AI Magazine Volume 11 Number 1 (1990)
(1991) (© AAAI)
Research in Progress
Directions in AI Research
and Applications at
Siemens Corporate Research
and Development
Wolfram Buettner, Klaus Estenfeld,
Hans Haugeneder, and Peter Struss
■ Many barriers exist today that prevent
effective industrial exploitation of current
and future AI research. These barriers can
only be removed by people who are working at the scientific forefront in AI and
know potential industrial needs.
The Knowledge Processing Laboratory’s
research and development concentrates in
the following areas: (1) natural language
interfaces to knowledge-based systems and
databases; (2) theoretical and experimental work on qualitative modeling and
nonmonotonic reasoning for future knowledge-based systems; (3) application-specific language design, in particular, Prolog
extensions; and (4) design and analysis of
neural networks.
This article gives the reader an overview
of the main topics currently being pursued
in each of these areas.
Many barriers exist today that prevent effective industrial exploitation
of current and future AI research.
These barriers can only be removed
by people who are working at the
scientific forefront in AI and know
potential industrial needs.
The Knowledge Processing Laboratory within Siemens Corporate
Research and Development in
Munich, Germany, aims at breaking
down these barriers. With over
350,000 employees and a product
line ranging from coffee makers to
mainframe computers, Siemens is
one of the world’s leading high-tech
companies. Its interest in leadingedge technologies such as AI is
understandable.
The Knowledge Processing Laboratory’s research and development concentrates in the following areas: (1)
natural language interfaces to knowledge-based systems and databases; (2)
theoretical and experimental work
on qualitative modeling and nonmonotonic reasoning for future
knowledge-based systems; (3) application-specific language design, in
20
AI MAGAZINE
particular, Prolog extensions; and (4)
design and analysis of neural networks.
The lab’s 26 researchers are organized into four groups corresponding
to these areas. Together, they provide
Siemens with innovative software
technologies, appropriate applications,
prototypical implementations of AI
systems, and evaluations of new
techniques and trends.
In addition to its responsibilities to
the company, the lab aims at establishing close contacts with the outside scientific community. In part,
this contact is made by sharing technical results and advances in AI
technology and its theoretical foundations. Furthermore, lab researchers
support a two-way exchange of information through publications and
talks on current work as well as activities as referees, teachers at tutorials,
and conference organizers.
The remainder of this article gives
the reader an overview of the main
topics currently being pursued in
each of the four groups.
Natural Language
Technology
Current state-of-the-art natural language interfaces have many limitations. Among these are a linguistic
coverage that is too narrow, restricted
types of dialogue interaction, insufficient robustness, and modeling of
the application domain that is too
implicit.
To develop interfaces that do not
exhibit these limitations, the Natural
Language Technology Group is
engaged in basic research and in the
development of actual applications.
The theoretical work encompasses
such elements as the development of
expressive formal representations for
linguistic knowledge and empirically
tested, formally explicit descriptions
of linguistic phenomena. The computational work concerns questions
of adequate processing models and
algorithms, as embodied in the
actual interfaces being developed.
These topics are explored in the
framework of three projects: The natural language consulting dialogue
project (Wisber) takes up researchoriented topics (descriptive grammar
formalisms and linguistically adequate
grammar specification, handling of
discourse, and so on), the data-access
project (Sepp) focuses on the practical application of state-of-the-art
technology, and the work on grammar-development environments
(Ape) centers on the problem of adequate tools for specifying linguistic
knowledge sources and efficient processing methods.
Wisber is jointly funded by the
German government and several
industrial and academic partners.
The goal of the project is to develop
a knowledge-based advice-giving
system in the domain of financial
consultation.
The group's
general strategy
for validating its
theoretical work is
to build prototypical tools and
integrate them
into a system.
The natural language analysis component is the laboratory’s responsibility. It is based on a lexical-functional grammar (LFG)–type parser
(Block and Hunze 1986; Block and
Haugeneder 1988) but handles longdistance phenomena more in the
spirit of the slash categories of the
generalized phrase structure grammar. It uses discourse representation
theory (DRT) as the framework for its
semantic and discourse representation (Hunze 1988; Frederking and
Gehrke 1988). A KL-TWO–type representation formalism is used for conceptual modeling. A grammar
compiler developed by the laboratory
allows grammars to be perspicuously
written but efficiently processed.
