Draft Administrative Interests 1. Position supports Student Success Task Force mandates 2. Provide counseling support for students to identify and meet their goals. Summer 2013 Schedule Development February 14 February 19-22 February 25-27 February 28 March 1 March 4 - 6 March 8 March 18 Proposed sections due from Deans to Tiffany Schmitcke Section data entered into Datatel— Tiffany Schmitcke and site schedulers Review/correction of data by Deans IR run simulations to determine FTES projection Cabinet review FTES projections and review/revise/approve summer schedule Corrections made to the schedule Summer schedule available on WebAdvisor—Tiffany Schmitcke Begin priority registration process Summer Course Scheduling Guidelines Goal is to build a summer schedule to slightly exceed the annual FTES capacity of 4,565—need about 253 FTES (94-100 sections--$425,000-$450,000). Balance the following: 1. We schedule high FTES generating courses using the Keppner/Cummings/Anderson course prioritization model developed last spring as a guide (http://inside.redwoods.edu/strategicplanning/enrollmentmanagement/documents/EMCTLUAllocationto Cabinet3212.pdf); 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Two four week sessions: May 20-June 13 or June 17 – July 11 Six week session: June 17-July 26 Two eight week sessions: May 20-July 11 or June 17-Aug 8 One ten week session: May 20-July 25 Schedule enough classes that have a census date on or before June 30 and ends after July 1 to meet the 2012-13 FTES target Ten week session will hold basic/remedial classes English 150 and Math 120 Sessions beginning June 17 will be geared toward recent high school graduates and the summer bridge Math 301,302, 303 Focus on online courses and courses that are traditionally impacted during the academic year. Look to online for Mendocino or Del Norte students as a possible substitute for low enrolled traditional classes We reallocate TLUs from low efficient courses/areas to areas that can generate FTES;We aggressively market the schedule; The District has set a goal of less than 10 percent cancellation rate for credit courses programming for the College. It is important that the deans/directors and course scheduler review trend data by section basis during the planning process. Examining the historical trends will ensure that the same sections are not scheduled and cancelled for multiple semesters in a row. Integration Initial Goals Work together to develop holistic solutions to issues Improve communications Better understanding of each other’s concerns, procedures, timelines Develop a matriculation system that is both efficient and accessible for students Implement institution’s planning activities Create an environment where student development and instruction would have regular conversations about student learning (i.e. team teaching, learning communities, FYE, SEPs, student outcomes)