Journal of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 1–6 www.elsevier.com / locate / jconrel Rapid communication New mode of drug delivery: long term autonomous rhythmic hormone release across a hydrogel membrane a Gauri P. Misra , Ronald A. Siegel a a,b , * Department of Pharmaceutics, 9 -177 Weaver-Densford Hall, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA b Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Received 4 December 2001; accepted 13 February 2002 Abstract This note demonstrates a novel mode of rhythmic drug delivery, which is independent of external modulation or physiological stimulation. Rhythmic behavior is attributed to negative, nonlinear feedback between the swelling state of a hydrogel membrane and the enzymatic conversion of glucose to hydrogen ion. The system pulsates in the presence of a constant level of glucose, thus distinguishing it from insulin delivery devices that respond to changes in glucose concentration. As an example, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was released in short, repetitive pulses over 1 week. 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Rhythmic delivery; Hormone; GnRH; LHRH; Ultradian; Feedback; Hydrogel 1. Introduction Numerous hormones are endogenously secreted in an episodic, pulsatile manner [1–3]. For example, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) is secreted by the hypothalamus in nearly regular bursts every 1–2 h [4,5]. Treatment of hormonal disorders associated with GnRH deficiency in both men and women warrants hormone delivery in a temporal pattern mimicking the endogenous ultradian rhythm [4,5], and several approaches to ultradian delivery have been proposed [6–12]. In this communication we demonstrate rhythmic delivery of GnRH across a polyelectrolyte hydrogel *Corresponding author. E-mail address: siege017@tc.umn.edu (R.A. Siegel). membrane in the presence of a constant level of glucose, approximating conditions seen in nondiabetic individuals. Rhythmicity is attributed to nonlinear feedback between the membrane and the enzyme glucose oxidase. The results presented here provide the first positive evidence supporting a strategy, described previously [13–17], for the ultradian delivery of hormones. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Membrane N-Isopropylacrylamide (NIPA, Kodak), methacrylic acid (MAA, Polysciences), and ethyleneglycol dimethacylate (EGDMA, Polysciences) 0168-3659 / 02 / $ – see front matter 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0168-3659( 02 )00043-3 G.P. Misra, R. A. Siegel / Journal of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 1 – 6 2 with molar composition 90:10:0.7 NIPA–MMA– EGDMA, were dissolved in 1 ml water–ethanol (50:50, v / v), with cosolvent mass twice that of the monomer mixture, along with 5 mg ammonium persulfate (APS, Polysciences) and 20 ml tetraethylmethylenediamine (TEMED, Aldrich). The solution was polymerized at 10 8C between glass plates separated by a 250-mm spacer. Resulting hydrogels were extensively washed and conditioned in saline media. 2.2. Enzymes Glucose oxidase (GluOx, Sigma: 234 I.U. / mg) and catalase (Cat, Sigma: 10 700 I.U. / mg) were immobilized in small polyacrylamide gel particles produced by polymerization at 4 8C with the following ingredients: 1 ml water, 0.2 g acrylamide (Sigma), 5 ml EGDMA, 4 mg APS, 10 ml TEMED, 10 mg albumin (Sigma), 20 mg GluOx and 2 mg Cat (10,700 I.U. / mg). 2.3. Experimental procedure Membranes were mounted in a water-jacketed, side-by-side diffusion cell with 80 ml cell volumes and transport aperture radius 1 cm, illustrated in Fig. 1. A steady pH gradient was established across the membrane by pH stat-ing Cells I and II overnight at 37 8C in 75 ml, 50 mM NaCl solutions at pH 7.0 and 6.0, respectively. Just before an experimental run, enzyme particles were added to Cell II, and Cell II was stat-ed at pH 4.5 for 45 min. At the start of a run, the contents of Cell I were replaced with 75 ml of a stock solution containing 50 mM glucose, 50 mM NaCl, and 0.01 wt.