Because morphology is of critical
importance in German, we also
developed a morphological analyzer
using the same formalism as for syntactic analysis. Additionally, we
Copyright ©1990 AAAI. All rights reserved. 0738-4602/89/$4.00
Research in Progress
implemented a component for handling and accessing large lexicons on
the basis of discrimination trees and
random-access methods (Gehrke and
Block 1986). A sizable, restrictively
formulated German grammar is
being developed as part of this work
using government and binding concepts within an LFG representation
(Schachtl 1988). These components
run in Interlisp-D on a Siemens 58xx
(Xerox 1100) workstation.
Sepp (SESAM preprocessor) is a
natural language interface to database
systems supporting the standard
query language SQL (Block and
Schlereth 1987). Included are tools
for adjusting the domain-independent language processor to a specific
database. Sepp functions as a translator, producing SQL queries in a twophase process. Natural language
queries are mapped into SQL queries
through an intermediate abstract,
object-centered internal representation.
The current version of Sepp is being
used in a pilot project by an organization outside Siemens to access
information in its large, real-world
database. This experience will give us
feedback on the system’s language
coverage, habitability, and overall
facilities. The next version of this
interface will employ left-corner
parsing, making use of bottom-up
information in addition to the topdown information already used.
Work also continues on extending
Sepp’s linguistic coverage, especially
with regard to quantifiers, ellipses,
and comparative constructions (the
latter are currently handled by semiformal expressive features). Enlarging
the functionality and user friendliness of Sepp’s domain-tailoring tools
will also be tackled (Schmid 1988).
The development of the system is
being performed in Prolog on SUN
workstations, with Siemens MX
(Unix-based) computers as target
machines.
The Ape (augmented transition
network [ATN] programming environment) grammar-development
environment is a highly interactive
development and testing environment for the ATN formalism based
on an active chart parser (Haugeneder and Gehrke 1986). This system
allows the specification and debugging of network-style grammars
using an extensive graphic interface
and provides a highly flexible tool
for defining and testing various
control strategies (Haugeneder and
Gehrke 1987) using an agenda control mechanism. These capabilities
have been used extensively in the
development of heuristic search
strategies that are independent of the
underlying grammar formalism (Haugeneder and Gehrke 1988). Ape is
implemented in Interlisp-D on a
Siemens 58xx.
To provide a focus for future work,
we have adopted the ambitious goal
of developing a linguistic core processor (LCP) that will bring together
the results of the work in the three
preceding projects. LCP will be an
integrated, application-neutral natural language–processing component
having linguistic capabilities adequate for a variety of interface uses.
LCP is envisioned not only as being
parameterized with respect to domain
but also as being usable as a natural
language interaction component in
multimodal user interfaces. The natural language facilities of LCP will
include the analysis of natural language input as well as the generation
of natural language output. In its
final version, it will have comprehensive coverage and be robust in the
face of ungrammatical input, attentive
SPRING 1990
21
Research in Progress
to its discourse context, and alert to
the implications of a variety of speech
acts. Of course, the initial version
will be significantly limited compared
to the eventual LCP, with development proceeding incrementally.
Participants: H. Haugeneder, H. U.
Block, R. Frederking (until June 1989),
M. Gehrke, R. Hunze, S. Schachtl,
and L. Schmid.
Advanced Reasoning
Methods
The Advanced Reasoning Methods
Group is engaged in the areas of
qualitative reasoning and truth
maintenance. Both are key issues in
building systems that use deep knowledge as opposed to the conventional
rules of thumb extracted from domain
experts. The group participates in the
TEX-B project, Foundations for
Expert Systems in Technical Domains,
which is funded by the Ger man
government.
