G327: Structure and Deterioration of Craft Materials Course handbook 2015-2016 Top: Cyanotype image by C.R. O’Grady Bottom: removal of burial encrustations with dilute acid image by N. Passerotti 1 UCL - INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY G327: Structure and Deterioration of Craft Materials 2015-16 MA Principles of Conservation, Year 1 Course: 15 credits Turnitin Class ID: 2971229 Turnitin Password: IoA1516 Co-ordinator: Caitlin R. O’Grady caitlin.r.ogrady@ucl.ac.uk Room: 203 / Telephone number: 02076797487 Post-Graduate Teaching Assistant: Anjali Jain anjali.jain.14@ucl.ac.uk Please see the last page of this document for important information about submission and marking procedures, or links to the relevant webpages. This handbook contains basic information about the content and administration of this course. If you have queries about the objectives, structure, content, assessment or organisation of the course, please consult the Course Co-ordinator. Further important information, relating to all courses at the Institute of Archaeology, is to be found at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/students and in the general MA/MSc handbook. It is your responsibility to read and act on it. It includes information about originality, submission and grading of coursework; disabilities; communication; attendance; and feedback. OFFICE HOURS: Thursdays 14.00-16.00 or by appointment 2 1. OVERVIEW ARCLG327 SHORT DESCRIPTION This course introduces craft materials and their manufacture, while relating these processes to observed deterioration mechanisms. Lectures will focus on understanding materials and their manufacture through exposure to artefacts (UCL collections) and art objects (privately owned). Laboratory sessions will provide students with the opportunity to practically manipulate traditional craft materials and/or assess degradation. Through lectures and laboratories, students will begin to define and understand the relationships between craft materials and degradation through assessment of associated technology and underlying chemistry. WEEK-BY-WEEK SUMMARY TERM 1 2015 Week 1: 5 October Lecture (rm. 209): Introduction to the course / Linking material structure, properties and degradation Week 2: 12 October Lecture (rm. 209): Understanding light: wave and particle duality and its effects on materials Lab Activity (rm. 615): Spectrometry and examination of various light sources Week 3: 19 October Lecture (rm. 209): Colour production: how inorganic pigments and organic dyes produce colour; role of trends in periodic table Lab activity (rm. 615): Identifying pigments and dyes through their interaction with various light sources Week 4: 26 October Lecture (rm. 209): Photography: relationships between light, image layers and substrates Laboratory activity (rm. 615): Light sensitive materials – linking light and pigments thru chemistry Week 5: 2 November Lecture (rm. 209): Glass and ceramics: crystalline vs. non-crystalline materials READING WEEK: 9 – 13 November (No Teaching) Week 6: 16 November Lecture (rm. 209): Metals: technology and redox Dr. John Merkel Week 7: 23 November (TBC) Lecture (rm. 209): Calcium carbonate, lime plaster and plaster of Paris: pH and acids/bases Laboratory (rm. 615): Exploring pH and the impact of acids/bases on materials 3 Week 8: 30 November Lecture (rm. 209): Polymers: structure/orientation, adhesive binders, film formation and solubility Laboratory (rm. 615): Exploring adhesives – role of structure and solubility Week 9: 7 December Site visit: Natural History Museum London – Green Zone Minerals and Red Zone Earth Lab Week 10: 14 December Lecture (rm. 209): Polymers: paper structure and manufacturing methods Basic texts The following books and websites will give you a good introduction and knowledge of materials chemistry, properties and degradation. KHAN ACADEMY. 2014. Subject: Chemistry. [Online]. [Accessed 17 SEPTEMBER 2015]. Available from: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/chemistry KINGERY, W.D. 1996. “A role for materials science.” In: Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Ed. W.D. Kingery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 175180. INST ARCH BD KIN KINGERY, W.D. 1996. “Materials science and material culture.” In: Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Ed. W.D. Kingery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 181-203. INST ARCH BD KIN ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY. 2014. Periodic Table. [Online]. [Accessed 17 SEPTEMBER 2015]. Available from: http://www.rsc.org/periodic-table Methods of Assessment This course is assessed by three total pieces of assessment. These include 2 written reports totalling 4000 words and submission of laboratory notebook recording observations made during practical sessions and include: a. Short essay 1 – discussion/comparison of pigment/dye including chemistry, history, degradation (35% weighting - 2000 words) b. Short essay 2 – visual assessment and discussion of object: chemistry, materials and method of manufacture, degradation (35% weighting - 2000 words) c. Laboratory notebook (30% weighting) The topics and deadlines for each assessment are discussed in the following section. If students are unclear about the nature of an assignment, they should contact the Course Co-ordinator. The Course Co-ordinator will be willing to discuss an outline of their approach to the assessment, provided this is planned suitably in advance of the submission date. 4 Teaching Methods The course is taught over Term 1 of the 2015-2016 academic year and includes weekly lectures and laboratory sessions (all are compulsory). Teaching will take place on Mondays in IoA room 209 and conservation labs (rms. 615 and 617). There is one museum site visit and future details regarding timing and meeting location are forthcoming. Please remember that students will be expected to wear appropriate clothing, footwear and lab coats for these laboratory sessions held in the IoA basement labs. Workload There will be 150 hours for this course, which is divided in the following way: Lectures Demonstration/practical Reading Preparation and production of assessed work 20 hours 10 hours 40 hours 80 hours Prerequisites The course is introductory and assumes no previous knowledge of the subject. The lectures will contain technical and scientific content. Basic knowledge of physics and chemistry would be an advantage. However, it is intended that the course should be comprehensible to students of any background. 2. AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT Aims The aims of the course are: • To introduce craft materials, their method of manufacture and associated deterioration mechanisms To provide an in-depth analysis of introduced artefacts by linking their chemical composition to technology and deterioration To provide students with the opportunity to understand and assess craft materials through practical laboratories designed to recreate specific materials or test chemical principles/relationships To provide students with the opportunity to understand and assess artefacts and degradation through observation and handling of selected artefacts from private and UCL collections Objectives On successful completion of this course a student should: Understand various craft materials and link their composition and technology to expected 5 degradation processes Be able to identify specific qualities and characteristics that suggest the method of manufacture and potential deterioration of observed artefacts and craft materials Understand specific technological choices made during manufacturing and production that affect artefact function, appearance, and degradation Know how to relate craft material technology, method of manufacture and composition to deterioration mechanisms Learning Outcomes The module is focused on the technology and history of craft materials, as well as their expected chemical degradation mechanisms. Following completion of the course students will: Be able to demonstrate a good understanding of the relationship between chemistry, technology and degradation Be able to evaluate the methods used to understand, reconstruct and interpret craft materials used historically Have a broad and comparative knowledge of classes of craft materials Know how to relate technological choices to craft materials and their degradation Coursework Item 1: Essay 1 – Pigment/Dye (2000 words / 35% weighting) This essay is a review of the literature focused on an assigned colorant with discussion of how colour is produced, the pigment is identified visually/chemically, its history, how it is manufactured including materials and technology, any associated degradation mechanisms and why the colourant is important to study for conservators. This review is expected to survey the literature on the assigned colourant, as well as critically assess/discuss the topics listed above. For the assigned colorant, students should evaluate the literature and identify future areas of research. Your paper MUST include a 100 word abstract summarizing your review. Guides on writing literature reviews, as well as examples can be found on the following websites: http://library.bcu.ac.uk/learner/writingguides/1.04.htm http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/studyadvice/StudyResources/Essays/sta-startinglitreview.aspx http://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/ld/resources/writing/writing-resources/literature-review The use of images, tables, diagrams are encouraged for this assignment. Additional guidelines regarding the report format will be made available in future class sessions. Please submit an electronic version to caitlin.r.ogrady@ucl.ac.uk with high resolution images in addition to that submitted to Turnitin and the paper copy. 6 The completed project should be handed in no later than Wednesday 18 November 2015. Item 2: Essay 2 – Object Description (2000 words / 35% weighting) The second essay will focus on the description and technological assessment of an assigned object. Students are expected to visually assess (magnification, visible light/ultraviolet illumination) the object and make observations regarding the materials and technology used in its construction; evidence of use-wear; and comment on any observed degradation mechanisms. Potential deterioration, as predicted by the materials, technology and way in which the object is potentially used, based on visual inspection should also be addressed. Your paper MUST include a 100 word abstract summarizing your conclusions regarding your object. The use of images, tables, diagrams are encouraged for this assignment. Additional guidelines regarding the report format will be made available in future class sessions. Please submit an electronic version to caitlin.r.ogrady@ucl.ac.uk with high resolution images in addition to that submitted to Turnitin and the paper copy. The completed project should be handed in no later than Monday 14 December 2015. Item 3: Laboratory Notebook (30% weighting) Students are required to prepare notes and observations in a formal notebook DURING each of the five laboratory sessions and the one museum site visit. It is imperative to record your observations about components of the laboratory sessions as you observe them. Additional guidelines regarding the laboratory notebook format will be made available in future class sessions. The laboratory notebook is due on Monday 14 December 2015 by 17.00. Please submit this directly to the course instructor. If students are unclear about the nature of an assignment, they should discuss this with the Course Co-ordinator. Students are not permitted to re-write and re-submit essays in order to try to improve their marks. However, the Course Co-ordinator is willing to discuss an outline of the student's approach to the assignment, provided this is planned suitably in advance of the submission date. Word Counts The following should not be included in the word-count: title page, contents pages, lists of figure and tables, abstract, preface, acknowledgements, bibliography, lists of references, captions and contents of tables and figures, appendices. 