% 2-bromo2-nitro-1,3-propanediol (bronopol, Aldrich, antimicrobial). Steady feed and drainage of stock solution through Cell I were then initiated, controlled by peristaltic pump (SciLog) with a flow-rate 1.36–1.38 ml / min, and pH in Cell I was clamped at 7.0 by pH-stat. At the same time, the pH-stat was disconnected from Cell II, and a 12.5-g piece of marble was introduced there. Finally, tetramethylrhodaminelabeled GnRH (f-GnRH, Mw 51614, Genemed Synthesis), was spiked into Cell II to a concentration of 1 mM. During a run, the pH in Cell II was followed with a pH electrode, and the appearance of f-GnRH in Cell I was monitored spectrofluorimetrically ( lex 5 Fig. 1. Diagram of test cell for rhythmic pulsatile delivery of GnRH. Both Cells I and II are 80 ml and are charged with 75 ml solutions, which are stirred vigorously using magnetic stir bars (SB) and maintained at 37 8C by circulation from a waterbath through water jackets. Cell I is fed at 1.36–1.38 ml / min by 50 mM saline containing and 50 mM glucose and 0.01 wt.% bronopol (antibacterial), is drained at equal rate, and is pH stat-ed at 7.0. Cell II initially contains glucose-free saline solution, a 12.5-g piece of marble, and small particles of polyacrylamide gel containing enzymes. Small dots refer to f-GnRH molecules, initially introduced at 1 mg / ml into Cell II. pH in Cell II is monitored by a pH meter and appearance of f-GnRH in Cell I is recorded by a spectrofluorimeter, with both instruments sending data to a personal computer. G.P. Misra, R. A. Siegel / Journal of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 1 – 6 520 nm, lem 5572 nm). Vigorous stirring (600 rpm) was provided in both cells, and temperature was maintained at 37 8C. 3. Results Results of a typical run are shown in Fig. 2. The pH record in Cell II (Fig. 2a) is characterized as an oscillation, with peaks that converge rapidly to a near-constant value between pH 5.05 and 5.1, and troughs that become progressively shallower, approaching |pH 4.9–4.95. The period of oscillation steadily increases from |4 h initially to |8–12 h at about 1 week, after which pH oscillations cease. Fig. 2b shows a series of pulses of f-GnRH concentration in Cell I that correlate with pH drops in Cell II. When pH rises in Cell II, f-GnRH transport ceases, and the subsequent decay in fGnRH concentration in Cell I reflects washout through the drain line. The rate of release of f-GnRH across the membrane was estimated from the record in Fig. 2b by deconvoluting the residence time distribution, r(t), of hormone in Cell I. Since Cell I is well stirred with constant volume V 5 75 ml and constant outflow-rate Fig. 2. (a) Time course of oscillations of pH in Cell II. (b) Corresponding time course of concentration of f-GnRH in Cell I. 3 F 51.37 ml / min, r(t) 5 (F /V ) exp (2Ft /V ). Results of deconvolution, shown in Fig. 3, feature bursts of f-GnRH release separated by quiescent periods. Pulse width and interpulse interval increase with time, in register with the pH swings in Fig. 2a. The pattern of pH oscillations is almost exactly reproduced in the middle of a run when the contents of Cell II are replaced with fresh stock solution and enzyme (data not shown). Some variability between runs is seen, however, possibly due to nonuniformity of marble samples or subtle differences in membrane preparation and mounting. Variations in peak and trough levels seen in Figs. 2b and 3 are most likely due to baseline drift in the fluorescence detection system, initial buildup of an f-GnRH load in the membrane, and reduction of transmembrane gradient of f-GNRH with time. 4. Discussion It is significant that the present system behaves rhythmically even though it is fed by a constant glucose concentration. The rhythms are therefore termed autonomous [18]. In Fig. 4 the present system’s autonomous behavior is contrasted with the responsive behavior of systems that have been previously considered for glucose-sensitive insulin delivery [19–23]. Autonomous rhythmic behavior is attributed to nonlinear negative feedback between the NIPA– MAA membrane and glucose oxidase [13–17]. When pH in Cell II is sufficiently high (.5.02), the membrane is charged, swollen, and permeable to glucose. Glucose enters Cell II and is converted by glucose oxidase to gluconate 2 and H 1 , resulting in a pH drop in Cell II. Hydrogen ions then bind to and neutralize the MAA groups on the membrane, and the membrane shrinks under the influence of the hydrophobic NIPA component, diminishing its permeability to glucose. Enzymatic