The results obtained to date in the
area of qualitative reasoning systems
include a framework for componentoriented device modeling with a
means for structuring models in a
hierarchical and view-oriented fashion and focusing the analysis of these
models (Struss 1987). A systematic
analysis of contemporary qualitative
reasoning methods within a general
mathematical model of qualitative
calculi (based on algebraic and differential equations) uncovered some
inherent limitations to these approaches (Struss 1988c, 1988d, 1988e). Continued joint work in this area with
researchers from XEROX Palo Alto
Research Center led to the thesis that
some of these limitations can be
overcome by radically departing from
the concepts of differential calculus
and focusing on commonsense
physics (Huberman and Struss 1989).
In the area of truth maintenance,
the group’s main contributions are
extensions to justification-based
truth maintenance systems (JTMSs)
and assumption-based truth maintenance systems (ATMSs). These efforts
include integrating nonmonotonic
justifications into the essentially
monotonic ATMS as well as encoding
disjunctive and negative information
(Dressler 1988a, 1988b). Justification
schemata (Freitag and Reinfrank
1988; Reinfrank and Freitag 1988)
add limited first-order capabilities to
the inherently propositional TMSs
and constitute an alternative choice
22
AI MAGAZINE
The statement of
a problem should
at the same time
be an executable
computer program
that solves the
problem.
for implementing systems based on
ATMSs or JTMSs. Controlling the
inferences of TMS-based problem
solvers is a central problem of the
field. The control strategy for ATMS,
which is based on local contr ol
guards and a global focus (Dressler
and Farquhar 1989), enables the
implementation of tight problem
solver control. It is general enough to
represent all control regimes that
have been proposed for ATMS in the
literature.
Based on these TMSs, the group
has developed constraint systems, in
particular, for the propagation of
temporally indexed values (Decker
1988; Dressler and Freitag 1989).
A recent and noteworthy theoretical contribution of the group is a logical theory of truth maintenance
(Reinfrank and Dressler 1989). By
translating JTMSs, as well as ATMSs,
into a variant of nonmonotonic
logic, the theory puts truth maintenance on a firmer ground than was
previously possible.
The group’s general strategy for
validating its theoretical work is to
build prototypical tools and integrate
them into a system. This practical
system functions as a workbench,
providing a basis for experimentation
and empirical feedback into further
theoretical investigations.
The practical application of the
group’s techniques in this case is
model-based diagnosis (Struss 1988a,
1988b, 1989a, 1989b). Currently, the
diagnostic system under development
is mainly evaluated in the domain of
thyristor circuits for the power supply
and control of direct-current motors.
This example confronts approaches
to model-based diagnosis with several important challenges, such as
feedback, the changing of device
topology, temporal reasoning, imprecise obser vations, and multiple
models. The approach is based on an
extended version of de Kleer and
Williams’s general diagnostic engine.
As implemented, this framework
deals with hierarchical models and
allows focusing within these models
(Struss 1988a, 1988b), handles
dynamic device models (Dressler and
Freitag 1989), and integrates fault
models exploiting the extended
ATMS (Struss and Dressler 1989).
Future work involves investigating
and exploiting the relationships
between qualitative reasoning and
nonmonotonic reasoning, for example, a description of process models
using situation-action structures. The
work will emphasize the dynamic
aspects of the application domains,
for example, by considering actions
taken by a diagnostician that shift
the device under consideration into
different states. Paradigms from both
qualitative and nonmonotonic reasoning must be integrated.
Participants: P. Struss, R. Decker (until
June 1989), O. Dressler, H. Freitag, M.
Reinfrank, and A. Farquhar (guest
researcher until July 1989).
Prolog Extensions for
Scientific and Technical
Applications
The ideal of declarative programming
can be summarized as follows: The
statement of a problem should at the
same time be an executable computer program that solves the problem.
This ideal has been approximated by
Prolog, but there has been little evidence that Prolog could achieve the
ideal in a technical industrial environment, for example, very largescale integrated circuit design,
communications systems, or knowledge-based design of technical systems.
The Language Extension Group has
tried to meet the need for declarative
programming in these areas by suitably extending Prolog. On the basis
of theoretical research (Buettner
1988; Enders 1989), a new system,
PROLOG-XT (Estenfeld and Ruckert
1988), was designed and implemented.
