1976 ANNUAL REPORT
HOP BREEDING, GENETICS, CHEMISTRY, AND PATHOLOGY
Alfred Haunold, S. T. Likens, and C. E, Horner
Not for publication or
further duplication
without permission of
the authors.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
HOP PRODUCTION STATISTICS (HAC Data)
U.S. Hop Production and Acreage in 1976
World Hop Production in 1965 to Date
World Hop Acreage, Yield and Production
U.S. Hop Imports 1968-1976
U.S. Hop Exports 1969-1976
Analysis of U.S. Hop Production 1973-1976
Hops Supplies and Brewery Consumption
1976 U.S. Beer Production
HGA Bulletin: Hop Economy Lags
Grower Allotment Bases and Annual Allotments Effective for 1976
HOP BREEDING
Exchange of Germplasm
Germplasm distributed in 1976
'
Germplasm received at Con/all is
Accession Numbers Assigned or Eliminated in 1976
1
4
7
10
12
13
16
17
18
25
26
32
32
32
37
39
New Accession Numbers
Accession Numbers Eliminated
Crosses made in 1976
39
42
44
1976 Nursery
Hop Variety World Collection
47
48
Seedless Named Variety Collection
Seeded Named Variety Nursery
48
48
Seedless Observation Nurseries
Advanced Seedless 10-hill Observation Nursery
52
52
Seedless 5-hill Observation Nursery
54
the 2-hill Seeded Observation Nursery, Con/all is, 1976
59
Summary of 36 High Alpha Selections from 1970 Nursery
Germplasm Collection Nursery
Agronomic and Quality Data of High or Low Alpha Acid Lines Grown in
Agronomic and Quality Data of Male Genotypes Grown in the Germplasm
Nursery, Corvallis, 1976
Agronomic and Quality Data of Female Genotypes Grown in the Germplasm
Nursery, Corvallis, 1976
Selections from the 1973 Nursery
Male Selections From the 1973 Nursery
Female Selections From the 1973 Nursery
Reduced Tillage-Herbicide Trial With Cascade
57
58
60
63
64
64
64
72
HOP PRODUCTION STATISTICS (HAC Data)
American hop acreage in 1976 showed a 5% (1,963 acres) decline from the
previous year which was fairly evenly distributed among the three major hop
growing states, Washington, Oregon and Idaho and a very slight decrease in
California.
New plantings for 1976 amounted to 498 acres and replantings to
nearly 1,200 acres resulting in a total baby acreage of 1,694 acres (HAC Table 2)
Hop production the past year set a modern day record with a total of
295,687 bales or 57.88 million pounds (HAC Table 1) surpassing the previous
year's production by 3,3% in spite of lower acreage.
The major hop varieties
produced in the United States in the order of total acreage in 1975 were as
follows:
Early Clusters (47%), Cascade (14%), Late Cluster (12%), California
and Grants Pass Late Cluster Seedless (5%), Bullion and Brewer's Gold (8%),
Fuggle (7%); the remainder was made up of Talisman, Comet and others (pri
marily Columbia and Willamette planted as babies in Oregon),
The cool and relatively wet summer was particularly favorable to Cascades
in Washington with an all-time record production of 2,033 pounds/acre for
Cascades and a state average of 1,960 pounds/acre (HAC Table 3).
Average
production in Oregon was below that of the previous year particularly due to
mildew problems in the English and Cascades.
Idaho produced slightly more
pounds per acre than last year but due to the drastic acreage reduction in this
state, the total 1976 production for Idaho was 16% below that of the previous
year.
California came in with an average production of 1,660 pounds per acre
which was substantially below that of 1975 and somewhat lower than that of 1974.
The declining trend in world hop production that has persisted since 1974
again was evident with a 1976 total of 238.1 million pounds (HAC Table 4) of
which the U.S. accounted for 24% and West Germany, the leading world hop pro
ducer contributing 27% or 63.4 million pounds.
Slightly over 51% (27,9 million pounds) of our 1975 production was ex
ported in the 1975/76 marketing year (HAC Table 4).
American breweries used
a total of 23.1 million pounds (69%) of domestic hops, and 10.4 million pounds
(31%) of improted hops (HAC Table 4).
The ranking of the leading hop production countries both in terms of
acreage and in terms of total production (HAC Table 6A) remained nearly un
changed from that of the previous years, with West Germany again being No. 1
followed by the United States, Czechoslovakia, England, Yugoslavia, East
Bermany etc. in that order (HAC Tables 6A and 6B).
The Soviet Union, in spite
of its tremendous hop acreage (nearly 28,000 acres), again had a very low
yield (below 1,000 pounds per acre) and may again become a factor on the world
hop market during the coming marketing year.
Other important hop producing
countries that are not members of the International Hop Production Bureau in
order of production are Japan, Romania, Canada, Hungary, New Zealand, Argentina,
and South Africa in that order.
The total production of the non member countries
of the IHGC however amounted to only 5.5% (39.9 million pounds) of total world
hop production, as compared to 198.2 million pounds of hops produced by the
member countries of the International Hop Production Bureau (Table 6B).
U S. hop imports continued their declining trend that was begun about 4
years ago; however, total imports still exceeded 12 million pounds (HAD Table 7)
as compared to nearly 28 million pounds of U.S. hop exports in the 1975/76
marketing year (HAC Table 8).
Our leading foreign customers (HAC Tables 9A, 9B)
in order of importance were: Mexico, Canada, Brazil, Soviet Union, Columbia,
Ireland, Czechoslovakia, etc. with the remainder distributed among 48 other
foreign countries.
Brewery consumption of U.S. hops was below expectations in 1975-1976
(HAC Table 11) amounting to only 33 1 million pounds.
The carry-in hop stocks
in 1976 reached an all time high of over 50 million pounds (HAC Table 11) which
coupled with the new 1977 production, could reach an all time high of total
hop supplies well in excess of 100 million pounds.
Total U.S. Beer production in 1976 topped 150 million barrels (MBAA
special report p.3£-2U).
Anheuser Busch remained the leading beer producer in
spite of a decrease of over 6 million barrels (-17%), probably largely due to
a 3 month strike.
Miller again showed outstanding growth of over 43%/year,
which moved it into 3rd place among major brewers.
The top 5 brewers share
of U.S. beer sales rose to 68.1% in 1976 (67% in 1975) and the top 10 brewers
accounted for over 86% of total beer sales in the United States.
u.
Table 1
s. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
1/19/77
Total 1976 Produci,ion
Actual Bales
Less:
Wash.
Total
210,013
295,687
£,1,260
57,882
59
912
B79
938
Oreqon
12,511
26.102
2,490
5,152
6,980
0
0
0
0
0
2,490
5.1^
8,921
39,469
56,032
199.0
197.4
190.B
196.5
195.8
3,277
3,277
Production 1/
Fire Loss
Reserves
Total Salable
w
Idaho
Calif.
Hops
1/ Average bale cuts.
912
1976 Reserve Pool Cateqories (Bales )
I
Hops
Grp. A (Clstr. or higher
alpha type)
*
B (English type)
"
C (Fuggle type)
"
—
21
260
21
280
D (Cont. or lower alph a
type)
II
1,002
1,002
168
168
4,447
4,748
(Screenings)
III (Package hops)
301
Total
Summary of Reserve Pools to Date
Hops
(Bales)
Reserve Pools
Total Income
Total
Screen.
(Equiv.
(lbs.)
Bales)
45,510 1/
1966 thru 1975
1976
622
8,390,587
936,000
$5,607,475.02 2/
622
9,32 6,587
$6,382,628.50
4,748
50,258
Total
775,153.48
1/ Includes 2,705 bales from 1974 pool and 1,714 from 1975 pool still for sale at 73c
and 76cf plus, respectively.
2/ Assuming 1974, '75 and '76 pools are sold at established pool prices.
Parity and Grower
Season Averaqe
Parity
Crop Year
(9/1-B/31)
1966-67
1967-68
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
1975-76
Price
Reserve Pool
Gr . Return
Grouer
Price
Prices
(9/1 -a/3i)
67.8
69.1
70.7
73.7
78.5
68.6
101.8
13.9
13.9
13.9
69.8
69.6
113.1
119.2
51. D
56.0
65.9
71.4
76.2
79.3
74.3
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
Mo.
Price
Price
$
lb.67.6
Parity
• Parity
Mo.
Mar.
- 1.20
- 1.20
-'1.20
May
-
June
-
-
1.20
April July
Aug.
-
74.2
76.6
—
*
—
be released 1/28/77.
SOURCE:
HAC records except for parity and grouer prices reported by SRS, USDA.
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Teble 2
1976 ACREAGE BY STATE (Strung for Harvest)
1/19/77
Incr.
Wash.
Oregon
Idaho
19,046
19,251
20,665
21,400
21,603
5,076
5,242
5,352
5,571
5,621
3,434
3,833
3,981
4,086
230
222
Calif.
Total
—Acres-
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
V
-
Plntgs. new ground 1/
Plow out & not repl. 2/
1976 Final
Net Change
(756)
(405)
21,077
(526)
5,438
(183)
3,709
1,489
1,473
1,473
1,500
1,535
29,045
29,799
31,471
32,557
32,466
46
-0-
498
(776)
2,979
(730)
Over
Prior Year
%
5%
3%
8%
3%
(•)
(1,963)
(26)
1,509
31,003
(1,465)
(26)
(5%)
1/ Plantings on new ground to be harvested for first time in 1976.
•Less than # of 1%\
2/ Includes 273 acres idle—all Washington.
1976 BABY ACREAGE BY STATE
New Plantings 1976
Replantings for 1976
Total Babies
230
222
1,033
42
1,263
% of Total Acreage
Baby Cascade Acreage
6%
46
121
-0-
498
-0-
,196
264
167
-0-
1,694
5%
6%
-0-
5% 1/
-0-
-0-
276
79
199
1/ Babies were 6% of total in 1974, 5% in 1975 and 5% in 1976.
1976 ACREAGE—BY STATE AND VARIETY (Strung for Harvest)
Wash.
Oregon
Category I (Cluster or higher
Alpha type)
Early
Clusters
14,150
• -0-091
781
-0-
Clusters
Talisman
Late
Late
Cal. & Gr. P.
Sdls.-Late
2,800
*
-0-
Comets
579
Others 1/
166
Category II
English - Late
Category III
Fuggles - Early
135
6
2
Calif.
Total
448
-0-
14,598
47^
909
-0-
3,709
125
-0-
672
3?
1,507
1,642
2
2
589
8
-0-
176
5?
25
15
Idaho
-Acres-
618 2/
1,984 3/
-0-
-0-
2,602
-0-
2,324
-0-
-0-
2,324
874
649
182
-0-
4,287
22
-0-
204
5,438
2,979
1,509
31,003
Category IV (Cant, or lower alpha type)
Cascade-Mid. to Late
Others j+/
2,764
»
Total
21,077 5/
14?
1/ Includes other Cat. I Clust. or higher alpha-type varieties such as North Brewers,
U of I 40, T-l and other exper. varieties not falling in other three categories.
2/ Bullions - 513 acres (63%); Brewers Gold - 105 acres (17%).
3/ Bullions - 1,328 acres (67%); Brewers Gold - 656 acres (33%).
4/ Includes Hallertau, Tettnang, Willamette, Columbia, and other flavor-type varieties,
5/ Acreage count by variety not available in Wash, except for Cascades (13%), Comets
(3%) and English (3%). The Early Clust. are estimated at S7%; Late Clust. at 13%;
and other varieties (i.e. Talis., Tettnang, Pr. of Ringwood, etc.) at less than 1%.
Early Clust. incl. E-2, E-21 and L-l; and Late Clust. incl. L-8 and L-16 origi
nating from certified root stock. Acreage of varieties shown with (*) are included
in estimate of "other" Wash, acreage in Cat. I.
SOURCE:
HAC Records.
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Table 3
1/19/77
ALL VARIETIES - ACREAGE. YIELDS PRODUCTION
%
Acreage
State
1974
Yield Per Acre (lbs.)
1975
Product. (1,000 lbs.)
L976
1974
1975
1976
1974
1975
1976
1,254
1,924
1,237
2,288
1,346
2,086
3,190
3,638
3,088
4,295
3,127
4,139
1-716
Che
-Harvested-
Oregon
Fuggles
2,496
1,877
1,173
2,324
1,984
Others
2,543
1,891
1,094
1,130
1,537
1.603
1.519
1.682
2.115
Sub-Tot.
5,500
5,600
5,400
1,550
1,700
1,660
8,525
9,520
8,964
(5.
Wash.
21,300
21,300
21,000
1,630
1,770
1,960
38,979
37,701
41,160
9.
Idaho
4,100
3,700
3,000
1,700
1,660
1,720
6,9.70
6,142
5,160 (16.I
Calif.
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,670
1.700
1,660
2.505
2.550
2,490
32,400
32,100
30,900
1,759
1,742
1,870
56,979
55,913
57,774
English
Total
Note
SOURCE:
The sum of individual items may not agree with totals because of rounding state
acreage to nearest 100 acres and state average yields to nearest 10 lbs.
USDA except variety figures in Oregon.
CASCADES - .ACREAGE, YIELD AND PRODUCTION
Wash.
1
,821
2,667
2,764
1,587
1,738
2,033
2,890
4,634
5,620
Oreqon
706
843 .
874
1,458
1,943
1,644
1,029
1,638
1,437
Idaho
596
757
649
933
1,256
1,746
556
951
1,133
Calif.
0
0
0
0
0_
0_
0_
7,223
8,190
Total
SOURCE:
3
123
4,267
4,287
1,433
0
1,693
0
1,910
4,475
HAC records.
ALL OTHER VARIETIES - ACREAGE. YIELD AND PRODUCTION
Wash.
Oreqon
Idaho
Calif.
Total
19,479 18,633 18,336
4,794 4,757 4,526
3,504 2,943 2,351
1'500
*f50°
1,853 1,775 1,936
1,564 1,657 1,663
1,831 1,764 1,713*
1.500
1,670 1,700 1,660
29,277 27,833 26,713
1,793 1,749 1,856
* 1,745 in S.W. Idaho.
SOURCE:
3.31
HAC records.
36,069 33,067 35,540
7,496 7,882 7,527
6,414 5,191 4,027
2,505 2,550
2,490
52,504 46,690 49,584
1,700
1,660
1,710
21,150(1*9*)
18,275(1414*).
31,902(614*)
28,061(55*)
25,1*79(1*8*)
25,215(1*5*)
27,933(51*)
68-69
69-70
73-714
W69-70 to a8te . Iotol ^
FAS, USDA.
56,100(28*)
55,1*00(27*)
1*9,500(214*)
1*3,700(22*)
1*1,800(20*)
1*5,900(21*)
1*9,700(21**)
51,300(22*)
51*, 800(21*)
57,000(23*)
55,900(23*)
57,600(21**)
Production
Difference
Unacc.
plus or
(Minus)
1,1*10(2*)
2,730(5*)
7,700(Ll4*)
6,110(11*)
(2,170) (-I,*)
i/
1414,696
1*2,783
1*1,683
l*5,8Ul
1*9,890
5i,i6U
51*,108
56,365
55,350
*Less
°
'•
"
"
•» •
»
•«
»
'<
«
than 1*.
265,000
2145,1*00
2UU,300
238,100
230,600
221,300
210,100
206,100
207,000
202,800
II
II
II
II
It
II
It
II
»
203,100(100*)
208,1*00 «
Production 1/
World
Total
23,058(71**)
22,1814(71*)
21,597(67*)
22,502(67*)
20,9140(614*)
22,1415(66*)
21,7714(63*)
23,3914(63*)
21,701(62*)
23,085(69*)
1/19/77
Table U
9,060(29*)
10,U66(33*)
10,915(33*)
11,776(36*)
11,588(314*)
12,955(37*)
13,5814(37*)
13,1411(38*)
10,365(31*)
8,288(26*)
Hops
Net Usage
Foreign
1,000 Its.
U.S. Hops
Net Usage
U.S.Brewery Usage
125,300(147*)
1114,500(1*7*)
117,000(148*)
116,900(149*)
107,000(51*)
112,1*00(50*)
106,900(52*)
lll*,l*00(55*)
108,300(52*)
iio,6oo(5l**)
111*, 200(56*)
116,500(52*)
53,875(100*)
Product.
Stocks
2,770(5*)
(710)(-2*)
1,090(3*)
(150)(-*)
290(*)
Salable
Domestic
J^- ^ ^ ^ ±
(1,778)(-3*)
2,505(14*)
1,71*9(3*)
(2,257) (-I4*)
(8l)(-*)
1,056(2*)
107(*)
(1,051*) (-3*)
1,111(2*)
1,335(3*)
1*0,100(20*)
38,600(18*)
149,200(21**)
1*8,500(214*)
50,100(2U*)
58,900(27*)
53,1*00(25*)
66,900(28*)
81*, 900(32*)
73,900(30*)
71,1*00(29*)
63,1*00(27*)
Increase o r
(Decrease) in
Production
Other
World
-1,000 lbs.-
W. Germany
Production
—1,000 lts.-
le53 ^
21,701(38*)
23,085(1*1*)
23,058(1,3*)
22,l81j(50*)
21,597(51*)
22,502(5U*)
20,9140(146*)
22,1.15(1*5*)
21,77l*(l43*)
23,39b(1*3*)
U.S. Hops 3/
Usage of
., . „
Net Domestio
Jf>E>onr.
.-,.„
...
SOURCE:
SRS,
FAS and. HAC
records.
y
77-78
7U-75
75-76
70-71
71-72
72-73
2l*,50l4(51**)
26,936(50*)
21,887(1^9*)
1,661
1,51*0
1,51*7
1,656
1,718
1,728
1,71*1*
1,759
1,71*2
1,871
1,721
1,711*
iJTs.
U.S.
Disposition of Salable Production
1,750
1,660
1,670
1966-67
67-68
1,700
1,610
l,5oo
1,670
1,700
Exports
75 1,770
76 1,960
—2Z_
71*
73
1,710
1,660
1,550
1,560
1,8U0
1,590
1,830
Calif.
1,700
1,730
70
71
72
65
68
1,950
1,810
.1,810
1,71*0
1,860
1,51*0
1,61*0
-Pounds-
Idaho
1,670
1,550
1,700
1,470
1,660
1,510
1,560
1,680
67
1,810
1,780
1,830
1,1*50
1,U30
1,1*90
l.Wo
1,250
1,670
66
1,710
1,790
Ore.
1965
Wash.
Yield per Acre
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE 30MMITTEE
U.S. World Production - 1965 to Date
Fire Loss.
1/
56,979
55,913
57,774
(3)
(%)
93%
93%
85%
75%
None
8,286
11,155
9,060
10,466
6,945
All
91%
63%*
7596*
70%
77%
84%
86%
91%
80%
82%
85%
92%
13,646
12,266
13,055
14,294
33,720
42,170
50,400
95%
93%
95%
14,161
12,485
11,000 4/
79.3
83.0
84.9 2/
32,000 3/
75.7
71.4
65.3
56.0
50.0
46.7
45.9
47.2
46.3
((f)
4/ Projected by HAC at January 1976 Marketing Policy meeting.
over 1971 which uould be a new all-time record.
_3/ 4 mill. lb. increase estimated primarily as result of shorter than average 1976 European crop or slightly
45,138
46,419
49,050 2/
25,681
32,461
36,631
41,457
25,672
22,701
20,659
21,305
$25,937
($1,000)
Total
Value
1/19/77
Table 4-A
25,215
27,933
24,504
31,902
27,969
25,479
2/ Assuming one half as much increase in season average price as last year*(1.9$ inc.).
