Glacier atmosphere interactions and hydrology: Peyto field experiment discoveries. D. Scott Munro University of Toronto base (2240 m) + low (2183 m) + middle (2461 m) + high (2709 m) + AWS Network • ← Point process investigation: glacier atmosphere interactions and hydrology • ← Distribution tools (DEM, trigonometry, parameterization) • ← Distributed modelling and prediction • ← Base AWS/RCM forcing Snow reservoir Snow accumulation Ice reservoir Ice & Snow melt K 1 α i/s L* Q H Q E Pr/s δM j i/s Lf j qj Model – AWS Comparisons Low AWS - 2003 SR50 DenAdjSR50 Model 2 2 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 h (m) h (m) Model Middle AWS - 2006 -2 -3 -4 -4 -5 -5 Day of Year DenAdjSR50 -2 -3 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 SR50 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Day of Year Hydrology q M Ar QM i f K~1.5 h K~10.5 h q S t 1 q M q (t 1) K 03-06 Mean 71-74 Mean Mϋller & Keeler 1969 2.0 q/q24 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 170 173 176 179 182 185 188 191 194 197 200 203 206 209 212 215 218 221 224 227 230 233 236 239 241 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 q/q24 q/q24 June to August Melt Period 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 232 233 Early Melt Period 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 Late Melt Period 2.0 2.0 R² = 0.73 2008 1.5 2003-06 1971-74 1.5 q/q24 Measured71-74 q/q24 234 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 K~11.25 h, ice; 100 h, snow 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 Model03-06 q/q24 1.5 2.0 8 12 16 20 Time ( h ) 24 4 Glacier – Atmosphere Interaction • Focusing on the sensible heat flux, QH, there are respectively to the right of the equal sign the gradient, eddy correlation (EC) and bulk transfer methods of obtaining the flux density: Du DT 2 T TS 2 c p w' T ' c p k u Q H c p k z 2 D z D z ln z z o 2 2 • The key feature of the flow regime is a local wind speed maximum, close to the surface, through which heat should not flow because Du/Dz = 0, yet the bulk transfer approach seems to provide reasonable heat flux values, regardless of the measurement height used. • Although EC measurements of QH below the local wind speed maximum seem to agree with bulk transfer estimates, less is known about EC measurements near to and above the level of maximum wind speed. • Also to consider is the Oerlemans-Grisogono parameterization (OG) ......which is convenient for modelling, but contrary to classical thinking..... ......about the nature of the glacier atmospheric boundary-layer. 𝑄𝐻 = 𝜌𝑐𝑝 𝐾𝑔𝑒𝑜 + 𝐾𝑘𝑎𝑡 2 𝑇 − 𝑇𝑆 If classical thinking is correct EC measurements of QH → 0 near the .....local wind speed maximum, but if OG is correct the QH measurements .....will show a step change across the level of maximum wind speed. • Experiment objectives: Regional Wind ? A: B-L turbulent flow field, 1-6 m B to A: B-L acceleration & cooling 6m 6m B 4m 4m A Mobile EC 2m 2m Fixed EC 1m 1m ~50 m ~ 650 m Turbulent flow field, 1-6 m R e g i o n a l G l a c i e r W i n d W i n d Acceleration & cooling 6 5 H eig h t (m) 4 3 A: Wind 2 B : Wind A: T emp. 1 dDz B : T emp. 0 0 5 10 15 20 -1 Wind S peed (m s ) T emperature (°C ) Taking mean values, assuming no heat transfer across 4 m and correcting for adiabatic warming, expect 1 & 2 m TA< TB by ~2 °C. Concluding with analogues: On hydrology: • An electrical analogue to consider for supraglacial runoff is a series resistance system that links the runoff potential of the melting ice surface to supraglacial stream discharge. • In such a system resistance should increase with weathering crust development, decrease with decay, so a good test of this idea is to continuously measure short-term runoff from a supraglacial basin all summer to see if K depends on the weather. On glacier-atmosphere interactions: • An electrical analogue to consider for boundary-layer heat transfer to the glacier is a parallel resistance system that links the energy potential of the regional air mass to surface melt. • One branch of such a system is the geostrophic flow, the other a katabatic flow that is subject to sporadic breakdown, thus explaining hot flash behaviour. • This is supported by the 2008 eddy correlation data that suggest two turbulent transfer fields adjacent to the glacier surface, one of which extends above the level of the wind speed maximum. Acknowledgements CFCAS → IP3 Network Funding Environment Canada → CRYSYS Program NSERC → Discovery Grants Natural Resources Canada → GSC-CGVMAN University of Toronto Mississauga