Most current commercial Prolog
systems lack expressiveness, efficient
control, and ease of use. Many complex application domains cannot be
adequately modeled. Unification
only works on a syntactic level (Herbrand terms); there is no possibility
to reflect, for example, the algebraic
properties of special application
domains. Representing hierarchically
structured knowledge for knowledgebased systems is possible only on top
of Prolog. Inheritance mechanisms
Research in Progress
Figure 1. Modeling of Input-Output Relations in a Digital Circuit Using Prolog-XT.
implicitly available in object-oriented
programming languages have to be
explicitly coded.
As a control mechanism, only the
Prolog standard computation rule is
available; no clean mechanisms are at
hand to avoid superfluous computation steps. Comfortable programming environments and graphic tools
for building application-specific user
interfaces are the exception. The
facilities for closely coupling Prolog
programs with more conventional
software are usually only rudimentary.
The new Prolog system PROLOG-XT
is intended to cope with these deficiencies. The expressiveness of standard Prolog is extended in several
ways. Domain-specific semantics can
be modeled through algebraic terms,
and unification is extended to finite
algebraic models. Thus, for example,
the input-output relations of digital
circuits on the gate level can be modeled by Boolean functions and processed in PROLOG-XT by Boolean
unification (figure 1).
Object-oriented programming is
integrated into PROLOG-XT through
typed variables and typed unification
on a compiler level. Hierarchically
structured knowledge can thus be
represented in a natural way and processed efficiently.
To overcome the standard (static)
computation rule and to keep it flexible, coroutining is incorporated into
PROLOG-XT on the basis of a delay
mechanism. Delay conditions that
are checked at run time and might
possibly delay the execution of a goal
can be added to any user-defined
Prolog procedure. In most cases, it is
the noninstantiation of goal parameters at run time that is responsible for
the delay. The idea is to postpone the
execution of such a goal until its
parameters are sufficiently instantiated.
Unnecessary computation steps can
thereby be avoided.
With PROLOG-XT, applicationrelated user interfaces can be easily
constructed. A set of integrated builtin predicates provides full access to
standard graphics and window management tools. A graphic debugger
for the objects allows comfortable
program development. External language code can easily be accessed
through the C language interface.
Backtrackable and even delayable C
functions can be written and handled
this way.
The object system of PROLOG-XT
(Enders 1989) is based on ordersorted logic. Classes (the object-oriented analogy to sorts), metaclasses,
and objects are provided. Reasoning
on the class hierarchy (multiple
inheritance) is enabled through
sorted variables. Procedures are generalized to generic procedures, such
that methods (procedure parts belonging to a class) can be independently
managed. Method selection and
inheritance are automatically regulated by sorted variables in the clause
heads. To achieve high performance,
abstract machine instructions are
added that handle sorted variables
and indexing over classes.
Based on the object system, a
microshell for rapid prototyping of
expert systems was built. The efficiency of the compiler integrated
approach was proved in an expert
system project (Ruckert and Voges
1989).
The Prolog kernel of PROLOG-XT
is based on the compiler system
SEPIA V2.0 (Meier 1988) of ECRC
(European Computer Industr y
Research Centre). The extensions
concerning finite algebras, graphic
interface, and definite-clause grammars were designed and implemented at Siemens; the extensions
concerning object-oriented programming are based on an implementation of ECRC. It was extended at
Siemens with a browser and an external representation formalism.
PROLOG-XT runs on the Siemens
workstation WS 30-4xx (Apollo DN
4000) under Unix System V. Figure 1,
from the domain of circuit design,
shows how a full adder is specified
and verified in PROLOG-XT.
A circuit verification environment
(CVE), based mainly on the extended
(continued on page 26)
SPRING 1990
23
Research in Progress
. . . artificial
neural networks
. . . were introduced as highly
connected
networks of
elementary processing elements.
unification and the graphic package
of PROLOG-XT, was built. With this
tool, real circuits are symbolically verified on gate and switch level. For
example, a 16-bit full adder (900
switches) was verified within 12
seconds.