100%
100%
100%
Decline in Acreage Cycle in Latter 1970s
27,950
30,120
28,770
30,280
Rise in Acreage Cycle in Early 19703
22,140
24,710
27,480
26,770
27,660
27,581
26,936
21,887
21,150
18,275
(1,000 lbs.) (1,000 lbs.)
Decline in Acreage Cycle in Latter 1960s
45,863
49,663
51,309
54,769
(2)
56,060
55,418
49,498
43,733
41,763
(1)
Exports
Price
Imports
Avell.
Sal.
Stocks
(1,000 lbs.XlfOOO lbs.)T%)
Prod.
1/ Based on HAC estimate of January 1, 1977.
1976-77
1977-78
1978-79
1974-75
1975-76
1973-7.4
32,400
32,100
31,000
27,700
28,900
29,700
31,400
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
32,700
32,200
29,800
28,400
27,000
Acreage
1965-66
1966-67
1967-68
1968-69
1969-70
(begin Sep. 1)
Year
Mktg.
Seas.
Ave.
Base
Act.
Base
Begin
SELECTED STATISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH THE:
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Table $
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Y/im.ue of
Season Average Farm Price by States—1968 to Date
Production
Crop Year
Oregon
Wash.
Average
Calif.
Idaho
All States
—$1,000—
i
1968
1969
1*8.0
52.0
58.0
69.0
1973
1*6.5
5o.o
55.0
6U.0
69.0
7U.0
197U
1975
77.0
87.0
67.0
75.0
76.5
8i.o
82.0
86.0
82.6
1970
1971
1972
1*8.0
53.0
58.0
79.0
82.0
1*7.2
5i.o
56.0
72.0
71.1*
75.7
79.3
$20,659
21,305
25,681
32,1*61
36,631
1*1,157
1*5,138
83.0
1*6,U19
65.3
76.0
8U.0
t
1976*
be
52.0
56.0
59-0
65.0
88.0
released 1/28/77.
Le?
f & Stem Content (*)
1969
1.63
2.11*
1.10
.31
1.55
1970
1971
1972
1.87
1.93
1.08
.53
1.63
1.69
1.69
1.70
.60
.39
1973
2.05
1.95
1.75
2.29
1.22
1.02
1.79
1.6o
1.60
1.93
1971*
1975
1976
1.71
1.23
1.32
1.57
1.21*
1.1*3
.71
1.72
.97
.56
.65
1.16
.88
1.21;
1.53
1975 Down & Unharvested Acreag 8
Rounded
Prod, for
Harvest
Actual
Prod, for
Harvest
21,600
5,700
21,603
5,621
Idaho
3,700
3,709
Calif.
1,500
1,535
32,500
32,1*68
Wash.
Oregon
Total
Unharvested
Down 1/ Standing
180
112
1*2
—
—
222
Total
Rounded
Harvested
292 2/
21 ,311
21,300
69 1/
5,552
5,600
27
—
—
—
—
139
Actual
Harvested
361
3.,709
3,700
,535
1,500
32 107
32,100
30,?03
30,900
1
1/ Total down yards were 382 acres (Wash. 759 4 Oregon ±23).
2/ hh Cascades, 21*8 others — total 292
3/ 3 Cascades, 66 others — total 69
1*7
3H7
351
1976 Down and Unharvested Acreage
Total 1976
31,000
31,003
o~i7
1/ 35 acres of down yards that wero harvested."
100 2/
100
2/ *0 acres in Washington and UO in Oregon.
SOURCE: First Table, SRS, USDA; Second Table Grain Division, USDA; Third Table, HAC records.
311*
121*
98
11*
311*
121*
98
11*
12U
98
1U
S. Africa
27.1*
212
212
230
Argen.
26.3
360
639
36O
639
350
380
250
Canada
Hungary
N. Zealand
82,H7
1 Zntr. equals 110.23 lbs. equals 50 Kilos.
80,776 78,921*
19.281*
306',678
9,330
• 31*3,1*1*3
2,1*36,601
_3fcS2li.
1*50
1*50
(7,2*)
2,262,198
361,860
1.0*
(5.5*)
2,281*,528 2,159,682
352,277
1*00
l*5o
5,900
1,800
2,550
9,302
35,500
5,000
6,300
I*, 000
1,600
2,600
5,700
6,953
l*,560
1,800
" 2,550
5,ioo
12,500
5,952
7,660
1*,060
1,800
2,550
trade est.) and "Balance" of "Other" countries (estimated the same as shown for the previous year.}
1973 - Hopfen-Rundschau, Sep. 1, 1975, except latest Gov't Est. for U.S. and Austrl. & Prod. Est. for USSR from FAS.
197U-75 "
"
Sep. 1 & 15,'76 "
"
"
"
» "
"
•»
»
"
" •»
" n
1976 - EEC Commission, Nov. 15, 1976 for IHGC countries. Hectares for "other" countries is assumed same as 1975 and
their production estimate is from 1976 Lupofresh Annual Report except for Romania (Horst Report), Japan (latest
SOURCE:
1 Hectare equals 2.1*71 acres.
Percent change from previous year
Ealance
1,206
OTHER SUB-TOTAL 17,61*2
WORLD TOTAL
8,1,21*3
Switz.
Austria
1,1*27
16,662
11,000
11,000
800
800
800
Romania
1,1*27
16,662
1*1*, 1*60
11,000
11,000
7,032
11,000
11,900
21*0,000
202,800
227,100
1,955,520
11*,397
16,239 • 16,500
1,932,251 1,797,822
38,500
1,371*
12,000
1,371*
Japan
6TI7567
1,200
1,211
57,280
1*3,681
63,601
1,069
1,080
1,200
1*1,1*60
U.S.S.R.
IHGG S.TOT.
Bulgaria
Austrl.
Belgium
21*0,300
1*8,900
1*5,396
32,000
30,000
50,000
53,000
1*6,000 •
92,000
52l*,122
180,000
160,700
11,300
1*5,596
93,532
57,280
51*,7U0
1*7,071*
1*3,817
3U,002
165,1*1*6
507,239
218,721*
516,910
151,175
20U,o56
10l*,200
1*5,686
51,075
53,171
l*i,i5o
1975
5757000
11,300
1*96,861
206,000
208,91*9
110,91*0
50,796
61*,536
448,110
1*3,11*0
1*0,000
1*2,260
61*67752
6707B2I*
12,61*0
1,550
27.5
7697555
270937155
30.0
1975
1,220
62,262
1,030
1,000
2,305
1,81*1
2,200
12,51*6
9,810
5,917
3,71*3
WIST?
1975
1,220
6U,lll*
2,1*09
1,81*1
1,11*6
2,197
9,659
6,1*10
3,829
20,212
12,991
197T"
Production (Zentnera)
1975"
1971*
1973
973
9,351
6,568
U,079
2,1U1*
2,539
1,81*7
1,162
1,180
13,112
207im
1971T
Yield Per Hectare
1/19/77
Table 6A
l,C.6o
1,11*0
France
Spain
2,1*92
1,890
1,21*9
2,093
6,769
U,012
E. Germ.
Poland
9,001
Eng.
Yugo.
20,039
12,707
1973
U. S.
Czech.
Country
K. Germ.
Hec tares
WORLD HOP ACREAGE. YIELD & PRODUCTION
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
202,911
200,751
change from previous year
199,597
1*1,172
52U
776
1*1,172
195,021
306
21*2
35
3,526
1,579
521*
776
306
21*2
35
3,526
1,977
890
1,579
1,977
890
3,395
3,395
27,922
27,922
1,338
50
50
1,261
9U3
1,111
1,221
969
1,110
37,857
268,581*
(7.2*)
21*9,362
33,805
2,126
281
281
1,028
650
198
1.0*
251,823
38,831
3,916
50
281
656
81*1*
1*1*8
198
1,378
1,213
(5.5*)
238A062
39,888
11
11
11
11
"
11
n
11
it
11
1976 -EEC Commission, Nov. 15, 1976 for IHGC countries. Acreage for "other" countries is assumed same as 1975 and
their production estimate is from 1976 Lupofresh Annual Report except for Romania (Horst Report), Japan (latest
trade est.) and "Balance" of "Other" countries (estimated the same as shown for the previous year )
3,913
1,213
1,213
551
691*
1*1*1
176
287
1*1*
26,1*55
1*,901
1,819
196,171*
1,213
775
562
503
198
3,307
l*,2l*l*
212,992
25,033
l*,8ll*
1,025
1976
63,382
57,771*
19,81*1
17,711*
10,11*1
5,81*2
5,071
5,511
3,528
. 1,790
6,311*
6,031*
5,189
l*,830
3,71*8
5,001*
10,310
71,513
55,913
2!*, 110
18,237
1975
22,355
l*,570
568
575
628
1,587
2l5i557
766
31*9
1,213
1,312
26,1*88
5,390
230,727
1,323
1*,755
l*,l*09
l*,658
5,303
. 5,599
7,111*
22,707
23,032
12,229
73,91*5
56,979
16,661*
22,1*93
11,1*86
5,036
5,630
5,861
1*,536
5,026
6,311*
81*, 829
51*, 769
1,321*
1,161 1,186
1,1*29 1,257
577
61*7
1*15
1,611
6U*
1,363
611*
1,1*1*1*
91*7
603
1,288
1,386
1,338
1,765
890
1,211
1,096
1,075
1,51*8
1,1*18
897
591*
1,31*1*
818
1,212
1971*
1973
Production (1,000 lbs.)
i/iq h i
Table 6-B
for U.S. and Austral. 4 Prod. Est. for USSR from FAS.
1,229
71*3
780
31*5
868
1,161
1,1*29
798
£1*7
1,895
591*
866
716
1,300
611*
1,351
2,110
535
1,281*
1,580
1,721*
1,011*
1,11*1
1,706
1,1*31
1,776
1,163
1,090
1,151
951
897
1,010
1,301*
1,861*
1,1*32
1,71*2
721
1976
1975
1,388
1,11*0
1,161
1,1*29
61*7
886
669
1,239
1,517
6ll*
1,1*07
81*9
1,1*68
1*96
1,231*
1,083
1,155
1,136
1,51*1
1,1*87
1,761*
1,021
1,377
1,1*83
1,759
197U
Per Acre (lbs.)
1973 - Hopfen-Rundachau, Sep. 1, 1975, except latest Gov't Est
197U-75 "
"
Sep. 14 15, '76 ••
"
"
«
SOURCE:
Fercent
WORLD TOTAL
1*3,366
2,980
Other Sub-Tot. 1*3,593
Switzerland
Balance
Austria
Scuth Africa
Argentina
Now Zealand
35
2,861
939
618
Hungary
568
306
21*2
35
1,977
895
91*6
51*1
815
306
21*2
1,977
865
Rcmania
Canada
3,515
31,233
158,1*25
3,015
2l*,2l*l
11*, 621
9,21*9
5,1*36
5,696
l*,5l*9
2,51*5
2,1*71
2,l*0i*
3,015
153,8h9
1,71*5
31,000
32,100
23,867
15,839
9,1*61
5^1*29
5,953
l*,5l*9
2,832
2,619
2,817
1,713
16,622
1*9,91*1*
3,830
31,233
Yield
1973
1*9,850
32,1*00
23,106
1976
1975
Acreage
1971*
16,726
16,230
9,911*
10,079
5,298
5,172
6,158
6,271*
l*,561*
I*,670
3,086
2,871
2,916
2,565
2,61*1
2,992
2,669
2,965
157,158
159,51*5
•
Japan
L .S .S »R.
ihgg s.tot:
Bulgaria
Australia
Belgium
France
Spain
Poland
E. Germany
England
Yugoslavia
22,21*1
1*9,516
31,1*00
W. Germany
U.S.A.
C2ech.
1973
Country
WORLD HOP ACREAGE, YIELD & PRODUCTION
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
12
U. S. ADMINISTRATUVE COMMITTEE
TaWe 7
U.S. IMPORTS OF HOPS AMD HOP EXTRACT
BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN BY MARKETING YEAR (SEPT. 1 -AUG. 31)
1/19/77
Imports of Hods - Monthly
Marketing
West Germany
Year
(1976-77)'
Yugoslavia
Belgium
France
Total
Others
3^,1*76
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
206,616
10,028
196,588
36,1*761
March
April
May
June
July
August
Total
Annual
Imports of Hops
6,861
7,21*1*
8,520
7,51*9
8,639
9,255
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-71*
?,088
197U-75
——(1,000 lbs.)-
2,891*
2,711*
3,515
3,696
119
305
113
533
1*90
796
51*9
3,233
58
57
3,583
3,596
39
73
811
801
662
ZM1
Ik
1x8/1
Imports of Hop Extract (Hop Squiv.) - Annual
55
366
10,1*63
11,12c
13,631
12,251
13,01*5
305
11*,1L
1*61*
11*,]
736
!>0ii2— -J2M
692
1*00
Conversion
Factor
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
2.8-1
3JU-1
3.U-1
0
0
5
35
0
0
0
0
0
6
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3(U. K.)
2(0. K.)
5
1971-72
1972-73
2.7-1
2.7-1
5
0
1973-71*
197U-75
3.5-1
3.5-1
11*9
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
1
12ZSrZ6_
2*5=1—
T»tal Imports - Annual
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-71*
197U-75
1975-76
Uotfii—
SOURCE:
6,866
7,279
8,526
7,561*
8,61*1*
9,U0l*
9,091
8,201*
2,891*
2,711*
3,515
3,696
119
533
305
1*90
113
3,233
58
57
3,583
3,596
2,677
39
73
71*
1SJ
-0—
--0-
Q.
11
id
55
366
695
10,1*61
ii,i5|
13,f
796
51*9
1*02
811
310
13,o5|
801*
662
1*80
1*61*
737
ii*,;
m,i*
12,1'
USDA Hop Market News Reports (Monthly) and Bureau of Census (Annual).
1,01*9
12,2c
13
Table B
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
1/13/11
.. q HOP EXPORTS, VALUE OF EXPORTS AND IMPORTS AND TRADE BALANCE
U. b. Hur HAr
1969-70 TO DATE
Exports_
Mkt. Yr.
Canada
Begin. 9/1
Hops
1969-70 (Final)
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
197U-75
1975-76
2,229
2,658
2,187
2,813
2,425
3,350
3,203
1976-77 thru Nov.1,091
1975-76 "
"
322
Europe
:Orig.
U.K.:E.C._ :Other: Total
1970-71
"
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
"
1974-75
1975-76
"
"
1976-77 thru Nov.
1975-76
"
:Total
Other
Total :Value
B8
29
750
782
287
33
136
371
1 704
2 929
•SI,000
6
1
2,697
4,393
12,252
5,177
1,320
1,565
3,398
7,321
7,535
7,033
8,418
11,500
9,667
5,940
12,247
14,586
21,472
16,408
15,245
14,582
12,541
796
578
1,778
1,219
1,026
. 4,088
2,458
708
672
431
339
938
1,065
2,245
2,330
2,728
2,493
2,699
3,383
1,773
2,917
3,863
4,282
2,924
3,038
4,398
157
69
702
669
860
905
1,435
,908 4,594
,726 2,669
540
342
188
611
32
493
1,190
3,074
46
532
130
283
612
872
301
162
327
919
77
62
2
230
43
4
14
349
452
87
173
575
1
50
89
66
18
3
70
610
1,533
1,554
:Favor.
:Trade
-.Exports :Imports :Bal.
-1,000 lbs.-
Hop Extract
1969-70 (Final)
:Net
:Total
:Value
808
Total (Hops & Hop
Equiv. of Extract)
1969-70 (Final) 2,229
244 3,513 1,347 5,104
1970-71
"
2,658
240 3,e91 2,547 6,678
1971-72
"
2,187
755 8,560 7,075 16,391
1972-73
"
2,813 1,403 4,080 3,889 9,372
798 2,828
1973-74
"
2,425
437 1,593
909 1,796 2,752
1974-75
"
3,350
47
J.975-76
"
3,493
185 1,410 5,086 6,681
1976-77 thru Nov.1,095
J.975-76 "
" 1,067
546
922
263
859
588
2,327
851
10,942
15,168
13,324
15,784
20,226
19,113
17,780
3,676
3,367
18,275 514,469 $10,900
24,504 20,398 13,400
31,902 29,220 11,600
27,969 26,901 12,529
25,479 26,546 17,192
25,215 25,920 17,718
27,933 26,625 16,616
$ 3,569
6,998
17,620
14,372
9,354
8,202
10,009
7,098
5,285
Extract Conversion Factors
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
3.4-1
3.4-1
2.7-1
2.7-1
1973-74
1974-75
1975-76
3.5-1
3.5-1
3.5-1
Note:
Totals may not agree with additions of individual items because of rounding.
SOURCE: FAS, except Extract Conversion Factors from USDA Hop Market News.
li*
U. S.
u. S. EXPORTS
HO P
ADMINISTRATIVE :0MMITTEE
BY COUNTRIES AND REGIONS OF DESTINATION ( 1,000 lbs.)
197U-75
Hops
Belize
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
512
512
M
a»M
Panama
3,350
3,51*5
(3)
(2)
3,203
876
57B9F
1/Total Ten
77
3,1*72 (2)
5,569 (1)
1,31*1
1,1*18
1*,079
"" k
5
1
3
2
12
18
6
38
11
115
57
59
20
130
39
1
16
21
5
2
39
7
105
1*2
252
81
121
1*
1*21*
8
6
132
135
616
w»
__
—
101*
35
11*3
11
—
—
1
,
238
71*
12
8
116
"" 1*9
62
1*6
1
177
76
51
1*1*3
127
8
1
—_
56
317
23
398
135
21*
1*9
22
Bolivia
Brazil
219
119
60
2,292
21*2
1*6
512
59
2,881
Chile
Colcmbia
Ecuador
155
31*
Gvyana
Paraguay
19
27
1*1*0
1*8
Venezuela
193
Switzerland
Other Eur. Sub-Tot.
36
1,372
991*
1*,766 (1)
162
90
319
9,061*
21*6
109
1,039 (7)
233
179
1,996
29
6
102
20
7
35
1
89
159
130
313
1,369
——
—
8
188
Czechoslovakia
USSR
2,023
E.Eur. Sub-Tot.
2,211
__
—
—
1*7
11
188
2,211
357
3,13? (3)
258
1,889 (5)
250
21*
39
988 (8)
158
1*2
11
109
172
81
711
3,302
1,302
7,859
15
SI
11*7
2
1*2
__
1,269 (6)
1,269
21
21
•-•*
"l36
161*
191*
H*
98
I83
507
1,592
363
2,862
681
rmmm
„
im
—«
565
2,023 (1*)
u
261*
h35
21
l*
38
1
—..
1,01*9 (6)
301
33
20
76
86
100
1*2
311
26
7
—
—
97
97
1,61*8 (5)
31
13
21
U.K.-N.Ireland
Norway
Spain
12
221
W. Germany
Austria
11*
171*
—
Italy
EC-9 Sub-Tot.
2
1*,262
Belgium-Lux.
Netherlands
2
1*61
85
13
Uruguay
France
Ireland
539
16
U5
Argentina
S.Am. Sub-Tot.
9,0liT
29
U
Peru
Top
Extract
7
—
Carrih. Sub-Tot.
Hops
1*
78
Barbados
Jamaica
Trinidad
Ten
1-
—
Cent .Am. Sub-Tot.
1975-76
Top
1/Total
—
1
Nicaragua
Haiti
—
S,103
N.Am. Sub-Tot.
