The NAFTA Promise and the North American Reality: The Gap and How to Close It Dr. Robert A. Pastor Professor and Director Center for North American Studies American University Washington, D.C October 31, 2013 American University Washington, D.C. Introduction & Organization of the Conference Fracturing a Continent The colonial encounter Independence War and uneven development Limits to friendship/distant neighbors The 1980s revolution: U.S.-Canada FTA NAFTA The Debate and the Gaps Panels Population and GDP Population of North America, Selected Years (in Millions) Year 1800 1900 1950 1980 1990 2009 Mexico 5.6 13.6 26.0 67.0 82.0 109.6 United States 5.3 75.0 150.0 226.0 249.0 314.7 Canada 0.3 5.3 14.0 24.0 27.0 33.5 North America 11.2 93.9 190.0 317.0 358.0 457.8 GDP of North America, Selected Years (in Millions of USD) Year 1820 1900 1950 1980 1990 2009 Canada $738 $15,887 $102,164 $268,893 $582,723 $1,337,578 Mexico $5,000 $18,585 $67,368 $194,357 $262,710 $883,741 United States $12,548 $312,499 $1,455,916 $2,767,500 $5,750,800 $13,898,300 U.S. to Mexico U.S. > 1.5x U.S. > 16x U.S. > 21x U.S. > 13x U.S. > 21x U.S. > 15x U.S. to Canada U.S. > 17x U.S. > 19x U.S. > 14x U.S. > 10x U.S. > 10x U.S. > 10x Source: World Bank Databank, World Development Indicators; Bolt, J. and J. L. van Zanden (2013). The First Update of the Maddison Project; Re-Estimating Growth Before 1820. Maddison Project Working Paper 4. The Three NAFTA Gaps Trade Foreign Investment Income Gap U.S. Trade with North America, 1992-2012 AAGR is Average Annual Growth Rate. Sources: TradeStats Express, U.S. Census Bureau, OECD, WTO, Industry Canada In 2010, President Obama announced the National Export Initiative, which aimed to double exports within 5 years; this would mean an increase from $1.84 trillion in 2010 to $3.68 trillion in 2015. If we had sustained the same rate of growth in North America after 2000, this would have accounted for 1/8th of that goal. Foreign Direct Investment in North America, 1987-2011 Sources: UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2006: FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development; Inward FDI stock, by Host Region and Economy, 1980 - 2006. Available at: http://stats.unctad.org; Bureau of Economic Analysis, Balance of Payments and Direct Investment Position Data: U.S. Direct Investment Abroad. Available at: http://www.bea.gov/international/ii_web/timeseries2.cfm?econtypeid=1&dirlevel1id=1&Entitytypeid=1&stepnum=1; Bureau of Economic Analysis, Foreign Direct Investment in the U.S.: Balance of Payments and Direct Investment Position Data. Available at: http://www.bea.gov/international/di1fdibal.htm; SourceOECD, International Direct Investment Statistics. Available at: http://miranda.sourceoecd.org/vl=4415314/cl=17/nw=1/rpsv/ij/oecdstats/16081080/v45n1/s1/p1; Statistics Canada, Table 376-0051: International Investment Position, Canadian direct investment abroad and foreign direct investment in Canada. Available at: http://www.statcan.ca. Foreign Direct Investment in North America Income Disparity Between 1980 and 2011, the income gap between Mexico and its Northern neighbors widened 1980 1990 1993 2000 2008 2011 GDP pc in North America (1980 - 2011) GDPpc (Current USD) GDPpc as % of NA GDPpc Canada Mexico U.S. NA GDPpc Canada Mexico US $10,934 $2,826 $12,180 $25,939 42% 11% 47% $20,968 $3,116 $23,038 $47,122 44% 7% 49% $19,549 $4,525 $25,327 $49,400 40% 9% 51% $23,560 $5,817 $35,082 $64,458 37% 9% 54% $45,100 $9,893 $46,760 $101,753 44% 10% 46% $50,345 $10,047 $48,112 $108,505 46% 9% 44% How to Close the Income Gap? The North American Development Bank commissioned a research project from the Center for North American Studies at American University in 2005 to estimate what it might cost to begin to narrow the income gap between Mexico and its northern neighbors. As the principal cause of undocumented migration to the United States from Mexico is the income gap – – not jobs, since most undocumented workers leave jobs in Mexico – – it was felt that a narrowing of that gap might have the greatest impact on reducing undocumented migration over the long term. The research was done by Dr. Robert Pastor, Sherman Robinson, Samuel Morley, and Carolina Diaz Bonilla, using a dynamic computable general equilibrium model. They asked how Mexico could generate an annual rate of growth of 6%, assuming that would be twice the annual rate of growth during the decade by the US and Canada, and if Mexico succeeded, it would reduce the development gap by 20% in a decade. That would at least give Mexicans a sense of