Executive Board in Public: February 2015 Item Public Subject: Safe Staffing Level’s Update Report -Compliance with Hard Truths Doc Author: Ben Chambers, Lead Nurse for Clinical Assurance Purpose: Discussion Key Issues: Trust wide Compliance with safe staffing levels January 2015: Registered Nurse Day hours – 12,880.5 planned, 12,801 worked representing 99% fill rate overall. Registered Nurse Night hours – 10,757 planned 10,183 worked representing 95% fill rate. Care Support Worker Day Hours – 22,877 planned, 27,349 worked representing 120% fill rate Care Support Worker Night Hours- 12,632 planned, 17,484 worked representing 138% fill rate Health/Social Impact: Staff in hospitals where the staff levels are not deemed safe have been known to have higher burnout rates and were approximately twice as likely to be dissatisfied in their job. Good staffing levels will lead to positive outcomes for people using our services Financial Implications: £1.2m has had to be identified to facilitate improved staffing levels on the wards. Ongoing review of this investment with our commissioners should be considered and agreed going forward for any deficits in staffing establishment that may affect compliance with delivering safe staffing levels Diversity/Equality Impact Assessment: No Equality issues have come to light; the review has considered all protected characteristics equally. Recommendation to Board: The Board is asked to note the improvement in staffing levels and the direction of travel. 24/7 Safe Staffing Levels – Monthly Update Report 1.0 Introduction NHS England and the Care Quality Commission issued joint guidance to Trusts on the delivery of the ‘Hard Truths’ commitments, associated with publishing staffing data regarding nursing and care staff levels. We have embraced the Safe Staffing agenda and implemented a number of initiatives such as our surge and escalation process to ensure we receive real time intelligence from our front line staff, on how we are meeting safe staffing levels. A review of the hours worked against plan for registered nurses in our 24/7 wards for the month of January, shows appropriate shift cover for the day shift and night shifts, with exceptions discussed below. In February 2015 the Lead Nurse for Clinical Assurance and the Director of Risk and Safety (Deputy Director of Nursing) reviewed the safe staffing levels for all the services with support from the clinical areas. Recalculations were made to account for changes to bed levels, using the same ratio principles as originally used. The levels will next routinely be reviewed in 6 months-time unless National guidance for MH services is published before this date. The fill rate for day shift, registered nurse hours was 99% a reduction of 11% on December’s figures. This reduction reflects the continued commitment of the wards to work with safe staffing numbers. The safe staffing review carried out in February increased the number of registered nurses required to work on Spencer ward during the day which affected their % fill rate for this month, reducing the overall percentage to below 100%. The fill rate for night shift registered nurse hours was 95% fill rate, the same as the previous month which is lower than expected due to 2 wards Wingfield and Hayworth House where there have been challenges in staffing to the required register nurse levels for a number of months as discussed below. Our fill rate for Care Support Workers was high for both day and night cover with fill rates of 120% & 138% respectively. These figures however represent a 2% increase and 3% decrease in fill rate (respectively). The additional use of care staff at night care has been required due to the acuity of need currently on the wards usually as a result of people requiring 1:1 or 2:1 support. Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 2 2.0 Monthly Safe Staffing Compliance Update As in the previous 3 months, the January data shows a reduction in the number of wards which had a figure below the 90% of expected staff. This is an encouraging trend and indicates the continued effort of the clinical teams to provide safe and effective care. The reasons for lower than expected figures on some wards are discussed below. We analysed data by looking at the nursing hours planned against actual hours worked including those hours covered by NHS Professionals. The overall picture suggesting that staffing levels within the 24/7 services are becoming increasingly consistent in operating within the safe staffing levels agreed for their services. Over the past 4 months, 3 wards (Wingfield, Hayworth House and Spencer ward) have often found it difficult to staff all their shifts to the levels agreed. The safe staffing review considered the number of beds each ward had, the context of their care including the needs of the people they were supporting and the expected work load of the shifts. The review concluded that the original registered nurse levels at night for both Wingfield and Hayworth House wards were correct at 3 and 2 respectively and the wards are currently recruiting to support these expected levels. As described above the February review increased the number of registered staff expected on Spencer ward during the day. The % fill rate for Spencer ward will continue to be analysed monthly as their shift patterns flex during the week (as need dictates) to ensure that the principles of safe staffing are being accurately reflected in our reviews. Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 3 Key for charts: Red indicates <90%, blue indicates 90% – 110% and yellow indicates >110%. 