For the first time ever (as far as we
are aware), a complete 64-bit ALU
(11000 transitors) was symbolically
verified. A translator was developed
as part of CVE. It maps the internal
circuit descriptions of different CAD
systems into PROLOG-XT programs,
thus providing an interface to conventional design systems.
Two other applications in the
domain of digital circuit design are
handled by the extended unification:
the generation of test patterns and
synthesis problems (Tiden 1988). CVE
is in use in a design center within
Siemens for application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Substituting
formal verification for lengthy testing
and simulation reduces development
time and improves reliability. This
substitution is of high importance for
cost-effective circuit development.
The results obtained to date with CVE
are promising (Tiden 1989).
We have started using PROLOG-XT
to tackle tasks that occur in the
design of communication systems.
As a first project, a specification and
verification environment for communication protocols was developed.
Participants: W. Buettner, K. Estenfeld,
R. Enders, H. Leiss, M. Ruckert (until
June 1989), R. Schmid, H.-A. Schneider, D. Taubner, and E. Tiden.
Design and Analysis of
Neural Networks
Inspired by the functioning of human
(or biological) nervous system perception, artificial neural networks
(ANNs) were introduced as highly
connected networks of elementary
processing elements. They exhibit
26
AI MAGAZINE
some of the basic characteristics of
human perception, such as massive
parallelism, adaptivity, and robustness. These properties happen to correspond to principal weaknesses in
conventional information processing. Therefore, the recently reactivated field of neurocomputing has
drawn enormous scientific and commercial attention to its activities.
Neurocomputing is expected to augment conventional computing with
an important new paradigm.
To obtain reliable statements about
the medium-term potential of ANNs
for information technology, Siemens
decided to launch a three-year Neurodemonstrator Project (Buettner et
al. 1989) to integrate and extend previous activities in neural nets. The
project started in October 1988; the
total effort involved will be approximately 60 person-years.
The project goal is a system that
combines conventional and neural
approaches to industrial scene analysis. Methods, principles, and procedures for the design and analysis of
ANNs are to be studied and developed under the real-world constraints
of the application. Application-specific requirements must be translated
into network characteristics. On the
software side, a software development environment comprising a
compiler for a programming language for ANNs and a comfortable
user interface will be provided. For
fast emulation of neural nets, a coprocessor board will be developed.
The Neurodemonstrator Project is
accompanied by research on the
technological aspects of ANNs. The
Knowledge Processing Laboratory is
an important part of this project. The
lab’s primary effort is in the area of
design and analysis of neural networks.
The design of a neural net requires
transforming the structure of a problem into the topological-functional
structure of a net, which solves the
problem in a highly parallel fashion.
This mapping is achieved by fixing a
connectivity structure; defining
input-output nodes; and choosing
net parameters such as weights,
thresholds, activation functions, and
time scales.
In the simplest case, you explicitly
extract the topology and parameters
for a suitable net from the problem.
Various optimization problems, such
as the traveling salesman or associative access, can be coded into
quadratic (or higher-order) forms,
defining a Hopfield net or a Boltzmann machine, that solve the task. It
is the massive parallelism that neural
nets focus on such problems that
appears promising and deser ves
attention within the project.
In the most difficult case, the structure of a problem is entirely hidden
in the data, and the learning must
reveal this structure and synthesize a
net. As an example of this type of
problem, we are currently experimenting with time series derived
from biosignals and economic data.
Under certain application-specific
hypotheses, the results obtained to
date are encouraging.
However, both theory and practice
confirm that unrestricted learning is
costly. To remove part of the burden
from the learning routine, explicitly
known information about the structure of the problem should be used
to construct the coarse structure of
the network. One problem of this
type is visual pattern recognition
subject to certain invariance properties such as rotation. Such invariances induce relations between net
parameters, thereby reducing the
number of free parameters.
We are currently incorporating
such knowledge into the learning
routines of various models. It is in
this spirit that we expect to perhaps
bridge the gap between the symbolic
and the connectionist approaches
to AI.
We are also exploring another
approach to solving invariant pattern-recognition problems in which a
vector of geometric featur es is
extracted from a pattern by a preprocessor and then fed to a neural net
for recognition.
