Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Agriculture
Michael L. Galyean
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 43 (39.8%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 43
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
43
4.42
5
5
1
0.95
0.14
41
4.05
5
4
1
1.08
0.17
43
4.12
5
4
1
1.08
0.17
43
4.28
5
5
1
1.15
0.18
43
4.05
5
5
1
1.33
0.20
43
3.70
5
4
1
1.34
0.20
43
4.21
5
5
1
1.05
0.16
36
4.14
5
5
1
1.36
0.23
41
4.20
5
4
1
1.06
0.17
43
4.14
5
5
1
1.30
0.20
40
3.95
5
4
1
1.22
0.19
43
4.00
5
4
1
1.14
0.17
41
4.24
5
4
1
0.90
0.14
42
3.71
5
4
1
1.31
0.20
43
4.44
5
5
2
0.82
0.12
43
4.12
5
4
1
1.12
0.17
671
4.11
5
4
1
1.14
0.04
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
7
16%
2
5%
0
0%
3
7%
0
0%
2
5%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
17
2%
1
2
2
11
27
43
2
2
5
15
17
41
3
1
2
19
18
43
3
1
3
10
26
43
5
1
4
10
23
43
6
2
5
16
14
43
2
1
5
13
22
43
5
0
1
9
21
36
3
0
2
17
19
41
5
0
4
9
25
43
3
2
7
10
18
40
3
1
7
14
18
43
1
1
4
16
19
41
5
3
5
15
14
42
0
2
3
12
26
43
3
1
4
15
20
43
50
20
63
211
327
671
2.3%
4.7%
4.7%
25.6%
62.8%
100%
4.9%
4.9%
12.2%
36.6%
41.5%
100%
7.0%
2.3%
4.7%
44.2%
41.9%
100%
7.0%
2.3%
7.0%
23.3%
60.5%
100%
11.6%
2.3%
9.3%
23.3%
53.5%
100%
14.0%
4.7%
11.6%
37.2%
32.6%
100%
4.7%
2.3%
11.6%
30.2%
51.2%
100%
13.9%
0.0%
2.8%
25.0%
58.3%
100%
7.3%
0.0%
4.9%
41.5%
46.3%
100%
11.6%
0.0%
9.3%
20.9%
58.1%
100%
7.5%
5.0%
17.5%
25.0%
45.0%
100%
7.0%
2.3%
16.3%
32.6%
41.9%
100%
2.4%
2.4%
9.8%
39.0%
46.3%
100%
11.9%
7.1%
11.9%
35.7%
33.3%
100%
0.0%
4.7%
7.0%
27.9%
60.5%
100%
7.0%
2.3%
9.3%
34.9%
46.5%
100%
7.5%
3.0%
9.4%
31.4%
48.7%
100%
12.7
8.0
9.3
9.0
5.5
3.8
11.7
6.0
12.0
6.8
5.6
8.0
17.5
3.6
19.0
8.8
7.7
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Architecture
David A. Vernooy
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 24(43.6%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
24
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
24
3.00
5
3
1
1.58
0.32
24
3.42
5
4
1
1.50
0.31
24
3.13
5
3.5
1
1.51
0.31
24
3.13
5
3
1
1.64
0.33
24
2.79
5
2.5
1
1.61
0.33
23
2.48
5
2
1
1.58
0.33
24
3.00
5
3
1
1.55
0.32
23
2.52
5
2
1
1.47
0.31
23
3.48
5
4
1
1.56
0.32
24
2.71
5
2.5
1
1.65
0.34
24
2.17
5
2
1
1.25
0.25
24
2.54
5
2
1
1.38
0.28
23
2.22
4
2
1
1.25
0.26
24
2.29
5
1.5
1
1.40
0.29
23
3.13
5
3
1
1.45
0.30
17
3.00
5
3
1
1.50
0.36
372
2.81
5
2.75
1
1.49
0.08
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
4%
7
29%
12
3%
7
3
3
5
6
24
5
1
5
5
8
24
5
5
2
6
6
24
7
2
4
3
8
24
8
4
3
3
6
24
11
1
4
3
4
23
7
2
5
4
6
24
9
3
4
4
3