Don. Rep.
Extract
3,350
1,753
Canada
Mexico
Table 9-A
1/19/77
1,206
11
38
5
19
16
57
599
"~559
1,805
559
1,206 (7)
2,555 (1*)
3,761
15
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Table 9-B
1/19/77
U. S. EXPORTS BY COUNTRIES AND REGIONS OF DESTINATION (1,000 lbs.)
Continued-
197U-75
Angola
Hops
Extract
2
59
5
—
Cameroon
Dahomey
—
Ghana
71
—
21*2
190
51
1*2
1*7
2
5
168
562
_—
Bangladesh
Hong Kong
—
Indonesia
20
1*
700
_211*
337
256
7
10
1
12
35
110
2
19
19
9
1*
25
11
51*
5
588 (9)
2
11
"i*61*
71
192
925 (9)
17
"6TB"
17
78
273
153
I7S53
12
3
7
21*
—
1
773
21*
~~857
26
60
37
220
51*
5
13
161*
1*1
.
22
26
27
17
5
United Arab Emirates —
GRAND TOTAL
1*2
5
21*9
1*20
1,805
Top
1/Total Ten
6
700 (8)
90
Pakistan
Asia-Oceania Sub-T .
110
11
21
355
—
—
—
7
77
Extract
—
—
Israel
Philippines
Singapore
__
—
Australia
Japan
Korea, Rep. of
Malaysia
6
8
11*
5
Liberia
Mauritius
Sierra Leone
Tanzania
Zaire
Africa Sub-Tot.
1975-76
Hops
—
—
Mozambique
Nigeria
Rep.-S. Afr.
Top
1/Total Ten
10
572 (10)
11*1*
10
"83
31*2
132
1*63
15
51*
13
"877
155
2
17509
12,51*1
U,398
27,933
2
—
819
281*
H*,582
3,038
1,813 .
25,215
1/ Natural Hop Equivalent with extract converted at 3.5-1.
Note: Totals may not agree with addition of individual items because of rounding.
SOURCE: Hop Market News, Grain Division, AMS, USDA.
(10)
16
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Table 1C
1/19/77
HOPS
ANALYSIS OF PRECEDING FOUR CROPS
1973
1974
59,270
BASE
, Allotment Percentage
• Reg. Allotment
Special Fuggle Allot.
1975
-1,000 lbs.—
59,270
59,270
92%
1976
1977
59,270
59,270
100%
100%
100%
54,528
1,000
59,270
59,270
59,270
1,000
1,000
1,000
TOT. ALLOTS. POTENT. AVAIL.55,528
60,270
60,270
60,270
Reg.Allots.Not Produced
Spec.Fug.Allot.Not Used
Allots. Lost by Fire
Net Allots. Available
-2,092(4%)
- 113(11%)
- 688
-3,429(6%)
- 538(54%)
-4,707(8%)
- 106(10%)
-
285(29%)
-
-
-
912
52,635
56,249
Res. Used to Fill Defic.
0
Res. Sold Normal Outlets
54
55,232
0
1,473
225
116
-3,041(5%)
56,032
• 98
0
20
0
ALLOTS. & RES. ACTUALLY
AVAIL.a % SUCH IS OF BASE 54,108(91%) 56,365(95%)
55,350(93%) 56,032(95%)
RECONCILIATION WITH USDA
; Reserves Not Sold
in Normal Outlets
0
540
343
938
Fire Loss
688
54
225
912
Unacc.
(27)
Diff.
Sub-Total
TOTAL CROP (USDA)
(5)
20
(108)
661
614
563
1,742
54,769
56,979
55,913
57,774
PROD. IN EXCESS OF ALLOT.
(RESERVES)
Used to Fill Deficiencies
RESERVE POOL HOPS
Sold
Balance far Sale
SOURCE:
1,473(3%)
0
656(1%)
0
461(1%)
96
1,473
656
363
1,473
116
20
0
540
343
Hop Administrative Committee records.
938(2%)
0
938
0
938
1,000
17
U. S. HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
Table 11
SUPPLY AND DISPOSITION 1971»-72 TO DATE
(In 1,000 lbs.)
L971-72
SUPPLY
Carryin
30 120
Imports
49 B90
268
Stocks 1/
Salable Product7 2/
1972-73
28 ,770
51 ,164
13 ,055
1973-74
"30,280
54,108
14,294
,969
98,682
92 278
Toti3l
92
DISPOSITION
1975-76
1976-7
33,720
56,365
14,161
104,246
42,170
55,350
12,4,65,
110,005
50,40
35,112
33,132
27,933
56,03
-
Carryout Stocks 1/
34 003
31 902
2B 770
Balancirlg Item
(2 397)
Brewery Usage
Exported
Toti3l
Hopping
1/19/77
1974-75
34 ,729
28 061
30 280
(81)
92 ,989
92 278
42,170
1,749
104,246
110,005
.238
.222
.20*»
.243
.248
Ratio
36,978
25,479
33,720
2,505
98,682
25,215
50,40flN
BREAKDOWN OF BREWERY CONSUMPTION AND EXPORTS
(In 1,000 lbs.)
Mktg.
Ext. Convers.
Factor 3/
Year
Dom.
1967-68
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
1974-75
1975-76
1976-77
Export
2.7-1
2.8-1
3.4-1
3.4-1
3.8-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.8-1
2.7-1
2.8-1
3.4-1
3.4-1
2.7-1
2.7-1
3.5-1
3.5-1
4.2-1
3.5-1
Exports
Brewery Consumption
As Hops
28,549
26,862
26,330
25,134
23,937
23,598
26,355
29,245
28,257
As
Extract
[Hop Equiv.)
2,695
5,201
7,087
7,582
10,066
11,131
10,623
5,867
4,675
Total
As Hops
31, 244
32, 063
33, 417
32, 716
34, 003
34, 729
36, 978
35, 112
18,015
16,976
12,247
14,586
21,472
16,360
15,245
14,582
33, 11?
12,541
BREAKDOWN OF FORM IN WHICH CARRYIN (SEPT.
Tota
As Extract
(Hop Equiv. )
21,88
3,872
4,174
21,15
18,27
6,028
24,50
9,918
31,90
10,430
11,701
28,06
25,47
10,234
25,21
10,633
27.93
15,392
1 STOCKS) WERE HELD
(In 1,000 lbs. - Not available prior to 1969)
As Ext.
Sept.
As Dry Hops
F03'eign
7 840
a 080
9 960
10, 640
1
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
10, 740
.11, 450
12, 200
14, 320
Domestic
Pellets
Domestic
(Hop Equiv.)
*
13,410
11,660
12,190
9,530
9,640
11,990
14,660
17,890
Domestic
Sub-Total
Domestic
*
6,610
—
—
—
—
3,920
8,060
10,310
20,020
19,870
20,160
18,130
19,540
22,270
29,970
36,080
8,210
7,970
8,600
' 9,900
6,360
7,250
7,880
Totol
Re;serves
27,860
27,950
30,120
28,770
30,280
33,720
42,170
50,400
—
—
—
—
—
—
540
860
1977
•May occasionally
includsi
minor quantities from foreig n
cc
untries.
1/ Brewer, dealer and grower stocks as of Sept. 1.
2/ Production less fire loss and reserve hops not sold in normal outlets.
—
reserve hops sold.
Includes
3Y Beginning Jan. 1, 1972, Domestic Conversion Factor is based on actual pounds of hops
used in production of extract as reported by Treasury Dept.
Export Conversion Factor|
is based on USDA Hop Market News Service.
SOURCE:
"Selected Hop Stat.," C&MS-FV, October 1970, Hop Market News Reports and
HAC records.
xo
May 1977-The BREWERS DIGEST
150,425,858: the total for 76
ANEW INDUSTRY record
of 150,425,858 barrels in
taxable removals
of malt
beverages was achieved in 1976.
This figure represents an increase of
1,782,073 barrels, or 1.2 per cent,
over calendar year 1975, the pre
vious industry high.
Packaged beer sales increased by
1.5 per cent over 1975 to 132,169,-
746 barrels, which is 87.9 per cent
of total sales. Draught beer sales
decreased by 0.9 per cent to 18,256,112, which is 12.1 per cent of
total sales.
Ten of the 20 states and group
end place. Texas, Colorado and
California were in third, fourth and
fifth places, respectively.
Percentage of Taxable Removals
ings showed increases over 1975,
Each Month for Calendar Year*
with Texas leading the way with a
1976-1975
gain of 3,142,739 barrels. The larg
est decrease was in Missouri — by
2,235,461 barrels.
Three of the six geographical
areas reported increases in 1976,
led by the West South Central area's
25.6 per cent gain. The largest de
crease was recorded in New England
— 16.9 percent.
Wisconsin continued as the sales
leader, representing 15.7 per cent
of total national taxpaid removals,
and the Ga., Ky., N.C., Va. and
Tenn. grouping remained in sec-
January
Februaiy
March
April
May
June
July
August
Scpiember
Ociober
November
December
TOTAL
California
Colorado
Florida
Illinois
Indiana
Louisiana
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
New Jersey
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Washington
Wisconsin
(Barrel!)
%
Difference
220,920
2.3
9,495,047
11,910,986
1,772,147
14.9
7,219,258 -911,285 -12.6
3,612,724
516,245
14.3
1,331,684 -230,896 -17.3
978,746 -182,200--18.6
586,228
24.6
2,379,628
12.7
724,425
5,699,628
3,238,241
204,257
6.3
10,540,531 --2,235,461 --21.2
7,721,334 -505,132
6.5
6,658,011 --1,162,076--17.5
6,689,179 --1,160,022 --17.3
7,540,382
686,916
9.1
10,607,074
3,142,739
29.6
157,582
5,845,390
2.7
4.2
22,595,048
957,788
9,715,967
13,683,133
6,307,973
4,128,969
1,100,788
796,546
2,965,856
6,424,053
3,442,498
8,305,070
7,216,202
5,495,935
5,529,157
8,227,298
13,749,813
6,002,972
23,552,836
In Barrel!
In Bottles
100.0
100.0
That Were Packaged and Draught
by States and Groupings
% Pickajed
% Drautkt
Wisconsin
87.4
91.7
91.4
90.4
92.6
92.9
86.9
90.1
82.1
89.3
82.0
79.9
82.1
80.9
94.4
85.4
86.8
12.6
8.3
8.6
9.6
7.4
7.1
13.1
9.9
17.9
10.7
18.0
20.1
17.9
19.1
5.6
14.6
13.2
California
Colorado
(Quantities in Barrel s>
Difference
7.5
6.6
7.8
8.8
9.0
9.7
9.9
9.3
8.4
8.0
7.1
7.8
Percentage of Total Taxable Removals
State
(By States and Grouping:0
Total Re
movals 1975
.
7.2
7.3
7.3
8.6
9.0
9.5
10.0
9.9
8.9
8.1
7.0
7.2
Calendar Year 1976
CALENDAR YEARS 1975-76
Total Re
moval! 197S
1975
%el
Total
1>7i
%•(
Total
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TAXABLE REMOVALS
state
13
and Cans (1976) and Kejs (137S)
Florida
Illinois
Indiana
Louisiana
Maryland
Michigan
8,494,719
12,542,520
5,763,047
3,731,521
1,019,443
740,322
2,577,272
5,789,481
2,824,846
7,414,566
5,917,937
4,393,766
1,221,248
1,140,613
544,926
397,448
81,345
56,224
1,102,169
Iowa. Neb., Ariz.,
Ore., Hawaii
86.8
13.2
4,539,509
989,648
1,567,860
N.H., Mass.,
Conn., R.I.
82.8
17.2
N.C., Tenn., Ga.,
Ky., Va.
90.5
9.5
87.9
12.1
6,659,438
12,985,330
5,128,786
20,435,276
388,584
634,572
617,652
890,504
1,298,265
764,483
874,186
3,117,560
Minnesota
Missouri
New Jersey
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Washington
TOTAL
lo.. Neb..
Ariz., Ore.,
Hawaii
N.H., Mass.,
Conn., R.I.
N.C., Tenn.,
1,731,397
1,788,391
3,310,678
3,983,009
18,738,717
18,809,494
-3.2
1,503,239
228,158
-672,331 --16.9
2,742,820
567,858
16,965,908
1,772,809
-56,994
Ga., Ky.,
Va.
State
150,425,858 148,643,785
Total
Total Taxable Removals by Breweries
in Order by Leading States
and Groupings (1976)
-70,777
1,782,073
-0.4
1.2
132,169,746
18,256,112
Wisconsin
N.C., Tenn. Ga.
Ky., Va.
Texas
Colorado
California
Missouri
Materials Used at Breweries
Pennsylvania
CALENDAR YEAR 1976
New Jersey
Michigan
(Pounds)
Malt and malt products
Corn and corn products
Rice and rice products
Wheat and wheat products
Barley and barley products
Sorghum grain and sorghum grain products
TOTAL GRAIN
Soybean and soybean products
Sugar and sirups
Hops
Hop extracts
Other
GRAND TOTAL
4,194,271,187
1,663,452,151
675,500,062
—
21,188,134
—
6,554,411,534
1,900,643
376,613,234
23,332,133
4,887,489
—
6,961,145,033
Florida
Washington
Ohio
New York
Illinois
Minnesota
N.H., Mass.,
Conn., R.I.
Maryland
lo.. Neb., Ariz.
Ore., Hawaii
Indiana
Louisiana
Total of the
United Slates
Barrels
% of Total
23,552,836
15.7
18,738,717
13,749,813
13,683,133
9,715,967
8,305,070
8,227,298
7,216,202
6,002,972
5,529,157
5,495,935
4,128,969
3,442,498
12.5
9.1
9.1
6.5
5.5
5.5
4.8
4.3
4.2
4.0
3.7
3.7
2.7
2.3
3,310,678
2,965,856
2.2
2.0
1.731.397
1,100.788
796,546
1.2
.07
0.5
150,425,858
100.0
6,424,053
6,307,973
19
MBA Special Report:
In 1976, America's Malt Beverages
Topped 150.4 Million Barrel Mark
By Stan Vlantes
THE
BICENTENNIAL
YEAR
has come to a close, and all the
summer's hot dogs, pop corn, bar
becues, chili, cole slaw and potato
salad did not do a great deal to
help move the brewing industry's
overall sales performance up very
much. With a year-end tally of
150,475,000 barrels, the gain was
just about 1.2 percent for the
domestically produced malt bev
erages. When one adds up the
performance of imported malt
beverages with about a 42 per
cent increase over 1975 for a total
of approximately 2.3 million U.S.
barrels, the 1976 figure for all
malt beverage products moves up
to 152,775,000 barrels. A similar
1975 total would be 150,267,000
barrels.
Of the domestic figure, the
nation's top ten producing organi
zations, who operate 43 brew-
eries, accounted for 85.9 percent
of the total. A decade earlier, the
top ten of that year accounted for
62.9 percent. Brewers in that 1966
top ten not included in last year's
list were Theo. Hamm Brewing
Co. and Associated Brewing Co.
The 1976 top ten includes in their
place The Stroh Brewery Co. and
G. Heileman Brewing Co.
Indicative of the trend in the
Seventies for large new brewing
Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.
Miller Brewing Co.
Pabst Brewing Co.
Adolph Coors Co.
Olympia Brewing Co.
The Stroh Brewery Co.
F. & M. Schaefer Brewing
G. Heileman Brewing Co.
Carling National Breweries
Falstaff Brewing Corp.
C. Schmidt and Sons, Inc.
Genesee Brewing Co. (est.)
Pearl Brewing Co.
Rainier Brewing Co.
Erie Brewing Co.
Peter Hand Brewing Co.
measure of stabilization which o<
curred with costs. Packaging cos
vary from brewer to brewer, d
pending in degree on how eac
organization manages to fabricafc
and purchase its packaging re|
quirements. No U.S. brewin
organization is fully self-sufficienl
in providing packaging needs]
The basic brewing materials hav
facilities, it must be mentioned
had steep cost increases in re|
that
Anheuser-Busch,
Inc.
brought its Fairfield, Calif, brew
ery on stream late last year; the
cent years, but this past year di<
not follow that pattern. Malt bar
ley, hops, rice and corn had sig
nificantly good crops in 1976 s<
that price pressures did slacke:
off. The full impact of labor cost
arrived at through new contract
in 1976 has not yet been made. A,
this report is being written, th
nation's fifth ranking brewery
Adolph Coors Co. is still negoti
Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. com
menced operations of its new
brewery in Baldwinsville, New
York; and Miller Brewing Co.
began commercial shipments
from its new plant in Fulton, New
York, while' breaking ground for
its fifth brewery, located in Eden,
(Continued on MS-12\
North Carolina.
1976 Sales
Brewer
The Bicentennial Year was
nervous one when one looks at th|
1975 Sales
31-Gal. Barrels
31-Gal. Barrels
29,051,000
24,162,000
18,403,000
17,037,000
13,665,000
6,370,000
5,765,328
5,300,000
5,210,000
4,311,767
3,950,000
3,402,000
2,500,000
1,318,000
932,000
247,940
234,972
35,100,000
23,279,000
12,862,000
15,669,000
11,950,000
5,577,000
5,133,370
5,880,755
4,535,000
4,100,000
n.a.
Gain or Loss
Barrels
- 6,149,000
883,000
5,541,629
1,368,000
'
1,715,000
793,000
631,958
580,755
675,000
211,767
Gain or Loi
Percentage
-17.0^
4.0"]
43.11
8.71
14.41
14.01
12.31
9.9?
14.9^
4.9°j
—
—
3,330,000
2,200,000
1,400,000
880,000
262,228 '
72,000
300,000
- 82,000
52,000
-14,288
275,000
- 40,028
2m
13.6°J
-6.1°J
6.0"J
-5.8°J
-17.0°J
Compiled and copyrighted by Modern Brewery Age 1977. Subject
to final revision for the 1977 MBA Blue Book. Reproduction by any
means expressly forbidden without permission from the publisher.
MS-10
Modern Brewery Age, February 14, 19771
20
) \t
passed away last November 12/ >
America's Malt Beverages.
Robert
(Continued from MS-10)
leadership at a time when sales
ating wage and benefit improve
ments for about 1400 employees.
It is 20 years since a strike was
called by employees at Coors.
The overall cost of goods sold
last year by brewers was higher
not only because of a general in
flationary hike of nearly five per
cent in the economy. There was
also a flattening of consumer de
mand, particularly in the last
quarter, which appeared to block
year-end price increases which
sidiary can-producing company,
Metal Container Corp. did very
well in 1976 and a second plant is
expected to begin production in
Columbus, Ohio, this summer. A
would "ride" with the inflation
new malt plant in Moorhead,
Minn., went into construction last
year and will, upon completion in
late 1978, combine with the
Manitowoc, Wis., plant to supply
about 30 percent of AnheuserBusch's annual malt require
ments. Real estate and railway
operations had a good year, but
rate.
the St. Louis National Baseball
In historic terms, the two major
developments in 1976 were the
13-week
strike
at
Anheuser-
Busch, Inc. which led to a decline
of some 6.1 million barrels under
Club, Inc. did not.
On-stream operation in Decem
ber of the new 3.6 million barrel
brewery in Fairfield, Calif., brings
the number of plants up to 10. The
new facility is expected to sub
stantially reduce shipping costs in
the 1975 figure; and the sharp
gain of 5.5 million barrels, or 43
percent, to a record 18,403,228
barrels shipped by Miller. As for
the factor of "questionable pay
the Pacific market where A-B will
ments" in the marketplace,effects
on companies involved do not
The Classic Dark draft beer
went national in 1976 as did the
appear to have reached "adverse"
levels as the year closed.