production of H 1 is then attenuated, leading to a rise in pH in Cell II. Eventually the hydrogen ions bound to the membrane are released into Cell I, restoring the membrane’s charge, and the membrane reverts to its swollen, high permeability state. The cycle is now poised to repeat itself. Cycles of swelling and 4 G.P. Misra, R. A. Siegel / Journal of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 1 – 6 Fig. 3. Estimated rate of f-GnRH delivery through the membrane, obtained by deconvoluting data in Fig. 2a. Deconvolution is based on the residence time distribution r(t) 5 (F /V ) exp (2Ft /V ) of f-GnRH in Cell I, which is assumed to be well stirred, of constant volume V 5 75 ml, and fed and drained with stock solution at a constant rate F 51.37 ml / min. A symmetric 17-point, third-order Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter ( ORIGIN 6.0 software, Microcal) was used to suppress noise arising from deconvolution. Inset: detailed view of fifth and sixth peaks, with no smoothing. deswelling correspond, respectively, to permeation and blockade of f-GnRH. Because of the large volume of Cell II, pH swings would normally require days instead of hours. In this work, pH swings were accelerated but kept in range by increasing glucose concentration and introducing marble (CaCO 3 ) into Cell II. Marble acts as a shunt for eliminating H 1 via the reaction 2H 1 1 CaCO 3 →Ca 21 1CO 2 1H 2 O [24]. The characteristic relating glucose permeability of NIPA–MAA membranes to pH in Cell II exhibits a sharp, first order transition, with hysteresis [16,25], and this is an important enabling property for the mechanism proposed above. From Fig. 2 we estimate that the hysteresis band has its lower and upper limits in the pH ranges 4.9–4.95 and 5.02–5.10, respectively, in rough agreement with observations in Ref. [25]. As pH increases or decreases within the hysteresis band, the membrane remains in its col- lapsed or swollen state until it crosses the band’s upper or lower limit, respectively [14,16]. Because of sluggishness of membrane response, measured pH may overshoot these limits before a transition takes place, particularly on the low end, as seen at early times in Fig. 2. With increasing time, however, pH oscillations converge to a nearly constant amplitude, and periodicity steadily increases. We attribute these phenomena to a steady accumulation of gluconate 2 , which acts as a pH buffer, in Cell II [17]. This accumulation slows the upswings and downswings of pH, and reduces the overshoots. When a sufficiently high concentration of gluconate 2 is reached, H 1 production may be buffered to the extent that pH in Cell II cannot drop below the lower limit of the hysteresis band, and the system is trapped in its high permeability state. At this point pH oscillations cease, as does rhythmic delivery of f-GnRH. G.P. Misra, R. A. Siegel / Journal of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 1 – 6 5 Fig. 4. Illustration of difference between glucose-responsive delivery of insulin (top panel) and autonomous, glucose-driven rhythmic delivery of ultradian hormones such as GnRH (bottom panel). In the top panel, insulin release is minimal until glucose level rises, usually in response to a meal, at which point a pulse of insulin is released. In the bottom panel, the glucose level does not change with time, but hormone release occurs in regular pulses due to nonlinear, negative feedback between hydrogel membrane swelling and enzymatic conversion of glucose to hydrogen ions. The present system is an early prototype of a device for rhythmic delivery of hormones. Cells I and II represent external body fluids and the device interior, respectively. Methods to maintain rhythmic behavior indefinitely, in the absence of marble and the presence of physiologically more realistic glucose concentrations (3–7 mM) and pH-buffering environment (pH 7.4, 27 mM bicarbonate), are under investigation. Acknowledgements This work was funded by NSF grant CHE- 6 G.P. Misra, R. A. Siegel / Journal of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 1 – 6 9996223. We thank Anish P. Dhanarajan and Yuandong Gu for helpful comments. [14] References [15] ¨ [1] G. Brabant, K. Prank, C. Schofl, Pulsatile patterns in hormone secretion, Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 