23
5
1
4
4
9
23
10
2
2
5
5
24
11
3
6
3
1
24
8
5
3
6
2
24
10
4
3
6
0
23
12
1
4
6
1
24
5
2
7
3
6
23
4
3
3
3
4
17
124
42
62
69
75
372
29.2%
12.5%
12.5%
20.8%
25.0%
100%
20.8%
4.2%
20.8%
20.8%
33.3%
100%
20.8%
20.8%
8.3%
25.0%
25.0%
100%
29.2%
8.3%
16.7%
12.5%
33.3%
100%
33.3%
16.7%
12.5%
12.5%
25.0%
100%
47.8%
4.3%
17.4%
13.0%
17.4%
100%
29.2%
8.3%
20.8%
16.7%
25.0%
100%
39.1%
13.0%
17.4%
17.4%
13.0%
100%
21.7%
4.3%
17.4%
17.4%
39.1%
100%
41.7%
8.3%
8.3%
20.8%
20.8%
100%
45.8%
12.5%
25.0%
12.5%
4.2%
100%
33.3%
20.8%
12.5%
25.0%
8.3%
100%
43.5%
17.4%
13.0%
26.1%
0.0%
100%
50.0%
4.2%
16.7%
25.0%
4.2%
100%
21.7%
8.7%
30.4%
13.0%
26.1%
100%
23.5%
17.6%
17.6%
17.6%
23.5%
100%
33.3%
11.3%
16.7%
18.5%
20.2%
100%
1.1
2.2
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.6
1.1
0.6
2.2
0.8
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.5
1.3
1.0
0.9
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Arts and Sciences
William B. Lindquist
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 184 (37.5%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 184
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
180
3.19
5
3
1
1.30
0.10
176
2.69
5
3
1
1.15
0.09
169
2.82
5
3
1
1.15
0.09
172
2.58
5
2
1
1.36
0.10
180
2.26
5
2
1
1.30
0.10
173
2.05
5
2
1
1.17
0.09
172
2.66
5
3
1
1.19
0.09
126
2.92
5
3
1
1.13
0.10
158
2.85
5
3
1
1.16
0.09
183
2.33
5
2
1
1.29
0.10
151
2.66
5
3
1
1.25
0.10
176
2.93
5
3
1
1.36
0.10
167
2.73
5
3
1
1.28
0.10
179
2.36
5
2
1
1.33
0.10
154
3.41
5
3
1
1.07
0.09
165
2.47
5
3
1
1.27
0.10
2681
2.68
5
3
1
1.24
0.02
4
2%
8
4%
15
8%
12
7%
4
2%
11
6%
12
7%
58
32%
26
14%
1
1%
33
18%
8
4%
17
9%
5
3%
30
16%
19
10%
263
9%
27
24
48
49
32
180
33
37
72
19
15
176
29
27
73
25
15
169
51
38
35
28
20
172
73
36
36
22
13
180
82
28
39
20
4
173
44
21
66
32
9
172
21
13
57
25
10
126
29
20
69
26
14
158
67
40
38
24
14
183
40
19
58
21
13
151
36
33
42
37
28
176
41
27
51
32
16
167
64
43
31
25
16
179
12
9
62
46
25
154
55
24
52
22
12
165
704
439
829
453
256
2681
15.0%
13.3%
26.7%
27.2%
17.8%
100%
18.8%
21.0%
40.9%
10.8%
8.5%
100%
17.2%
16.0%
43.2%
14.8%
8.9%
100%
29.7%
22.1%
20.3%
16.3%
11.6%
100%
40.6%
20.0%
20.0%
12.2%
7.2%
100%
47.4%
16.2%
22.5%
11.6%
2.3%
100%
25.6%
12.2%
38.4%
18.6%
5.2%
100%
16.7%
10.3%
45.2%
19.8%
7.9%
100%
18.4%
12.7%
43.7%
16.5%
8.9%
100%
36.6%
21.9%
20.8%
13.1%
7.7%
100%
26.5%
12.6%
38.4%
13.9%
8.6%
100%
20.5%
18.8%
23.9%
21.0%
15.9%
100%
24.6%
16.2%
30.5%
19.2%
9.6%
100%
35.8%
24.0%
17.3%
14.0%
8.9%
100%
7.8%
5.8%
40.3%
29.9%
16.2%
100%
33.3%
14.5%
31.5%
13.3%
7.3%
100%
26.3%
16.4%
30.9%
