Association of Emotion and Cognition over centuries of philosophy Mind v. Brain debate Emotion and Cognition Magda Arnold (1960) Emotion and Personality – appraisal theory of emotions Richard Lazarus (1991) Language and Adaptation - theory of cognitive-mediational theory within emotion Cornelius (2000: 2.3) The Cognitive Approach Emotion and Cognition (or Reason) have been associated over the centuries Reason = master Emotion = slave ‘Good’ emotions > virtues > support relationship to cognition ‘Bad’ emotions > sins > the ‘bestial’ part of human nature “The central assumption of the cognitive perspective and its associated tradition of research is that thought and emotion are inseparable. More specifically, all emotions are seen within this perspective as being dependent on what Arnold (1960) called appraisal, the process by which events in the environment are judged as good or bad for us”. Arnold challenged James’ "bodily changes follow directly the PERCEPTION of the exciting fact" (James, 1884, p. 189) . How does that perception take place? How does perception lead to the bodily changes described? For Arnold and others the missing link is the process of appraisal. James could not conceive of an emotion without a body Arnold could not conceive of an emotion without an appraisal. A (James) 1. Emotion producing event 2. Individual’s resulting phu 3. Individual's perception of event and consequent emotion B (Arnold) 1. Emotion producing event 2. Individual's perception of event and consequent emotion 3. Individual’s resulting behaviour Man sees tiger Does he ◦ Take evasive action ◦ Shake ◦ Attribute his reaction to fear? OR Does he ◦ Appraise the dangerous situation ◦ Take evasive action ◦ Shake? John dislikes a person John attributes this dislike to this person’s unpleasant behaviour John observes behaviour of unpleasant person at a party John dislikes this person Do we experience emotion and then reason about it? How ‘instinctive’/’unconscious’ is our reaction? Is there time – in the ‘Fear’ example – to reason? Do we appraise a situation and then react emotionally? Do we ‘instinctively’ dislike someone – or does dislike result from cognitive appreciation? Theories of Perception ◦ Bibliography used drew attention to physical processing by the brain ◦ Little reference to influence of psychological influence or the ‘mind’ Yet – the lexicon of light effects often associated with observation of emotion Is emotion physical or psychological? Does it involve Mind or Brain? Emotion is "a mental feeling or affection (e.g. of pain, desire, hope, etc.) as dist(inct) from cognitions or volitions” Mind is "the seat of consciousness, thoughts, volitions, and feelings", or "memory” Brain is "taken as the seat of sensation, the organ of thought, memory, or imagination”. Mental is "concerned with the phenomena of mind” Physical is "of or pertaining to material nature; pertaining to or connected with matter; material; opp(osite) to psychical, mental, spiritual” Definitions by S.O.E.D – tended to be circular and not very helpful! Further basic research found very confusing references ◦ E.g. Entry in Encyclopedia Britannica on ’Emotion’ clearly 1960’s Behaviourist SO ….. My reading took me in several different directions The result – although now rather out-of-date - was the first chapter of my thesis “Emotion – a Controversial Subject” ◦ Mind v. Brain debate ◦ Follows argument 1950s > 1990s ◦ Ryle’s (1949) – negation of the “ghost in the machine” > ‘mind’ + ‘brain’ = BRAIN! ◦ Bunge (1977) - “Any notion of Mind unexplainable by science”. ◦ Idea of brain as ‘black box’ ◦ Neuroscience and technology - study of the Brain What is hard-wired – what is learnt? Communication in non-human species ◦ Lorenz (1952) – birds; Frisch (1967) – bees; Goodall and Hussey and primates Human brain’s capacity for language Broca’s and Wernicke's areas, have little or no counterpart in the brains of other species Chomsky (1947) – Language and Mind – yet language structures in the brain? Brain has its centre of emotion in limbic system – evolutionarily most primitive part But sensory perception - except smell - is processed between limbic system and prefrontal lobes in complex interaction If brain is damaged – or malformed or develops abnormally – this will affect normal interaction – e.g. certain types of autism Used neurological evidence to argue that Descartes’ theory of dualism of mind and brain > essentially flawed The brain + the sensory information fed in by every fibre of our bodies contributes to the way we function If emotion process in the brain is damaged – as in the example he uses – the individual loses ability to interact successfully in society What is the relationship between physiological reactions and cognitive identification of emotion? Arguments in favour of independent ‘mind’ based on theories of interval of time in situation of emotion ◦ Some neurologists argue that it is not possible for the brain to process so fast ◦ Others argue that the whole body conveys messages Compare: ◦ Learner driver v. expert driver ◦ Beginners v. champions of fast moving games like tennis, ping pong ◦ Learning to play the piano v. a concert pianist Consider: ◦ Fear of – spiders, snakes, lions, dogs, people we know, strangers, the dark …. ◦ Love of – God, parents, children, partners, dogs, swimming, coffee ….. Are intuitions results of instinct or learning? Darwin and James – Interested in evolution 1930-60 influence of Freud 1950-60s - Behaviourists – interested in making Psychology a scientific discipline based on observable phenomena esp. Skinner (1953) 1970s a move away from simple stimulus > response to stimulus > organism > response Idea of brain as ‘black box’ Fridja (1986) and others – interested Universals and behaviour Plutchik (1990) - interested in Universals and categories of emotions Lazarus (1991: 39) – offers “a theory of emotion that is cognitive, motivational and relational”… Gradual ‘Retreat from Radical Behaviorism and the Rise of Cognitivism’ (Lazarus (1991: 8-15) Lazarus (1991: 15-29) Perspectives on Emotion: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ The The The The Individual Observer Society Species 1. 2. How should the construct of emotion be defined? What should a theory of emotion do? Which reactions are emotions, which are not, and by what reasoning should we make the decision? Is startle an emotion? What about surprise? Pain and pleasure? How about empathy and aesthetic emotions? Are frustration, threat, challenge and hope emotions or are the best regarded as types of appraisal? 3. Are emotions best thought of as discrete categories – for example, anger, frightanxiety, guilt, shame, envy, jealousy, sadness, happiness, love, pride, relief, hope, compassion - or a small set of factor dimensions such as pleasantness and unpleasantness, tension or relaxation or the like? 4. 5. What, if any, is the role of action tendencies and physiological activity in emotion? ….. Should physiological activity be a defining attribute of emotion? What are the functional interdependencies among emotions such as anger, guilt, sadness, relief and so on? … hate (anger) and love (affection? …. Depression > anxiety, guilt and sadness? 6. What are the functional relations among what Hilgard (1980) called the trilogy of mind – namely, cognition, motivation and emotion? … What role, for example, does cognition play in the generation of an emotion? What kinds of cognition are there and do they all influence the emotion process and in the same way? 7. 8. 9. How can we reconcile biological universals in emotion (biological scientists) with sociocultural sources of variability (social scientists)? How should we relate the concept of cognitive appraisal to depth psychology and unconscious mental activity? How does each emotion differ in the way it is generated? 10. How should we understand emotional development? What are the sources of influence? What is the role of biological factors such as temperament? What is the role of learning and personality?..... What does language usage tell us about emotion?