors treated on the module. Outstanding work that might be fit for publication or for development into a publishable article. Work that is exceptional for its originality of conception and argument, its conduct of analysis and description, its use of research and its demonstration of knowledge of the field and of the core materials studied on the module. Merit 60-69% Good or very good work that is thoughtfully structured or designed, persuasively written and argued, based on convincing use of research and fairly original in at least some of its conclusions. Pass 50-59% Satisfactory work that meets the requirements of the module and sets out a plausible argument based on some reading and research but that may also include errors, poor writing, or some unargued and improbable judgments. Fail 0-49% 35-49% Unsatisfactory Work that is inadequate with respect to its argument, its use and presentation of research and its demonstration of knowledge of the topics and authors treated on the module, or that is poorly written and difficult to follow or understand. 15-34% Very unsatisfactory Work that plainly does not meet the requirements of the course and that fails to make any persuasive use of research or to conduct any argument with clarity or purpose. 0-15% Unacceptable or not submitted. 7. Teaching faculty Peter Boxall (English) has published widely on modern and contemporary writing. Recent books include Twenty-First Century Fiction: A Critical Introduction, Don DeLillo: The Possibility of Fiction, Since Beckett: Contemporary Writing in the Wake of Modernism and an edition of Beckett's novel Malone Dies. He is currently editing a volume of the Oxford History of the Novel with Bryan Cheyette. He is the editor of the UK journal Textual Practice. Nicholas Royle (English) works in the fields of modern literature and literary theory, as well as Shakespeare. His books include Veering: A Theory of Literature, How to Read Shakespeare, The Uncanny, E.M. Forster, Jacques Derrida, Telepathy and Literature and (with Andrew Bennett) An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory. He is an editor of the Oxford Literary Review. He has also published numerous works of short fiction, as well as a novel, Quilt. Minoli Salgado (English) works on postcolonial literature and theory, as well as poststructuralist debates in history. She is the author of the critical study Writing Sri Lanka; her short fiction and poetry have been published internationally. Sam Solomon (English) works broadly on twentieth century and contemporary literature (poetry and cross-genre writing especially) as they relate to radical social movements; he has written on the connections of gay and women's liberation to political economy, particularly in the context of Marxist-feminist praxis. Research and teaching interests include: creative writing, feminism, Marxism, contemporary poetics, cross-genre and documentary writing, queer theory, critical university studies, Yiddish literature and culture, literary translation, aesthetics and politics. Bethan Stevens (English) has research interests which involve people and groups whose work crosses over between the visual and the literary, such as William Blake; the Flaxmans (an eighteenth-century family including an RA sculptor, book-illustrator and amateur writer); eighteenth- and nineteenth-century producers of chapbooks and illustrated novels; the PreRaphaelites; Virginia Woolf and Vanessa Bell. Keston Sutherland (English) works on 20th century and contemporary poetry; Marx, the reception and translation of Marx, and Marxism; Adorno; Wordsworth; Pope; Beckett. Recent books include TL61P, a suite of five greater odes dedicated to the now-obsolete product code for a Hotpoint tumble and spin dryer, Stupefaction: a radical anatomy of phantoms, The Stats on Infinity, Stress Position and Hot White Andy. He is the editor of Quid, Brighton's chief organ of neopreraphaelite totalitarian poetics, and co-editor of Barque Press. He is currently working in scholarly fashion on the poetics of Marx's critique of political economy, on the problem how perfection may be disgusting, and on mouths.