16.9%
9.5%
100%
1.6
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.6
1.0
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.4
3.4
0.4
0.6
Institutional Research, 2/8/2016, page 1 of 1
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
Rawls College of Business
Lance A. Nail
Survey participation: 36 (34.3%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
36
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
36
3.58
5
4
1
1.16
0.19
35
3.43
5
4
1
1.29
0.22
34
3.50
5
4
1
1.24
0.21
36
2.83
5
3
1
1.59
0.26
36
2.42
5
1.5
1
1.61
0.27
34
1.97
5
1
1
1.42
0.24
35
3.20
5
3
1
1.39
0.23
29
2.52
5
2
1
1.35
0.25
35
3.51
5
3
1
1.05
0.18
36
2.42
5
2
1
1.52
0.25
31
2.42
5
2
1
1.58
0.28
36
3.42
5
4
1
1.26
0.21
32
3.00
5
3
1
1.46
0.26
35
1.94
5
1
1
1.41
0.24
35
3.46
5
4
1
1.38
0.23
34
2.91
5
3
1
1.38
0.24
549
2.91
5
3
1
1.38
0.06
0
0%
1
3%
2
6%
0
0%
0
0%
2
6%
1
3%
7
19%
1
3%
0
0%
5
14%
0
0%
4
11%
1
3%
1
3%
2
6%
27
5%
2
4
11
9
10
36
3
7
6
10
9
35
3
4
9
9
9
34
13
2
7
6
8
36
18
3
3
6
6
36
21
3
4
2
4
34
7
3
8
10
7
35
9
6
8
2
4
29
1
4
14
8
8
35
16
5
4
6
5
36
15
2
6
2
6
31
2
9
6
10
9
36
6
9
3
7
7
32
22
3
4
2
4
35
4
7
3
11
10
35
7
7
8
6
6
34
149
78
104
106
112
549
5.6%
11.1%
30.6%
25.0%
27.8%
100%
8.6%
20.0%
17.1%
28.6%
25.7%
100%
8.8%
11.8%
26.5%
26.5%
26.5%
100%
36.1%
5.6%
19.4%
16.7%
22.2%
100%
50.0%
8.3%
8.3%
16.7%
16.7%
100%
61.8%
8.8%
11.8%
5.9%
11.8%
100%
20.0%
8.6%
22.9%
28.6%
20.0%
100%
31.0%
20.7%
27.6%
6.9%
13.8%
100%
2.9%
11.4%
40.0%
22.9%
22.9%
100%
44.4%
13.9%
11.1%
16.7%
13.9%
100%
48.4%
6.5%
19.4%
6.5%
19.4%
100%
5.6%
25.0%
16.7%
27.8%
25.0%
100%
18.8%
28.1%
9.4%
21.9%
21.9%
100%
62.9%
8.6%
11.4%
5.7%
11.4%
100%
11.4%
20.0%
8.6%
31.4%
28.6%
100%
20.6%
20.6%
23.5%
17.6%
17.6%
100%
27.1%
14.2%
18.9%
19.3%
20.4%
100%
3.2
1.9
2.6
0.9
0.6
0.3
1.7
0.4
3.2
0.5
0.5
1.7
0.9
0.2
1.9
0.9
1.0
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Education
Dale S. Ridley
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 62 (45.3%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
62
3.63
5
4
1
1.48
0.19
61
3.44
5
4
1
1.48
0.19
62
3.87
5
4
1
1.41
0.18
62
3.45
5
4
1
1.44
0.18
62
2.92
5
3
1
1.55
0.20
62
2.63
5
2
1
1.53
0.19
61
3.34
5
3
1
1.45
0.19
53
3.17
5
3
1
1.51
0.21
61
3.69
5
4
1
1.47
0.19
62
3.15
5
3.5
1
1.57
0.20
57
2.81
5
3
1
1.57
0.21
62
3.47
5
4
1
1.50
0.19
58
3.12
5
3
1
1.52
0.20
61
2.66
5
2
1
1.57
0.20
61
3.97
5
4
1
1.28
0.16
60
3.05
5
3
1
1.45
0.19
967
3.27
5
3.25
1
1.49
0.05
No-Response out of 62
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
9
15%
1
2%
0
0%
5
8%
0
0%
4
6%
1
2%
1