1 3,000 2 2,850-3,150 Penalties will only be imposed if you exceed the upper figure in the range. There is no penalty for using fewer words than the lower figure in the range: the lower figure is simply for your guidance to indicate the sort of length that is expected. 7 3. SCHEDULE AND SYLLABUS Teaching schedule Lectures and demonstrations/practical sessions will be held from 2.00 – 6.00 on Mondays in room 209 and conservation laboratories (rms. 615 and 617). Lectures will be followed by a practical session. Please note that some lectures are subject to finalisation of the arrangements and discussion with the class. Further details will be announced closed to the date. Owing to the wide variety of techniques taught during the course practical sessions may be scheduled at slightly different times each week and in various locations depending on the subject taught, therefore it is important that you check your timetable at the beginning of each week. Except in the case of illness, the 70% minimum attendance requirement applies to all aspects of the course (lectures, practicals and demonstrations). Syllabus (detailed lecture summaries and weekly readings) The following is an outline for the course as a whole, and identifies essential and supplementary readings relevant to each session. Information is provided as to where in the UCL library system individual readings are available; their location and Teaching Collection (TC) number, and status (whether out on loan) can also be accessed on the eUCLid computer catalogue system. Readings marked with an * are considered essential to keep up with the topics covered in the course. Copies of individual articles and chapters identified as essential reading are in the Teaching Collection in the Institute Library (where permitted by copyright) or are available online. Students should check their e-mail frequently as any changes to arrangements and other messages will be communicated by this means. Term 1 2015 Week 1: 5 October 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Introduction to the course and Linking material structure, properties and degradation During the first week of class, students will be introduced to the course, its structure, syllabus, aims, objectives, methods of assessment, etc. Each session will incorporate a case study focused on the introduced topic as presented in an assigned reading, which students will be expected to discuss and comment during the lecture. The course timetable will be discussed in depth as there are a number of practical sessions, and locations to be accommodated. Following an introduction to the course, the first lecture will focus on the relationships between material structure, properties and degradation. COTTERILL, R. 1985. “From mine, quarry, and well: Minerals.” The Cambridge Guide to the Material World. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, pp. 99-118. INST ARCH JB Qto COT 8 HODGES, H. 1989. “15. Some Other Materials Part II: The Examination of Artifacts,” and “16. General Principle.” In Artifacts: an introduction to early materials and technology. London: Duckworth. INST ARCH K HOD KINGERY, W.D. 1996. “A role for materials science.” In: Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Ed. W.D. Kingery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 175180. INST ARCH BD KIN KINGERY, W.D. 1996. “Materials science and material culture.” In: Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Ed. W.D. Kingery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 181-203. INST ARCH BD KIN Week 2: 12 October 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Understanding light: wave and particle duality and its effects on materials This lecture will focus on the physics of light including its wave/particle duality. Key concepts to be discussed include the electromagnetic spectrum, the interaction between light and with materials and how we see colour. *BAILÃO, A. and S. ŠUSTIC. 2013. “Retouching with mica pigments,” e-conservation journal 1:45-60. [Online]. [Accessed 8 September 2015]. Available from: http://www.e-conservation.org/issue-1/18-retouching-with-mica-pigments BRILL, T.B. 1980. Light: its interaction with art and antiquities. New York and London: Plenam Press. INST ARCH L BRI *CONSENTINO, A. 2014. “Identification of pigments by multispectral imaging; a flowchart method,” Heritage science 2(8): 12 pages. [Online]. [Accessed 29 September 2015]. Available from: http://www.heritagesciencejournal.com/content/pdf/2050-7445-2-8.pdf COSTELLO, K. 2008. “Experiment #7: light as a tool spectroscope,” Chemistry 107 Laboratory. [Online]. [Accessed 8 September 2015]. Available from: http://www.chemistryland.com/CHM107Lab/Exp7/Spectroscope/Spectroscope.html *FEINBERG, G. 1968. “Light,” Scientific American 219: 50-75. KUEHNI, R.G. 1997. Color: an introduction to practice and principles. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Bartlett ND1488 .K82 2005 NASSAU, K. 2001. The physics and chemistry of color. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley. PHYSICS L 5 NAS *THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY SCHOOL OF CHEMISTRY. 2008. “Colour and light.” [Online]. [Accessed 8 September 2015]. Available from: https://scilearn.sydney.edu.au/fychemistry/calculators/colour_wheel.shtml 9 Case study article: OSMOND, G. 1993. “Accelerated deterioration of artists’ oil paints: an assessment involving ultraviolet fluorescence microscopy.” In ICOM Committee for Conservation tenth triennial meeting, Washington, DC, 22-27 August 1993: preprints, Volume 1. Ed. J. Bridgland. Paris: ICOM Committee for Conservation, pp. 239-247. INST ARCH L Qto ICO V. 1 Laboratory Session 1: Students will make their own spectrometer and characterize multiple light sources to understand the various ways the electromagnetic spectrum interacts with materials. Week 3: 19 October 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Colour Production: how inorganic pigments and organic dyes produce colour Inorganic pigments and organic dyes will be discussed with special reference to their elemental composition/structure, as well as the ways these characteristics produce colour. Students will also be introduced to a broad history of pigment and dyes used throughout history. *BEMISS, E. 1806. The Dyer’s Companion in two parts. London: Cady & Eells. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/dyerscompanion00bemi *BYTESIZESCIENCE. 2013. “The chemistry of natural dyes.” Published 15 October 2013. [Online]. [Accessed 9 September 2015]. Available from: https://youtu.be/Gwk1B66dvAM *CENNINI, C. 1933. Il Libro dell’Arte. Trans. D.V. Thompson. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.noteaccess.com/Texts/Cennini/ DOUMA, M. and J. LIPSCHER. Pigments through the ages. Institute for Dynamic Educational Advancement. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.webexhibits.org/pigments/ HARLEY, R.D. 2001. Artists’ pigments c. 1600-1835: a study in English documentary sources. 2nd Revised Edition. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH JDJ HAR MIKROPOULOU, E., E. EUPHORIA, and E.A. VARELLA. 2009. “Revival of traditional European dyeing techniques yellow and red colorants,” Journal of Cultural Heritage 10(4): 447-457. PRICE, H. 2002. The chemistry of dyes. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/webprojects2002/price/first%20page.htm SHAKHASHIRI, B.Z. 2012. “Chemical of the week: fireworks!” Science is fun in the lab of Shakhashiri. [Online]. [Accessed 8 September 2015]. Available from: http://scifun.chem.wisc.edu/chemweek/fireworks/fireworks.htm *THOMPSON. D.V. 1956. The materials and techniques of medieval painting. New York: Dover Publications. INST ARCH KN 1 THO Additional references: BERRIE, B.H. ed. 2007. Artists' pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Volume 4. Washington/London: National Gallery of Art/Archetype Publications (distributer). INST ARCH JDJ ART 10 EASTAUGH, N., V. WALSH, T. CHAPLIN and R. SIDDALL. 2004. The pigment compendium: a dictionary and optical microscopy of historical pigments. Amsterdam/London: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Available online through UCL libraries. FELLER, R.L. ed. 1986. Artists' pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Volume 1. Washington/London: National Gallery of Art/Archetype Publications (distributer). INST ARCH JDJ FEL FITZHUGH, E.W. ed. 1997. Artists' pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Volume 3. Washington/Oxford: National Gallery of Art/Oxford University Press (distributor). INST ARCH JDJ ART HOFENK DE GRAAFF, J.H. 2004. The colourful past: origins, chemistry and identification of natural dyestuffs. Riggisberg and London: Abegg-Stiftung and Archetype Publications. KIRBY, J., ed. 2001. Dyes in history and archaeology 16/17: Papers presented at the 16th meeting, Lyons, 1998, and the 17th Meeting, Greenwich, 1998. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH JDJ DYE KIRBY, J., ed. 2002. Dyes in history and archaeology 18: papers presented at the 18th meeting, Brussels, 1999. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH JDJ DYE KIRBY, J., ed. 2003. Dyes in history and archaeology 19: papers presented at the 19th meeting, Edinburgh, 2000. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH JDJ DYE KIRBY, J., ed. 2003. Dyes in history and archaeology 20: papers presented at the 20th meeting, Amsterdam, 2007. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH JDJ DYE KIRBY, J., ed. 2008. Dyes in history and archaeology 21: papers presented at the 21st meeting, Avignon and Lauris, France, 2002. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH JDJ DYE LEGGETT, W.F. 2009. Ancient and medieval dyes. Landisville, Pennsylvania: Coachwhip Publications. INST ARCH JDJ LEG ROY, A. ed. 1993. Artists' pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Volume 2. Washington/Oxford: National Gallery of Art/Oxford University Press (distributor). INST ARCH JDJ ART Case study article: VERRI, G. 2009. “The spatially resolved characterization of Egyptian blue, Han blue and Han purple by photo-induced luminescence digital imaging.” Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 394(4): 1011-1021. 11 Laboratory Session 2: Students will explore the identification of pigments and dyes through their physical properties, interaction with various wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum and chemical reactivity. Week 4: 26 October 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Photography: relationship between light, image layers and substrates This session will focus on the production of image layers and their interaction with light through their chemical/physical relationships. Early photographic processed will be the focus. *BOYD, J.E. 2010. “Silver and sunlight: the science of early photography,” Chemical heritage magazine 28(2): 20-25. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.chemheritage.org/discover/media/magazine/articles/28-2-silver-and-sunlight.aspx *BYTESIZESCIENCE. 2012. “A brief history of photography: innovations in chemistry.” [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://youtu.be/Mh42xZQL6-k?list=UUeYmwVIKjh29F5WBdhbEZiQ GEORGE EASTMAN HOUSE. 2011. Making a tintype. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://youtu.be/fY5KQQLBbcs HESS, D.H. and J.J. GUTIERREZ, 2010. Issues in the conservation of photographs. Readings in Conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. ART T NOR LAVÉDRINE, B. 2009. Photographs of the past: process and preservation. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Trust. SCIENCE ARCHIVES K 11 LAV *STULIK, D.C. and A. KAPLAN. Cyanotype. The Atlas of Analytical Signatures of Photographic Processes. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. [Online]. [Accessed 22 September 2015]. Available from: http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/atlas_cyanotype.p df *THE GETTY MUSEUM. 2012. Early photography: making daguerreotypes. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://youtu.be/N0Ambe4FwQk *WARE, M. 1998. Cyanotype: the history, science and art of photographic printing in Prussian blue. London: Science Museum and National Museum of Photography, Film & Television. STORE 06-0215/121 *WARE, M. 2003. “A blueprint for conserving cyanotypes,” Topics in photographic preservation, 10: 218. [Online]. [Accessed 29 September 2015]. Available from: http://cool.conservationus.org/coolaic/sg/topics/v10/pmgt10-004.pdf 12 Case study articles: FREIFELD, K. 2004. “Prussian blue, blue print, cyanotype chemicals are cyanides, says EPA,” Arts, crafts and theatre safety (ACTS) newsletter 18(2): 1-2. [Online]. [Accessed on 29 September 2015]. Available from: http://www.conservation-us.org/docs/defaultsource/periodicals/acts_facts_2004_vol18.pdf?sfvrsn=2 GERVAIS, C., M.A. LANGUILLE, S. REGUER, M. GILLET, S. PELLETIER, C. GARNIER, E.P. VICENZI and L. BERTRAND. 2013. “Why does Prussian blue fade? Understanding the role(s) of the substrate,” Journal of analytical atomic spectroscopy 28(10): 1600-1609. Laboratory Session 3: Students will make cyanotypes and explore the relationships between chemistry, light sensitivity and pigments in early photographic methods. Week 5: 2 November 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Glass and ceramics: crystalline vs. non-crystalline materials Crystalline and non-crystalline materials will be explored through introduction to ceramic and glass technologies. Material properties and their resulting structure will also be explored and how they can be manipulated through composition and manufacturing. *KINGERY, W.D. and P.B. VANDIVER. 1986. Ceramic masterpieces: art, structure, technology. New York: Macmillan USA. INST ARCH KD KIN KOOB, S.P., 2006. Conservation and care of glass objects. London and Corning, NY: Archetype Publications and The Corning Museum of Glass. INST ARCH KL KOO *NEWTON, R. and S. DAVISON, 1997. Conservation of glass. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. INST ARCH KL DAV PARMELEE, C.W. 1951. Ceramic Glazes. 2nd edition. Eds. E.D. Lynch and A.L. Friedberg. Chicago, Illinois: Industrial Publications, Inc. NST ARCH KD 1 PAR *RYE, O.S. 1981. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Manuals on Archaeology – 4. Washington: Taraxacum. INST ARCH KD 1 RYE *SHEPARD, A. O. 1980. Ceramics for the archaeologist. Publication 609. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institute of Washington. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCsQFjAB&url=http %3A%2F%2Fcarnegiescience.edu%2Fpublications_online%2FCeramics_arch.pdf&ei=lwcXVMDuIu6p7 Aaw2YCgCA&usg=AFQjCNEqLNdtuEbHwyLHZVh9JTdrcUEb5w&sig2=tVuEQanSymc8AaErTaL9_A&bv m=bv.75097201,d.d2s THEOPHILUS. 1979. On divers arts: the foremost medieval treatise on painting, glassmaking and metalwork. Trans. J.G. Hawthorne and C.S. Smith. New York: Dover. INST ARCH KN THE 13 Case study article: VAN KEUREN, S., H. NEFF, and M.R. AGOSTINI. 2013. “Glaze-paints, technological knowledge, and ceramic specialization in the fourteenth-century Pueblo Southwest,” Journal of anthropological archaeology 32(4): 675-690. Reading Week 9 – 13 November 2015 (No Teaching) Week 6: 16 November 2015 John F. Merkel: Metals: technology and redox The chemistry and structure of metals will be introduced in relation to technology. The concept of REDOX – oxidation/reduction and its role in both manufacturing and degradation will be discussed. *BBC HOME. 2003. Riddle of ‘Baghdad’s batteries’. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2804257.stm DRAYMAN-WEISSER, T. 2000. Gilded metals: history, technology and conservation. London: Archetype Publications in association with The American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. INST ARCH KEB Qto DAR *GETTENS, R.J., 1970. “Patina noble and vile.” In Art and technology: a symposium on Classical bronzes. Ed. S. Doerringer. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 57-72. INST ARCH KN 5 DOE MATTUSCH, C.M. 1996. The fire of Hephaistos: large classical bronzes from North American collections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Art Museums. YATES QUARTOS M 130 MAT MARYON, H. 1954. Metalwork and enamelling: a practical treatise on gold and silversmiths' work and their allied crafts. 3rd revised edition. London: Chapman & Hall. INST ARCH KEA MAR SCOTT, D. 2002. Copper and bronze in art: corrosion, colorants, conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute. INST ARCH KEB 1 SCO SCOTT, D.A. and G. EGGERT. 