3 (1992) 183–190. [2] W.F. Crowley, J.G. Hofler, The Episodic Secretion of Hormones, Wiley, New York, 1987. [3] A. Goldbeter, Biochemical Oscillators and Cellular Rhythms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. [4] N. Santoro, M. Filicori, W.F.J. Crowley, Hypogonadotropic disorders in men and women: diagnosis and therapy with pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone, Endocr. Rev. 7 (1985) 11–23. [5] M.B. Southworth, A.M. Matsumoto, K.M. Gross, M.R. Soules, W.J. Bremner, The importance of signal pattern in the transmission of endocrine information: pituitary gonadotropin responses to continuous and pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 72 (1991) 1286– 1289. [6] N.J. Medlicott, I.G. Tucker, Pulsatile release from subcutaneous implants, Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 38 (1999) 139–149. [7] A. Gopferich, Bioerodible implants with programmable drug release, J. Controlled Release 44 (1997) 271–281. [8] H.L. Jiang, K.L. Zhu, Pulsatile protein release from a laminated device comprising of polyanhydrides and pHsensitive complexes, Int. J. Pharm. 194 (2000) 51–60. [9] E.R. Edelman, J. Kost, H. Bobeck, R. Langer, Regulation of drug release from polymer matrices by oscillating magnetic fields, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19 (1985) 67–83. [10] H.J. Lynch, R.W. Rivest, R.J. Wurtman, Artificial induction of melatonin rhythms by programmed microinfusion, Neuroendocrinology 31 (1980) 106–111. [11] Y. Ly, Y. Cheng, Electrically-modulated variable permeability liquid crystalline polymeric membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 77 (1993) 99–112. [12] P. Arunothayanun, T. Sooksawate, A.T. Florence, Extrusion of niosomes from capillaries: approaches to a pulsed delivery device, J. Controlled Release 60 (1999) 391–397. [13] R.A. Siegel, C.G. Pitt, A strategy for oscillatory drug release. [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] General scheme and simplified theory, J. Controlled Release 33 (1995) 173–186. X. Zou, R.A. Siegel, Modeling of oscillatory dynamics of a simple enzyme–gel diffusion systems with hysteresis. The case of lumped permeabilities, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 2267–2279. J.-C. Leroux, R.A. Siegel, Autonomous gel–enzyme oscillator fueled by glucose—preliminary evidence for oscillations, Chaos 9 (1999) 267–275. J.-C. Leroux, R.A. Siegel, pH-Hysteresis of glucose permeability in acid-doped LCST hydrogels—a basis for pulsatile, oscillatory drug release, in: J. DeNuzzio (Ed.), Intelligent Materials and Novel Concepts For Controlled Release Technologies, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1999, pp. 98–112. R.A. Siegel, G.P. Misra, A.P. Dhanarajan, Rhythmically pulsing gels based on chemomechanical feedback, in: Y. Osada, A.R. Khokhlov (Eds.), Polymer Gels and Networks, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 357–372. L. Edelshtein-Keshet, Mathematical Models in Biology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988. S.Y. Jeong, S.W. Kim, M.J.D. Eenink, J. Feijen, Self-regulating insulin delivery systems. I. Synthesis and characterization of glycosylated insulin, J. Controlled Release 1 (1984) 57–66. F. Fischel-Ghodsian, L. Brown, E. Mathiowitz, D. Brandenburg, R. Langer, Enzymatically controlled drug delivery, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85 (1988) 2403–2406. K. Ishihara, K. Matsui, Glucose-responsive insulin release from polymer capsule, J. Poly. Sci. Poly. Lett. Ed. 24 (1986) 413–417. J. Kost, T.A. Horbett, B.D. Ratner, M. Singh, Glucosesensitive membranes containing glucose oxidase: swelling, activity, and permeability studies, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19 (1985) 1117–1122. C.M. Hassan, F.J. Doyle III, N.A. Peppas, Dynamic behavior of glucose-responsive poly(methacrylic acid–g-ethylene glycol) hydrogels, Macromolecules 30 (1997) 6166–6173. ´ G. Rabai, I. Hanazaki, pH oscillations in the bromate– sulfite–marble semibatch and flow systems, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 10615–10619. J.P. Baker, R.A. Siegel, Hysteresis in the glucose permeability versus pH characteristic for a responsive hydrogel membrane, Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 17 (1996) 409–415.