progress and hope that someday the gap would close. Their model suggested that Mexico would need to increase its capital investment to the level of 30% or more of GDP and, and most of that would need to come from foreign savings. Together, the researchers proposed an investment fund of $20 billion a year that would mostly fund transportation, infrastructure, and rural community education in Mexico. How to Close the Income Gap? The proposed North American Investment Fund would be administered by the World Bank, but would be overseen by the US, Canada and Mexico, each of whom would contribute. It was clear that more funding would close the gap faster, but at the time, the feasibility of seeking such funds seemed so remote that they didn't propose anything larger. A customs union would yield $45 billion a year that could be invested in such a fund, and if new funding for border fencing could be diverted for development, that would offer an equivalent amount of funds. Three Other NAFTA Gaps NAFTA –over-promised Initial success proved unsustainable without plan or follow-up New challenges, lack of response Could this be a North American moment? The Biden Challenge. The New North American Agenda: Panels Panel I: Competitiveness in a World of Three Regions World trade and production are increasingly divided among three regions: the EU, East Asia, and North America Regional Share of World Product, 2001 and 2011 • In 2001, 83% of world product in three regions • In 2011, 75% of world product in three regions Sources: UN Stats Division, National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates ; World Bank, World Databank; CIA, World Factbook . 2001:15. Panel II: Shared Responsibility & Institutional Collaboration for Security Issues and Judicial Reform Panel III: Energy and the Environment Source: TheStar.com Source: Politico.com Luncheon Dialogue: New Social Demography of North America Mexican-Origin and Hispanic Population in the U.S., 1970–2050 Number and Percent of Foreign-Born Population of Canada, 1901-2006 • As of 2010, there were 30.6 million Mexican-origin people living in the U.S., which will more than double by 2050– twice the population of Canada • 85% of Mexicans say they have friends or relatives living in the U.S., and 21% say they receive money from them Source: “Hispanics in the United States,” U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch; Pew Global Attitudes Project, “Mexicans and Salvadorans Have Positive Picture of Life in U.S. (October 24, 2013) • Since 1961 at least 15% of Canada’s population has been foreign born Source: Statistics Canada, censuses of population, 1901 to 2006. Luncheon Discussion Part II: North American Values & Attitudes: Tri-national Poll The three countries want to collaborate over a wider range of issues Panel IV: Organizing the Three Governments and Nations to Close the Gap: Visions and Institutions Does North America need a vision? How should each government reorganize itself internally to more effectively realize North American challenges? Should the governments address their problems independently, bilaterally, or trilaterally? Do we need to modify existing institutions or create new ones to accomplish these goals? Panelists Moderator: Andrés Oppenheimer, Senior International Columnist, Miami Herald Roberta Jacobson, Assistant Secretary of State, Western Hemisphere Affairs, U.S. Sergio Alcocer, Undersecretary for North America, Ministry of Foreign Relations, Mexico William Crosbie, Assistant Deputy Minister and Chief Security Officer, Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada Summary and Conclusion What have we learned and where do we go from here? What recommendations should we promote? What is the role of non-governmental organizations, civil society, and business in promoting a North American strategy? What strategy do we recommend for the next North American leaders summit? The Biden Challenge "There is no reason why North America cannot be the most prosperous and most economically viable place of the world in the 21st century..." Then after spelling out the most comprehensive North American agenda, he said, "we have been convinced of your message; now make us do it. Now make us do it. Hard-working people in our countries are building our economic partnerships from the ground up every single solitary day. Our job is to take the difficult steps that make their job easier.“ -Vice President Joe Biden, May 2013 The essential challenge of the conference: can the three nations, working together, collectively improve the lives of all of their citizens?