2009. Iron and steel in art: corrosion, colorants, conservation. London: Archetype Publications. INST ARCH KEB 2 Qto SCO *SCOTT, D.A., J. PODANY, and B.B. CONSIDINE. 1994. Ancient & historic metals: conservation and scientific research: proceedings of a symposium organized by the J. Paul Getty Museum and the Getty Conservation Institute, November 1991. Marina del Rey, CA: Getty Conservation Institute. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/ancientmetals.html 14 SELWYN, L. 2004. Metals and corrosion: a handbook for the conservation professional. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute. INST ARCH KEB SEL *UCDAVIS CHEM WIKI. Metallurgy. [Online]. [Accessed 23 September 2015]. Available from: http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Inorganic_Chemistry/Descriptive_Chemistry/dBlock_Elements/Metallurgy No case study article this week. Week 7: 23 November 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Lime plaster and plaster of Paris: pH and acids/bases The properties of pH will be explored through the exploration of calcium carbonate, lime plaster and plaster of Paris materials. Used to manufacture a variety of craft materials, their interaction with acids and bases will be discussed as they relate to the manipulation and deterioration mechanisms. BOYNTON, R.S. 1980. Chemistry and technology of lime and limestone. 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley. ENGINEERING QC 92 BOY CATHER, S., ed. 1991. The conservation of wall paintings: Proceedings of a symposium organized by the Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty Conservation Institute, London, July 13-16 1987. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Trust. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://www.getty.edu/publications/virtuallibrary/089236162X.html *DAL, P.H. and W.J.H. BERDEN, 1965. “The ageing of plaster of Paris in relation to its equilibrium water-content.” In Science of ceramics: proceedings of a conference held ... under the auspices of the British Ceramic Society and the Nederlandse Keramische Vereniging 3. Ed. G.H. Stewert. London: Academic Press, pp. 95-108. INST ARCH KD 2 STE GIBBONS, P., S. NEWSOM, and E. WHITFELD, 2004. Care and conservation of 17th century plasterwork in Scotland. Technical Advice Note, 26. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland. Bartlett NA3690 .G53 2004 *KAKOULLI, I. 1997. "Roman wall paintings in Cyprus: a scientific investigation of their technology." In Roman wall painting: materials, techniques, analysis and conservation. Proceedings of the international workshop, Fribourg, 7-9 March 1996. Eds. H. Bearat, M. Fuchs, M. Maggetti, and D. Paunier. Fribourg: Institute of Mineralogy and Petrography, pp. 131-141. INST ARCH KN 1 BEA *UCDAVIS CHEM WIKI. The pH scale. [Online]. [Accessed 23 September 2015]. Available from: http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Acids_and_Bases/Aqueous_Solutions/The_pH_Scal e#Self-Ionization_of_Water Case study article: BYNE, L.S.G. “The corrosion of shells in cabinets.” In Historical perspectives on preventive conservation, ed. S. Staniforth. Readings in conservation, 6. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 276-285. 15 Laboratory Session 4: Students will explore pH and its relationship to artistic materials through examination and testing of calcium carbonate, lime plaster and plaster of Paris materials. Week 8: 30 November 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Polymers: structure, directionality, adhesives and solubility This lecture will look at the structure and directionality of polymers in relationship to specific properties. Adhesives used in conservation will also be discussed. ALLEN, N.S., M.D. EDGE and C.V. HORIE. 1992. Polymers in conservation. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. INST ARCH JDE ALL GETTENS, R.J. and G.L. STOUT. 1966. Painting materials: A short encyclopedia. New York: Dover Publications. ART TD 10 GET *HORIE, V. 2010. Materials for conservation: organic consolidants, adhesives and coatings. 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. INST ARCH JDE HOR MILLS, J.S. and R. WHITE. 1994. The Organic Chemistry of Museum Objects. 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann. INST ARCH JDB MIL *MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES COMMISSION. Adhesives and Coatings. Science for Conservators, Volume 3. Conservation Science Teaching Series. London: Routledge. INST ARCH JDE CRA *SHASHOUA, Y. 2008. Conservation of plastics: materials science, degradation and preservation. Amsterdam/London: Butterworth-Heinemann. INST ARCH LA SHA Case study article: HORELICK, L.A., K. MCHUGH, and O. MADDEN. 2011. “What’s going on with guts: assessing adhesives used to repair cultural objects made of gut skin.” In Adhesives and consolidants for conservation: research and applications symposium proceedings / Adhésifs et consolidants pour la conservation: recherche et applications: les actes. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute. [Online]. [Accessed 29 September 2015]. Available from: http://www.cci-icc.gc.ca/discoverccidecouvriricc/symposium/2011symposium-eng.aspx Laboratory Session 5: Properties including structure and solubility of various adhesives will be investigated. Week 9: 7 December 2015 Site Visit: Natural History Museum – Green Zone Minerals and Red Zone Earth Lab (2 pm – 4 pm) 16 During a visit to the Natural History Museum London, students will look at the geological collections in particular to assess how people use these raw materials – and in particular their chemical composition and structure – as the basis of craft and artistic and production. Natural History Museum Floor Plans: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/galleries/floorplans/index.html Site visit observations: Students are expected to record their observations regarding the minerals and geological specimens on display in the Natural History Museum in their laboratory notebooks. Students should discuss the physical, chemical and structural relationships between specimens and their use in the production of art/craft objects. No case study article this week. Week 10: 14 December 2015 Caitlin R. O’Grady: Polymers: paper structure and manufacturing methods This session will focus on the foundation of paper chemistry, as a natural polymer. Paper technology and manufacturing methods will also be explored. BARAŃSKI, A., D. DUTKA, R. DZIEMBAJ, A. KONIECZNA-MOLENDA, J.M. ŁAGAN. 2004. “Effect of relative humidity on the degradation rate of cellulose: methodology studies,” Restaurator: international journal for the preservation of library and archival material 25(1): 68-74. *BELL, L.A. 1983. Plant fibers for papermaking. 2nd revised edition. McMinnville, Oregon: Liliaceae. INST ARCH KH BEL DACUS HAMM, P. 1992. “The history of the manufacture of printing ink from 1500-1900 with notes for the conservator.” In The Institute of Paper Conservation: conference papers, Manchester, 1992. Ed. S. Fairbrass, p. 30-35. Leigh, United Kingdom: Institute of Paper Conservation. INST ARCH KH Qto FAI *HUNTER, D. 1947. Papermaking: the history and technique of an ancient craft. New York: Dover Publications. INST ARCH KH HUN 1 week MANSO, M. and M.L. CARVALHO, 2009. “Application of spectroscopic techniques for the study of paper documents: a survey,” Spectrochimica acta. Part b, atomic spectroscopy 64(6): 482-490. NEEDHAM, J. 1974. “Part 1. paper and printing by Tsien Tsuen-Hsuin.” Science and civilization in China. Volume 5, chemistry and chemical technology. London: Cambridge University Press. INST ARCH DBL Series CHI 5/11 *TUMOSA, C.S., D. EEHARDT, K. HUFFORD, and E. QUASNEY, 2008. “The deterioration of newsprint and implications for its preservation,” Newsletter (Western Association for Art Conservation) 30(3): 21-24. [Online]. [Accessed 2 August 2015]. Available from: http://cool.conservation-us.org/waac/wn/wn30/wn30-3/ 17 Case study article: BOGAARD, J., H.R. MORRIS, and P.M. WHITMORE. 2005. “A method of the aqueous deacidification of oxidized paper,” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 44(2): 63-74. 4 ONLINE RESOURCES The full UCL Institute of Archaeology coursework guidelines are given here: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/students/handbook The full text of this handbook is available here (includes clickable links to Moodle and online reading lists) http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/administration/staff/handbook Online reading list The online reading list for this course can be found via the Moodle site for this course. Moodle There is a Moodle course associated with this core unit, please make sure you sign up so that you can benefit from the extra resources available in this location. The course title is as follows: ARCLG327 Structure and Deterioration of Craft Materials and you can log in to the Moodle system here: http://moodle.ucl.ac.uk/login/ 5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LIBRARIES AND OTHER RESOURCES In addition to the Library of the Institute of Archaeology, other libraries in UCL with holdings of particular relevance to this course are: Main Library, Wilkins Building, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT Bartlett Library, Ground Floor, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, WC1H 0NN Science library, DMS Watson Building, Malet Place, London, WC1E 6BT Libraries outside of UCL which have holdings which may also be relevant to this degree are: The British Museum Conservation Department Library to which you are admitted as a conservation student of this institute (see separate leaflet on access to, and rules for the use of, this library). INFORMATION FOR INTERCOLLEGIATE AND INTERDEPARTMENTAL STUDENTS Students enrolled in Departments outside the Institute should obtain the Institute’s coursework guidelines from Judy Medrington (email j.medrington@ucl.ac.uk), which will also be available on the IoA website. HEALTH AND SAFETY The Institute has a Health and Safety policy and code of practice which provides guidance on laboratory work, etc. This is revised annually and the new edition will be issued in due course. All work undertaken in the Institute is governed by these guidelines and students have a duty to be aware of them and to adhere to them at all times. This is particularly important in the context of the laboratory work which will be undertaken as part of this course. 18 19 APPENDIX A: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 2015-16 (PLEASE READ CAREFULLY) This appendix provides a short précis of policies and procedures relating to courses. It is not a substitute for the full documentation, with which all students should become familiar. For full information on Institute policies and procedures, see the following website: http://wiki.ucl.ac.uk/display/archadmin For UCL policies and procedures, see the Academic Regulations and the UCL Academic Manual: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/srs/academic-regulations ; http://www.ucl.ac.uk/academic-manual/ GENERAL MATTERS ATTENDANCE: A minimum attendance of 70% is required. A register will be taken at each class. If you are unable to attend a class, please notify the lecturer by email. DYSLEXIA: If you have dyslexia or any other disability, please discuss with your lecturers