Chabot College
Student Services
Program Review Report
2016 -2017
Year in the Cycle: 3
Program: Disabled Students Programs &
Services, (DSPS) Special Programs
Disabled Student Resources Center,
(DSRC)
Adapted Physical Education
Computer Application Systems
Learning Skills
Psychology-Counseling
Submitted on October 26, 2015
Contact: Kathleen R. Allen
FINAL 10/20/15
Appendix B2 (1 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 100
Fall 2014
1
1
100%
Spring 2015
Allison Golde and Kathleen Allen
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: Students will be able to keyboard alphabetic characters by
touch.
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL perform basic computer operations.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL demonstrate correct posture and finger
placement.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75% of the class
scored either 3
or 4
75% of the class
scored either 3
or 4
75% of the class
scored either 3
or 4
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
75%
75%
75%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students will be able to keyboard alphabetic characters by touch by identifying, the home row keys by
demonstrating their knowledge of their keys through on hands assessments.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
I feel that many students are able to identify, explain, implement, recognize, through
adaptive keyboarding accommodations on a basic QWERTY keyboard, it is best to assess
these students through hands on learning and rate their achievements on a case-by-case
basis.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
My current scores reflect that the students are able to perform basic computer operations by becoming
familiar with the computer and its functions as well as the keyboard and finger placement, thus they are able
to develop confidence that results in success.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Based on the date gathered, coupled with my teaching experiences, parlaying with
faculty, I see the importance and need for the repetition of the understanding that
comes with in class learning of the computer. Prior to this class, many students were
unable to recall, describe, show, and relate, to the computer. This class allows for
reinforcement of knowledge gained and gives me a greater sense of how little traditional
evaluations play in this class.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The current scores demonstrate correct posture and finger placement. It is important to note that many
students must execute finger placement and posture much like a student of the Piano or display posture like
that of a horseback rider. Students start timidly, but as the semester progresses the charts justify the levels of
success that is achievable in the classroom setting (some start typing 2 wpm and end the class typing between
15 to 20 wpm).
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Data shows that repetition increases the student’s confidence level and as their
confidence grows so does their typing speed and accuracy, along with their confidence.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
We have adjusted for the students case-by-case needs and used a more user-friendly
computer program.
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Assessment’s reveal continued strengths in typing and through 24/7 availability students’
progress at their own speed, some faster, some slower, but everyone is a success.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix B2 (2 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 101
Fall 2014
1
1
100%
Spring 2015
Allison Golde& Kathleen R. Allen
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: Students will be able to create and print a Word document.
.
(CLO) 2: Students will perform a spell and grammar check in Word.
(CLO) 3: Students will save, delete, and rename document files in
Word.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75% of the class
scored either 3
or 4
75% of the class
scored either 3
or 4
75% of the class
scored either 3
or 4
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
75%
75%
75%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
75% of the students scored a 3 or higher which matched exactly with my target.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
I feel that many students are able to create and print a Word document. The students
have difficulty not with the Word applications but the actual writing.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
My current scores reflect that the students are able to perform a spell and grammar check in Word, becoming
familiar with function, thus they are able to develop confidence that results in success.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Based on the data gathered, coupled with my teaching experiences, parlaying with
faculty, I see the importance and need for the repetition of the understanding that
comes with in class learning of the computer. Prior to this class, many students were
unable to recall, describe, show, and relate, to the computer. This class allows for
reinforcement of knowledge gained and gives me a greater sense of how little traditional
evaluations play in this class.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The actual score 75% matched my target exactly.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Data shows that repetition increases the student’s confidence level, and as their
confidence grows so does their comfort level with making changes and renaming their
documents.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
4. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
We have adjusted for the students case-by-case needs and used a more user-friendly
computer program.
5. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Assessments reveal continued strengths in typing, and through 24/7 availability of the
software, students progress at their own speed, some faster, some slower, but everyone is
a success at learning how to create and manage Word documents.
6. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix B2 (3 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 102
Fall 2014
3
3
100%
Spring 2015
Kathleen R. Allen and Nathaniel
Rice
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: Students will be able to use the appropriate assistive
technology based on their disability to access the internet.
(CLO) 2: students will be able to use the appropriate assistive
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
76%
70%
72%
70%0
72%
technology based on their disability to write their college papers.
(CLO) 3: Students will be able to use the appropriate assistive
technology based on their disability to correct their grammar and
spelling.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 76% of students scoring 3 or 4 exceeds my target score of 70%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. They are using their designated
assistive technology to read and research on the internet.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 72% of students scoring 3 or 4 exceeds my target score of 70%.
5. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. They learned the concepts and
applications needed when using the assistive technology. As the students take more
writing courses they will become proficient with the use of the assistive technology.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The actual score of 72% of students scoring 3 or 4 exceeds my target score of 70%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. As they become more confident with
this application, they will successfully use it to their benefit.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
3. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? To better meet the
course curriculum, it was necessary to change the SLOs for this course.
4. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
This course curriculum includes screen reader, scan/read, screen enlargement and speech
recognition programs. The students learn the software that meets their individual disability
needs. The students are required to use course materials from their other classes while they are
learning the technology. As a result the students learn the benefits of the assistive technology as
they study and read current course texts and assignments.
5. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix B2 (4 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 103
Fall 2014
1
1
100%
Spring 2015
Kathleen R. Allen and Nathaniel
Rice
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1:
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
91%
CAS 103 - Students will demonstrate proficiency with the basic
functions of Their appropriate assistive technology:
keyboarding, word processing and Internet access as they
complete their academic work.
(CLO) 2:
(CLO) 3:
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
3. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
6. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 91% of students scoring a 3 or 4 far exceeds my target score of 70%.
7. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. This course is extremely beneficial to
DSPS students
4. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
8. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
None
9. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The students are continuing to use the assistive technology available in the DSRC.
10.