2%
2
3%
25
3%
10
7
3
18
24
62
12
5
6
20
18
61
9
2
6
16
29
62
12
3
10
19
18
62
16
13
9
8
16
62
22
11
8
10
11
62
12
3
16
12
18
61
13
4
11
11
14
53
10
3
9
13
26
61
17
5
9
14
17
62
18
9
10
6
14
57
11
7
8
14
22
62
13
8
13
7
17
58
22
11
6
10
12
61
6
1
12
12
30
61
11
13
14
6
16
60
214
105
150
196
302
967
16.1%
11.3%
4.8%
29.0%
38.7%
100%
19.7%
8.2%
9.8%
32.8%
29.5%
100%
14.5%
3.2%
9.7%
25.8%
46.8%
100%
19.4%
4.8%
16.1%
30.6%
29.0%
100%
25.8%
21.0%
14.5%
12.9%
25.8%
100%
35.5%
17.7%
12.9%
16.1%
17.7%
100%
19.7%
4.9%
26.2%
19.7%
29.5%
100%
24.5%
7.5%
20.8%
20.8%
26.4%
100%
16.4%
4.9%
14.8%
21.3%
42.6%
100%
27.4%
8.1%
14.5%
22.6%
27.4%
100%
31.6%
15.8%
17.5%
10.5%
24.6%
100%
17.7%
11.3%
12.9%
22.6%
35.5%
100%
22.4%
13.8%
22.4%
12.1%
29.3%
100%
36.1%
18.0%
9.8%
16.4%
19.7%
100%
9.8%
1.6%
19.7%
19.7%
49.2%
100%
18.3%
21.7%
23.3%
10.0%
26.7%
100%
22.1%
10.9%
15.5%
20.3%
31.2%
100%
2.5
2.2
4.1
2.5
0.8
0.6
2.0
1.5
3.0
1.4
0.7
2.0
1.1
0.7
6.0
0.9
1.6
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Engineering
Albert Sacco
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 75 (46%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 75
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
75
4.04
5
5
1
1.22
0.14
75
3.44
5
4
1
1.39
0.16
72
3.44
5
4
1
1.36
0.16
72
3.53
5
4
1
1.50
0.18
73
2.96
5
3
1
1.63
0.19
74
2.59
5
2
1
1.58
0.18
73
3.48
5
4
1
1.38
0.16
70
3.07
5
3.5
1
1.62
0.19
73
4.01
5
4
1
1.01
0.12
75
3.11
5
3
1
1.69
0.20
69
2.80
5
3
1
1.50
0.18
72
3.38
5
4
1
1.47
0.17
68
3.31
5
3
1
1.45
0.18
74
2.70
5
3
1
1.67
0.19
70
3.73
5
4
1
1.04
0.12
73
3.40
5
4
1
1.37
0.16
1158
3.31
5
4
1
1.43
0.04
0
0%
0
0%
3
4%
3
4%
2
3%
1
1%
2
3%
5
7%
2
3%
0
0%
6
8%
3
4%
7
9%
1
1%
5
7%
2
3%
42
4%
3
9
9
15
39
75
10
10
15
17
23
75
9
10
14
18
21
72
12
8
10
14
28
72
23
10
6
15
19
73
30
8
13
8
15
74
10
8
14
19
22
73
20
10
5
15
20
70
2
4
13
26
28
73
24
6
9
10
26
75
23
4
19
10
13
69
10
16
6
17
23
72
9
15
12
10
22
68
31
5
12
7
19
74
2
6
20
23
19
70
8
14
14
15
22
73
226
143
191
239
359
1158
4.0%
12.0%
12.0%
20.0%
52.0%
100%
13.3%
13.3%
20.0%
22.7%
30.7%
100%
12.5%
13.9%
19.4%
25.0%
29.2%
100%
16.7%
11.1%
13.9%
19.4%
38.9%
100%
31.5%
13.7%
8.2%
20.5%
26.0%
100%
40.5%
10.8%
17.6%
10.8%
20.3%
100%
13.7%
11.0%
19.2%
26.0%
30.1%
100%
28.6%
14.3%
7.1%
21.4%
28.6%
100%
2.7%
5.5%
17.8%
35.6%
38.4%
100%
32.0%
8.0%
12.0%
13.3%
34.7%
100%
33.3%
5.8%
27.5%
14.5%
18.8%
100%
13.9%
22.2%
8.3%
23.6%
31.9%
100%
13.2%
22.1%
17.6%
14.7%
32.4%
100%
41.9%
6.8%
16.2%
9.5%
25.7%
100%
2.9%
8.6%
28.6%
32.9%
27.1%
100%
11.0%
19.2%
19.2%
20.5%
30.1%
100%
19.5%
12.3%