Wounded Eagles Don't Cry
now have about 7,000,000 bar
rels in capacity.
seven-ounce Michelob bottle,
Mich VII, and the seven-ounce
Budweiser in selected southern
With a 1976 total of 29,051,000
and eastern markets. While only
barrels, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. did
rumored in 1976, Anheuser-Busch
sustain a substantial adverse ef
Natural Light bowed in after New
Year's and is expected to comple
ment the company's malt bever
age brand range. Right after New
Year's, the company raised
freight-on-board prices about one
fect on sales and earnings be
cause of its insistence on holding
on to important management
responsibilities. While beer sales
account for about 90 percent of the
company's revenues, the other
business operations of the world's
largest brewing organization re
quire a few comments. Of the
three Busch Gardens, the Tampa
and Williamsburg facilities had
percent.
In his closing remarks of the
successful seasons with record at
year-end report, President August
A. Busch, III, said, "Despite
lower earnings in 1976, AnheuserBusch is in a strong financial posi
tion. Our cash position at year-
tendance. The Los Angeles facility
end was in excess of S120 million,
has not been a success as an
entertainment center and has
and our ration of debt to total
been run at a loss. At year-end, it
was
announced
that
the
Los
Angeles Gardens would be closed
and converted back to its original
purpose: a beer promotion facili*
ty.
The Industrial Products Divi
sion which produces bakers yeast
and corn syrup products both ex
perienced excellent market posi
tions and profit levels. The sub
MS-12
capitalization was approximately
34 percent." He added that some
$225 million would be spent this
year for modernization and expan
sion. Cash flow from operations
plus the current cash position as
of January 14 were expected to
cover the firm's cash require
ments for 1977.
The Gusto At Schlitz
The man at the helm of the Jos.
Schlitz 'Brewing Co. since 1961
A.
Uihlein
assumed
">
had been in decline since 1952 .'i
(6,347,000 barrels) and he moved V'
with "real gusto" to expand and ' '>
improve the brewery's position.^'-*
The thrust for improvement con->';
tinued with gains each year since', ' -'•
1962 and last year were just shy of;?'.''
quadrupling that old "peak year"-^
figure of 6.3 million barrels.
;
'.;-
Beer sales of all Schlitz brands V;
in 1976 came to 24,162,000 bar- "?•'
rels, up four percent over the '•'
previous year and double that' of {
the general industry sales gain. ;
Eugene B. Peters, president arid >,
chief executive officer, noted that £,•.,
the Jos. Schlitz Brewing Cp.
would continue growing and uti
>
lizing the capacity which should
see the company through until at
least the early 1980s. Peters has
held to an optimistic outlook for.
the company and its autonomy/
Merger rumors surfaced during:
Uihlein's illness and again afte^
his death, but family ownership
dispersed through about 65 per-J
cent of the board's composition?
does not lend substance to such,1r:l
speculation.
>•>'-
In addition to a large share o::[
the most modern brewing capacity '•,':
in the world, the Schlitz organic ;<
zation has increased its own can';/
manufacturing ability to about 60 :\
percent of its needs. In addition to
the brands presently marketed, it*:',
is possible that a new super- \' r
premium brand will join the range :
of products sometime this year. \
There was good news at the
Schlitz organization in that the
company's sponsorship of out
standing sports events such as the
1976 Super Bowl and Olympic
games at Innsbruck and Montreal
were
effective.
Bad
news
de
veloped from the numerous in
vestigations on several govern
mental levels about Schlitz mar
keting practices. The outcome of
these actions cannot be predicted.
Non-brewing activities at
Schlitz account for
about three
percent of the company's billiondollar revenue level. These in
clude the brewers spent grains by
products company, a duck grow
ing and processing company, and
(Continued on MS-14)
Modern Brewery Age, February 14, 1977
21
America's Malt Beverages.
(Continued from MS-12)
the Geyser Peak Winery in Cali
fornia.
A
significant
turnaround
in
base less than 10 years old.
Revenues at Miller Brewing Co.,
he added, came to $982,810,000,
brewer-wholesaler relations took
an increase of 49.3 percent over
place last year. Comments from
the brewery's 950 independent
distributors in different parts of
the country indicate that an
entirely new attitude is prevailing
in the Schlitz marketing depart
1975's $658,268,000. Income in
creased 100 percent from $28,628,000 in 1975 to $76,056,000 last
ment. This is demonstrated best
produced some 550 million units,
fulfilling more than 50 but less
than 60 percent of beverage can
requirements. There has been no
by the better flow of communica
tions from the local level to and
from the headquarters. To this
end, Peters has realigned re
sponsibilities into Western and
Eastern regions and possibly
more later. For this year, the
company expects that the industry
will show about a three percent
gain.
Miller's Outstanding Gains
Following a 41.9 percent in
crease in 1975 shipments over
1974, Miller Brewing Co. last year
showed a gain of 43.1 percent over
year.
By the end of 1976, Miller's
three can manufacturing plants
further comment about the feasi
bility of entering self-manufacture
of glass containers. While Philip
Morris Industrial has strong paper
and packaging material capabili
ties, no other segment of Philip
Morris would have need of glass
containers other than Miller. No
additional comment about Lowen-
hampered by brewing capacity
limitations and strict product allo
cation on all our brands continued
place an allocation procedure on
throughout the year.''
The gain in Miller barrelage
was the largest ever in U.S. brew
ing history and enabled the brew
ing organization to increase its
product during the significant
second quarter. With Pabst Blue
Ribbon sales expanding sharply in
share of the domestic market from
8.6 percent in 1975 to 12.2 per
cent in 1976. Since 1973, it must
be pointed out, Miller Brewing's
parent company, Philip Morris,
Inc., has spent some $385 million
on Miller Brewing expansion and
modernization. For the five-year
period 1977-1981, the company
expects to spend some $600 mil
lion for continued expansion and
modernization of brewing facili
ties. The goal, according to Chair
man Joseph F. Cullman 3rd, is to
have 90 percent of the fixed asset
MS-14
The
acknow
"alternative,"
but
no
further
comment has been made to date
by President Frank C. DeGuire.
The acquisition of the Burgermeister brand from Theo. Hamm
Brewing Co. has added sufficient
production to the Pabst California
plant in Los Angeles for it to
match capacity. Continuing ex
pansion of the major midwestern
markets may yield to increasing
activity not only in the Pacific
states but in the Northeast where
Pabst Blue Ribbon showed gains
of nearly 20 percent over 1975.
Pabst Brewing Co. sales last
year increased 13.1 percent for a
profits for
With 17,037,000 barrels in 1976
our premium brands, Miller High
barrels.
Blue Ribbon Year
accounting for 11.3 percent of the
year's total, Pabst Brewing Co.
closed the year with an all-time
high. The shipments increase of
8.7 percent was more than five
times that of the industry. There
is no question that Pabst Blue
Ribbon is getting the heaviest
amount of corporate attention.
Operating at capacity month after
month last year, Pabst had to
Life and Lite. We were again
million
ledged excellence of Pabst's
financial position (no debt) would
not preclude acquisition of an
other plant, either active or idle.
This approach has been termed an
total of $752,654,000, announced
James C. Windham, chairman
1975 for a new record of 18,403,-
continued strong growth of both of
year. It is expected that overall
volume capability at Pabst this
year will be between 18.7 to 19.3
brau production in the U.S. was
available at year-end.
228 barrels. This placed the
brewer in the third-ranking posi
tion nationally.
According to John A. Murphy,
president, "Our 5,541,629 barrel
gain in 1976 was again led by the
.
areas where the brand had not
been a strong market contender,
the company did not place more
emphasis on its luxury brand,
Andeker.
Expenditures
on
national advertising and network
television focussed on Blue Rib
bon's "Oldtime quality." Last
year's activities also included ex
and chief executive officer.
Net
the year came to
$32,444,000, or $3.79 a share,
against 1975 profits of $20,695,000, or $2.42 a share—an increase
of 56.8 percent. There was not a
significant shift in shares out
standing last year. The weighted
average number of shares out
standing was 8,560,462 compared
to 8,562,237 in 1975. Some finan
cial institution purchases were
noted in 1976.
No report on Pabst would be
complete or equitable without tak
ing note of the company's whole
saler relations. Pabst's President
DeGuire talks with and moves
easily among the company's
wholesalers and has logged con
siderable mileage in order to
avoid confinement at a desk. The
importance of the independent
wholesaler network to Pabst ap
pears to be both fairly and ob
jectively assessed.
tension of restraint on introduc
tion of a Pabst lower-than-usual-
Coors Did Try Harder
calorie malt beverage. There was
versed by the Adolph Coors Co.
last year with the Golden, Colo
rado, brewery setting a new
also an extension of restraint on
any implementation of plans for
new brewery construction. Ex
pansion of existing plant capacity
proceeded in 1976 and into this
A
1975 sales decline was re
record —13,665,000 barrels, or
14.2 percent over the previous
year. Since 1975 was the first year
Modern Brewery Age, February 14, 1977
year. It is expected
America's Malt Beverages.
volume capability at|
year will be between
(Continued from MS-12)
the Geyser Peak Winery in Cali
fornia.
.
A significant turnaround m
brewer-wholesaler relations took
place last year. Comments from
the brewery's 950 independent
distributors in different parts of
the country indicate that an
entirely new attitude is prevailing
million
barrels.
Tr
base less than 10 years old.
Revenues at Miller Brewing Co.,
he added, came to $982,810,000,
ledged
1975's $658,268,000. Income in
creased 100 percent from $28,-
This approach has be<\
an increase of 49.3 percent over
excellence
financial position (no I
not preclude acquisj
other plant, either ad
628,000 in 1975 to $76,056,000 last
"alternative," but
comment has been
year.
by President Frank
in the Schlitz marketing depart
ment. This is demonstrated best
three can manufacturing plants
meister brand from
tions from the local level to and
from the headquarters. To this
end, Peters has realigned re
than 60 percent of beverage can
further comment about the feasi
pansion of the major
Eastern regions and possibly
of glass containers. While Philip
markets may yield
activity not only
company expects that the industry
and packaging material capabili
by the better flow of communica
By the end of 1976, Miller s
produced some 550 million units,
fulfilling more than 50 but less
requirements. There has been no
sponsibilities into Western and
bility ofentering self-manufacture
more later. For this year, the
Morris Industrial has strong paper
will show about a three percent
ties, no other segment of Philip
gain.
Miller's Outstanding Gains
Following a 41.9 percent in
crease in 1975 shipments over
1974, Miller Brewing Co. last year
showed a gain of 43.1 percent over
1975 for a new record of 18,403,-
Morris would have need of glass
containers other than Miller. No
additional comment about Lowen-
brau production in the U.S. was
available at year-end.
Blue Ribbon Year
With 17,037,000 barrels in 1976
The acquisition of]
Brewing Co. has adc
production to the Pal
plant in Los Angell
match capacity. Col
states but in the Noi)
Pabst Blue Ribbon
of nearly 20 percentl
Pabst Brewing Cf
year increased 13.11
total of $752,654,00|
James C. Windlu
and chief executive
profits for the ye
$32,444,000, or $3
brewer in the third-ranking posi
year's total, Pabst Brewing Co.
against 1975 profit;!
000, or$2.42 a shard
tion nationally.
high. The shipments increase of
significant shift
228 barrels. This placed the
accounting for 11.3 percent of the
closed the year with an all-time
of 56.8 percent. ThJ
president, "Our 5,541,629 barrel
gain in 1976 was again led by the
8.7 percent was more than five
standing last year,
our premium brands, Miller High
Ribbon is getting the heaviest
amount of corporate attention.
According to John A. Murphy,
continued strong growth ofboth of
Life and Lite. We were again
hampered by brewing capacity
limitations and strict product allo
cation on all our brands continued
throughout the year."
The gain in Miller barrelage
was the largest ever in U.S. brew
is no question that Pabst Blue
average number ol
standing was 8,560J
Operating at capacity month after
cial institution pv.
noted in 1976.
times that of the industry. There
month last year, Pabst had to
place an allocation procedure on
product during the significant
second quarter. With Pabst Blue
share of the domestic market from
Ribbon sales expanding sharply in
areas where the brand had not
been a strong market contender,
the company did not place more
cent in 1976. Since 1973, it must
Andeker.
ing history and enabled the brew
ing organization to increase its
to 8,562,237 in 197^
No report on Pe
complete or equitat
ing note of the cor
saler relations. Pat
DeGuire talks wit
easily among tr
wholesalers and hd
siderable mileageI
8.6 percent in 1975 to 12.2 per
emphasis on its luxury brand,
on
importance of thJ
be pointed out, Miller Brewing's
parent company, Philip Morris,
Inc.,
has
million
Inc
nas spent
spent some
sumo $385
ww; ""*"»on Miller Brewing expansion and
national advertising and network
television focussed on Blue Rib
bon's "Oldtime
quality."
Last
- - .
ijj
pears to be both
jectively assessed.
modernization. For the. five-year
period 1977-1981, the company
expects to spend some $600 mil
lion for continued expansion and
Expenditures
year's activities also included ex
tension of restraint on introduc
tion of a Pabst lower-than-usualcalorie malt beverage. There was
also an extension of restraint on
modernization of brewing facili
any implementation of plans for
man Joseph F. Cullman 3rd. is to
pansion of existing plant capacity
ties. The goal, according to Chair
new brewery construction. Ex
haw 90 percent of the fixed asset proceeded in 1976 and into this
avoid confinement r
wholesaler networj
Coors Did Try Ha|
A 1975 sales
versed by the AdJ
last year with the
rado,
brewery
record-13,665,001
14.2 percent ove|
year. Since 1975
Modern Brewery Aga
MS-14
22
Changes In 1976's Top Ten From 1967
since 1942 that the brewery came
up with a decline instead of
increase, there was considerable
satisfaction over the rebound in
the company ranks and its inde
pendent distributors. The pre
vious company high was 12,370,000 barrels in 1974.
The year's increase was partic
ularly highlighted by the excellent
fourth quarter, up nearly 16
percent, and the November figure
in
California
which
was
22.8
percent higher than the same 1975
month. The past year was notable
for Coors in that new markets
were opened in Montana and
Washington as well as extension
of markets in Texas to include the
entire state.
With a great deal of attention
paid to the possible entry of Coors
into Nebraska last year, the move
did not take place. It appears
likely that a part of the metro
Omaha market will by mid-year,
come under the operations of the
Coors Distributing Co. with inde
pendent distributors designated
for the rest of the state. The intro
duction
of
Coors
into
Spokane was done through a
brewery operated unit. Peter
Coors, who is a president of the
distributing subsidiary, said four
eastern counties in Washington
are serviced from Spokane. It was
also announced last year that
Coors Distributing purchased
from Ray Lowell the Rayell Co. in
Tustin, California, which accounts
for some three percent of the
brewery's production in the popu
lous Orange County area.
And again we can say as we did
last year that' 'never before in any
12-month period had so many
people in so many diverse sections
of the U.S. consumed as much
Coors."
When William K. "Bill" Coors
became president back in late
1955, the brewery was rated at a
900,000 barrel capacity. With one
-of the longest track records in the
industry at the head of a major
brewery, Bill Coors speaks with
authority about the role of stress
in the daily lives of people. His
life-long study of the subject has
led to the belief that stress is the
limiting factor in everyone's per
formance. Well, last year's sales
Modern Brewery Age, February 14, 1977
1976 Barrel age
29,051,000
24,162,000
18,403,000
17,037,000
13,665,000
6,370,000*
5,767,328
5,300,000**
5,210,000***
4,311,767
Anheuser-Busch
Jos. Schlitz
Miller Brewing
Pabst Brewing
Adolph Coors
Olympia Brewing
Stroh Brewing
F. & M. Schaefer
G. Heileman
Carling National
129,177,095
Totals In Barrels
* Including Hamm's
** Including Piel's
*** Including acquisitions
**** Excludes National Brewing
Gains or Losses
Barrels
1967
15,535,000
10,220,000
4,575,000
13,516,000
13,942,000
13,829,000
6,914,000
9,049,000
3,503,000
3,364,328
449,500
3,900,000
- 604,933
10,123,000
4,616,000
2,866,000
2,403,000
4,850,000
1,310,000
4,916,700*
67,862,395
61,414,700
Compiled in this form from Modern Brewery
Age tabulations and copyrighted 1977. Repro
duction by any means is expressly forbidden
without permission from the publisher.
performance at the brewery
comes out to exactly 15 times
more than that modest 900,000
12-ounce export returnable bottle.
This would be compatible with
Olympia's long-time interest in
barrels back in the mid-Fifties.
multiple reclamation of both glass
The goal is 25,000,000 ... in one
and
At
the
brand.
Olympia, Wash, brewery,
the
Posting sales increases for each
of the five consecutive years since
1971, Olympia Brewing Co. is now
marketing in 26 states, seven
more than it did in 1975. Beer
sales last year were up 14 percent
to a new company record of
6,300,000 barrels (estimated)
is
twice
that
of
1971's
3,094,363 barrels in a 12-state
market.
Robert A. "Bobby" Schmidt,
chairman
and
chief
executive
officer, noted increased accep
tance of the Olympia and Hamm's
brands. "More people in more
markets are trying our products
and apparently they like what they
taste," he said last month.
But a more significant an
nouncement from Olympia's
chairman was the acquisition of
the Lone Star Brewing Co. in San
Antonio. Lone Star's figure, which
in 1975 amounted to 983,000
barrels, is not included in Olym
pia's 1976 report. The San Anton
io brewery, considered one of the
finest breweries of its size in the
world, will continue with produc
tion of Lone
containers.
company operates one
Olympia Expands Again
which
metal
Star brands and
eventually will produce the other
Olympia brands when some physi
cal changes are completed. In the
past year, lone Star has had a
successful package entry in the
market with its "Long Neck," a
of the
largest and most efficient bottle
recycling plants in the country.
While Lone Star's easternmost
market can be identifies as Ten
nessee, Olympia and Hamm's are
still short of the eastern seaboard.
The avowed intention of "going
national" was made known by
Olympia several years ago. It is
the only West Coast brewery ever
to expand its market over the
Rockies and into the Midwest.
With the St. Paul and San Antonio
plants established as Olympia—
style plants, the setting for "vig
orous eastward growth" would
appear complete.
The latest development at
Olympia came right after New
Year's when the brewery's light
beer entry, Olympia Gold, with
half the calories of its regular
Olympia Beer. Test marketing is
going on with a broad media
support. According to Schmidt,
the new brand is an important and
integral part of our future expan
sion plans." The chief executive
estimates the light beer market
has doubled in the past year and,
at the beginning of 1977, consti
tuted about five percent of the
overall malt beverage market.
Stroh Gains Markets
The Stroh Brewery Co. moved
into seventh from eighth position
(Continued on MS-16)
MS-15
23
America's Malt Beverages.
Cleary, president. For example,
about 90 percent of the advertis
ing budget centers on the three
(Continued from MS-15)
nationally with a record sales year
of 5,765,328 barrels. Peter W.
Stroh, president, said this was a
12.3 percent increase over 1975,
of 631,958 barrels. Well ahead of
the industry trend which flattened
out last year under previous
annual increases, Stroh expanded
its marketing area to 16 states
move into the new operating
headquarters in Queens, New
York; and we have effected the
transition to our new plant and
distribution configuration without
significant loss of market share or
major disruption to customer
service."