The prominent feature of the Hopfield net is the existence of a cost
function (determined by weights and
thresholds) on the state space of the
net. Alterations (such as weight
changes) in the state of the net
should only come about in a costreducing manner. Stability, in particular, is ensured this way.
A basic requirement in the Hopfield net, as well as in the other
dynamically stable networks reported
to date in the literature, is that the
connection matrix be symmetric. We
have been able to show that stability
is preserved under general conditions.
Initial results indicate that our generalization is more efficient for pattern
association than continuous Hopfield, Cohen-Grossberg, and Kosko
models (Schuermann 1989).
Workshops
An important goal of network
design is the development of a
methodology that allows nets to be
hierarchically specified and composed
from subsets, as in circuit design. For
simple binary nets, we experiment
with PROLOG-XT as an executable
net specification language.
We are also developing a network
simulator in the form of a C library
containing a variety of neural network algorithms and models; a pilot
version of the simulator is available.
Further work will go into the development of a C-based programming
language for neural nets. A compiler
will be available in September 1990.
In a later stage of the project, we
will need techniques for observing
network dynamics, which go beyond
panning and zooming. It might be
necessary to abandon the microscopic picture of individual nodes and
weights and switch to macroscopic
descriptions of the network’s behavior, for example, by calculating
moments of distribution functions
for the nodes and weights.
Participants: W. Buettner, F. Hergert,
M. Hoehfeld, I. Leuthaeusser, B.
Schuermann, M. Weick, P. Witschel,
and H. G. Zimmermann.
Bibliography
Block, H. U., and Haugeneder, H. 1988.
An Efficiency-Oriented LFG-Parser. In
Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic
Theory, eds. U. Reyle and C. Rohrer. Dordrecht.
Block, H. U., and Haugeneder, H. 1986.
The Treatment of Movement-Rules in a
LFG-Parser. In Proceedings of the
Eleventh International Conference of
Computational Linguistics (COLING-86).
Bonn.
Block, H. U., and Hunze, R. 1986. Incremental Construction of C- and F-Structure
in a LFG-Parser. In Proceedings of the
Eleventh International Conference of
Computational Linguistics (COLING-86).
Bonn.
Block, H. U., and Schlereth, D. 1987. Natural Language Access to SESAM. In Proceedings of the Siemens User’s
Association. Heidelberg.
Buettner, W. 1989. Implementing Complex Domains of Application in an
Extended Prolog System. In International
Journal of General Systems 15:129–139.
Buettner, W., et. al. 1989. Artificial Neural
Networks in Microelectronics. In Microelectronics for Artificial Neural Nets, eds. H.
Klar and U. Ramacher. Duesseldorf, Germany: VDI.
Buettner, W. 1988. Unification in Finite
Algebras Is Unitary(?). In Proceedings of
the Ninth International Conference on
Automated Deduction. Argonne.
Buettner, W.; Estenfeld, K.; Schmid, R.;
Schneider, H.-A.; and Tiden, E. 1988. A
General Framework for Symbolic Constraint Handling in Prolog, Technical
Report, INF2-ASE-1-88, Siemens AG.
Buettner, W., and Simonis, H. 1987.
Embedding Boolean Expressions into
Logic Programming. In Journal of Symbolic
Computation 4:191–205.
Decker, R. 1988. Modeling the Temporal
Behavior of Technical Systems. In Proceedings of the Twelfth German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence,
Informatik-Fachberichte. Berlin: Springer.
Dressler, O. 1988a. Extending the Basic
ATMS. In Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. London: Pitman.
Dressler, O. 1988b. An Extended Basic
ATMS. In Proceedings of the Second
Internal Workshop on Nonmonotonic
Reasoning. Berlin: Springer.
Dressler, O., and Farquhar, A. 1989. Problem Solver Control over the ATMS. In
Proceedings of the Thirteenth German
Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, Informatik-Fachberichte. Berlin: Springer. Also
1989. Technical Report, INF2-ARM-13-89,
Siemens AG.
