Care Management for Children with Chronic Conditions: Health Plan vs. Primary Care June 24, 2004 Project Partners Maternal Child Health Bureau Children’s Hospital & Regional Medical Center (CHRMC) – Center for Children with Special Needs Study period: July 1, 2002 – June 30, 2006 John Neff, MD Virginia Sharp, MA Jean Popalisky, RN, MN Regence BlueShield Tracy Fitzgibbon, RN Kristin Myers June 24, 2006 2 Project Goal & Objectives Develop, implement and evaluate a cost effective quality care management program for children with chronic conditions (CCC) Identify and classify CCC for case management using Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) software (health plan). Develop a range of reimbursement strategies case management in other settings (primary care). June 24, 2006 3 Health Plan Case Management Implementation Elements: Identifying CCC using Clinical Risk Groups software Developing tools Contacting members Project management June 24, 2006 Difficulty defining meaningful outcome measures 4 Health Plan: Case Management Identification Summary 315 CCC identified for CM screening CRGs + utilization filters 72 eliminated 120 unable to contact 123 CCC contacted 87 members screened using the 22-item CM screening tool 46 members (53%) opened case management June 24, 2006 5 Health Plan Activities Health Plan Case Management Activities, N=165 1% Education: Health Care System & Services 2% Needs & Health Assessment 13% 32% Community Service Referral & Coordination Assistance with Health Plan Issues 22% 30% Financial Planning Assistance Transition Assistance June 24, 2006 6 Health Plan Cost Savings $291,295 1.5 FTE Nurse Case Managers 19 month timeline Regence cost-savings methodology June 24, 2006 7 Health Plan: CM Screening Tool Analysis Five CM screening tool questions used to identify need for case management: Areas of concern: Access/Organization of services (3 questions) Out-of-pocket expenses (1 question) Family stress (1 question) 22-items could be reduced to 5 items June 24, 2006 8 Health Plan: Case Management Summary Predictive Modeling: Engagement rate = 37% of members contacted Interventions: CRGs + utilization filters + screening = “actionable” children with chronic conditions member education needs assessment community resource coordination benefit management Value: Cost savings of $291,295 over 19 months Members report case management impact June 24, 2006 9 Primary Care Case Management Implementation Elements: Identify CCC for case management Develop tools Define outcome measures meaningful to the health plan June 24, 2006 10 Primary Care: Tracking Activities All clinic staff involved in tracking Information collected: Type of intervention (existing CPT codes) Duration of intervention Provider type performing intervention Direct outcome of intervention Avoided outcome as result of intervention Tracking forms faxed to health plan at regular intervals for entry into database June 24, 2006 11 Primary Care: Tracking Results Clinic #1 454 tracking forms on 83 CCC Engagement rate = 83% Clinic #2 813 tracking forms on 84 CCC Engagement rate = 84% June 24, 2006 12 Primary Care: Care Planning Activities MD’s to do WRITTEN care plan Short-term goals: 3 – 6 months Include strategies for reaching goals Include input from families Revise when indicated Document progress toward goals Care plans faxed to health plan when completed June 24, 2006 13 Primary Care: Written Care Planning Results Clinic #1 Submitted 38 care plans Family input included on 16 care plans Clinic #2 Submitted 5 care plans June 24, 2006 Family input included on 3 care plans 14 Primary Care Activities Primary Care Case Management Activities, N=1083 10% Family Support 13% Disease Mgmt 49% 28% June 24, 2006 Medication & Equipment Mgmt Referrals for Specialty Care 15 Primary Care Cost Savings $44,434 Avoided Out-patient services 241 avoided ER visits @ $146/visit 136 avoided Pediatric clinic visits @ $68/visit 32 Avoided In-patient episodes June 24, 2006 16 Primary Care: Case Management Summary Predictive Modeling: Engagement rate = 83.5% Interventions: CRGs + utilization filter + staff selection family support activities condition management activities Cost savings: avoided services June 24, 2006 17 Side-by-Side Comparison Factor HPCM PCCM Predictive Modeling CRG + Utilization filters + Screening CRG + Utilization filters + Staff selection Engagement rate 37% of CCC contacted 83.5% of CCC identified Type of interventions Educational, Financial Family Support, Condition management Cost savings $291,295 by 1.5 FTE over 19 months OP: $44,434 in 7 months; IP: 32 episodes in 7 months Fee negotiation, lower level care, network providers, etc Avoided services Type of cost savings June 24, 2006 18 Key Learning Points Health plan case management activities and primary care case management activities are unique Primary care providers identify, contact, and engage patients more efficiently and effectively than health plan Both settings produce short-term cost savings from different sources June 24, 2006 19 Recommendations Comprehensive care coordination for the families of CCC should integrate the unique case management activities from the health plan and primary care into a single, cooperative effort June 24, 2006 20 Contact Information: John Neff, M.D. Jean Popalisky, MN 1100 Olive Way, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-987-5275 Fax: 206-987-5741 Email: john.neff@seattlechildrens.org 1100 Olive Way, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-987-5326 Fax: 206-987-5741 Email: jean.popalisky@seattlechildrens.org Tracy Fitzgibbon, RN 333 Gilkey Road, MS: BU270 Burlington, WA 98233 Phone: 360-755-2755 Fax: 360-755-4576 Email: tfitzgib@regence.com June 24, 2006 21