16.5%
20.6%
31.0%
100%
4.5
2.0
2.1
2.1
1.0
0.6
2.3
1.2
9.0
1.2
0.9
1.5
1.3
0.7
5.3
1.7
1.6
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Human Sciences
Linda C. Hoover
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 45 (41.3%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
45
3.96
5
4
1
1.32
0.20
45
3.87
5
4
1
1.28
0.19
44
3.93
5
4
1
1.21
0.18
42
4.10
5
5
1
1.21
0.19
43
3.65
5
4
1
1.34
0.21
42
3.24
5
3
1
1.39
0.22
44
3.84
5
4
1
1.28
0.19
41
3.71
5
4
1
1.25
0.20
42
3.90
5
4
1
1.17
0.18
45
3.76
5
5
1
1.49
0.22
43
3.51
5
4
1
1.42
0.22
44
3.77
5
4
1
1.20
0.18
40
3.85
5
4
1
1.30
0.20
44
3.34
5
4
1
1.41
0.21
42
4.05
5
4
1
1.19
0.18
43
3.86
5
4
1
1.13
0.17
689
3.77
5
4
1
1.29
0.05
No-Response out of 45
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
3
7%
2
4%
3
7%
1
2%
4
9%
3
7%
0
0%
2
4%
1
2%
5
11%
1
2%
3
7%
2
4%
31
4%
5
1
7
10
22
45
4
2
10
9
20
45
4
0
10
11
19
44
3
0
11
4
24
42
6
1
10
11
15
43
8
3
12
9
10
42
4
3
7
12
18
44
4
1
13
8
15
41
2
3
10
9
18
42
6
5
6
5
23
45
6
4
11
6
16
43
4
2
8
16
14
44
4
2
7
10
17
40
8
5
5
16
10
44
3
2
5
12
20
42
2
3
10
12
16
43
73
37
142
160
277
689
11.1%
2.2%
15.6%
22.2%
48.9%
100%
8.9%
4.4%
22.2%
20.0%
44.4%
100%
9.1%
0.0%
22.7%
25.0%
43.2%
100%
7.1%
0.0%
26.2%
9.5%
57.1%
100%
14.0%
2.3%
23.3%
25.6%
34.9%
100%
19.0%
7.1%
28.6%
21.4%
23.8%
100%
9.1%
6.8%
15.9%
27.3%
40.9%
100%
9.8%
2.4%
31.7%
19.5%
36.6%
100%
4.8%
7.1%
23.8%
21.4%
42.9%
100%
13.3%
11.1%
13.3%
11.1%
51.1%
100%
14.0%
9.3%
25.6%
14.0%
37.2%
100%
9.1%
4.5%
18.2%
36.4%
31.8%
100%
10.0%
5.0%
17.5%
25.0%
42.5%
100%
18.2%
11.4%
11.4%
36.4%
22.7%
100%
7.1%
4.8%
11.9%
28.6%
47.6%
100%
4.7%
7.0%
23.3%
27.9%
37.2%
100%
10.6%
5.4%
20.6%
23.2%
40.2%
100%
5.3
4.8
7.5
9.3
3.7
1.7
4.3
4.6
5.4
2.5
2.2
5.0
4.5
2.0
6.4
5.6
4.0
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Media and Communication
David Perlmutter
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 16 (30.2%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
16
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
16
4.38
5
5
2
0.86
0.21
16
4.25
5
4.5
2
0.97
0.24
16
4.44
5
5
1
1.06
0.26
16
4.38
5
5
1
1.11
0.28
16
4.13
5
5
1
1.32
0.33
16
3.56
5
4
1
1.41
0.35
16
4.31
5
5
1
1.21
0.30
13
4.31
5
5
2
0.99
0.27
16
4.25
5
5
1
1.30
0.32
16
4.13
5
5
1
1.32
0.33
14
3.93
5
5
1
1.49
0.40
16
4.00
5
4
1
1.27
0.32
15
4.13
5
5
1
1.26
0.32
16
3.50
5
3
1
1.37
0.34
16
4.38
5
5
2
1.05
0.26
16
4.50
5
5
2
0.87
0.22
250
4.16
5
5
1
1.18
0.07
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
19%
0
0%
0
0%
2
13%
0
0%
1
6%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