Schoen
attributed
the
lower
its on beverage containers. (See
barrelage shipments in the first
hald to production limitations
created by the early closing of the
Kent Avenue plant in Brooklyn.
With the modern facility in Penn
sylvania able to increase produc
tion, Schoen indicated that Schae
fer brands will "begin anew a
vigorous exploitation of our mar
kets," citing a favorable product
November 29, 1976, Magazine
Section) The defeat of the con
price promotions."
plus the District of Columbia. New
urban markets last year included
Baltimore, Maryland, and St.
Louis, Missouri. The first eastern
seaboard
market
was
in
the
Tidewater area of coastal Virginia.
In the latter part of last year,
Stroh's was involved in the Michi
gan referendum on forced depos
and market mix with "minimal
tor of the National Center For
Resource Recovery as well as
chairman of the
U.S.
Brewers
Association. A post-election sur
vey-indicated that the ' 'gut issue''
in Michigan was "litter" and the
real issues of energy and resource
utilization did not gather the
public attention the issue merited.
Last month (January) Chairman
Stroh was elected to a third term
as chairman of the USBA.
Schaefer's New Stance
Heileman On The March
Showing a hefty 14.9 percent in
crease of 675,000 barrels over the
1975 figure of 4,535,000 barrels,
the G. Heileman Brewing Co.
moved from tenth to ninth posi
tion nationally. Most of the
strength -shown was in its Old
Style, Blatz and the additional
Grain Belt which was not included
in
1975
activity
with
Jacob
Schmidt.
More than $7 million was
devoted to extensive moderniza
tion and improvements at Heile
man plants last year including the
barrels as its 1976 figure, the F. &
M. Schaefer Brewing Co. was
down 9.8 percent from its 1975
total of 5,880,755 barrels. But the
major plant in La Crosse. With
completion of the La Crosse
expansion, Heileman's overall
capacity will exceed seven million
barrels annually. This develop
decline was not the major news at
ment could lead to a
Schaefer in a critical year of
marketing effort for the highly
regarded Heileman Special Ex
port which has been hampered by
lack of capacity.
With an estimated 5,300,000
change and re-structuring for
greater efficiency.
As described by William J.
Schoen, president and chief oper
ating officer, "A number of major
goals have been accomplished.
We achieved two new competitive
labor contracts—for two years at
Lehigh and three years at Balti
more; we brought our new pack
aging lines at Lehigh into opera
tion in late June, on schedule and
on budget; we have completed our
MS-16
Heileman
has
man "reached" the Pacific Coast
late last year with the definitive
purchase agreement with the
Rainier Brewing Co. in Seattle.
Completion of the transaction was
expected to take place in February
and includes certain real estate
and other assets related to the
brewery
operations.
Rainier's
1976 sales came to 932,000 barrels
which is just about 90 percent of
capacity. The price was reported
to be $7 million in cash. Rainer
will be operated as a separate
entity and retain Allan B. Fergu
son as chairman and Edwin S.
Coombs, Jr., as president and
chief executive officer.
sumer's free choice of containers
in Michigan was felt as a keen loss
by the Stroh organization because
the company president is a direc
brands mentioned above plus
Special Export.
Continuing its march toward
full scale national impact, Heile
renewed
succeeded
in
expanding annual sales for 15 of
the last 16 years. While acquisi
tion of other breweries has been
an on-going venture for the La
Cross organization, the marketing
effort has been highly selective in
positioning brands so that they
become positive factors in the
profit mix, according to Russell G.
Cleary made it clear that whole
salers are very much part of the
picture. ' 'I am particularly im
pressed with the strength of the
Rainier wholesaler organization
(119 independents in eight states)
and consider it most important to
the future sales success of Rain
ier. Heileman will honor the
Rainier Wholesaler Appointment
Agreements or would offer the
Heileman Wholesaler Appoint
ment Agreement to Rainier
wholesalers. It is expected that
some Heileman brands will be
brewed at the Seattle plant as
early as March or April. In turn,
Rainier brands may be brewed at
Heileman's St. Paul plant.
The Rainier negotiation does
not close out acquisition possibili
ties for Heileman, Cleary indi
cated, but no further comment
was offered. He also pointed out
late last summer that the brew
ery's non-brewing operations ar
growing and are profitable. These
include six regional bakeries in
four states, and a producer of
precision metal parts for jet
engines. Gottfried Heileman
founded the company in 1853.
Carling National's First Year
Formed in late 1975 with the
National Brewing Co. and Carling
Brewing Co., the new Carling
(Continued on MS-41)
Modern Brewery Age, February 14, 1977
America's Malt Beverages.
(Continued from MS-16)
National Breweries, Inc. rounded
out its first full year of operations
under the direction of Jerold C.
Hoffberger. The combination
made sense to the managements
of both companies because of the
cross-fertilization
of
individual
Danish supervision, Leif Pagh
Rasmussen from Copenhagen,
Peter Codd, production vice presi
dent
from
Baltimore
and
the
respective brewing teams at the
four breweries.
More American Breweries Too
45, Malt Duck and Arizona's A-l
barrels. Still not audited (at this
the U.S. for the bottom line effect.
Sales in 1976 came to 4,311,767
While we had a "not available"
figure for 1975 sales figures at
Falstaff Brewing Corp., the brew
ing organization has responded
for 1976 with a tally of 3,950,000
time in January, 1977), the taxpaid sales barrelage comes from
the new president, Joseph E.
Griesedieck, Jr. in San Francisco.
Changes in Falstaff manage
ment were announced in October
of last year by Paul Kalmanovitz,
who acquired the firm in early
1975 and has directed operations
up to the October announcement.
He will take active
interest
in
implementation of policies and
operations, but the new chairman
is Nicholas Schleifer, nationally
barrels. This was an increase of
renowned
211,767 barrels, or 4.9 percent
many years service ith Falstaff,
over the 4,100,000 barrels of the
who has been in San Francisco
since 1973. Vice chairman is John
1975 combined figure. Brand
breakdowns were not given.
There is no question that Carl
ing National is digging the turf for
a difficult period in which the
specialty-premium concept will
prove valid or invalid. For this
year, the Tuborg Gold emphasis
moves out boldly to production in
four of the Carling National plants
including Phoenix. First brewed
in the U.S. by Carling in 1972,
Tuborg has been limited in market
reach. The new emphasis in nine
Western states is backed by
master
brewer
with
Strauss, whose experience with
Falstaff's Narragansett Brewing
Co. goes back several decades. He
became
Technical
brewery since the legendary
"Papa Joe" Griesedieck of preWorld War I days.
The changes include Lauren
Gregg to vice president and the
election of Bud Miller to Falstaff
brewery assets. While Carling
produced anywhere from 60 to 70
percent of its brands in the
regular price range, National
already had strong market iden
tity with such specialties as Colt
Light Pilsner Beer. Carling's
strategy with U.S.-brewed Tuborg
took a decidedly strong turn last
year with a revamped package
design more closely identifiable
with the original Danish design
and termed it Tuborg Gold. The
overall strategy at Carling Na
tional is not really to win a
barrelage race, but more in the
area of expanding its share of the
specialty and premium market in
21*
manager of Falstaff's Pacific
Region when Kalmanovitz ac
quired the firm, Joe Griesedieck is
the fourth of his family to head the
director
and
later vice president in charge of all
brewing operations at Falstaff
until 1975 when he retired and
scaled down his work to that of
consultant. Strauss also enjoys a
national reputation as a brewer
among brewers.
President of Falstaff at the age
of 32 is not a formidable task for
Joe Griesedieck Jr.
Marketing
secretary.
Former
Chairman
Kalmanovitz indicated that he is
giving up personal management
of Falstaff because he now feels
that the organization is "charted
on the right course."
Schmidt Does A Number
When the Beer Can Collectors
of America convened for their
Bicentennial convention in Phila
delphia last September, the prize
souvenir was the specially made
Schmidt's of Philadelphia Bicen
tennial Can which quickly became
a super-memento of the event.
So 1976 was a good year for C.
Schmidt and Sons, Inc. Sales were
up two percent for a total in all
brands of 3,402,000 barrels. June
and July were the heaviest sales
months in the company's history,
and new one-day shipping records
were being set almost in regular
sequence.
While demand for Schmidt's
has surfaced in California from
time to time because of its "Coors
taste test" advertising campaign,
Schmidt's products are marketed
in 18 states and the District of
Columbia; north and south from
Maine
to
Florida
and
west
to
Kentucky. About 90 percent of the
production from two plants (one in
Cleveland) is Schmidt's of Phila
delphia. (See separate story in
this Magazine Section).
Watch for weekly reports in
Modern Brewery Age for changes
and up-dates on brewing industry
events. Figures for several other
prominent brewing organizations
do not appear as a matter of their
choice. Our news columns are
intended to serve the entire
brewing and distributing indus
tries. Organization and company
news announcements are always
welcome.
Modern Brewery Age, February 14, 1977
MS^1
Jl
...
25
Jan. 28, 1977
Number 249
HOP ECONOMY LAGS
Except for nature's kindness, which resulted in the biggest U.S.
crop in 16 years, the 1976 slow-down in the hop economy would have "been
more conspicuous.
The crop was 3-3% larger than in 1975 and the dollar value
($48.1 million) was 3-6% greater. The average price inched up only
slightly, to 83.3 cents a pound from 83 cents in 1975- These are U.S.
Department of Agriculture figures.
It was the smallest price increase since 1967. Annual gains
since that time have averaged 4# cents.and never.were less than a cent •
a pound. But in 1976 Oregon and Calif6-rnia growers actually lost a
full cent, to 85 in Oregon and to 87 in California. ,Idaho growers
gained nearly 2 cents' a pound, to 84)*.. Washington growers- gained _.
one-half cent, to 82)6.
But the cost of growing hops"rose nearly % from Sept. 15, 1975,
to the same date in 1976, if the USDA parity index is used as a .
measurement. To keep pace, the hop price average should have climbed .
to 87 cents.
Or, if it had•risen by the average rate of the past. .
10 years, it would be nearly 88 cents.
The difference totals more than t-2 million hop growers did not
receive.
CONVENTION
COMBINES
Despite those numbers and some ominous information about
- this year's water supply, growers and their associates and
WORK, FUN- .. guests faced the future squarely last week at the 21st
'annual convention in Yakima.
As Joe Dougherty of Olympia-
Brewing Co. expressed it, "I was once again impressed with the quality
and abilities of the growers and the vigor of the industry." .
The Hop Growers of America board moved, ahead with plans to host
the International Hop Growers Congress for the-first time. Probable
dates are Aug. 11-13 and Yakima is the likely site. It will be a
western-style affair, different from anything the delegates from..
12 countries:have experienced in IHGC conclaves.
A peak crowd of 504 at the "Happy Days" beer party proved that
Yakima's new Convention Center is none too large, and christened the
dance floor with typical hop growers1 vigor.
Hop Administrative Committeemen set the salable again, at 100%
and declined to lower the price, of the reserve pool.
Under a new
chairman, Pete Rooney of California, HAC based plans on.an optimistic
prediction that U.S. "brewers will increase their hop consumption to
35)6 million pounds during the 1977 marketing year, and that expor.ts
will'rise and imports will fall.
.....
Recognizing the importance of greater efficiency and new •
machinery, growers voted to contribute 12 an acre toward further
development of a mechanical twiner. HAC appointed a subcommittee to
study an HGA request for continuing research on hop drying. Research
scientists, active participants throughout the convention, shared with
growers economic concerns over such developments as higher alpha
varieties.
. The trend toward beers with less hops is not unanimous, reported
Fritz Maytag, president of Steam Beer Brewing Co., San Francisco.
26
U. S~ HOP ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
April 1, 1976
GROWER ALLOTMENT BASES AND ANNUAL ALLOTMENTS 1/
EFFECTIVE FOR 1976 CROP YEAR
GROWER
WASHINGTON
ALLWARDT, MONA M. OR CARL DENNIS (c/o MONA ALLWARDT)
ANDERSON, RAY
BATALI RANCH, INC. (c/o JOSEPH & GENE J.)
BATES, K
P.
BB - BC HOPS, INC. (c/o BENNETT BRULOTTE)
BEIAIRE, VICTOR W.
BOISSELLE RANCHES, INC. (c/o RICHARD A.)
BRULOTTE, ARNOLD 0.
BRULOTTE FARMS (ROLAND E., RONALD L. & RICHARD D. d/b/a)
BRULOTTE, HERVY
BRULOTTE (LAWRENCE) RANCHES, INC. (c/o LAWRENCE)
BRULOTTE, LLOYD J.
BRULOTTE, LYLE J.
BRULOTTE, RICHARD D.
BRULOTTE, ROIAND E.
BRULOTTE, RONALD L.
BRULOTTE, STANLEY H.
ALLOTMENT BASE &
ANNUAL ALLOTMENT (100%)
(Lbs.)
214,729
33,238
67,231
80,334
268,948*
209,383
451,265
401,602*
223,544
182,630
21,000*
455,499*
380,000
114,000
674,079.
161,002
200,000.
BRULOTTE (STAN) FARMS, INC. (c/o STANLEY H.)
300,782*
CARIBOU RANCHES, INC. (c/o William L. Schilperoort)
150,876»
CARPENTER & CARPENTER (THOM. D. & THOMAS JR. d/b/a)
81,381
CARPENTER, THOM D.
CARP-LAND COMPANY (THOM. D. CARPENTER d/b/a)
CHAMP0UX, ALAN
CHAMPOUX BROS. (MARVIN & JOSEPH T. d/b/a)
CHARRON COMPANY, INC. (c/o SEBASTIAN CHARRON)
CHARRON, EDGAR
CHARRON, JOSEPH E*
CHARRON, ROBERT
240,111
45,618
236,887
294,022
170,511
130,465
403,124 «
36,500
CHARRON, SEBASTIAN
470,719 •
CHARVET, BEN L.
442,604 •
CHARVET (EDWARD) ESTATE (c/o FRANCES CHARVET)
132,409
CHARVET (EMILE) ESTATE (c/o VIOLET CHARVET)
138,386
CHARVET, ERNEST W.
CHARVET, EUGENE P., JR.
145,544 •
136,395
•These growers had retransfers effective April 2, 1976. See last page for such grower*•
base for 1977 as of April 6, 1976. Further transfers for 1977 crop authorized thru 3/31/77.
28
ALLOTMENT BASE &
GROWER
WASHINGTON (CONT'D.)
ANNUAL ALLOTMENT (100%)
(Lbs.)
HEARRON (E.T.) CO., INC. (c/o THCM. D. CARPENTER)
294,097.
HEFFLINGER RANCHES, INC (c/o LEE HEFFLINGER)
251,741
HERKE & SON (CARL J. & JOSEPH d/b/a)
HOGUE RANCHES, INC. (c/o WAYNE HOGUE)
81,469
679,092
HOLLINGBERY, 0. E., JR.
55,085.
HUBERDEAU, ALBERT
43,825
IMPERIAL HOP FARM (c/o JAMES W. ORKNEY)
167,309
KORESKI, MICHAEL J.
262,909
L & R FARMS, INC (c/o RONALD MCDONALD)
289,755
LAURENT, RICHARD W.
31,506
LENSEIGNE, ALCIDE R.
138,029*
LENSEIGNE, ALCIDE R. & ALFRED F.
116,735.
LENSEIGNE, ALFRED F.
208,572
LENSEIGNE, IDA
95,994
LENSEIGNE, LAWRENCE
158,900.
LENSEIGNE, PAUL
155,094
LENSEIGNE, WALLACE
B. T. LOFTUS RANCHES, INC (c/o LEOTA MAY LOFTUS)
LOFTUS, LEOTA MAY
48,893
225,786
60,797
MCDONALD, DANA., JR.
120,860.
MCDONALD, DAN SR.
179,556
MCKELHEER, JOSEPH D.
184,541
MIERAS, VERN M.
45,718
MORRIER, ALBERT
38,021
MORRIER RANCH, INC (c/o JOSEPH R. MORRIER)
231,129.
MORRIER, NINA E.
57,390.
NEWHOUSE, ALBERT
23,000
NEWHOUSE, ALFRED R.
65,809
NEWHOUSE FARMS (c/o MELVIN, ALFRED, ALBERT, JOHN & WAYNE)
877,488
NEWHOUSE, IRVING
133,952
NEWHOUSE, JOHN
155,500
NEWHOUSE, MELVIN
80,213
NEWHOUSE, WAYNE
50,000
OASIS FARMS, INC (c/o WILLIAM A. ROY)
411,603
ORKNEY FARMS, INC (c/o JAMES W. ORKNEY)
109,130
ORKNEY, JAMES W.
350,740
PATNODE HOPS, INC. (c/o ELIE PATNODE)
406,982
29
-
4
ALLOTMENT BASE &.
GROWER
WASHINGTON (CONT'D.)
ANNUAL ALLOTMENT (100%)
(Lbs.)
PERRAULT FARMS, INC. (c/o BERNARD PERRAULT)
492,919 *
PERRAULT, FRANK
128,466 •
PERRAULT, WAYNE
92,000 •
PUTERBAUGH, R. MARTIN
•
267,851 •
REGIMBAL & REGIMBAL (ALAN F. & lAURENT d/b/a)
470,398 •
RIEL, DONALD P.
227,497
RIEL, JEROME 0.
98,353
RIEL, LEONARD F.
173,469
RIEL, LEONARD W.
66,813
RIEL RANCHES, INC. (c/o RONALD J. RIEL)
ROBILLARD, LEO
258,000
36,896
ROONEY HOP RANCH (WM. L., DONALD A., FRANK J. & MRS. T. L. (d/b/a)
171,731
ROY, ALCID
326,737
ROY FARMS, INC (c/o LESTER W. ROY)
1,121,391 .
ROY, GERALD S.
24,000
ROY, LESLIE A.
24,000
RUTHERFORD, JOHN H.
753,658
ST. MARY, CHARLES P. (JIM)
244,391
SALI, KASPER
159,372
SAUVE, IRVIN J.
328,190
SAUVE, LOUIS
358,706
SAUVE, MICHAEL L.
65,814
SCYMANSKI, PETER
923,146 «
SEGAL, JOHN B.
401,333 .
SEYMOUR, NICHOLAS
SHINN & SON (HARLAN L. & EDWARD L- d/b/a)
SIMCOE HOP RANCHES, INC. (c/o WM. GASSELING)
89,680 *
539,991 •
60,135
STRAUSZ, DAVID A.
390,107
SUN RANCHES, INC. (c/o JAMES W. ORKNEY)
238,403
SYBOUTS, GERALD F.
291,912
TOBIN (L.&H.) BROS., INC (c/o LAWRENCE K. & HENRY J.)
227,344
TOBIN, LAWRENCE K.
120,430
TOBIN, LEONARD
WYCKOFF FARMS, INC (c/o CLIFFORD D. WYCKOFF)
YAKIMA CHIEF RANCHES (DAN ALEXANDER d/b/a)
YANCEY, MARVIN
YOUNG, ISABELLE & JOHN
74,034
758,830
1,848,763
196,974
34,127
30
- 5 ALLOTMENT BASE &
GROWER
OREGON
ANNEN BROS., INC (c/o JOSEPH H.)
B. C
ANNUAL ALLOTMENT (100%)
(Lbs.)
374,419 *
FARMS (BRUCE & CHARLIE DAVIDSON d/b/a)
35,000 *
BERNING, LOUIS G.
300,270
CAPITOL FARMS, INC (c/o ROGER A. KERR)
232,770 *
COLEMAN FARMS, INC (c/o JOHN F. & WILLIAM A.)
