Collaborative School Leadership: An Exploration of Teacher Activity Systems in a Progressive High School – A Research Proposal Mollie A. Davis mad432@drexel.edu Prepared for Drexel University’s Research Day 2015 4 Conceptual Framework Activity Systems and Expansive Learning (Engeström, 2009, p. 56) 3 1 Context: Progressive Education Progressive Curricula Nurtures Students’: • Participation in a democratic society. • Social, emotional, academic, cognitive, and physical development. • Natural curiosity and innate desire to learn. • Internal motivation. • Respectful relationships with teachers. • Active participation in their learning “Progressive educators must play an active role in guiding the educational vision of our society.” (Adapted from Progressive Education Network, ND) 2 Problem Statement Ideally, communities of practice operate as a space within a school where teachers can learn from one another, investigate their pedagogical practice, and work collaboratively to improve student outcomes. Current literature on communities of practice points to evidence of each of these by-products, but generally in such a way to propose a 'best-practice’ approach to implementing them. What often gets overlooked is the importance of the context in which the communities are situated and the types of interactions that occur between teachers. This research aims to further explore the relationships between teachers within communities of practice, and between the communities of practice and the structure of the school particularly in regards to: • Teacher leadership and agency, • Understanding the context of a school and its curricular choices, • Promoting teachers’ trust in one another as they learn together and become critical from Gross & Shapiro, 2014, p. 1) Institutional Ethnography Central Tenet: Framing the individual’s experience within the organizing framework of an institution as the central focus of research. • Participant Observation – One School Year • Semi-structured interviews (teachers) • Focus Groups (communities of practice) • Document Review (policy documents) Structure of Schooling Democratic Ethical Educational Leaders: (Adapted Methodology (Smith, 1987, p. 171) colleagues. Context: Democratic Ethical Educational Leadership • Feel an inner sense of responsibility to the development of students, families, and the community. • Lead from an expansive community-building perspective. • Integrate democracy, social justice, and school reform through scholarship, dialogue, and action. • Operate from a dynamic, inclusive, democratic vision. • Have a well -developed sense of mission toward democratic social improvement that cuts across political, national, class, gender, racial, ethnic, and religious boundaries. 5 Schooling as Social Change Teacher Trust Communities of Practice Teachers as Professionals Accountability Transformational Learning A special thank you to: Kristy Kelly Anthony Matranga Mary Davis Please contact the author for references.