What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?X
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_____
Appendix B2 (5 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
ENGL 116
Fall 2014
6
6
100%
Spring 2015
Jerry Egusa, Shirley Pejman
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: Students will increase their understanding of their learning
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
80%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
92%
strengths and weaknesses..
(CLO) 2:
(CLO) 3:
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
11.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
92% of students scored a 3 0r 4 which far exceeded our target score of 80%. target score of
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have increased their understanding of their learning strengths and weaknesses.
12.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
13. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
14. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
15.






What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_____
Appendix B2 (6 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
ENGL 117
Fall 2014
1
1
100%
Spring 2015
Jerry Egusa
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
72%
(CLO) 2: An ability to visually recognize and pronounce new and
familiar words using a multisensory approach.
70%
72%
(CLO) 3: An ability to write a simple summary.
(CLO) 4: Increase reading comprehension
70%
70%
72%
72%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: An ability to articulate and demonstrate which reading and
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
compensatory strategies work for them.
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
19.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
16. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
72% of the students scored 3 or 4 which exceeds our target score of 70%.
17. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
72% of the students demonstrated the ability to articulate which reading and
compensatory strategies work for them.
20.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
72% of the students scored 3 or 4 which exceeded our target score of 70%.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
72% of the students demonstrated an ability to visually recognize and pronounce new
and familiar words using a multisensory approach.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
72% of students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded our target score of 70%
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Y2% of the students demonstrated an ability to write a simple summary.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
72% of the students scored a 3 or 4which exceeded our target score of 70%
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
72% of the students demonstrated increased reading comprehension.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
18. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
19. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
20.






What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_____
Appendix B2 (7 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
ENGL 118A
Fall 2014
2
2
100%
Spring 2015
Jerry Egusa
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: Students will identify support details and transition words
while distinguishing the differences between major and minor details.
(CLO) 2: Students will increase their ability to identify the main idea
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
73%
70%
73%
70%
73%
of presented passages.
(CLO) 3: Students will increase their receptive and expressive
vocabulary skills.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
27.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
73% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded our target score of 70%
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
73% demonstrated the ability to identify support details and transition words while
distinguishing the differences between major and minor details.
28.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
73% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded our target score of 70%. 7
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
3% of the students increased their ability to identify the main idea of presented
passages.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
73% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded our target score of 70%.
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
73% of the students increased their receptive and expressive vocabulary skills.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
33. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
34. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
23. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
24. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
25.






What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_____
Appendix B2 (8 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
ENGL 118B
Fall 2014
1
1
100%
Spring 2015
Jerry Egusa
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: An ability to write a 500 word essay.
(CLO) 2: Improved ability to identify and apply grammar rules in their
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
70%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
87%
87%
70%
87%
own writing.
(CLO) 3: Increased confidence as a writer.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
35.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
26. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
87% of the students scored a 3or 4 which far exceeded our target score of 70%.
27. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
87% of the students demonstrated an ability to write a 500 word essay.
36.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
37. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
87% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which far exceeded our target score of 70%.
38. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
87% of the students improved their ability to identify and apply grammar rules in their
own writing.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
39. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
87% of the students scored a 3or 4 which far exceeded our target score of 70%.
40. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
87% of the students increased their confidence as writers.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
41. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
42. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
28. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
29. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
30.





