Table - Academic Deans as Evaluated by Faculty All Deans 3%)

advertisement
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
Table - Academic Deans as Evaluated by Faculty
All Deans
Survey participation: 554 (39.3%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 554
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to low
ratings (4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
548
3.68
5
4
1
1.32
0.06
539
3.35
5
3
1
1.33
0.06
531
3.49
5
4
1
1.31
0.06
534
3.34
5
4
1
1.49
0.06
545
2.96
5
3
1
1.55
0.07
533
2.66
5
3
1
1.49
0.06
535
3.34
5
3
1
1.37
0.06
446
3.26
5
3
1
1.40
0.07
510
3.56
5
4
1
1.28
0.06
552
3.03
5
3
1
1.56
0.07
478
2.99
5
3
1
1.45
0.07
540
3.34
5
4
1
1.37
0.06
508
3.20
5
3
1
1.40
0.06
541
2.77
5
3
1
1.51
0.06
509
3.74
5
4
1
1.17
0.05
518
3.22
5
3
1
1.42
0.06
8367
3.25
5
3
1
1.40
0.02
6
1%
15
3%
23
4%
20
4%
9
2%
21
4%
19
3%
108
19%
44
8%
2
0%
76
14%
14
3%
46
8%
13
2%
45
8%
36
6%
497
6%
56
53
99
145
195
548
69
68
142
123
137
539
63
50
134
134
150
531
102
59
100
104
169
534
153
75
89
98
130
545
189
64
103
92
85
533
87
45
137
129
137
535
81
40
120
92
113
446
53
40
140
123
154
510
151
70
89
97
145
552
119
44
141
70
104
478
77
79
108
138
138
540
87
72
122
106
121
508
170
80
92
100
99
541
33
35
130
144
167
509
92
71
117
107
131
518
1582
945
1863
1802
2175
8367
10.2%
9.7%
18.1%
26.5%
35.6%
100%
12.8%
12.6%
26.3%
22.8%
25.4%
100%
11.9%
9.4%
25.2%
25.2%
28.2%
100%
19.1%
11.0%
18.7%
19.5%
31.6%
100%
28.1%
13.8%
16.3%
18.0%
23.9%
100%
35.5%
12.0%
19.3%
17.3%
15.9%
100%
16.3%
8.4%
25.6%
24.1%
25.6%
100%
18.2%
9.0%
26.9%
20.6%
25.3%
100%
10.4%
7.8%
27.5%
24.1%
30.2%
100%
27.4%
12.7%
16.1%
17.6%
26.3%
100%
24.9%
9.2%
29.5%
14.6%
21.8%
100%
14.3%
14.6%
20.0%
25.6%
25.6%
100%
17.1%
14.2%
24.0%
20.9%
23.8%
100%
31.4%
14.8%
17.0%
18.5%
18.3%
100%
6.5%
6.9%
25.5%
28.3%
32.8%
100%
17.8%
13.7%
22.6%
20.7%
25.3%
100%
18.9%
11.3%
22.3%
21.5%
26.0%
100%
3.1
1.9
2.5
1.7
1.0
0.7
2.0
1.7
3.0
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.4
0.8
4.6
1.5
1.6
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Download