The motives for late 19th century imperialism were economic, political, paternalistic, and racist. New Imperialism J. A. Hobson Joseph Chamberlain Suez Canal Boers Wars Sepoy Mutiny jingoism Alfred T. Mahan Cecil Rhodes David Livingstone Henry Stanley Boxer Rebellion Open Door Policy gunboat diplomacy Opium Wars Congress of Berlin Economic Access to markets, raw materials and profits from investments in developing infrastructure Reduce prices of goods and provide employment and economic benefits for workers Political Nationalists argued that imperialism was necessary for the prestige of their country and for strategic ports Social Darwinist believed that the European states were engaged in a fierce struggle for survival and that colonies were important for victory Paternalistic Some argued that it was a moral obligation for Europeans to spread the benefits of Western civilization – medicine, education, democracy, science, and technology to the backwards world Christian missionaries believed they were saving souls Racist argued that imperialism was justified because of the inferiority of the African and Asian races. Critics said that imperialism was detrimental in that the taxpayers had to pay for the imperial armies and navies Critics, such as Hobson, argued that only the cash-rich capitalist who needed places to invest their surplus capital benefited from imperialism Critics argued that imperialist competition might lead to unnecessary wars Critics also asserted that imperialism was a way for the ruling elite to avoid discussing of domestic problems Critics argued that such imposition of Western culture was destructive of native cultures, religions, and languages and presumed a superiority that was not always valid Critics opposed both Social Darwinism and racism as lacking any scientific basis and said that they were simply justifying white domination