Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
All Deans
Table - Academic Deans as Evaluated by ChairsAsso./Asst Deans
Survey participation: 78 (47%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 78
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to low
ratings (4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts
fair and
rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
78
4.37
5
5
2
0.80
0.09
78
3.92
5
4
1
1.12
0.13
78
3.92
5
4
1
1.17
0.13
78
3.87
5
4
1
1.27
0.14
78
3.63
5
4
1
1.42
0.16
78
3.32
5
4
1
1.53
0.17
78
4.08
5
4
1
1.15
0.13
74
4.18
5
4
1
1.02
0.12
77
4.04
5
4
1
1.10
0.13
78
3.62
5
4
1
1.46
0.17
74
3.88
5
4
1
1.29
0.15
78
3.63
5
4
1
1.32
0.15
77
3.60
5
4
1
1.35
0.15
78
3.26
5
4
1
1.55
0.18
78
4.19
5
5
1
1.09
0.12
76
3.92
5
4
1
1.21
0.14
1236
3.84
5
4
1
1.24
0.04
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
4
5%
1
1%
0
0%
4
5%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
12
1%
0
2
10
23
43
78
3
5
19
19
32
78
3
8
15
18
34
78
7
5
12
21
33
78
11
7
12
18
30
78
16
10
10
17
25
78
5
3
10
23
37
78
3
1
12
22
36
74
2
7
12
21
35
77
11
10
8
18
31
78
7
4
13
17
33
74
4
18
10
17
29
78
9
8
14
20
26
77
19
7
9
21
22
78
4
3
7
24
40
78
4
7
14
17
34
76
108
105
187
316
520
1236
0.0%
2.6%
12.8%
29.5%
55.1%
100%
3.8%
6.4%
24.4%
24.4%
41.0%
100%
3.8%
10.3%
19.2%
23.1%
43.6%
100%
9.0%
6.4%
15.4%
26.9%
42.3%
100%
14.1%
9.0%
15.4%
23.1%
38.5%
100%
20.5%
12.8%
12.8%
21.8%
32.1%
100%
6.4%
3.8%
12.8%
29.5%
47.4%
100%
4.1%
1.4%
16.2%
29.7%
48.6%
100%
2.6%
9.1%
15.6%
27.3%
45.5%
100%
14.1%
12.8%
10.3%
23.1%
39.7%
100%
9.5%
5.4%
17.6%
23.0%
44.6%
100%
5.1%
23.1%
12.8%
21.8%
37.2%
100%
11.7%
10.4%
18.2%
26.0%
33.8%
100%
24.4%
9.0%
11.5%
26.9%
28.2%
100%
5.1%
3.8%
9.0%
30.8%
51.3%
100%
5.3%
9.2%
18.4%
22.4%
44.7%
100%
8.7%
8.5%
15.1%
25.6%
42.1%
100%
33.0
6.4
4.7
4.5
2.7
1.6
7.5
14.5
6.2
2.3
4.5
2.1
2.7
1.7
9.1
4.6
3.9
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1