227,239
COLEMAN, JOHN F.
98,495
COLEMAN RANCH, INC. (c/o ROBERT T. COLEMAN)
225,627
COLEMAN, STEPHEN D.
15,000
COLEMAN, WILLIAM A.
97,688
CROSBY HOP FARMS, INC. (c/o E. W. CROSBY, JR.)
371,155 *
DAVIDSON, JAMES E.
150,940 *
FINNEY LAKE FARM (DONALD C
& CARL W. WEATHERS d/b/a)
108,781 *
FOBERT, FRANK & BILL
206,725 *
GESCHWILL, FRED, HENRY J., & WM. J.
271,552 *
GOSCHIE, HERMAN
344,163 *
GOULET, HOMER L.
262,632
GOULET, PHILLIP H.
162,184
GREENLEAF HOP FARM, INC. (c/o DONALD F. COLEMAN)
119,789
HORSESHOE LAKE FARMS (JAMES N., SAM, DAVE & JACK SMITH d/b/a)
355,487
JOHNSTON, CHARLES R.
47,304
KERR HOP RANCH (ROGER A. KERR d/b/a)
117,012 •
KING, MELVIN A.
KIRK HOP FARMS, INC (c/o RICHARD C
135,029
KIRK)
353,781 «
LEAVY, JOSEPH
MISSION BOTTOM FARMS, INC (c/o DONALD C
50,967
WEATHERS)
P-M RANCH, INC. (c/o PHILIP E. WOLF, JR.)
226,117 *
162,745
R D FARMS, INC (c/o RAY DAVIDSON)
39,107
SAN SALVADOR FARMS, INC (c/o CARL EUGENE SMITH)
97,116
SANTIAM FARMS, INC (c/o KENNETH & RONALD KREBS)
160,455
SCHWABAUER FARMS (KENNETH AND L. J. SCHWA3AUER d/b/a)
63,601 »
SERRES, ADELA & JOSEPH SERRES ESTATE (c/o ADELA SERRES)
456,051
SMITH, JOHN W.
142,512
STAUFFER BROS. (NORMAN & ROBERT d/b/a)
518,126
SUNNYBROOK HOP YARDS, INC. (c/o CHARLES IATHROP)
526,313
VALLEY HOP FARMS, INC. (c/o ROBERT T. COLEMAN)
271,367 «
WEATHERS, G\RL W.
183,737 •
WILMES, WILFRED
50,358
31
ALLOTMENT BASE &
ANNUAL ALLOTMENT (100%)
GROWER
(Lbs.)
IDAHO
ENROSE FARMS, INC. (c/o VERNON M. BATT)
464.989 •
GEM HOP COMPANY (HAROLD J. BATT d/b/a)
461,808 •
GOODING FARMS, INC (c/o FRED GOODING)
458,082 •
GREENLEAF FARMS, INC (c/o ROBERT M. BATT)
484,975
NOTUS HOP CO., INC (c/o VERNON M. BATT)
215,176 *
OBENDORF, BERNARD
181,120 •
OBENDORF, ORVILLE
120,000
R & M HOP COMPANY, INC. (c/o MAX SCHLOTTMAN)
363,952
RIM RANCHES & R & D, INC. (c/o RAY OBENDORF)
905,571 •
SUN VALLEY FARMS, INC. (c/o CHAS. C
509,334
KELLEY)
SUTER FARMS, INC (c/o LAURA SUTER)
482,816
WILDER FARMS, INC (c/o DONALD R. BATT)
481,840*
WILDER HOP COMPANY(WENDELL C
381,824*
BATT d/b/a)
CALIFORNIA
ROONEY BROS., INC. (c/o PETER M. & EDWARD T.)
388,978
ROONEY, F. L., INC (c/o F. L. & BERNARD J.)
220,071
SIGNOROTTI, GEORGE W.
260,704
WESTERBERG FARMS (P. F. ESTATE & MIKE d/b/a)
332,990*
CALIFORNIA -
GOLDEN GATE HOP RANCHES, INC. (c/o A. C
CALIFORNIA -
1/
For information only.
IDAHO
ZUCCHI, SSS, INC.)
WASHINGTON -
JOHN I. HAAS, INC (c/o FREDERICK J. HAAS)
TOTAL ALL STATES
WASHINGTON -
OREGON -
2,235,604*
IDAHO
5.302,557*
59,269,877
Growers must qualify for their 1976 annual allotments by
completing and returning, not later than May 1, 1976, the annual allotment applica
tion mailed to each grower having an allotment base.
32
HOP BREEDING
Exchange of Germplasm
Germplasm distributed in 1976:
A large amount of diverse hop germplasm was
distributed in 1976 to various domestic and foreign cooperators (Table 1).
Columbia (USDA 21040) and Willamette (USDA 21041) were released in early spring
and a limited amount of planting stock was distributed to various growers. The
bulk of the increase during the 3rd year of commercial planting came from the
two-acre trials at 4 commercial locations in the Willamette VaUey.
The other
increase was contributed by a commercial propagator hired by the Oregon Hop
Commission.
Triploid males for commercial evaluation were planted at several locations
in the Willamette Valley (Goschie, John I, Haas) in Oregon and Washington.
Another group of triploid nearly sterile males from the 1970 crosses (Cr. 7008,
7009 and 7010) was also planted in Oregon (J. I. Haas, Alluvial Ranch) and in
California (Singorotti Ranch) for evaluation of flowering date and cone size
stimulation under commercial conditions,
Sufficient propagules of USDA 21091,
an early triploid Fuggle type, were supplied to Ken Schwabauer, Hubbard, Oregon
to plant a 2-acre plot for commercial evaluation and trial brewing of hops
begining in 1977.
Fred Netter, root propagator received a small amount of
prunus free Bullion rhizomes (USDA 21056) for increase under contract by the
Oregon Hop Commission.
High alpha selections from the 1970 nursery (crosses
7005, 7006 and 7007) were sent to C. E. Zimmermann; Prosser, WA. and Dr. R.
Romanko; Parma, ID. for evaluation under field conditions.
Dr. Berry, 0SU
Entomologist, received propagules of hop genotypes such as Cascade, Fuggle,
Comet, Yakima Cluster and several triploid males and females for mite studies.
Various foreign researchers (Dr. Neve; Wye College, England; Dr. Wirowski,
Poland; Dr. Wagner, Yugoslavia and Dr. Bhat, India) received propagules of
recently released hop varieties notably Comet, Cascade and some mildew resist
ant males (USDA 64032, 64033, 64037).
June 9
J.I. Haas Inc, Alluvial
C. E. Zimmermann, ARS, USDA, Prosser, Wa. 99350
March 9
"
"
"
3
3
7
7005-122
194
7006-74
96
273
296
311
339
378
"
"
"
7
7
7
2 pc.
April 1
J.I. Haas Inc, (Dr. Rigby), Box 1441,
21056
7005-194
7006-74
296
311
339
392
7007-162
120 pc.
April 15
Fred Netter, Aurora, Or.
21091
6 pc.
1500 pc.
April 15
Yakima, wa. 98901
21040
21102M
21100M
21105M
4 pots 21100M
21102M 21103M -21104M
21105M
21106M
21107M
7008-03M
38M
40M
99M
7009-57M
500 pc.
19 pc.
23 pc.
20 pc.
Variety & Amount
Ken Schwabauer, Rt. 1, Box 241, Hubbard, Or.
Farm
March 15
June 9
Herman Goschie, Rt. 1, Box 350
Silverton, OR. 97381
(Don Kirk, Manager)
Date Sent
Hop Germplasm distributed in 1976.
Recipient and Address
TABLE 1:
i
ii
it
n
ti
H
ii
H
it
ii
high rt
II
H
H
ii
ii
H
line
high <* line
prunus free Bullion, increase
early Fu type triploid female, yield test
i
i
i
i
ii
ii
i
ii
M
H
i
i
H
ii
H
<
i
M
(6659-17M) potted pi., for BG seedless yd.
(6756-26M) potted pi.,
'
(6769-09M)
(6769-33M)
(6771-06M)
(6775-15M)
(6777-26M)
Columbia, commercial planting
early tripl oid male (potted plants), E
tripl. male , BG background,Late
tripl. male , Late
Reason
L
E
L
L
L
L
L
L
ME
M
M
L
8
April 13
George Signorotti, Rt. 1, Box 107,
Sloughhouse, CA 957683
Idaho.
Dr. Karl Borde, VEB, DDR701, Leipzig, E. *Germ.
Feb. 19
Feb. 9
99350
Dr. C.B. Skotland, IAREC, Prosser, Wa
May 25
March 18
05477
May 6
Hawkeye Institute of Technology, Waterloo, Iowa
Jonathan Schechtman, Richmond, Vt.
of
Jim Benson, Expt. Station, Sandpoint, Univ.
Miami, Florida
April 1
March 9
C. E. Zimmermann, ARS.USDA, Prosser, Wa. 99350
Marvin Florman, State Beverage Co, Box 316
Date Sent
continued
Recipient and Address
TA5LE 1:
II
10 pc.
II
II
10 pc.
20 pc.
5 pc.
ii
12 pi.
12 pc.
8 pc.
2 pc.
56013
62013
21094
21095
21096
56013
48209
21040
21041
56013
51M
7010-23M
57M
7009-13M
99M
28H
40M
38M
17M
7008-03M
06M
09M
7006-382
392
408
445
7007-60
162
206
Variety & Amount
"
Comet,
Cascade, Variety collection
Cluster Sel. for virus testing-
Cascade, for centennial planting
Fuggle, home gardening
Willamette,
Columbia, potted plants
Cascade, hop demonstration
M
•I
H
ii
ii
•I
it
•I
it
ii
ii
Triploid mail
ii
ii
it
H
it
H
high < line
Reason
L
M
E
E
M
M
VL
L
L
VL
"D.I.Haas, Inc. (Dr. Rigby), Yakima, Wa.
Jan. 27
April 9
Jan. 26
March 11
of Idaho
Dr. R. R. Romanko, Parma,, ID
Univ.
Date Sent
Recipient and Address
TABLE 1: continued
II
II
11
11
M
ii
H
M
H
ii
3 pc-
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
M
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
M
II
II
II
30 pc.
50 pc.
30 pc.
21100M
21102M
21103M
21104M
21105M
21107M
7008-17M
38M
7009-13M
57M
7010-51M
21049
21091
7003-243
7004-03
7005-70
72
87
194
201
205
232
7006-61
74
96
273
296
311
339
382
392
445
450
7007-162
206
281
339
Variety & Amount
lines
forBritish Columbia testing
high a
Styrian, for Idaho tests
ea triploid, baby crowns
Reason
tt
49005
March 15
Robt. Coleman, Rt. 1, Box 290, Gervais,
Dr. B. K. Bhat, Sanat Nagar, Srinagar, India
97026
Feb.
Dr. Tone Wagner, Zalec, Yugoslavia
Or.
Feb. 19
Dr. Z. Wirowski, Inst, of Agri.,
24-100 Pulawy, Poland
March 16
19
Feb. 19
Dr. Ray Neve, Wye College, England
Feb. 19
Feb. 10
Dr. R. E. Berry, OSU, Entomology
Paul Todd, Kalamazoo Spice Co.
4313 W. Main St. Kalamazoo, Mi
Date Sent
concluded.
Recipient and Address
TABLE 1:
n
ii
it
ii
5 pc.
500 pc.
10 pc.
II
10 pc.
10 pc.
5 pc.
4 pots
64032M
64033M
64037M
65103
66052
21041
62013
56013
62013
62013
64100
62013
56013
19209
48209
62013
65102
65104
21011
21100M
6769-11
60019M
Variety & Amount
"
"
"
H
H
Pride of Ringwood
E-2
•
Mildew resistant males,
Willamette, commercial plan
Comet, Variety collection
Cascade, Variety collection
Comet,
"
Comet, Variety collection
Bullion, Variety collection
"
Comet,
triploid male, "
triploid female,
diploid WA male,
L-16
L-8,
Yakima Cluster (L-l), "
Comet,
Fuggle,
Fuggle H,
Cascade, mite studies
Reason
37
Germplasm received at Corvallis:
In exchange for hop genotypes supplied from
the USDA program to other hop researchers we received hop varieties from
various foreign countries (Poland, England) as well as from Idaho and
Washington (Table 2).
Dr. Virowski, Poland supplied propagules of two
standard Polish varieties, Lubelska and Nadwislanska; from Wye College we
obtained Wye Target, a virus free high alpha hop cultivar that is being
extensively planted in England at the present time.
Dr. Skotland, Prosser, WA.
supplied rhizomes of Prunus free Brewer's Gold (USDA 21116) which was increased
in the field and in the greenhouse in 1976.
Dr. Romanko, Parma, ID. supplied
24 genotypes from his breeding program for testing under Corvallis conditions.
The more promising selections were planted in a 5-hill plot in our seedless
yard and the remainder went to a 2-hill observation plot in 1976.
data and cone samples will be obtained in 1977.
Detailed
A home gardner and hop fan
from Wisconsin sent us propagules of a Wild Hop that he found near Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.
This genotype will be planted in the germplasm block in 1977.
G.E. Lindsay, 3624 N.54 Blvd.
Milwaukee, WI 53216
Oct. 26
March 25
C.B. Skotland
Dr.
March 30
Feb. 6
Poland
April 27
Dr. R.A. Neve, Wye College
Dept of Hop Research, Ebgland
Pulawy,
Dr. Z. Wirowski, Inst. Agr1.
Experiment Station
Parma, Idaho 83660
Dr. R. R. Romanko
Univ. Idaho
Date
rec'd
ii
hop;Acc.No.21117
Native Wisconsin
Brewer's Gold
Ace.No. 21116
Ace.No. 21112
6 pc.
6 pi.
4 pc.
16 pc.
Wye Target
17 pc.
Lube!ska
Ace.No. 21113
Nadwislanska
Ace.No. 21114
prob. Wild American
prunus free, for increase
collection
Virus free;from meristem culture,for variety
for variety collection
Ha x OP; adv. testing, 2 hOB
58112 x OP adv. testing, 2 hOB
Ha or Ca OP; adv. testing, 2 hOB
EC - OP; adv. testing, 2 hOB
21-26A
14-24A
21-17A
4-4
ii
, 5 hOB
M
•i
ii
ii
H
ii
ii
', 2 hOB
ii
', 5 hOB
ii
ii
ii
ii
BG x OP; adv. testing, 2 hCB
Remarks
Cascade x OP; adv. testing, 2 hOB
10 pc.
Amount
51-19A
49-8A
51-8A
47-17
55-12A
48-29A
34-52
42-39
34-5
33-6
32-13
43-24A
35-29A
37-21
30-15
31-11A
43-11
36-40
Variety
Germplasm received at Corvallis in 1976.
Supplier
TABLE 2:
CD
39
Accession Numbers assigned or eliminated in 1976
New accession numbers:
in 1976 (Table 3),
A large number of new accession numbers was assigned
Foreign hop introductions such as Wye Target, Lubelska,
and Nadwislanska, received new accession numbers; so did Pocket Talisman, a
mutant from Talisman released by Dr, Romanko in Idaho; the Prunus free
Brewer's Gold obtained from Prosser, WA; the Native Wild American hop from
Wisconsin and a large number of breeding lines developed during the past 8
or 9 years going back to the 1968 nursery.
The outstanding characteristics
of all these accessions are listed in the "remark" column of Table 3.
One
group (accessions 21119M to 21128) are zero alpha selections from the crosses
between 19105 x 19046M made in 1970.
Only one of these zero alpha lines
(accession number 21119M) is a male,
Some carry-over material from Dr. Brooks' breeding program going back to
1960 has now been evaluated for a number of years and the best selections
received accession numbers, such as 21143 a vigorous high yielding early
maturing hop with a relatively high alpha ratio but a rather low alpha + beta
total.
Other selections from 1961 (21144, 21145, 21146, 21147, 21148) and
from 1966 crosses (accession numbers 21149, 21150, 21151, 21152 and 21153M)
generally had high vigor, good yield potential and varied in quality potential,
Two triploid selections (21165 and 21166) came from crosses between Brewer's
Gold and a Brewer's Gold derived selection from the 1969 crossing program.
Both had high yield potential but were lacking in quality characteristics,
partically alpha acid and storage.
They are being maintained however in the
polyploid germplasm block in the West section of the main yard.
The tetra-
ploid self-fertile selection 6668-01 H also received an accession number
(21153M) and it will be maintained in the polyploid germplasm block.
Table 3: New Accession Numbers Assigned in 1976
Accession
Number .
Location Source
21112
WGH;
15:9-12
Wye College
21113
18:9-12
Z.Wirowski
Lubelska
Pulawy, Poland
21114
19:9-12
21115
20:9-12
R.A.Neve
Remarks
Name or Pedigree
Virus free from meristem
Wye Target
"
R.R.Romanko
tip culture, high <*, wilt
NB-OP x Eago-64103M
tolerant, not DM res.,hypersentsitive to Powd/ Mildew,
71 Wye Rep. p. 52.
Polish Variety
Nadwislanska
Mutation from Talisman, com
Pocket Talisman
pressed growth,high yield,
Parma, ID
mite resistant
high a.yield,from heat
21116
15:9-12
C.B.Skotland
Prosser,WA
Prunus free Brewer's Gold
21117
EGH
G.E.Lindsay
Milwaukee,WI
Native Wisconsin
Indigenous(Wild)American
hop from Wisconsin
21118M
20:55-56
Sel.6667-25M
19113x0P;(Bu x Sam-XS)x0P
Red-purple stem
21119M
38:5-6
Sel.7001-50M
19105x19046M
Zero alpha
21120
35:5-6
Sel.7001-13
19105x19046M
21121
36: "
Sel.7001-39
21122
37: "
Sel.7001-47
21123
39: "
Sel.7001-54
21124
40: "
Sel.7001-56
21125
41: "
Sel.7001-67
21126
42: "
Sel.7001-77
21127
43: "
Sel.7001-81
21128
44: "
Sel.7001-123
21129M
22:57-58
Sel.6803-90M
(LGpS x Fu-FuS)x(LCS-FuS)
(LGpS x Fu-FuS)x(LCS-FuS)
,v. small cones
'.Schlitz pilot brew
19105x63013M
(LGpS x Fu-FuS)x(BG x UT Very high Ad humulone
526-4)
30:57-58
Sel.6903-21M
65102x64037M
31:57-58
Sel.6903-23M
65102x64037M
21132M
32:
Sel.6903-234M 65102x64037M '
21133M
45:57-58
Sel.6906-98M
21134M
37:13-14
Sel.7005-121M 55009x63015M
21135M
52:13-14
Sel.7006-430M 65009x64035M
21136M
49:
Sel.7006-323M
21130M
~ "21131M"
"
"
treated 19001
alpha 40.9;beta 31.2
DM res,early,high S,
YC x Zatfler Seedling
(alpha 22.3;beta 56.2)
DM resistant
YC x Zat8er Seedling
DM res. .vigorous,a 27.2;
YC x Zattler Seedling
52013x5669-09M
Comet x GoBu-OP
8 29.5.
High a, VL;a 49.4;5 25.6
,
(BGxEG-XSMBG^xEKG-BavS) V.high a, a/B;a 59.6;S 23.2
(BG x EG-XS)x ZaS
High a, E, DMres;a 51.1;
3 25.0
Vigor,aroma,V.E. ,o(.50.1
£>28.1, CoF 20 Used for
1975 crosses.