whether there is any way in which they can help you. Students with dyslexia should indicate it on each coursework cover sheet. COURSEWORK SUBMISSION PROCEDURES: You must submit a hardcopy of coursework to the Co-ordinator's pigeon-hole via the Red Essay Box at Reception (or, in the case of first year undergraduate work, to room 411a) by stated deadlines. Coursework must be stapled to a completed coversheet (available from IoA website; the rack outside Room 411A; or the Library). You should put your Candidate Number (a 5 digit alphanumeric code, found on Portico. Please note that this number changes each year) and Course Code on all coursework. It is also essential that you put your Candidate Number at the start of the title line on Turnitin, followed by the short title of the coursework (example: YBPR6 Funerary practices). LATE SUBMISSION: Late submission is penalized in accordance with UCL regulations, unless permission for late submission has been granted. The penalties are as follows: i) A penalty of 5 percentage marks should be applied to coursework submitted the calendar day after the deadline (calendar day 1); ii) A penalty of 15 percentage marks should be applied to coursework submitted on calendar day 2 after the deadline through to calendar day 7; iii) A mark of zero should be recorded for coursework submitted on calendar day 8 after the deadline through to the end of the second week of third term. Nevertheless, the assessment will be considered to be complete provided the coursework contains material than can be assessed; iv) Coursework submitted after the end of the second week of third term will not be marked and the assessment will be incomplete. GRANTING OF EXTENSIONS: New UCL-wide regulations with regard to the granting of extensions for coursework have been introduced with effect from the 2015-16 session. Full details will be circulated to all students and will be made available on the IoA intranet. Note that Course Coordinators are no longer permitted to grant extensions. All requests for extensions must be submitted on a new UCL form, together with supporting documentation, via Judy Medrington’s office and will then be referred on for consideration. Please be aware that the grounds that are now acceptable are limited. Those with long-term difficulties should contact UCL Student Disability Services to make special arrangements. TURNITIN: Date-stamping is via Turnitin, so in addition to submitting hard copy, you must also submit your work to Turnitin by midnight on the deadline day. If you have questions or problems with Turnitin, contact ioa-turnitin@ucl.ac.uk. RETURN OF COURSEWORK AND RESUBMISSION: You should receive your marked coursework within four calendar weeks of the submission deadline. If you do not receive your work within this period, 20 or a written explanation, notify the Academic Administrator. When your marked essay is returned to you, return it to the Course Co-ordinator within two weeks. You must retain a copy of all coursework submitted. WORD LENGTH: Essay word-lengths are normally expressed in terms of a recommended range. Not included in the word count are the bibliography, appendices, tables, graphs, captions to figures, tables, graphs. You must indicate word length (minus exclusions) on the cover sheet. Exceeding the maximum word-length expressed for the essay will be penalized in accordance with UCL penalties for over-length work. CITING OF SOURCES and AVOIDING PLAGIARISM: Coursework must be expressed in your own words, citing the exact source (author, date and page number; website address if applicable) of any ideas, information, diagrams, etc., that are taken from the work of others. This applies to all media (books, articles, websites, images, figures, etc.). Any direct quotations from the work of others must be indicated as such by being placed between quotation marks. Plagiarism is a very serious irregularity, which can carry heavy penalties. It is your responsibility to abide by requirements for presentation, referencing and avoidance of plagiarism. Make sure you understand definitions of plagiarism and the procedures and penalties as detailed in UCL regulations: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/current-students/guidelines/plagiarism RESOURCES MOODLE: Please ensure you are signed up to the course on Moodle. For help with Moodle, please contact Nicola Cockerton, Room 411a (nicola.cockerton@ucl.ac.uk). 21 INSTITUTE OF ARCHAELOGY COURSEWORK PROCEDURES General policies and procedures concerning courses and coursework, including submission procedures, assessment criteria, and general resources, are available in your Degree Handbook and on the following website: http://wiki.ucl.ac.uk/display/archadmin. It is essential that you read and comply with these. Note that some of the policies and procedures will be different depending on your status (e.g. undergraduate, postgraduate taught, affiliate, graduate diploma, intercollegiate, interdepartmental). If in doubt, please consult your course co-ordinator. GRANTING OF EXTENSIONS: New UCL-wide regulations with regard to the granting of extensions for coursework have been introduced with effect from the 2015-16 session. Full details will be circulated to all students and will be made available on the IoA intranet. Note that Course Coordinators are no longer permitted to grant extensions. All requests for extensions must be submitted on a new UCL form, together with supporting documentation, via Judy Medrington’s office and will then be referred on for consideration. Please be aware that the grounds that are now acceptable are limited. Those with long-term difficulties should contact UCL Student Disability Services to make special arrangements. 22