2%
0
1
1
5
9
16
0
2
0
6
8
16
1
0
1
3
11
16
1
0
2
2
11
16
1
2
1
2
10
16
3
0
3
5
5
16
1
1
1
2
11
16
0
1
2
2
8
13
1
2
0
2
11
16
1
2
1
2
10
16
2
1
1
2
8
14
2
0
1
6
7
16
1
1
2
2
9
15
2
1
6
1
6
16
0
2
1
2
11
16
0
1
1
3
11
16
16
17
24
47
146
250
0.0%
6.3%
6.3%
31.3%
56.3%
100%
0.0%
12.5%
0.0%
37.5%
50.0%
100%
6.3%
0.0%
6.3%
18.8%
68.8%
100%
6.3%
0.0%
12.5%
12.5%
68.8%
100%
6.3%
12.5%
6.3%
12.5%
62.5%
100%
18.8%
0.0%
18.8%
31.3%
31.3%
100%
6.3%
6.3%
6.3%
12.5%
68.8%
100%
0.0%
7.7%
15.4%
15.4%
61.5%
100%
6.3%
12.5%
0.0%
12.5%
68.8%
100%
6.3%
12.5%
6.3%
12.5%
62.5%
100%
14.3%
7.1%
7.1%
14.3%
57.1%
100%
12.5%
0.0%
6.3%
37.5%
43.8%
100%
6.7%
6.7%
13.3%
13.3%
60.0%
100%
12.5%
6.3%
37.5%
6.3%
37.5%
100%
0.0%
12.5%
6.3%
12.5%
68.8%
100%
0.0%
6.3%
6.3%
18.8%
68.8%
100%
6.4%
6.8%
9.6%
18.8%
58.4%
100%
14.0
7.0
14.0
13.0
4.0
3.3
6.5
10.0
4.3
4.0
3.3
6.5
5.5
2.3
6.5
14.0
5.8
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College Visual and Performing Arts
Andrew W. Martin
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 37 (30.3%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
37
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
37
3.73
5
4
1
1.00
0.17
37
3.78
5
4
2
0.87
0.14
37
3.92
5
4
2
0.85
0.14
35
3.74
5
4
2
1.00
0.17
37
3.57
5
4
1
1.03
0.17
35
3.31
5
3
1
1.21
0.21
36
3.78
5
4
2
0.95
0.16
30
3.87
5
4
3
0.88
0.16
34
3.85
5
4
2
0.94
0.16
37
3.51
5
4
1
1.20
0.20
27
3.74
5
3
1
1.04
0.20
36
3.50
5
3
2
0.96
0.16
34
3.47
5
3
2
0.88
0.15
35
3.43
5
3
1
1.10
0.19
34
3.82
5
4
1
1.04
0.18
36
3.86
5
4
1
1.13
0.19
557
3.68
5
4
1
1.01
0.04
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
1
3%
7
19%
3
8%
0
0%
10
27%
1
3%
3
8%
2
5%
3
8%
1
3%
35
6%
1
2
13
11
10
37
0
1
16
10
10
37
0
1
12
13
11
37
0
4
11
10
10
35
1
4
13
11
8
37
3
6
10
9
7
35
0
3
12
11
10
36
0
0
14
6
10
30
0
2
12
9
11
34
3
4
10
11
9
37
1
0
13
4
9
27
0
5
15
9
7
36
0
3
18
7
6
34
2
4
13
9
7
35
1
2
10
10
11
34
1
4
8
9
14
36
13
45
200
149
150
557
2.7%
5.4%
35.1%
29.7%
27.0%
100%
0.0%
2.7%
43.2%
27.0%
27.0%
100%
0.0%
2.7%
32.4%
35.1%
29.7%
100%
0.0%
11.4%
31.4%
28.6%
28.6%
100%
2.7%
10.8%
35.1%
29.7%
21.6%
100%
8.6%
17.1%
28.6%
25.7%
20.0%
100%
0.0%
8.3%
33.3%
30.6%
27.8%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
46.7%
20.0%
33.3%
100%
0.0%
5.9%
35.3%
26.5%
32.4%
100%
8.1%
10.8%
27.0%
29.7%
24.3%
100%
3.7%
0.0%
48.1%
14.8%
33.3%
100%
0.0%
13.9%
41.7%
25.0%
19.4%
100%
0.0%
8.8%
52.9%
20.6%
17.6%
100%
5.7%
11.4%
37.1%
25.7%
20.0%
100%
2.9%
5.9%
29.4%
29.4%
32.4%
100%
2.8%
11.1%
22.2%
25.0%
38.9%
100%
2.3%
8.1%
35.9%
