Changes to the AIM Rules for Companies

21 May 2014
Changes to the AIM Rules for Companies
Practice Group(s):
By James O. Green and Penelope Davey
Capital Markets
On 13 May 2014, the London Stock Exchange (the "Exchange") published AIM Notice
39. The notice provided feedback on AIM Notice 38 (which consulted on proposed
changes to the AIM Rules for Companies (the "AIM Rules") and the AIM Rules for
Nominated Advisers (the "Nomad Rules") and confirmed the resulting changes to the
AIM Rules, the Nomad Rules and the AIM Disciplinary Handbook. The revisions to the
AIM Rules and Nomad Rules apply with immediate effect, save that the new
requirements of Rule 26 of the AIM Rules must be implemented by 11 August 2014. The
purpose of this update is to set out the key changes to the AIM Rules.
AIM -- The Worlds
Leading Growth
Market in the London
Stock Exchange
Changes to the AIM Rules
Many of the amendments to the AIM Rules are minor in nature, but there are some
significant changes:
The guidance notes include an explicit requirement for an AIM company or applicant to
be appropriate for AIM's regulatory framework; it should have a similar structure to a UK
plc; must not be complex in terms of its structure and securities; and should issue
primarily ordinary shares.
Rule 11
Rule 11 has been amended so that AIM companies must issue a notification of any nonpublic developments which, if made public, would be likely to lead to a "significant"
(rather than, as previously, a "substantial") movement in the price of their AIM securities.
Rule 11 also includes a non-exhaustive list of examples of such changes.
The purpose of this amendment was to bring the AIM Rules in line with the terminology
used in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. To this end the associated
guidance note has also been updated to clarify that a "reasonable investor" test (i.e.
whether the information is of a kind which a reasonable investor would be likely to use as
part of the basis of his or her investment decision) will apply to this rule. It is hoped that
this should bring greater certainty to the application of this rule and reflect general market
In addition, the guidance note clarifies that AIM companies are expected to keep pending
developments confidential and must ensure that they have in place effective procedures
and controls to ensure the confidentiality of unpublished price sensitive information.
Rule 18
An AIM company must now prepare and notify a second half-yearly report if the effect of
a change to its accounting reference date is to extend its accounting period to more than
15 months (Guidance Note, Rule 18).
Rule 20
Electronic copies of annual accounts and half-yearly reports sent to shareholders do not
need also to be sent to the Exchange (unless required under Rules 24 and 25 (Corporate
Action Timetables)) (Guidance Note, Rule 20).
Changes to the AIM Rules for Companies
Rule 21
Undertakings by a director or applicable employee to participate in an AIM company's
fundraising (where any close period arises solely due to that fundraising being
unpublished price sensitive information and that director or applicable employee's
participation is on exactly the same terms as all other investors) will be excluded from the
restrictions in Rule 21 on dealing in the AIM securities of that company (Guidance Note,
Rule 21).
Rule 26
Additional items have been added to the list of information that must be maintained on an
AIM company's website. For example, such information must now include:
• the AIM company's annual accounts for the last three years or since admission,
whichever is the lesser;
• details of the corporate governance code that the AIM company has decided to apply
together with details of compliance with that code (and if no code has been adopted, a
statement to that effect together with the AIM company's current corporate
governance arrangements);
• whether the AIM company is subject to the UK City Code on Takeovers and Mergers
or any other such legislation or code in its country of incorporation or operation or any
other provisions that it has voluntarily adopted; and
• the date upon which the details of its significant shareholders were last updated.
The increased visibility for investors of an AIM company's corporate governance
arrangements has been supported by respondents to AIM Notice 38. In particular, the
QCA has strongly welcomed this change and stated that it hopes that this additional
visibility will help improve the level of corporate governance behaviour and reporting for
AIM companies.
Rule 41
A takeover effected by a UK scheme of arrangement has been included in the list of
circumstances in which the Exchange might agree that shareholder consent is not
required in respect of the cancellation of the admission of that company's AIM securities
(Guidance Note, Rule 41).
Rule 43
A new rule has been added to the AIM Rules which states that when an AIM company
ceases to have a class of securities admitted to trading on AIM, the Exchange retains
jurisdiction over the company for the purpose of investigating and taking disciplinary
action in relation to breaches or suspected breaches of the AIM Rules at a time when
that company was an applicant or had a class of securities admitted to trading on AIM.
During the consultation pursuant to AIM Notice 38, concern was expressed on how the
Exchange proposed to enforce this rule in respect of overseas companies and whether it
would expect the AIM company's Nomad to assist with any such investigation. The
Exchange has provided clarification that it would not expect an AIM company's Nomad to
be the point of liaison for such an investigation.
Changes to the AIM Rules for Companies
The significant changes to the AIM Rules focus on the protection of investors by requiring
AIM companies to provide investors with more detailed disclosure. Given that most of
these changes have been welcomed by the respondents to AIM Notice 38 and are not
likely to prove too onerous for AIM companies to comply with, these changes are a
positive development.
Should you require any further information about any of the matters contained within this
alert or advice on how these changes may impact your company, please contact the
authors or your usual K&L Gates contacts.
James O. Green
[email protected]
Penelope Davey
[email protected]
Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Brisbane Brussels Charleston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Doha Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt
Harrisburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Melbourne Miami Milan Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto
Paris Perth Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Diego San Francisco São Paulo Seattle Seoul Shanghai
Singapore Spokane Sydney Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. Wilmington
K&L Gates practices out of 48 fully integrated offices located in the United States, Asia, Australia, Europe, the
Middle East and South America and represents leading global corporations, growth and middle-market
companies, capital markets participants and entrepreneurs in every major industry group as well as public
sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations and individuals. For more information
about K&L Gates or its locations, practices and registrations, visit
This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon
in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer.
© 2014 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.