21137M
50:
"
Sel.7006-340M
Vigor,Aroma,a/e near 1
CoF 18, Used for 1975
crosses.
sx
Accession
Number
Location
Source
Name or Pedigree
21138
Sel.6701-54
65103x OP; E2 x OP
16:49-50
Remarks
Vigor, yield, DM res, Cluster
type.
21139
24: "
~ Sel.6704-138
Vigor, yield, DM res, Cluster
65102 x OP; YC x OP
type.
21140
43:
Sel.6230-01
60018 x 58010M
N Mex 2-2 x Ut 525-2
Vigor, yield, 2% male
21141
45: "
Sel.6222-01H
64100 x 19043M
Bu x B Burv-FuS
V. large leaves,
21142
102:7-8
Sel.6934-41M
65104 x 6772-20M
Triploid cf, Cluster background
Q*
L8x(FuT x Fu-FuS)
Sel.6028-01
56001 x 19040M
Ha x Fu-FuS
Vigor, yield, Early, a.-ratio 73
ol 6.6, £2.5
tl
Sel.6185-01
19120 x 58006M
Su25S x Ut 524-2
Vigor, yield, « 4.6 j 0 6.1
11
Sel.6305-04
19209 x 19173M
Vigor, yield potential
21143
50: 51-52
21144
51:
21145
52:
Fu x SSp-LCS
21146
53:
11
Sel.6305-05
II
ii
H
21147
54:
II
Sel.6305-06
II
ii
H
21148
55:
11
Sel.6305-07
II
21149
48:
II
Sel.6616-02
21150
49:
II
Sel.6616-10
II
21151
30:
II
Sel.6616-20
II
21152
22:
II
Sel.6618-02
" ,'68:cx 7.3, &
19001x(l9209-60026M)
BG x(Fu x Colo 2-1)
" ,'68: <*• 4.2, 0 4.7
ii
106: 1-2
Sel.6668-01H
47:15-16
Sel.6806-01
,'68: <X 7.6, 3 6.1
i
1968« U. 10.8 ;
j3 8.2
Tetraploid <£ , self fertile,
56008 x OP
[XS x(Fu x EG-ECS)]x OP
21154
ii
Vigor, alpha, lupulin
19001 x 63023M
BG3 x EKG-BavS
21153M
6.1
vigor.
alpha:9.4;j}2.5j«-ratio 79.
62013 x 6616-35M
Comet x (BG x Fu-Colo 2-1)
21155
48:
Sel.6806-40
alpha:6.8;j3l.9 i«-ratio 78
21156
49:
Sel.6806-94
alpha:6.2;^2,l;((-ratio 75
21157
50:
Sel.6806-98
Vigor, good cone type.4* 5.2
£2.8, ok-ratio 65
21158
51:
Alpha, vigor, good cone type,
Sel.6806-99
<X8.7;02.4, tf-ratio 79
21159
53:
Sel.6818-43
Vigor, yield potential
61021 x 6320-01M
<x 4.8 j #7.9
Swiss x[(LGpS x Fu-FuS)x
EG-XS]
21160
32:17-18
Sel.6901-140
65102 x 64032M
YC x ZaS
21161
36:
Sel.6903-225
65102 x 64037M
YC x ZaS
21162
37:
"
Sel.6903-263
21163
39:
"
Sel.6907-58
DM res, vigor
Vigor; * 4.7; j5 5.
19105 x 6616-61M
(LGpS x Fu-FuS)x(BG x
Fu-Colo 2-1)
Vigor; o( 5.5; $ 5.3
21164
40:
"
Sel.6907-77
21165
41:
"
Sel. 6913-96
19001 x 21153M
21166
42:
"
Sel.6916-24
65011 x 21153M
- Triploid, exc. pick, VL
BG xffXS x(Fu x EG-XS)]xO?j
* 4.9; £ 6.2
Triploid; <x 6.9, /3 6.1
h2
Accession numbers eliminated:
Only 7 accession numbers were eliminated this
past year primarily because of disease problems such as Prunus Necrotic
Ringspot virus or extremely low vigor (Table 4),
Among these was one
accession that had only been assigned a USDA number a few years ago but which
came down with severe Yellow Fleck symptoms and was yery low in vigor
It is
true that such material could probably be freed of Prunus Necrotic Ringspot
Virus by heat treatment, but we have a large number of other genotypes coming
along in the program that it is not worth the effort to keep an extremely
susceptible type in the germplasm collection even if it had only been entered
into this collection a few years ago.
U3
Table 4:
Accession numbers eliminated in 1976.
Accession
Number
Location
66053
21002
13:5-8
247:7-8
8:49-50
57011
15:49-50
V. poor, late
60017
23:49-50
New Mexico 2-1; V. poor, YF3, late
64030M
36:57-58
Both hills female
21066M
43:57-58
YF2, poor; medium alpha
21074M
51:57-58
YF3, poor
Row:Hill
Reason & Remarks
Ringwood Special; very poor, YF2;
V. poor, low vigor
hk
Crosses made irr 1976:
Another attempt was made in 1976 to recombine germplasm
from the high alpha acid crosses grown in the 1973 nursery.
A total of 18
crosses was made in 1976 consisting of 6 females crossed to three different
males (Table 5),
The 6 females represent only 3 different crosses from the
1973 nursery (crosses 7303, 7312, 7314).
crosses 7303, 7308 and 7311.
The three males again represent
Thus, cross 7601 is actually a brother-sister
cross whereas the other crosses are between somewhat more distantly related
material.
Good seedset was obtained in all crosses except 7607; 7608 and
7609 on the female 7312-42 which was rather low in vigor but had a very high
alpha acid analysis in 1975.
The quality characteristics from two years of
analyses of the parents chosen for the 1976 crosses are listed in Table 6.
It can be seen that, generally, the alpha analysis and the alpha beta ratios
were very high both for males and for females.
The most outstanding female
in this series of crosses appears to be selection 7312-83 for which duplicate
analyses are listed in Table 6.
It had a two-year alpha value of nearly 16%
and, based on preliminary storage data (6 months at room temperature) had
storage stability comparable to 21055 with an ID of 0.40 after 6 months of room
temperature as compared to an ID of 0.70 for Cascade stored under identical
conditions.
Other outstanding selections seem to be 7312-36 and 7312-134 which
had an exceptionally high alpha ratio in both years.
Selection 7314-12 had good
alpha but relatively high beta resulting in an alpha ratio of 70 for the two years.
Among the males, alpha ratios exceeding 70% were common except for 7303-165M
in 1976.
This latter selection, however, was yery early and vigorous and it is
hoped that early good yielding high alpha selections can come from crosses
involving 7303-165M.
"
"
7617
7618
40:31a
"
7615
7616
"
7614
36:31a
"
7612
7613
"
7611
34:38a
"
7609
7610
"
7608
33:33b
"
7606
7607
"
7605
"
"
x(21055-21108M)
x(NB x Bu-ZS)
x 7311-141M;
x 7308-23M;
"
"
x(21055-21108M)
x(NB x Bu-ZS)
x 7311-141M;
x 7308-23M;
"
"
x(21055-21108M)
x(NB x Bu-ZS)
x 7311-141M;
x 7308-23M;
"
"
x(21055-21108M)
x(NB x Bu-ZS)
x 7311-141M;
x 7308-23M;
"
"
x(21055-21108M)
x(NB x Bu-ZS)
"
"
x 7311-141M;
x 7308-23M;
"
"
x(21055-21108M)
x(NB x Bu-ZS)
7314-12 x 7303-165M;(21055-2iniK)x(Comet x Bu-ZS)
"
"
7312-134 x 7303-165M;(21055-21109M)x(Comet x Bu-ZS)
"
"
7312-83 x 7303-165M;(21055-21109M)x(Comet x Bu-ZS)
"
"
7312-42 x 7303-165M;(21055-21109M)x(Comet x Bu-ZS)
"
7312-36 x 7303-165M;(21055-21109M)x(Comet x Bu-ZS)
x 7311-141M;
7603
7604
x 7308-23M;
7303-07 x 7303-165M;(Comet x Bu-ZS)x(Comet x Bu-ZS)
Pedigree
7602
-
7:18b
7601
32:46b
Location
of Female
Crosses made in 1976: Seed pretreatment started Dec. 29 , 1976.
Cross
Number
TABLE 5 :
a, a/B,
a, a/B,
a, a/B,
a, a/B,
a, a/6,
o, a/B,
storage
storage
storage
storage
storage
early maturity
Reason & Remarks
vn
h&-
TABLE6:
Quality data of parents used for 1976 crossing
1976
1975
B
Genotype
a/a+B
6
a/a+B
Remarks
7303-07
15.5
4.7
77
10.6
3.5
75
early, vigorous
7312-36
14.8
3.0
83
13.3
3.6
79
tight cone
-42
18.7
5.6
77
10.6
3.4
76
tight cone, highest a/
-83
15.6
4.1
79
16A
4-4
80
no DM/c, high a/B
44
high a/e
14.3
3.1
82
13-S
3-3
78
81
7314-12
15.3
6.7
70
14-0
6.f
lo
high a/B
7303-165M
50.1
14.3
78
51.1
25.3
67
early, vigorous
7308-23M
63.7
19.5
77
55.2
19.0
74
vigorous
7311-141M
61.9
19.2
76
54.2
21.0
72
vigorous
-134
U7
1976 Nursery:
A new nursery of approximately 1,800 seedlings was field planted
in the spring of 1976.
The material came from 1975 crosses (see 1975 USDA
report, page 27, Table 5).
The first 3 crosses represent inter-crosses of
zero alpha selections to study the inheritance of the zero alpha trait by
brother-sister mating.
The remainder (crosses 7504, 7505, 7506 and 7507) are
attempts to study storage stability, cohumulene content on crosses between
Cascade (poor storage) and 4 selected males.
but the nursery was not trained in 1976.
Excellent stand was achieved
In 1977 plants will be trained on
two strings and detailed data will be obtained.
1*8
tiop Variety World Collection:
A number of important hop varieties from many
hop growing countries are maintained in a two hill seedless and a four hill
seeded variety collection at Corvallis (Tables 7,8).
Not all varieties are
presently included in the seedless collection because of space limitations.
Seedless named variety collection:
(Table 7)
About 30 foreign and domestic
hop varieties are included in this collection and, as expected, yields are
quite variable since many varieties are poorly adapted to Oregon conditions.
Two new English varieties, Wye Challanger and Wye Northdown (21043 and 21044)
had low yields but good alpha analyses.
Selections from Yugoslavia,
particularly the high alpha varieties Ahil, Atlas, and Aurora from Tone
Wagner's program had good alpha analyses, but generally poor yields.
Among
the outstanding yielders in this collection was the early maturing English
variety Density with over 2,000 lbs/acre based on a two-hill plot which, how
ever, had rather low alpha acid analyses.
The earliest maturing hop in this
collection was the English variety Janus which bloomed in mid-June and had
cones in mid July (Accession number 62015); it's yield, however, was extremely
low as compared to most other varieties in this collection.
Seeded Named Variety Nursery: (Table 8) Hops from the World Collections are
maintained permanently in the Seeded Variety Nursery, a 4-hill block of
domestic and foreign hop varieties.
Yields again were quite variable depend
ing on the adaptation or disease resistance of various genotypes in this
collection.
European aroma varieties such as Hallertauer Med. Early, Tettnanger,
Backa, Swiss, etc. had generally low yields and low alpha acid content.
Shatter
ing was a particular problem with two Japanese varieties 21039 and 60042, Golden
Star and Shinshuwase, respectively.
Downy mildew in the cones was prevalent in
selection FR-2 which originally came from a Fuggle yard in Oregon and foreign
greeri wt/plot
Bramling Cross
Petham Golding
Calicross
First Choice
Smooth Cone
Progress
Pride of Ringwood
Defender
Northern Brewer
E-2
Alliance
Density
Swiss
Comet
Janus
Yugoslavia Golding
Savinja Golding
30
7/6
12
17
18
25
20
20
22
7/6
25
22
28
22
19
28
19
28
7/12
7/14
7/10
7/10
Ahil
Atlas
Aurora
Hallertauer
Backa
Wye Challenger
Wye Northdown
Styrian
Tettnanger
25
20
28
28
28
28
22
Late Cluster
FR-2
Hallertauer m. fruh
June
1st
x 0.213294 for 2-hill plot.
244:1-2
245: "
247: "
248: "
247:9-10
243: "
247:11-12
249:9-10
245:11-13
246: "
249:1-2
244:3-4
246: "
247: "
248: "
249: "
244:5-6
245: "
246: "
247: "
249: "
244:7-8
245: "
246: "
248: "
249: "
244:9-10
245: "
246: "
19208
21001
21014
21015
21043
21044
21049
21050
21052
21053
56001
56002
61019
61020
61021
62013
62051
62052
62053
64107
65103
66050
66051
66052
66054
66055
66055
68051
68052
—
Row:Hi 11
Ace. or
Sel. No.
Location
Pruned, April 2; Trained, May 13.
7/10
7/12
7/2
25
25
7/2
22
30
22
7/10
7/10
25
6/28
7/2
12
12
2
12
18
24
20
20
22
20
6
6
12
6
12
24
22
14
22
10
12
16
20
18
4
10
4
18
Most
28
26
28
26
14
8/1
14
18
18
12
16
22
7/6
22
12
14
12
26
18
20
24
30
30
18
28
16
18
10
18
July
1st
25
30
25
22
7/14
7/14
7/2
7/16
7/16
30
4
30
25
7/10
25
7/8
Most
9/14
8/26
9/14
9/14
9/14
8/26
8/26
9/14
9/14
9/14
9/14
9/14
9/14
9/14
8/26
9/14
8/26
8/26
8/26
9/14
8/26
9/14
9/17
9/17
9/14
8/23
8/23
8/23
9/14
Harvest
Date
1514
1770
683
235
725
640
1152
491
661
683
234
1386
1685
1066
576
1685
277
2090
405
640
2229
1685
1514
1258
1792
1408
1141
640
1109
lbs/A
/
t
Yieldl'
8.9
10.3
5.5
11.7
8.7
11.6
5.8
4.6
6.9
6.6
6.3
10.8
6.7
5.1
6.0
9.8
8.7
6.2
6.7
11.0
9.4
6.2
9.1
7.2
8.1
-
5.4
6.3
5.3
a
3.0
4.8
6.1
3.2
3.8
2.4
5.2
6.1
2.3
2.8
7.5
7.8
6-. 7
5.2
4.0
2.7
7.1
3.1
4.1
4.4
4.8
5.5
7.4
3.4
5.9
-
4.4
4.9
5.1
B
60
59
64
71
66
71
51
38
67
69
57
64
68
58
72
65
59
73
71
60
55
48
64
64
75
-
55
56
51
a+B
a
Qual ity
14.8
17.4
11.0
16.4
13.0
16.4
11.2
12.0
10.3
9.6
11.1
16.9
9.9
8.9
8.3
15.0
14.7
8.4
9.5
18.5
17.1
12.9
14.3
11.2
10.7
-
9.8
11.2
10.3
a+B
DM crown & cones
V. early
YF1
v. late
DM/cones
Remarks
TABLE 7 : Agronomic and Quality Data of Selected Genotypes Grown in the Seedless Named Variety Nursery, Corvallis, 1976
VO
50
Ol
Ol
i-
tO
z:
t/l
o
3
£
•o
OJ
<o
or
CO
r~
c
<4-
u
-~-
tn
j£
in o
ai o
oi
s-
c
o
01
4a>
IO +J +j
U +J •u
tn its IO
•a
S-
c
3
SO-
O
s0)
a.
o
O-
ai
c
sSOl
o
•
o
o
-»»cm
o
u
00 tv)
a.
a
o>
cor^cytcococo^ftn
onNinfncvivor-iDojn^-roi— mocicOr-r-CrtCftoONr-NvDrniocoi— «* «3- tn co f-oiror^omwd
^•cftcocAcooiwcicsjocooomcooMnoocovnni— concaooii— o i— co co «* cm co '
«-^ *— • • • '
s-
cj rv i-oo uj r-m tn
NiONr.vor.N^-
o
o
a
voo iflrv^tcACflNi— iniONOh-OMnn.— c o m o o o i w o c o i — ^j-cj.— r-. cm co oi **
totomir)tr)toto^r«d-mm*3-tn.tototr>r^.r~.toi— tor.ifJtrirNioi^Lnunorstino^in
+
>>
co cm i— ro to cy» to co
01
cor^o»-coCflCftoo^j-vDr^irjr-CM^wroioorocoioior^rv^fa)M»-vDOC^r^foi
coioco^f-tricoiooocMtor^O'iCMCOcncoincMi— co •— (niMr-.a-noOr-inNM»iONui
cnm*3-ir>«a-ioio*a-mir>*i-*3-u-iLnir>«3-i— iotricocnooiri.^io^io^inr^iococ>ito«3-
(oro^mromfoto
inincomcocoor*
cotoaiootooici*^
01
B
(O
T3
oi
-o
01
0)
to
W
01
Ol 4->
>
tn
10
oi moonpjwNcywmronmoicvicvcsincymnmncvinroncvinmoiaitTicfiN o> oioioioiaioioicrr
eONcocvj^fflMuocoiooootocococooooomioio^iocoioioooiooq-eowr-wojNc-jWNS
r— .— .— r— i— I— I— i— Hi— CM CM CM r— r— i— r— r— CM CM CM i— i— CJ N CJ i— CM CM CM f— CM i— i— CM
c
5
o
3
<*lOMeOOOOOO^OO<tVOeO<DCONOMWO«3COa)0(MONOCOM03NU
r-CMOJ — r-2ojCM
i—
i—
i— r— I— CM r— CM CM CM i—
r^r— I— i— <—
r— i— CM r— CM CM CM
r—
i— i—
01
>5
cm
"=f
o
_
o cm
CO
«— i— COCM
o~^«a-~^—. ^>. ~~. o
o
co
i— .a-i— cm
*r
co
co to •—
*— *r
va3C00300OOON^-sV.OVsON.ONVS.OX-s
01
CD
rscsicsjMcycnmcnNrsfNPspjpsroi— n
r s r s N c n i — r^
•a
01
cm
cm
to
«a-
to
O
'—
• CM
\CO ^ ^
r^ r—r-» r-
*aco
i— cvl IO \
^
i— r— r-»
oor^i— r s r s r ^ N f i N
CM
«—
CM
«3*
i—
tO
CO »—
'— CM tO
to - ^ \ o — . w i n m
*a- in ^- to cm
—tninmcMCOm(M-^o-~-.mcMcomcMmoo^.m — o v i n - s i n x - ^ - N - x - s O u i N N r N r i i N r s i v c j p j
o
•
oi r -
r^CMCMCMCMCMCMCMr^COr^CMCMCMCMCMCMrOrOr^CMr^.fOr^.CMI— CVJrsNI— N N f O C J N
I I
"v "~
IO
t - s:
o
c
+J
«
01
c
•a
ai
O-r-
Ol
s-
s-
o
CD
Ol
J-
3
Ol
Ol
3
t/1
OJ
!_
2
Ol
i-
«
-a
Ol
c
I
IO
c
r-
+J
•—
^—
•u
I
IO
Ol
at
r—
i—
Ol Ol
Ol C71
-O
3
to f—
U
*n
C
C
i—
o
—
ca
«_1
i-
o
1-
oi -a
C I—
cuoo
I
C
I -f-
i— •
s-
Ol
1
-si
o I
M3l
c
Ol 2
c
o
Ol T3
4->
C
- O O O i — J=
.