Other:_____
What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Appendix B2 (9 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 119
2014
3
3
100
Spring 2015
Jerry Egusa/Shirley Pejman
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
82%
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY TO
PROBLEM SOLVE BASIC ARITHMATIC WORD
PROBLEMS.
70%
82%
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY TO
UTILIZE ASSITIVE TECHNOLOGY WHILE PERFORMING
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS.
70%
82%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR
QUANITATIVE REASONING AND APPLIED
MATHEMATICAL SKILLS.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
43. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
82% Students scored 3 or 4 and exceeded the expected outcome of 70%
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
82% of the students increased their quantitative reasoning skills.
44.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
45. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
82% of the students scored a 3 or 4 and exceeded the expected outcome of 70%.
46. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
82% of the students increased their ability to problem solve basic arithmetic word
problems.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
47. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
82% of the students scored 3 or 4 and exceeded the expected outcome of 70%.
48. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
82% of the students increased their ability to utilize assistive technology while
performing mathematical problems.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
49. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
50. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
33. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
34. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
35.






What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_________________________________________________________________
Appendix B2 (10 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
ENGLISH 121
FALL 2014
1
1
1
100%
JERRY EGUSA
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
89%
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY TO
USE COMPENSATORY ARITHMATIC STRATEGIES.
70%
89%
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY TO
USE QUANTATATIVE BASED STUDY SKILLS
APPROPRIATE TO THEIR LEARNING NEEDS.
70%
89%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY TO
APPLY SELF-ADVOCACY TECHNIQUES WITH
INSTRUCTORS AND STAFF.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of
students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
51. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
36. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
89% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded expected outcome of 70%.
37. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
89% of the students increased their ability to apply self-advocacy techniques with
instructor and staff.
52.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
53. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
89% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded expected outcome of 70%.
54. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
89% of the students increased their ability to use compensatory arithmetic strategies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
55. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
89% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which exceeded expected outcome of 70%.
56. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
89% of the students increased their ability to use quantitative based study skills
appropriate to their learning needs.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
57. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
58. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
38. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
39. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
40.






