Chabot College
Program Review Report
2015 -2016
Year 3 of
Program Review Cycle
Submitted on October 30, 2014
Contact: Patricia Shannon
1
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
RELS70
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
2015
1
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
(CLO) 1:STUDENT HAS DEMONSTRATED AN UNDERSTAND OF
THE TWO TERMS “SPIRITUAL” AND “RELIGIOUS.”
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75%, score a 2.5
or above (C+)
(CLO) 2: STUDENT HAS EXAMINED WORKS REPRESENTING A
75%>2.5 (C+)
21 of 31 scored a
3 or 4 (8 students
scored a 2),
average exceeds
goal
75%>2.5 (C+)
21 of 29 scored a
3 or 4, 7 scored a
2, average
exceeds goal
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
WIDE RANGE OF REPRESENTATIONS OF A SIGNIFICANT RELIGIOUS
CONCEPT (E.G., PILGRIMAGE) IN ITS TRADITIONAL AND
CONTEMPORARY CONTEXTS.
(CLO) 3:STUDENT HAS DISCUSSED AND/OR WRITTEN ABOUT A
SIGNIFICANT RELIGIOUS TERM (E.G., PILGRIMAGE) USING
MULTIPLE SOURCES REPRESENTING A DIVERSITY OF
PERSPECTIVES.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
2
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
23 of 27 scored 3
or 4, exceeds goal
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceed goal.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Good work.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Meets or exceeds goal.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Good work.
3
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Meet or exceed goal.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The third CLO (writing assignment) is the capstone assignment, in which students use
their understanding of spirituality and exposure to representations of religious concepts
to write about a specific spiritual practice or term. The majority of students 21 of 29
scored well on this assignment. That’s good.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
Had not been taught in previous cycle.
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
None.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
xOther:____None___________________________________________________________
__
4
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level
discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Will be submitted when all assessment data gathered by end of Fall 2014.
Program: ______

PLO #1:

PLO #2:
 PLO #3:
 PLO #4:
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of
students completing your program?
5