Chabot College
Program Review Report
Check one:
_X__ SLO Portion of Upcoming ’16-’17
Program Review
(Submitted May 2015 in Preparation for Oct 2015)
___ Revision to ’15-’16 Program Review
(Originally Submitted Oct 2014)
___ Revision to ’14-’15 Program Review
(Originally Submitted Oct 2013)
Submitted on May 1, 2015
Contact: Charlotte Lofft
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
Business 71 Health Care Law
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Spring 2015
Charlotte Lofft
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1:DEMONSTRATE AN UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORICAL
PERSPECTIVES OF HEALTH CARE LAW, INCLUDING HOSPITALS OF
THE CHRISTIAN ERA, HOSPITALS THROUGHOUT EUROPE, AND
HOSPITALS IN THE U.S.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70% will receive
2 or above.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
85.4%
70% will receive 87.2%
(CLO) 2: DEMONSTRATE AN UNDERSTANDING OF SOURCES OF
LAW (COMMON LAW, STATUTORY LAW, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2 or above.
CONFLICT OF LAWS, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.
(CLO) 3: DEMONSTRATE AN UNDERSTANDING OF
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH CARE RECORDS
ISSUES, INCLUDING OWNERSHIP AND RELEASE OF THE MEDICAL
RECORD, COMPUTERIZED RECORDS, FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS,
INACCURATE RECORD ENTRIES, CHARTING BY EXCEPTION, LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS, AND THE MEDICAL RECORD, AND ISSUES
SURROUNDING THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
70% will receive
a 2 or above.
81.2%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
More than 80% (85.4%) achieved above the target goal of 70%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
It is useful to have the historical perspective of health care to help understand how far
we have come in the delivery of health care and how our legal system has had to evolve
to meet the challenges of advanced care.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
87.2% achieved above the target goal of 70%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
It is essential to have an understanding of all the different types of laws in order to
function well in the health care industry today. Practitioners are more vulnerable than
ever to personal liability and a thorough understanding of the legal system and how it
impacts their practice should help prevent future litigation.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
81.2% scored above the target of 70%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Use of ancillary materials with respect to the Affordable Care Act has helped
considerably since this is a new area of Health Care Law. Discussions with Nursing
faculty related to current issues in Health Care Law has been helpful.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
Review of the literature, especially in the area of the Affordable Care Act and its various
legal challenges.
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
I am committed to further student success and retention. For that purpose, I am
constantly working to review the literature and seek new teaching modalities.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 X Curricular
 X Pedagogical
 X Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________