What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_________________________________________________________________
Appendix B2 (11 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
PSCN 20
Semester assessment data gathered
Spring 2015
Number of sections offered in the semester
1
Number of sections assessed
1
Percentage of sections assessed
100%
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Fall 2015
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Kathleen R. Allen
& Felicia Tripp
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a
whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: PSCN 20 - Students will be able to identify what level of GPA
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
78%
70%
74%
would place a student on Academic Probation
(CLO) 2: PSCN 20 - Students will be able to identify four resources on
campus that will assist them in becoming successful students.
(CLO) 3:
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
59.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
41. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome? The actual score of 78% of students scoring 3 or 4 exceeded my
target score of 70%.
42. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The GPA lectures are being understood
by students; they either get it or they do not.
60.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
61. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 74% of students scoring 3 or 4 exceeds my target score of 70%.
62. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. They learned about the many resources
available for them on campus.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
63. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
64. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
65. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
66. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
43. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
44. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
45. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
Other:_____
Appendix B2 (12 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level
Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 901
Spring 2015
1
1
100%
Fall 2015
Kathleen R. Allen, Shirley Pejman &
Linda Phan
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate
for all sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course
as a whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75%
80%
(CLO) 2:
A student will become comfortable communicating
their needs to persons employed at state and
community agencies.
75%
80%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
90%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
67.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
46. How do your current scores match with your above target for student
success in this course level outcome? The actual score of 80% of students
scoring 3 or 4 exceeds my target score of 75%.
47. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
It is evident that this course is developing the students confidence needed to achieve
their education goals by communicating their needs to instructors. . The students are
achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable when
communicating with their instructors. Students are benefiting from the advice and
comments from their class peers.
68.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
69. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 80% of students scoring 3 or 4 exceeds my target score of 75%.
70. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. They achieve self-confidence and
personal growth in a group setting; they learn greatly from their peers. As a result
students are using community resources that are available to assist them personally and
academically.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
71. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 90% of students scoring 3 or 4 far exceeds my target score of 75%.
72. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable
when communicating with their Family and friends. Students are benefiting from the
advice and comments from their class peers. Learning to be assertive with family &
friends enhances their feeling of security & stability in relation to their family and
friends’ relationships.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
73. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
74. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
48. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
49. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
50. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix B2 (13 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 902
Spring 2015
1
1
100%
Fall 2015
Kathleen R. Allen, Shirley Pejman &
Linda Phan
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate
for all sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course
as a whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75%
82%
(CLO) 2:
A student will become comfortable communicating
their needs to persons employed at state and
community agencies.
75%
82%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
91%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
75.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
51. How do your current scores match with your above target for student
success in this course level outcome? The actual score of 82% of students
scoring 3 or 4 exceeded my target score of 75%.
52. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable
when communicating with their instructors. Students are benefiting from the advice and
comments from their class peers. Thus they have an easier time requesting academic
accommodations.
76.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
77. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 82% of students scoring 3 or 4 far exceeds my target score of 75%.
78. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. They achieve self-confidence and
personal growth in a group setting; they learn greatly from their peers. The course is
assisting the students with feeling comfortable when seeking services from community
agencies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
79. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 91% of students scoring 3 or 4 far exceeded my target score of 75%.
80. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable
when communicating with their Family and friends. Students are benefiting from the
advice and comments from their class peers. Many of these students are re-entry
students with family and children concerns. In the course they become more
comfortable communicating when dealing with situations presented by their extended
family that previously caused them stress; now they can handle it appropriately.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
81. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
82. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
53. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
54. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
55. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix B2 (14 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 903
Spring 2015
1
1
100%
Fall 2015
Kathleen R. Allen, Shirley Pejman &
Linda Phan
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate
for all sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course
as a whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75%
73%
(CLO) 2:
A student will become comfortable communicating
their needs to persons employed at state and
community agencies.
75%
73%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
91%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
83.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
56. How do your current scores match with your above target for student
success in this course level outcome? The actual score of 73% of students
scoring 3 or 4 barely met my target score of 75%.
57. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
73% of the students are achieving the desired outcome. These students are feeling
comfortable when communicating with their instructors. Students are benefiting from
the advice and comments from their class peers. Several students’ skill level was lower,
as a result it will take them longer to build their confidence. We do feel that the CLO
needs to be changed. We will experiment with developing strategies to benefit some of
the students more effectively.
84.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
85. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 73% of students scoring 3 or 4 barely met my target score of 75%.
86. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
73% of the students are achieving the desired outcome. They achieve self-confidence
and personal growth in a group setting; they learn greatly from their peers. It will take
the remaining students a longer time to meet this goal. The CLO does not need to be
changed; but different strategies need to be developed to support the students.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
87. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 91% of students scoring 3 or 4 far exceeded my target score of 75%.
88. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable
when communicating with their Family and friends. Students are benefiting from the
advice and comments from their class peers. This CLO is definitely working well. The
students are becoming more assertive.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
89. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
90. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
58. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
59. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
60. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix B2 (15 of 15): “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment
Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 904
Spring 2015
1
1
100%
Fall 2015
Kathleen R. Allen, Shirley Pejman &
Linda Phan
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate
for all sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course
as a whole.
Part I: Course-Level Outcomes – Data Results
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75%
89%
(CLO) 2:
A student will become comfortable communicating
their needs to persons employed at state and
community agencies.
75%
89%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
89%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
Part II: Course- level Outcome Reflections
91.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
61. How do your current scores match with your above target for student
success in this course level outcome? The actual score of 89% of students
scoring 3 or 4 exceeded my target score of 75%.
62. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable
when communicating with their instructors. Students are benefiting from the advice and
comments from their class peers. As a result they are requesting accommodations from
their instructors.
92.COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
93. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 89% of students scoring 3 or 4 far exceeds my target score of 75%.
94. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. They achieve self-confidence and
personal growth in a group setting; they learn greatly from their peers. Now they have
the confidence to request assistance from community agencies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
95. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The actual score of 89% of students scoring 3 or 4 far exceeded my target score of 75%.
96. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are achieving the desired outcome. The students are feeling comfortable
when communicating with their Family and friends. Students are benefiting from the
advice and comments from their class peers. This CLO is working well; the students’
family and friend relationships are more stable and healthy.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
97. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
98. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
Part III: Course Reflections and Future Plans
63. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
64. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
65. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_____
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level
discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: Disabled Students Programs & Services (DSPS)

PLO #1:
Interpret and apply compensatory learning strategies based on their individual learning style.
Engl. 116, 117, 120, 121
CAS 102

PLO #2:
Demonstrate a Competency with increasing vocabulary skills, ability to identify main idea and
supported ideas in passages, computation of math problems and in computer keyboarding.
CAS 100 and 103,
English 118A and 119

PLO #3:
The ability to write a 500 word essay, create and edit Microsoft word documents, use assistive
technology to complete their research and course assignments, request and utilize academic
accommodations according to their individual needs to enhance their college success
CAS 101,
English 118A, 118B and 119,
PSCN 20 and DSRC

PLO #4:
Demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively for student success based on their individual
needs.
PSCN 20, 901, 902, 903 & 904,
English 120, 121 and DSRC
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
How can we provide academic accommodations to evening students?
It is essential we continue to offer ENGL 116 & 119 in the evening. It will be necessary to
replace the second LD Specialist in order to achieve this goal.
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Strengths revealed:
Since DSPS Program courses are consistently filled, students are successfully meeting these
outcomes. We have an increasing number of students who are becoming more aware of their
individual needs and requesting accommodations through the DSRC. Therefore DSPS students
are passing higher level English and Math courses and completing their educational goals of
earning Certificates, AA/AS degrees and transferring to 4 year colleges.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of
students completing your program?
Make certain that our course offerings have very little conflicts and/or overlaps with each other, thus
allowing more students to enroll in the classes. This is essential since most of the courses are entry
level courses.