2.1 Services for People with a Learning Disability Division Due to the care needs of people using our Learning Disability Service our skill mix includes a high proportion of care support workers to support with activities of daily living, as such our care support staff planned number is much greater than those for registered nurses. Table 1 – LD safe staffing data January 2015 Total Ward Name Bramdean April Cottage Oakwood Ashmount & Derby Larkfield Day Registered Nurse Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 465.0 455 449.5 565 434.0 457 465.0 466 465.0 538 12,880.5 12,801 Night Care Staff Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 1,395.0 1,635 1,798.0 1,628 3,472.0 3,375 2,790.0 3,407 1,395.0 1,373 22,878.0 27,349 Registered Nurse Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 325.5 315 341.0 341 310.0 314 310.0 310 325.5 311 10,757.0 10,183 Care Staff Jan-15 Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual % Registered % CSW % Registered % CSW Hours Hours Day Day night night 651.0 622 98% 117% 97% 96% 341.0 657 126% 91% 100% 193% 930.0 927 105% 97% 101% 100% 930.0 954 100% 122% 100% 103% 325.5 310 116% 98% 95% 95% 12,632.5 17,484 99% 120% 95% 138% Brief summary by ward 1) Bramdean – Following the review of safe staffing levels this month’s figures show an improved alignment with the expected safe staffing levels. Bramdean continues to staff to the support needs of the shifts reducing NHSP use at times when people are at home with their families. 2) April Cottage – Following the review of safe staffing levels this month’s figures show an improving alignment with the expected safe staffing levels. The above anticipated fill rates for qualified staff across some days and nights is accounted for to cover the development needs of the qualified staff such as supervision and training. Additional CSW staff on nights, reflect the acuity of need on the ward at that time with some people requiring 1:1 or 2:1 support. 3) Oakwood – consistent appropriate staffing levels. 4) Ashmount and Derby – consistent good staffing levels with high acuity accounting for the higher than expected use of CSWs during the day. 5) Larkfield – consistent good staffing levels reported for January. Where figures are below 100% this is often when NHSP staff are booked for core hours as opposed to for entire shifts, reflecting the needs of the unit. Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 4 Current Actions There is ongoing recruitment in the Division to continue to meet the agreed safe staffing levels. 2.2 Mental Health and Social Care Division Due to the high levels of dependency and acuity of some of the people using our Acute Mental Health Wards, there is a need for quick responsiveness and flexibility regarding additional resource (for example when people are escorted off the ward or are placed on enhanced observation). We work closely with our front line staff to ensure that any additional demands on staff are escalated, to ensure prompt action is taken to provide the required support. Table 2 – WAA safe staffing data January 2015 Total Ward Name 24 7 Wingfield 24 7 Blake 24 7 Clare 24 7 Anderson 24 7 Delius 24 7 Elgar 24 7 Fenby (PICU) Day Registered Nurse Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 1,069.5 1,112 1,069.5 1,107 1,069.5 1,010 713.0 688 713.0 734 713.0 716 1,069.5 986 Night Care Staff Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 713.0 828 1,069.5 1,045 713.0 754 713.0 802 713.0 708 1,069.5 1,067 1,069.5 1,140 Registered Nurse Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 1,069.5 854 1,069.5 1,059 713.0 723 713.0 691 713.0 684 713.0 674 713.0 678 Care Staff Jan-15 Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual % Registered % CSW % Registered % CSW Hours Hours Day Day night night 713.0 982 104% 116% 80% 138% 713.0 799 104% 98% 99% 112% 713.0 790 94% 106% 101% 111% 356.5 504 96% 112% 97% 141% 356.5 434 103% 99% 96% 122% 356.5 356 100% 100% 95% 100% 1,426.0 1,554 92% 107% 95% 109% Brief summary by ward 1) Wingfield ward – generally has good cover across the 24hr shifts. The ward has yet to increase the bed numbers to the anticipated levels due on the 01.12.14 as the demand is not currently there however recruitment to ensure that the appropriately sized staff team is in place is currently underway. The low fill rate for qualified staff at nights has improved this month, but will require additional registered nurses to be in place to consistently staff the ward with the 3 expected qualified staff. CSWs have been used to ensure that the overall number of staff have been available on the ward during these shifts. 2) Blake ward – good consistent cover (bed number reduced to 17 from late December – safe staffing review reduced the number of CSWs required at nights from 3 to 2 to reflect this change). Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 5 3) Clare ward – good consistent cover. 4) Anderson ward –good cover with additional CSW use at nights due to acuity. 5) Delius ward – appropriate consistent cover with additional CSW use at nights due to acuity. 6) Elgar ward – appropriate consistent cover – with additional use of NHSP support managed well over the period. 7) Fenby ward – appropriate cover across the 24 hr period. Current Actions There is an ongoing recruitment programme within the Trust to reduce the impact of people leaving one clinical area to work in another. The NHSP CSW development placement programme is also reported to have worked positively in a number of settings helping to recruit and retain good staff while increasing the consistency of staffing on the wards. 