Oral/Paper Presentation Evaluation Criteria #tturc16

advertisement
#tturc16
Oral/Paper Presentation Evaluation Criteria
Presenter(s): ______________________________________________
Abstract #: ________
Reviewer: _______________________________________
Pleaseratethepresentationutilizingthe10-pointscaleprovided,with10beingtrulyexceptional,5beingaverage,and1beingpoor.
C ATEGORY
P OOR F AIR A VERAGE T RULY
E XCEPTIONAL O UTSTANDING 1.DepthofContent
Researchdealswithanimportantissueinthefield
ofstudy,includesgoals/motivatingquestionsthat
providetheaudiencewithasenseoftheproject’s
mainidea.
• Informationisaccurateandincludesacomplete
explanationofkeyconceptsandtheoriesdrawing
uponrelevantliterature,aswellasaclear
descriptionoftheresultsandtheimportanceof
theresults.
• Applicationsoftheoryareincludedtoilluminate
issues.
Comments:
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2.Organization
• Presentationisclear,logicalandorganized.
Listenercanfollowlineofreasoning.
1
2
3
Comments:
PLEASE TURN PAGE OVER TO COMPLETE SCORING ITEMS
#tturc16
3.PresentationStyle
Levelofpresentationisappropriateforthe
audience.
§ Presentationisaplannedconversation,pacedfor
audienceunderstanding.
§ Speakerisclearlycomfortableinfrontofthegroup
andcanbeheardbyall.
Comments:
§
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4.VerbalInteraction
Consistentlyclarifies,restates,andrespondsto
questions.
§ Summarizeswhenneeded
Comments:
§
1
2
3
5.CommunicationAids
Communicationaidsarepreparedinaprofessional
mannerandenhancethepresentation.
§ Informationisorganizedtomaximizeaudience
understanding.
§ Detailsareminimizedsothatmainpointsstand
out.
Comments:
§
1
2
3
PLEASEADDUPTOTALSCOREANDINDICATEHERE:
______/50
*AdaptedfromUNHManchesterUndergraduateResearchConference:http://manchester.unh.edu/sites/default/files/urc/JudgingRubric%20-PosterPresentations.pdf
PLEASE TURN IN SCORING SHEETS AT THE NORTHEAST END OF THE BALLROOM.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHERS.
Download