This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2011, The Johns Hopkins University and Charla Cain. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed. An Analysis of Direct Potable Water Reuse Acceptance in the United States: Obstacles and Opportunities Charla R. Cain MPH Capstone Project May 2011 Advisor: Jacqueline Agnew, RN, MPH, PhD, Professor, JHSPH Mentor: Thaddeus Graczyk, MSc, PhD Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Presentation Outline Introduction Description of Potable Water Reuse – Indirect and Direct Drivers of Direct Potable Reuse ADWT Treatment Train Case Studies Obstacles and Opportunities Treatment Train Unit Processes Health Risk Concerns Key Regulations Public Perception Management and Operational Controls Conclusion Introduction Dependable supply of safe drinking water Status quo – conventional drinking water treatment Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) – successful in U.S., 30yrs Direct Potable Reuse (DPR) – most sustainable option Has DPR’s time now come? Survey current literature Illuminate problem of DPR acceptance Report on opportunities to go forward Indirect Potable Water Reuse Unplanned IPR Wastewater Treatment Plant jjkj Planned Water Reclamation plant Wastewater Treatment Plant Drinking water Treatment Plant Adapted from: Asano, T. et. al. Water Reuse. 2007. p. 1307 IPR Drinking water Treatment Plant Direct Potable Reuse Water Reclamation plant Drinking water Treatment plant Wastewater Treatment plant Adapted from : Asano, T. et. al. Water Reuse. 2007. p 1307 “The introduction of highly treated reclaimed water either.. directly into the potable water distribution system downstream of a water treatment plant, (i.e., pipe-topipe) or into the raw water supply immediately upstream of a water treatment plant.” Drivers of DPR Global water situation Water-scarce Population / water-stressed areas increases / demographic shifts Environmental Right to Water Impacts Advanced Drinking Water Treatment (ADWT) Secondary effluent Tertiary treatment (pretreatment for advanced processes) Ozonation PAC MF/UF Filtration UV disinfection Dissolved constituents removal, conditioning GAC / BAC Ion Exchange RO AOP Water conditioning / pH Disinfection Chlorine UV Ozone HOME ADWT Targets Inorganics (i.e. nitrogen, sulfides, heavy metals) Organics (i.e. Benzene, DDT, carbon tetrachloride) Membrane Bioreactor, Reverse Osmosis Microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, protozoa, helminthes) Membrane Bioreactor, Reverse Osmosis Membrane Bioreactor, Disinfection (chlorine, UV, ozone) Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (i.e. Estradiol, Progesterone) and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (i.e. Hydrocodone, Dilantin, Deet) Reverse Osmosis and UV/Advanced Oxidation Process Note: MBR includes PAC, GAC, BAC, UF/MF/NF Case Study – Windhoek, Namibia Only DPR location in world! Opened 1969, upgraded 2002 Multiple Barrier Approach Oversight by leading water treatment agencies New Goreangab Water Reclamation Plant Source: http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windhoek_Skyline.jpg Source: http://www.fichtner.de/en/water_supply_projects.html Case Study - Singapore Used Water Microfiltration Reverse Osmosis Disinfection with UV light NEWater DPR – Current Dialogue Media / Government Wall Street Journal EPA’s Office of Water Scientific Researchers NWRI DPR regulation white paper, CA 2010 DPR Workshop Report, CA Public Health Researchers JHSPH and wastewater reuse WateReuse Association WateReuse Symposium DPR presentations Determinants of DPR Acceptance Treatment Train Processes Health Risk Concerns Management and Operational Controls Key Regulatory Issues Cost Treatment Train - Obstacles Logistical Difficulties Membrane Sensitivity Disinfection Waste Byproducts Stream Generation Treatment Train - Opportunities Increased Research and Development Example: Endocrine Disrupting Compounds and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products 2010 DPR Workshop Report Classification of best treatment process order Identification of Chemicals of Emerging Concern (CEC) surrogates Validation of barrier effectiveness against benchmarks Health Risk Concerns - Obstacles Few Epidemiologic and Toxicological potable reuse studies in IPR and DPR Difficulties extrapolating IPR epidemiologic studies to DPR Long-term CECs health effects difficult to assess Health Risk Concerns - Opportunities Perform epidemiologic studies of DPR and potential health effects 2010 DPR Workshop Report Water quality treatment performance goals Validation of treatment performance goals through performance monitoring Health risk and exposure assessments Monitoring for public health assurance Key Regulations - Obstacles SDWA No U.S. Federal regulations for IPR or DPR U.S. Federal guidelines for IPR only State No and CWA insufficient for DPR regulation regulations for IPR - 4 states only state regulations or guidelines for DPR Key Regulations - Opportunities EPA to include DPR chapter in next Guidelines for Water Reuse California leader 2010 NWRI White Paper 2010 DPR Workshop Report Identify optimal regulatory scheme Develop CEC evaluation approach Assess environmental buffer function Develop source control strategy Public Perception - Obstacles Largest hurdle No separation between sewage effluent and drinking water influent Media “From toilets to tap: How we get tap water from sewage” USA Today, Kathy Chu http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/environment/ 2011-03-03-1Apurewater03_CV_N.htm# Water is “everywhere” and therefore DPR not necessary Public Perceptions - Opportunities Utilize identified factors influencing public perceptions and behavioral acceptability 2010 DPR Workshop Report Develop appropriate terminology Survey stakeholders and involve at inception Utilize health communication specialists to develop messages and strategy “Trust” = strongest influencing factor. Capitalize! Management & Operational Controls – Obstacles and Opportunities Real-time Control 2010 process monitoring strategies development DPR Workshop Report Consider system design for emergency response Develop enhanced source control programs Develop DPR operational guidelines Conclusion Direct Potable Reuse…. Viable option for future water resource management Acceptance depends on pursuing opportunities Need for stronger epidemiologic research California as a model “When the well is dry, we learn the worth of water.” Benjamin Franklin, (1706-1790), Poor Richard’s Almanac, 1746 Thank You… For a thirst-free future… …your kids will thank you! www.thirstfreefuture.com References Intro http://www.battelle.org IPR / DPR Asano, T.; Burton, F.L.; Leverenz, H.L.; Tsuchihashi, R.; Tchobanoglous, G. Indirect Potable Reuse through Surface-Water Augmentation. Chapter 23. In: Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies, and Applications. New York: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 2007: p.1307 & 1346. Windhoek, Namibia http://www.fichtner.de/en/water_supply_projects.html http://www.hivresponse.gov.na http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windhoek_Skyline.jpg Singapore http://www.livetradingnews.com/barclays-offers-rmb-bond-fund-in-singapore-39050.htm http://www.ambsingapore.um.dk/en/menu/CommercialServices/MarketOpportunities/Sectoranalyses/ Energy+and+Environment/ http://www.greatnewplaces.com/t-Sembcorp Key Regulations – Opportunities http://nwri_usa.org Public Perceptions – Obstacles http://worldchanging.com http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/environment/2011-03-03-1Apurewater03_CV_N.htm#