2.3 Older Peoples Mental Health Division Due to the care needs of people using our older people’s services our skill mix includes a high proportion of care support workers to support with activities of daily living, as such our care support staff planned number are much greater than those for registered nurses. Table 3 - OP safe staffing data January 2015 Total Ward Name Victoria Albert Hayworth House Spenser Ward Bluebell Ward Primrose Ward Day Registered Nurse Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 1,023.0 1,094 713.0 728 713.0 665 1,023.0 734 356.5 366 356.5 382 Night Care Staff Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 1,023.0 1,859 1,069.5 2,432 1,426.0 1,861 1,023.0 946 713.0 1,348 713.0 1,142 Registered Nurse Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual Hours Hours 682.0 684 682.0 677 713.0 486 682.0 692 341.0 361 341.0 331 Care Staff Jan-15 Total Total Monthly Monthly Planned Actual % Registered % CSW % Registered % CSW Hours Hours Day Day night night 1,023.0 2,094 107% 182% 100% 205% 1,023.0 1,721 102% 227% 99% 168% 1,069.5 1,802 93% 130% 68% 168% 682.0 655 72% 92% 101% 96% 682.0 1,217 103% 189% 106% 178% 341.0 1,109 107% 160% 97% 325% Brief summary by ward 1) Victoria ward – comparable cover across the 24/7 period with previous months. The above 100% expected CSW use is largely accounted for enhanced observation. A programme of review is currently underway to determine if 1:1 support is the most effective way of maintaining safety on the ward. Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 6 2) Albert ward – comparable cover across the 24/7 period with previous months. The above 100% expected CSW use is largely accounted for enhanced observation. A programme of review is currently underway to determine if 1:1 support is the most effective way of maintaining safety on the ward. 3) Hayworth House – consistent cover across the 24/7 period. More CSWs were required at night than anticipated to compensate for the nearly 40% less than expected use of qualified staff at nights. The expectation of having 2 qualified staff members at Hayworth House every night was confirmed during the February safe staffing review. 4) Spencer ward – during the safe staffing review it was agreed that Spencer ward could be safely staffed at nights with 2 registered nurses and 2 CSWs due to the needs of the people they support and the availability of addition support staff from the other ACU wards should an incident occur requiring immediate support. Cover during the days is lower than on previous months however these measures do not reflect shifts where the manager has effectively worked as a nurse on the wards when staff have not been available at short notice. 5) Bluebell ward – consistent appropriate cover across the 24/7 period with over expected staff fill rates due to acuity (1:1 support). 6) Primrose ward – consistent cover across the 24/7 period with over expected staff fill rates due to acuity. The very high fill rates for CSWs at nights was due to a number of people being on 1:1 or 2:1 24/7. The levels of required supportive observation are reviewed daily. Current Actions Where there are either low or unusually high fill rates, queries have been escalated to the Divisional Director and discussions continue with the teams at the monthly safe staffing meetings to support the teams in ensuring improvements in fill rate are achieved. High rates of CSW use to manage supportive observations are being looked at across the OP directorate to ensure that approaches match evidenced best practice. 3.0 Display information about the nurses and care staff present on each ward. We now have full compliance with the displaying of nursing numbers on the wards. Further ongoing audit will be undertaken to ensure the process remains embedded. Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 7 4.0 Processes in place to enable staffing establishments to be met The Director of Quality (DoN) continues to coordinate the available staff programme which reviews & ensures the improvement in the quality of roster planning by ward. The review team analyse possible future breaches on planned rosters, which should identify any unforeseen low levels of staffing. This information is then compared with NHSP booking data which will allow for the robust monitoring of quality. This process also allows us to check that appropriate allowances have been made in establishments for planned and unplanned leave and the supervisory role of the ward manager. 5.0 Reasons for Gaps in Staffing fill rate Recruitment processes commenced in September are now helping some wards to reach their full staffing levels reducing the amount of NHSP required. It is anticipated that this will lead to an improved level of compliance to safe staffing levels going forward. Recruitment processes continue for wards where vacancies have since arisen. The Trust weekly operational review meeting monitors progress against all staffing risks currently on the Trust Risk Register. 6.0 Impact on Key Quality Outcome Measures For the month of January no direct correlation has been identified between fill rate and inability to deliver on quality outcome measures. Rates of NHSP use should reduce over the coming months as the reconfigured wards recruit to their new safe staffing levels. The rolling recruitment programme remains in place to reduce the impact of staff changing roles on the ward areas they leave by reducing the time between a job being available and the person being able to begin on the ward. Through the safe staffing programme, the Quality team is working to ensure there is enhanced effectiveness of the staffing resource leading to improving quality and care on the wards. Ben Chambers – Lead Nurse for Clinical Assurance. Safe Staffing Levels – Compliance with Hard Truths Doc BC 20.02.15 8