SUFAC Meeting 10/04/10 Members Present: Laura Lauderdale Madisson Heinze Reece Rykal Derek Nelson Carly Cappozzo Ben Knutson Tiep Nguyen John Palmer Hoang Vo Brock Bennett Bonnie Jo Bratina Larry Ringgenberg Not Present: Bill Doering Brianne Rogers Meeting called to order 5:33 pm I. Athletics carryover They would like to keep their entire carryover ($569.78) and use it for buses to have the men’s basketball team go to a Milwaukee Bucks game Should this be allowed or should this fall under a contingency fund request? Discussion of Athletics agreement – decided not to put their own projected revenue into their budget so they don’t over-predict and over-spend. Should we let them keep their carryover or not? To be discussed after budget hearings tonight II. Budget hearings – The Racquet Had a very good year – many new ways to advertise, changed advertisement system completely, many more issues sold than projected → much higher revenue than projected Budget surplus of $9,700 but still a budget deficit of $3,733. They would like to keep their budget surplus from last year to help pull them out of their budget deficit. If they are allowed to keep this money, they intend to be pulled out of debt by the end of this fiscal year Business this year has been tremendous – they try to have one print advertisement per page and would like to make more revenue than last year but cannot predict that at this point Group discussion: This mentality that we can take program revenue away from groups doesn’t make sense. Then they have no reason to even go through SUFAC, correct? III. Budget hearings – Multicultural Events Budget comprises 6 multicultural groups with various programs. We focus on leadership and encourage students to put on quality programs, not just spending money. The Director of programming tells groups to plan on the high end of budgeting to account for inflation and so that they do not over-spend. This, combined with a significant carryover from the previous year, offset their original budget plans. There has also been an increase in attendance to a lot of the multicultural events which increased program revenue. Last year there was a significant donation from PROVOTES (about $5,000 in a one-time donation) to help support Multicultural Events program. There was also support provided from the Ho-Chunk Nation and UW-Eau Claire. None of this money was asked for nor accounted for in the original program budget. The Multicultural Events program was also supported by several grants which were not projected. The program has tried to cut back on travel in the past few years, as advised by the University, and this cut back on projected costs as well We feel that this is a program which will be stand-alone financially within the next year or so. They anticipate another increase in program revenue for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. Request to purchase 2 computers to put in the Multicultural Events office to be used by students for planning and meeting purposes. Preliminary plan for cost: this would not be possible without being allowed to keep their carryover. They would like to keep $1903 to purchase 2 desktop computers to be moved to Centennial Hall when their office moves to that location. There is room for 5 computers in the new office – if we gave them the entire carryover, they could buy more than 2 computers Revenue last year was $2676.44 and no revenue was projected IV. Budget hearings – Student Association Carryover of $5,071 – Request to return $2700 to the account to purchase 2 Dell laptops. One laptop will be used for the Student Association Secretary and the other for the Campus Lawyer, both of which had computers that recently were deemed “non-repairable” by IT. Last year, Student Association applied for a one-shot for a computer for the secretary and it was deemed not necessary at the time. Student Association was notified near the end of summer by the former Secretary that the old laptop was no longer functioning. There was a carryover last year and Student Association has been trying to cut corners with their budgeting and not spend money when it isn’t necessary. They also cut some travel budget out last year and a lot of the money allocated to be spent on supplies was not spent. V. Budget hearings – CAB Negative ending balance ($-2,580.79) They started last year thinking they had $3,000 more than they actually had which was the cost of living increase. There were $7,000 put towards the Centennial Celebration concert and the proposal was vetoed by the Chancellor due to the budget situation. Thereafter, CAB thought that the $7,000 and $3,000 were going to be put into their budget but Student Senate did not approve either of these amounts even though CAB had already accounted for the $3,000 in their yearly budget. Last year’s spring concert was of a different genre and did not make a lot of revenue ($2,831) and the cost was about $20,000. CAB would like to get a more mainstreamed artist for the spring concert this year. They would like to have their deficit removed and would like to also receive a cost of living increase this year. VI. Budget hearings – Graduate Student Organization Positive ending balance of $2,553.47 They were told last year that they couldn’t spend the previous year’s carryover (about $500) and they were told to cut their travel 4% ($600) so this money was not spent all year. They were unaware that they could spend this money last year so that accounts for $1,100 of their $2,553 ending balance. The program has four cycles of funding, one of them being in May. They allocated $1,200 during this time but the money was not encumbered until the current fiscal year (2010-2011). Request to keep their entire carryover because the extra money was due to an accounting error and miscommunication with SUFAC, not due to the program’s faulty budgeting skills. VII. Budget hearings – Scholarship Reception They received a one-shot last year and instead of spending money out of the one-shot account, they spent money from their budget. They will not be coming in for a hearing tonight because it was just an accounting error. VIII. Discussion about how we would like to go about these decisions about carryover Should we allow them to keep carryover money to spend on capital items or should this be proposed as a contingency fund request? By giving them a special case scenario, we are making the process more complicated. This is what we created the contingency fund for. This is their revenue; they should be able to put it towards something they need. This isn’t unspent segregated fee money. Are we making too many exceptions? We need to draw the line somewhere so that people have incentive to budget responsibly. Groups need to have a real need for these items and be justified in their request for them because otherwise the money needs to be put back into a central pool so students aren’t paying for unnecessary items, just so IX. Budget Carryover Decisions (Bennett/Heinze) Move to approve the Racquet’s ending balance at ($3,733.00) Multicultural Events – Do they really need 5 computers? Should we be financially responsible for buying them 5 computers/Do they really need 5 computers? This group has very good budgeting strategies and they have taken fiscal responsibility for the events that have caused them to get off budget. There is a policy in place to deal with these situations so we should follow them VS. Our decisions should be taken on a case by case scenario. This money is revenue and they budgeted well so maybe in this case, we can justify this money being spent through their carryover. These computers are not running Windows 7, which is campus standard, so they really do need these computers – but CAN the computers run Windows 7? o (Knutson/) Motion to give Multicultural Events their full program revenue back as carryover: $2,676.44 and they can spend this revenue however they would like and this request must afterwards be justified in writing to SUFAC. Motion Passes 10:0:0 The computers for Student Association are very necessary and action needs to be taken a.s.a.p. to solve this problem VS. The computers are necessary but the money to fund them should be taken o (Palmer/Knutson) Motion to carryover $2,700 to Student Association to be spend on 2 computers Motion Fails 4:5:1 (Cappozzo/Nelson) Motion to approve $2,700 purchase of 2 computers through the Contingency Fund Reserve Motion Passes 10:0:0 (Palmer/Knutson) Motion to approve Student Association’s carryover at $0 Motion Passes 10:0:0 CAB has projected a very large revenue for this year, can they really make this much money this year? Their miscommunication last year was because they didn’t budget/communicate responsibly and their justification to have their negative balance wiped out was not justified. o (Bennett/Rykal) Motion to approve CAB’s carryover deficit of ($2,580.79) Motion Passes 10:0:0 Graduate Student Association awarded $1,200 in May but was not encumbered until this fiscal year. The other $1,100 was due to o (Palmer/Bratina) Motion to carry over $1,200 to Graduate Student Association to account for the money they awarded last may but was not encumbered until this year. Motion Passes 10:0:0 o (Knutson/Bennett) Motion to approve Scholarship Reception’s carryover at $0 due to accounting errors. Motion Passes 10:0:0 X. Athletics Carryover discussion brought back to the table Something like this has never been done before but they do have the right to this money. Does it make a difference that this is money being used for travel? It is their place to decide o Motion to approve Athletics carryover at $569.78 because they made revenue last year. Motion Passes 10:0:0 XI. Discussion about “Dead Accounts” Fan Bus and Anthology accounts are no longer being used but there still shows that there is money in the accounts. There are several other dead accounts as well. Some of them have been inactive for up to 12 years. o (Palmer/Rykal) Motion to zero out and delete all dead accounts. Motion Passes 10:0:0 XII. Discussion of possible new vice-chair Duties will be about the same as the vice-chair – assisting the chair whenever necessary o Motion brought forward by the chair to nominate Carly Cappozzo the new Vice-Chair of SUFAC. Motion Passes 9:0:1 Meeting adjourned 8:00 pm