ASSESSMENT REPORTING TOOL, revised draft for SD: Web Form Fields and Labels
Academic Year; Service Area; Method of Student Contact or Service; List all Faculty / Staff involved;
Where are artifacts housed and who is the contact person?; Additional Information to help you track
this assessment
What assessment methods or tools were used to evaluate how well the outcome was met?
1. DATA - Collect new data, tracking ongoing processes, counting data elements, making
observations; or use existing internal or external data sources
2. NOTES - Reports, meeting notes, documentation, narrative or descriptive information
3. SURVEYS - Surveys, Interviews, focus groups, training or workshop attendee evaluations
4. ANALYSIS - Cost/benefit analysis, SWOT, ROI analysis, or qualitative analysis
5. COURSE OUTCOME – Applying assessments used in courses to student services outcomes;
shared outcomes and assessments
6. OTHER
What criteria was used to determine the usefulness of the assessment? [Examples: benchmark, norm,
best practices, standard, expectations, hypotheses, assumptions]
To what extent did performance meet the criteria? [benchmark - assumptions]? Provide the number or
percent:
1. Did not meet [benchmark - assumptions];
2. Met [benchmark - assumptions];
3. Exceeded [benchmark - assumptions];
4. Not measured
What do these results indicate?
Check if actions or changes are recommended by the results. (Checking here will activate the section
below) What category best describes how the recommendations will be addressed:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
SUBMIT FORM
Reevaluate / modify outcomes
Reevaluate / modify processes
Modify evaluation tool / methods
Change funding priorities / shift staff or resources
Implement or modify staff training
Implement or modify student orientations
Purchase equipment, supplies, technology
Other
ASSESSMENT REPORTING TOOL, existing text from current web form
Acad Year
Area
(Choose an area)
Method of Instruction
Choose an Outcome
List all Faculty/Staff involved
Where are artifacts housed and who is the contact person?
Additional information to help you track this assessment (eg. MATH-120-E1234 2012F)
What assessment tool(s)/assignments were used? Use the text box to describe the student prompt, such
as the exam questions or lab assignments.
Embedded Exam Questions:
Writing Assignment:
Surveys/ Interviews:
Culminating Project:
Lab assignments:
Other:
Describe the Rubric or criteria that is used for evaluating the tool/assignment.
To what extent did performance meet expectation?
Enter the number of students who fell into each of the following categories.
Did not meet expectation/did not display ability:
Met expectation/displayed ability:
Exceeded expectation/displayed ability:
(NA) Ability was not measured due to absence/non-participation in activity:
A. What are your current findings? What do the current results show?
B. Check if actions/changes are indicated. (checking here will open a 'closing the loop' form which you
will need to complete when you reassess this outcome)
If you checked above, what category(ies) best describes how they will be addressed?
Redesign faculty development activities on teaching.
Purchase articles/books.
Consult teaching and learning experts about methods.
Create bibliography/books.
Encourage faculty to share activities that foster learning.
Other:
Reevaluate/modify learning outcomes.
Write collaborative grants.
Use the text box to describe the proposed changes and how they will be implemented in more detail.