Administered to all planning committees – Spring 2012
Reported on April 2, 2012
Institutional Research
Committee Evaluation according to Developmental Progress Rubric
Operates under charge
(1) Aware that a committee and charge is needed.
(2) The committee’s charge is being developed and
documented.
(3) The members have a clear and agreed upon understanding
of all areas of the charge.
(4) The charge is well understood and reviewed consistently to
ensure that it best meets the needs of the institution.
Grand Total
All
0
0%
EMC
0
0%
8
14%
2
15%
20
34%
5
38%
30
58
52%
100%
6
13
46%
100%
Engages in data-driven decision making
All
(1) A need to make data-driven decisions is
acknowledged, but data is looked at in an
inconsistent, ad-hoc basis.
(2) Dialog about data is becoming more prevalent. A
framework is beginning to develop in terms of the types of data
to evaluate. Data elements are being defined.
(3) Decisions consistently rely on agreed-upon analyses of a
set of defined data elements. Reports are interpreted in a
consistent manner.
(4) Systematic evaluations are carried out to continuously
improve the well-defined process.
Grand Total
Develops recommendations
EMC
0
0%
0
0%
18
31%
3
23%
25
43%
7
54%
15
58
26%
100%
3
13
23%
100%
All
EMC
(1) Awareness of the need and potential benefits of creating
committee recommendations. Dialog about recommendations
is becoming more prevalent.
1
2%
0
0%
(2) A framework is beginning to develop in terms of the types
of recommendations made by the committee.
Recommendations are sometimes made.
13
23%
2
15%
31
55%
8
62%
11
56
20%
100%
3
13
23%
100%
(3) Agreed-upon recommendations are consistently made to
constituent groups. The desired impact of the recommendation
is well established.
(4) Systematic evaluations are carried out to continuously
improve the well-established process.
Grand Total
Engages in evaluative process
(1) Aware that an evaluative process would benefit the
committee. Dialog about the evaluative process is becoming
more prevalent.
(2) Initial evaluation tools are being developed in terms of
developmental progress and strengths and weaknesses.
(3) The committee annually evaluates itself and makes
documented improvements based on the evaluation.
(4) Well-established evaluation tools are systematically
evaluated for improvement.
Grand Total
All
EMC
2
4%
0
0%
13
23%
2
17%
34
60%
10
83%
8
57
14%
100%
0
12
0%
100%
All
2
3%
EMC
1
8%
14
24%
2
15%
(3) Communication processes are developed that are inclusive
of key constituencies, and reach all relevant audiences.
24
41%
6
46%
(4) Collaborative, well-documented and ongoing processes are
used to effectively communicate information to the college
community.
Grand Total
18
58
31%
100%
4
13
31%
100%
Participates in communication
(1) Aware that broad based participation is necessary.
(2) Communication processes are being developed to include
dialogue among a broad constituent base.