Dressler, O., and Freitag, H. 1989. Propagation of Temporally Indexed Values in
Multiple Contexts. In Proceedings of the
Thirteenth German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, Informatik-Fachberichte.
Berlin: Springer.
Enders, R. 1989. The Object-Oriented
Extension of PROLOG-XT, Technical
Report, INF2-ASE-7-89, Siemens AG.
Estenfeld, K., and Ruckert, M. 1988.
Knowledge Processing with PROLOG-XT.
In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in
Practice. Munich: Siemens AG.
Farquhar, A. 1989. Modifying the Model
Sets during Diagnosis. In Proceedings of
the Thirteenth German Workshop on
Artificial Intelligence, Informatik-Fachberichte. Berlin: Springer.
Farquhar, A. 1988. A Qualitative Reasoning Approach to Fault Avoidance. In Proceedings of the Eighth European
Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
London: Pitman.
Frederking, R. E., and Gehrke, M. 1988.
Resolving Anaphoric References in a DRTBased Dialogue System. In Proceedings of
the Fourth Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vienna Workshop on
Knowledge-Based Natural Language Processing, Informatik-Fachberichte. Berlin:
Springer.
Freitag, H., and Reinfrank, M. 1988. A
Non-Monotonic Deduction System Based
on (A)TMS. In Proceedings of the Eighth
European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. London: Pitman.
Gehrke, M., and Block, H. U. 1986. Mor-
SPRING 1990
27
Research in Progress
pheme-Based Lexical Analysis. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of
the University of Waterloo Centre for the
New Oxford English Dictionary, Advances
in Lexicology. Waterloo.
Haugeneder, H., and Gehrke, M. 1988.
Improving Search Strategies: An Experiment in Best-First Parsing. In Proceedings
of the Twelfth International Conference
of Computational Linguistics (COLING88). Budapest.
Haugeneder, H., and Gehrke, M. 1987.
Modeling Heuristic Parsing Strategies. In
Proceedings of the Eleventh German
Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, Informatik-Fachberichte. Berlin: Springer.
Haugeneder, H., and Gehrke, M. 1986. A
User-Friendly ATN Programming Environment (APE). In Proceedings of the
Eleventh International Conference of
Computational Linguistics (COLING-86).
Bonn.
Huberman, B., and Struss, P. 1989. Chaos,
Qualitative Reasoning, and the Predictability Problem. In Proceedings of the
1989 Qualitative Reasoning Workshop.
Palo Alto.
Hunze, R. 1988. Resolving Anaphoric References in a DRT-Based Dialogue System:
Part 1, The Formal Discourse Model,
WISBER Report 24, Saarbruecken Univ.
Meier, M., ed. 1988. SEPIA Version 2.0,
User Manual, Technical Report, European
Computer Industry Research Centre.
Reinfrank, M. 1989. Logical Foundations
of Nonmonotonic Truth Maintenance. In
Proceedings of the Fourth Portugese AI
Conference, ed. J. Martins. Berlin:
Springer.
Reinfrank, M., and Dressler, O. 1989. On
the Relation between Truth Maintenance
and Non-Monotonic Logics. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint
Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Menlo Park, Calif.: International Joint
Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
Reinfrank, M., and Freitag, H. 1988. Rules
and Justifications: A Uniform Approach to
Reason Maintenance and Non-Monotonic
Inference. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation
Computer Systems. Tokyo: Institute for
New Generation Computer Technology.
Ruckert, M., and Voges, U. 1989. WIFEX—
WInterweizen Fungizid EXperte, Technical
Report, INF2-ASE-6-89, Siemens AG.
Schachtl, S. 1988. The Problem of Overgeneration in Parsing Processes and the
Aid of Linguistic Generalizations. In Proceedings of the Fourth Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vienna
Workshop on Knowledge-Based Natural
Language Processing, Informatik-Fachberichte. Berlin: Springer.
Schmid, L. 1988. Case-Driven Extension
of the Lexicon for Verbs in SEPP, Internal
Report, Siemens AG.
Schuermann, B. 1989. Generalized Adap-
28
AI MAGAZINE
tive Bidirectional Associative Memory. In
Proceedings of the International Neural
Network Conference. San Diego.
