EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK Frequent/ Timely The Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Expectations: Feedback on student work is frequent. Instruction: Feedback is regular and on-going. Students articulate goals and evaluate progress. Students have access to personal progress. Specific Evidence of Student Learning: Communication to parents and community about individual student progress exists in relation to goals. Expectations: Feedback on student work is specific. The Skillful Teacher Another factor that obstructs learning and contaminates most classroom climates is the belief that “good students do it by themselves,” instead of the belief that what makes good students is that they solicit help and lots of feedback on their work. (p. 373) Feedback has maximum communicative effect when it is both full and specific. (p. 247) Instruction: A feedback loop exists about adequacy and effectiveness of instructional materials. Teacher Expectation Student Achievement Effective feedback should be timely and direct for all learners. Classroom Instruction That Works Timely feedback appears to be critical to its effectiveness. (p. 97) Feedback given immediately after a test-like situation is best. (p. 97) Effective feedback should provide appropriate guidance to enhance achievement. Feedback should be informative, varied and credible. Feedback should be corrective in nature. Provide students with an explanation of what they are doing that is correct and what they are doing that is not correct. (p. 96) The best feedback appears to involve an explanation as to what is accurate and inaccurate in terms of student responses. (p. 96) Provide students with feedback in terms of specific levels of knowledge and skill. (p. 99) Page 1 of 2 Respectful Instructional The Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Expectations: Feedback on student work is respectful. Student self-evaluation and goal setting exist. There is a language of giving help. The Key Messages Instruction: Students provide nonjudgmental feedback to their peers. Evidence of Student Learning: Self-monitoring and goal setting are apparent. Teachers communicate that, with effort, students can achieve these rigorous goals. Expectations: Feedback on student work is instructional. There are provisions for reteaching and extra help. Language of response to errors or below-standard work/improvement or above standard work reflects this. There are opportunities for reciprocal feedback. Instruction: Students describe areas of mastery and areas of need. Students can articulate The Skillful Teacher It is argued that full and complete feedback is a form of respect by which teachers show students they value students’ work enough to look at it closely. (p. 247) Teacher Expectation Student Achievement Classroom Instruction That Works Corrective feedback should encourage positive selftalk, self-image and goal setting. Simply telling students that their answer on a test is right or wrong has a negative effect on achievement. (p. 96) Corrective feedback should promote reflective dialog. Asking students to stay on task until they succeed appears to enhance achievement. (p. 96) Feedback on student work can send “I believe in you” messages in three circumstances: unmet expectations, students doing well and significant change in performance. (p. 316) Reflective listening feeds back to speakers the content of their remarks and thus confirms to them that they have been heard. Active listening adds a feeling component to the feedback, and the listener restates or infers the feeling state of the speaker aloud. (p. 349) Teachers can claim they’re using knowledge of results if they’re giving students feedback about how they did very soon after they perform, along with an opportunity to self-correct or at least see what would have to be done to improve. (p.247) The knowledge base tells us that verbal reinforcement should be precise, appropriate, and when appropriate, scheduled from regular to intermittent. (p.248) When it comes to work, the Giving a test one day after a learning situation seems to be optimal. (p. 98) Effective feedback should connect abstract concepts. Effective feedback should link learning to new experiences. Teachers should model corrective feedback by demonstrating how to correct a mistake in order that students develop selfcorrection skills. Self-regulating skills ensure that students become self-directed and not dependent upon others. Provide students with feedback that is relative to how well they are doing. (p.96) The simplest prescription for improving education is “dollops of feedback.” (p. 9) Criterion-referenced feedback (telling students where they stand relative to a specific target of knowledge or skill) is most useful. This is in contrast to norm referenced feedback (where students stand in relation to other students).(p.98) Students can effectively quality work. Teachers match communication of instructional goals to students’ needs and learning styles. feedback students get about their products seems particularly important in communicating expectations. (p.299) The following important attributes of this feedback show up again and again in interviews with teachers and students: Prompt and complete Detailed Personal contact No excuses Recognizes superior performance Logical consequences for poor performance (p. 299-300) The importance of feedback to students being prompt, detailed, and sometimes delivered through personal contact rather than just in writing if expectations are to be communicated clearly. (p. 316) Page 2 of 2 Feedback should focus on students’ potential to learn, the value of challenge, and the use of effort and learning processes in the face of obstacles. monitor their own progress. (p. 99) Adapt generic rubrics to specific content looking at information, processes, and skills. (p. 99)