26.8%
26.9%
100%
7.0
20.0
24.0
5.0
3.8
1.8
7.0
No low
ratings
10.0
2.9
13.0
3.2
4.3
2.7
7.0
4.6
5.2
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
Library
Bella K. Gerlich
Academic Deans as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 26 (57.8%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
college
interests
making
7
8
9
10
Supports
faculty
development
Conducts fair
and rigorous
tenure and
promotion
processes
Actively
promotes
diversity
within the
college
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Conducts fair and
rigorous processes Has a clear
to appoint
strategic plan
administrators
and allocates
within the college
resources
(departmental
consistently
chairs, associate with that plan
deans, etc.)
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
college
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
26
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
26
4.42
5
4.5
3
0.63
0.12
25
3.92
5
4
2
0.84
0.17
26
4.19
5
4
3
0.73
0.14
26
4.12
5
4
2
0.93
0.18
26
4.00
5
4
1
1.21
0.24
26
3.62
5
4
1
1.30
0.26
26
4.31
5
4
3
0.67
0.13
21
3.86
5
4
2
0.94
0.21
22
3.95
5
4
2
0.88
0.19
26
3.77
5
4
1
1.15
0.23
18
3.67
5
3
3
0.82
0.19
26
3.62
5
3.5
1
1.00
0.20
25
3.48
5
3
1
1.17
0.23
26
3.50
5
4
1
1.25
0.24
26
3.92
5
4
2
0.87
0.17
26
4.00
5
4
1
0.96
0.19
397
3.90
5
4
1
0.96
0.05
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
19%
4
15%
0
0%
8
31%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
19
5%
0
0
2
11
13
26
0
1
7
10
7
25
0
0
5
11
10
26
0
1
7
6
12
26
2
1
4
7
12
26
3
2
5
8
8
26
0
0
3
12
11
26
0
2
5
8
6
21
0
1
6
8
7
22
2
1
6
9
8
26
0
0
10
4
4
18
1
1
11
7
6
26
2
2
9
6
6
25
2
4
6
7
7
26
0
2
5
12
7
26
1
1
3
13
8
26
13
19
94
139
132
397
0.0%
0.0%
7.7%
42.3%
50.0%
100%
0.0%
4.0%
28.0%
40.0%
28.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
19.2%
42.3%
38.5%
100%
0.0%
3.8%
26.9%
23.1%
46.2%
100%
7.7%
3.8%
15.4%
26.9%
46.2%
100%
11.5%
7.7%
19.2%
30.8%
30.8%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
11.5%
46.2%
42.3%
100%
0.0%
9.5%
23.8%
38.1%
28.6%
100%
0.0%
4.5%
27.3%
36.4%
31.8%
100%
7.7%
3.8%
23.1%
34.6%
30.8%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
55.6%
22.2%
22.2%
100%
3.8%
3.8%
42.3%
26.9%
23.1%
100%
8.0%
8.0%
36.0%
24.0%
24.0%
100%
7.7%
15.4%
23.1%
26.9%
26.9%
100%
0.0%
7.7%
19.2%
46.2%
26.9%
100%
3.8%
3.8%
11.5%
50.0%
30.8%
100%
3.3%
4.8%
23.7%
35.0%
33.2%
100%
No low
ratings
17.0
No low
ratings
18.0
6.3
3.2
No low
ratings
7.0
15.0
5.7
No low ratings
6.5
3.0
2.3
9.5
10.5
8.5
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1