Struss, P. 1989a. Diagnosis as a Process. In
Proceedings of the 1989 Workshop on
Model-Based Diagnosis. Paris: IBM.
Struss, P. 1989b. Model-Based Reasoning,
Progress, and Problems. In Proceedings of
the 1989 Congress of the German National Computer Science Association (GI
Congress) on Knowledge-Based Systems.
Berlin: Springer.
Struss, P. 1988a. A Framework for ModelBased Diagnosis, Technical Report, INF2ARM-10-88, Siemens AG.
Struss, P. 1988b. Extensions to ATMSBased Diagnosis. In Artificial Intelligence in
Engineering: Diagnosis and Learning, ed. J.
Gero, 3–28. Southampton, England: Computational Mechanics.
Struss, P. 1988c. Global Filters for Qualitative Behaviors. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial
Intelligence. Menlo Park, Calif.: American
Association for Artificial Intelligence.
Struss, P. 1988d. Mathematical Aspects of
Qualitative Reasoning. In International
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 3:156–169.
Struss, P. 1988e. Mathematical Aspects of
Qualitative Reasoning—Part Two: Differential Equations, Technical Report, INF2ARM-7-88, Siemens AG.
Struss, P. 1987. Multiple Representation of
Structure and Function. In Expert Systems
in Computer-Aided Design, ed. J. Gero.
Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Struss, P., and Dressler, O. 1989. Physical
Negation—Integrating Fault Models into
the General Diagnostic Engine. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International
Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, Calif.: International
Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
Tiden, E. 1989. Rapid Development of
VLSI CAD Tools with PROLOG-XT, Technical Report, INF2-ASE-4-89, Siemens AG.
Tiden, E. 1988. Symbolic Verification of
Switch-Level Circuits Using a Prolog
Enhanced with Unification in Finite Algebras. In Proceedings IFIP WG 10.2 Conference. Glasgow.
Wolfram Buettner received his diploma in
mathematics from the University of Heidelberg in 1975 and a Ph.D. in mathematics from Tulane University in 1978. In
1985, he joined Siemens Corporate
Research, where he currently heads the
Knowledge Processing Laboratory. His
research interests include the design of
Prolog extensions for circuit design and
algorithmic aspects of neural networks.
He is also affiliated with the University of
Kaiserlautern, where he is a professor of
computer science.
Klaus Estenfeld is leader of the Language
Extension Group at Siemens Corporate
Research and Development, with special
interests in Prolog implementation and
the extension of Prolog for special applications (for example, computer-aided
design electronics, XPS). He received his
diploma in 1976 and his Ph.D. in 1980,
both in computer science from the University of Saarbrucken. In 1981, he joined
the Siemens Research Labs, working in
the field of program construction and verification, with special interests in parsing
and unification. From 1984 to 1986, he
was project leader in the Logic Programming Group of the European ComputerIndustry Research Center (ECRC), where
he was responsible for the ECRC Prolog
Project.
Hans Haugeneder is co-leader of the Natural Language Technology Group at
Siemens Corporate Research and Development. He holds a Master’s in linguistics
and logics from the University of
Muenchen for his work on extensions of
Montague semantics. His key interests in
natural language understanding focus on
parsing models, descriptive formalisms for
linguistic knowledge sources, and
domain-independent language processing
systems. Currently, he is at the German
Research Center for AI in Saarbrucken,
where he is leading a project on humancomputer cooperation and communication in distributed environments.
Peter Struss is leader of the Advanced
Reasoning Methods Group at Siemens Corporate
Research
and Development. He received his Ph.D.
in computer science from the University
of Kaiserlautern for his research on qualitative reasoning with a focus on mathematical formalization and analysis of
qualitative calculi. His key interests are
model-based reasoning and the integration of qualitative reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning, including problems
such as the relations between qualitative
modeling and default reasoning in diagnostic systems, the role of commonsense
concepts in engineering problem solving,
and the interaction between model-based
and experience-based diagnostic reasoning. His current work is aimed at foundations for model-based diagnostic systems
that can deal with significant real applications.