OJ
r—
r—
(O
o
l/l
fO
Ol sC
Ol
2
Ol
s-
>
trt
to
-f
I <o 2
01
+J -o o
C
_ -r~ .
tn 01 i
r—
in
- +J
•r- C
S.
ras-c
r—
ia
o
•—
JTS-EOIOS-.^,— l _ o
tn -i-
_i—
nJU+J+JfOUZ-rfl)
3
oi£.r-.f-coOJ=
ECCH-.— i_CMC0OT3.— r- i. O +J U
C
Ol
IOC
S-
Ol >,
_
ruin
i—
CI
Q_ >
0
(D
^:
-i-j U
01 O
< < < < D z: >
ro
C3
010010130 I
I i-S-i— 10— E 91 >|>)+I 10
• </) oo U T O O D Z l U J I l f f l < u l l . W 0 . 3 3 W W
••" 1
>-< L
^to IL
CM
3
cn t_
«s a.
r—
I
O 2
o
o
_ice
s- o
o z
:
Ol
i - ^ m r . o a c f t O i — w r o ^ i n t o r s c o c i O i — i— cvco^s-r^cocn.— m
•—
ao
S_
Ol
3
IO •a
Ol 3
la
•
o .
CO U. _l :n i— u- u_ IE m u u o i
o<c
B
cm to
s- OS
i—
o
C
o
Ol
•
Ol +J (O -.- (
<-> </i 2
>
CO
Ol
o
CD 01
•
r— i— i— r— r— r— r-i— r-CMCM
<j i/i to n
co ai o
i— r-CMm<tmiorvco
r— r— ^-r— I— t— i— I— CMCM
u
f~- ,— ^— ^j- tn to cn .— cmcocooicmOiO'— co.— cMcoor-^co^r.— .— o ^ r t n t D M n ^ r a v r ^ ocmcOi— r - C M n o
OO'— i— i— i— O O O i — ocoq-i— cmcm.— i n L n u i o o a o i n L i i r i L n i f j i n u ' i c ^ ' J r ' tritniniricocococo
O
O
U
U
U
C
\
lO
UO
UO
UO
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
r.
f ir-.—
r-U
JJ
U
U
U
W
O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
C
M
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OU
rr—
Ot
O
O
O
O
O
OCOOO OOOOOOOO
CO
O
01
<£ 1/1
Cftr-i—
Olr-i—
r-.— .— i— i— COlOtOtOOli—
CO to to to Ol i— O'—
O ' — r- .— CMOsJCMOJ^J-Tj-inintOCOtOtOtOtOCO'—
CMCMCMCM^J-Tj-inintOCOtOtOtOtOCO'—
CMCMCMCM^T
'— r- <— .— i—
,— .— i— i— i— .— ,—
imv jmC M
t^i C
r»ij C
ftiMw-f
ir\
r\in c
inMin
ii—.t oif-i
i— c
Oj
^ ri/-i
L nin
u i i(-»
inL
t o(/">
i o tii-i
o tii-i
oto
t oin
t o ttn
o \^ ifl ^n i^q ^q to tO to to tO CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
51
varieties such as Petham Golding (68052) and Ahil (21050).
Janus (62051)
again was extremely early with first bloom in early June and full bloom by
June 10th, and the yield of Density was below average.
52
Seedless Observation Nursertes:
A new hop yard north of the current seeded
yard at the banks of the Willamette River was established in 1976 and planted
with most of the selections that are presently grown in the seedless Smith
yard on Peoria Road.
It is anticipated that both yards will be maintained as
seedless yards and that one yard will be used in the future primarily for
disease testing.
Should the new Willamette yard be maintained seedless which
we will assess in 1977, most of the advanced yield testing will probably come
from this location because it is much easier to transport hops from this
location to the picker as compared to crossing the busy highway from the
present seedless location in the Smith yard.
Advanced Seedless 10-hill observation nursery (Smith Yard):
A total of 22
varieties and selections were harvested from this nursery as 5-hill plots
(Table 9).
Some selections (21091, 21094, 21098) were harvested a second time
in order to get an idea of their yield and quality potential under widely
differing harvesting dates,
Yields in this nursery varied from a low 772 lbs.
for USDA 21055 which, however, had excellent alpha acid content, to a high of
over 3,000 lbs for USDA 21098.
(Fuggle N 21016;
The heat treated genotypes in this nursery
Bullion 10-A 21056; and Cascade 21092) again had higher
yields and alpha acid content than their non-heat treated counterparts.
Columbia and Willamette (21040 and 21041) had disappointingly low yields in
1976.
Partly due to severe pruning in order to obtain maximum amounts of
planting stock in the spring of 1976 for commercial planting.
Downy mildew
in the cones also was a problem in this nursery particularly with Willamette
from a late infection in August due to extremely heavy rains.
No control
measures were taken late in the season which accounted for the build-up in
the cones which also was found in many other selections in this block.
209:1-10
204:1-10
208:23-32
212:23-32
210:1-10
212:1-10
206:1-10
237:23-32
237:23-32
202:1-10
225:12-25
225:12-25
240:12-21
243:12-24
232:23-27
232:28-32
240:23-32
203:1-10
203:1-10
211:1-10
205:1-10
228:23-32
205:23-32
236:12-16
226:23-27
19001
21016
21040
21041
21054
21055
21056
21091
ii
21095
21096
21098
—
ii
H
Bullion
BG x EG-XS
FuTxFuS
FuTxRV-FuS
FuTxFuS
Cascade (nuclear stock)
Cascade
Fuggle H
L8 x[[XSx(FuxEG-ECS)]xOP]
ii
BG x[[XSx(FuxEG-ECS)]xOP]
M
II
ii
YC x 7K491-OP
Cascade (heat treated)
It
FuTxRV-FuS
Bullion 10 A (heat treated)
•I
Comet x(BGxFu-Colo 2-1)
Columbia
Willamette
Fuggle N (heat treated)
Brewers Gold
wt/plot X 774
No.plants/plot x 453.6 x 4
green
TRAINED, MAY 13.
Name or Pedigree
-J. %infection, estimate
21099
48209
56013
56013
64100
65009
6761-16
6771-21
21042
<i
21092
21094
ii
Location
RowrHill
PRUNED, APRIL 1;
18
25
22
22
21
ll
22
23
28
II
18
12
17
15
5
20
12
19
12
25
II
7/4
28
II
25
25
II
21
18
22
II
18
19
II
June
20
28
10
21
25
19
28
22
12
22
30
22
8
15
26
7/3
X
wire
1st Most
2
10
14
8
8
18
16
12
16
II
16
14
9
tl
12
13
11
5
6
10
7/2
12
5
18
18
July
10
14
20
14
16
24
22
18
20
II
16
22
24
it
18
19
tl
18
14
24
24
14
18
14
15
9/17
9/13
9/13
8/25
9/17
8/25
8/23
9/9
9/9
8/30
9/7
9/16
8/27
9/16
II
20
Trace
Trece
Trace
20
Trace
Trace
0
0
n
0
Trace
0
9/9
9/10
9/9
8/23
9/7
8/30
8/27
8/27
8/30
8/25
9/17
0
0
5
15
Trace
Trace
20
10
15
4
15
836
2730
2141
2272
1604
1689
3037
3295
2453
1479
1800
1945
2218
2078
1996
2628
2847
1408
1681
1446
1659
772
2517
1770
1877
Yield^
Bloom
D . Mildew Harvest
Date
lbs/A
Cones
1st Full
%
9.3
8.0
8.3
5.8
9.9
14.2
12.7
4.2
5.8
6.9
7.5
7.8
7.2
6.4
7.7
8.5
10.6
7.7
5.6
5.1
10.1
7.9
7.1
5.1
4.9
a
-
%
4.6
3.6
4.3
4.0
5.2
5.9
6.1
4.7
5.4
5.6
7.0
7.4
6.5
6.4
5.4
5.5
7.2
3.6
5.3
5.0
5.7
7.4
3.9
3.6
3.8
B
59
61
59
67
51
51
64
52
64
59
56
50
67
69
66
59
65
71
68
47
52
55
52
51
53
a+B
a
260
114
101
99
224
164
142
134
140
280 J
115
108
234 i
177-J
188
1611
48 J
74]
84
164
110
320
175
113
140
lbs/A
Production
Alpha acids
Remarks
Triploid
Triploid
Triploid, no DM/C
YF1
VL, to G.P.
Necrotic leaves and tips.
2 harv. dates, to GP
Some male, E
VE, bad DM/C
2 harv. dates
2 harv. dates, E
DM/cones like Bu
Center rot
Some males
9 t HOP VARIETIES AND SELECTIONS GROWN IN THE 10-HILL ADVANCED SEEDLESS OBSERVATION NURSERY, CORVALLIS, OREGON, 1976.
Ace. or
Sel. No.
TABLE
5k
Seedless 5-hill observation nursery:
A large number of selections from the
1970 nursery from crosses 7003, 7004, 7005, 7006 and 7007 were evaluated for
the second mature year in this seedless location and yields are based on
harvesting the whole 5-hill plot in each case.
Selection with an asterisk
in this nursery (Table 10) were also grown at Prosser and/or Idaho for
advanced evaluation,
A number of selections in this nursery had alpha acid
levels in excess of 10% and some even exceeded 12 or 13%.
Unfortunately, many
of the high alpha types had only moderate yield levels with few exceptions
such as 7003-15, 7003-38, 7003-81, 7003-143, 7004-75, 7005-70, 7006-278.
Alpha acid production calculated from yield and alpha acid percentage, varied
from less than 100 lbs for one to 300 lbs/acre,
Additional selections will be
made from this material in the spring of 1977 in order to reduce the large
number of entries and to concentrate on the most promising types.
Cone
infection by Downy Mildew was prevalent throughout this material but some
selections showed excellent resistance while others were extremely susceptible.
Most selections in this group were medium late to late in maturity, but some
early maturing ones had surprisingly good yields such as 7003-243, 7007-175
and 7007-318,
Others had little or no downy mildew in the cones, excellent
yield levels and moderate to adequate alpha acid content such as 7003-75, 7003-81,
7003-143, 7003-250, 7004-75, 7006-278.
A comparison of the 37 High Alpha Selections grown for the second year at
Yakima, Prosser and Corvallis is presented in Table 11.
Some genotypes received
good ratings at all three locations such as: 7003-243, 7005-194, 7006-96,
7006-356, 7006-445.
locations.
Others, however, looked good at only one or possibly two
There were some exceptionally high alpha acid values at one or
more locations, notably 7005-194, 7006-311, 7006-392, 7006-450,
Two of these
high alpha selections, namely 7005-194 and 7006-311 had excellent storage stability
both from the John I. Haas analyses and from a 5 cone analyses at Corvallis.
No.
or
Name or Pedigree
-215 218
-251 222
-278 224
7006-61* 215
-201"'209
-205*210
-232*'211
65009 x 64035M
7005-05 227
65009 x 63015M
-22
229
230
-40
-70* 238
-72* 239
-87* 241
-168 206 23-27 65009 x 63015M
-182'c207
-250 205
-284 210
7004-03* 212
-17
213
-75
221
65009 x 19182M
212 12-16 65009 x 19046M
213
221
222
227
229
230
231
233
238
239
242
202 17-21
Location
Row:Hi 11
-243*204
7003-03
-15
-30
-32
-38
-66
-75
-79
-81
-95
-111
-143
-176
Ace.
Sel.
19
18
22
22
12
15
12
17
19
15
25
25
22
15
18
17
17
15
19
20
17
18
22
22
22
2
12
15
25
15
18
19
28
28
22
22
22
25
25
25
25
28
25
16
16
14
18
12
18
18
14
12
7/2 18
18
28
30
20
22
18
22
4
28
6
7/4 16
22
12
25
18
28
14
7/10 18
7/4 18
7/2 18
22
12
7/8 16
7/14 16
22
18
12
25
25
20
25
18
25
12
7/2 18
7/4 20
7/2 18
30
18
24
24
22
26
24
18
20
28
24
24
22
16
16
22
18
24
18
26
28
28
18
20
24
22
26
22
22
22
24
20
24
24
22
17
3
13
13
13
3
13
13
16
10
3
7
9
9
9
16
3
8/30
17
13
15
10
15
15
8/27
15
15
15
15
7
7
15
7
15
1954
1510
1502
1084
2016
2005
1109
1647
3225
1952
4330
1937
2534
1604
1781
2107
1357
2440
2013
1834
2073
1903
2747
1290
1962
2193
1792
1271
1333
1510
1280
1630
1612
1612,
X wire
Bloom
Harv.
1/
1st
Most 1st
Most Date YieldJuly
Sept. lbs/A
J jne
10.1
5.9
6.4
9.8
7.7
7.5
7.8
6.8
9.5
6.7
10.9
10.2
9.4
7.6
11.2
8.8
12.4
7.9
12.2
9.2
11.3
8.4
11.7
10.1
7.2
11.2
6.8
7.3
8.2
10.5
6.1
4.8
5.1
8.4
6.0
9.5
7.8
7.9
4.9
9.4
8.3
5.9
8.2
10.0
5.2
5.2
4.7
6.4
4.0
4.8
7.9
5.7
3.9
2.8
6.0
6.6
5.8
4.7
3.3
5.6
10.9
4.2
X
%
7.8
10.4
7.3
8.2
9.0
6.4
B
a
Quality
58
66
64
78
64
40
73
64
56
70
61
70
61
58
61
76
73
67
40
49
50
54
63
64
43
53
44
57
43
57
51
48
56
49
a+B
a
<Z<lt>
126
209
81
135
290
125
295
141
256
95
114
206
104
183
157
125
197
128
299
132
184
167
201
112
165
119
156
150
182
164
177
152
78
lbs/A
Production
Alpha
TABLElOl ADVANCED SELECTIONS GROWN IN 5-HILL SEEDLESS OBSERVATION NURSERY IN 1976. CORVALLIS, OREGON,
PRUNED, APRIL 1, 1976; TRAINED, MAY 13, 1976.
No DM/C, VL
Discard
No DM/C
No DM/C
Heavy DM/C
No DM/C, VG Prosser
No DM/C
No DM/C
YF 2, pale lup., disc.
Some males
No DM/C
White hops
Some males, VL
No DM/C, YF1
. Some DM/C, YF1, VL
No DM/C, exc. yield
Some DM/C, VG Prosser
YF1, VL
Exc. pick,some DM/C
E, no DM/C, VG Prosser
Exc. pick, no DM/C
Exc. pick, No DM/C, VL
No DM/C, YF2, disc
No DM/C
ME
No DM/C
No DM/C
No DM/C, exc. yield
Shatter
No DM/C, exc. yield
DM/C, shatter, disc.
DM/C, shatter,
Exc. pick, T, no DM/C
DM/cones
Remarks
or
Location
Name or Pedigree
64100 x 64035M
No. plants/plotx 453.6 x4
—Green wt/plot x 774
* Also at Prosser and/or Idaho
-339*241
-300 236
-318 238
-206*230
-175 223
7007-60 *221
-456 216
-445*214
-450*215
-406 209 28-32
-408*210
-435 211
-370 242
-318*236
-356*241
7006-296*230 23-27 65009 x 64035M
-302*233
Sel. No. Row:Hill
Ace.
TA3LE 10: concluded.
19
28
18
25
25
12
19
12
25
15
25
15
16
19
19
19
22
20
12
12
6
10
16
12
7/6
22
22
25
25
25
28
18
12
18
7/2
30
20
12
6
20
20
20
22
25
7/2
30
30
7/2 12
7/10 18
Harv.
1/
18
16
20
16
16
20
24
26
28
26
20
20
26
22
20
30
20
July
3
8/27
8/27
17
8/27
16
10
16
7
16
16
3
17
13
3
9
7
2167
1984
1758
1160
1647
1425
1744
1766
1135
912
1280
1749
1493
1092
529
1075
1092
Sept. lbs/A
Most Date Yield~
Bloom
Most 1st
wire
June
1st
X
12.4
6.4
13.1
10.5
13.4
11.5
10.3
12.5
12.1
10.4
9.6
11.9
9.2
5.8
8.9
5.4
10.4
—tr-
5.8
7.2
5.0
4.7
6.7
5.0
4.8
6.4
3.2
7.6
5.8
5.5
8.7
10.4
6.3
7.0
7.4
QuaVity
65
59
71
57
50
66
68
64
57
70
66
46
64
53
62
67
62
a+B
Alpha
95
121
105
177
No DM/C
No DM/C, ME
Some males, VG Prosser
No DM/C, top crop, L
DM/C
DM/C
Some DM/C, VG Prosser
Some DM/C
Some DM/C
No DM/C
DM/C, E
Some DM/C, YF1, exc. pick
142
110
133
168
178
100
126
177
Exc pick, little DM/C
Heavy DM/C
No DM/C
144
Some DM/C
No DM/C, VG Prosser
Remarks
201
182
143
56
—iwa—
Production
&
51
Table 11.
Summary of 37 high alpha selections from 1970 nursery grown at 3 locations in 1976.
Yakima
Prosser
Storage
torva ins
ib re
Vigor Yield
Sel. No.
a
Vigor Yielc
a
8
Vigor Yielc I
a
8
maining
7003-243
G
G
6.1
6,4
G
G
9.4
7.4
G
VG
7.5
5.9
F
7004-03
P
P
8.1
4.9
G
G
7.0
3.7
G
VG
9.5
5.2
G
61
7005-70
-72
-87
-122
-182
-194
-201
-205
-232
P
P
P
F
F
G
F
G
G
P
P
P
G
F
G
F
G
G
6.0
9.7
8.3
8.7
5.6
14.4
6.9
10.9
8.4
8.9
9.3
3.0
6.0
4.4
5.8
5.2
5.9
4.5
10.7
6.6
10.7
9,6
10.3
5.6
3.4
G
F
F
G
P
7.9
5.7
3.9
G
VP
P
29
50
7006-23
-61
-74
-96
-230
-273
-294
-296
-302
-311
-318
-339
-356
-378
-382
-392
-398
-408
-445
-450
-468
P
F
F
P
F
G
G
F
G
F
G
G
G
G
6.6
7.4
9.4
8.4
8.3
9.3
7.7
6.0
3.1
G
F
G
F
F
G
F
G
P
G
VG
VG
VG
F
VG
G
G
VG
7007-60
F
G
G
F
F
-162
-206
-281
-339
Brewer's Gold
FuggTe »
Cascade, V. free
Cascade, V. inf.
Comet
Bullion, V. free
Bullion, V. inf,
Yak. CI.
E2, V. free
E 2, V. inf,
VG
F
G
P
VG
VG
VG
F
G
F
T
G
G
G
G
F
G
G
G
G
F
G
G
F
F
G
?
G
12.5
7.9
15.6
10.2
14.1
4.7
5.8
4.1
3.6
5.6
6.6
5.7
5.5
4.0
6.5
7.7
5.9
9.6
10.4
6.7
4.4
13.4
6.1
10.0
8.4
5.1
5.9
4.9
5.7
9.0
9.6
11.1
11.9
7.3
7.7
4.1
8.6
6.5
4.5
4.8
5.8
4.5
2.7
3.7
6.0
6.5
4.8
3.5
6.4
3.7
7.1
7.0
P
F
P
G
G
G
P
6.4
13.3
5.9
7.3
4.6
5.0
4.2
Virus, disc.
Discard
VP
G
G
G
P
P
P
P
G
F
G
G
F
G
P
F
P
G
F
G
P
P
G
G
VP
G
F
F
F
P
P
G
G
Virus, disc.
3.4
9,3
8.2
9.6
Discard
Discard
Discard
4.3
5.6
8.8
15.9
5.4
5.7
6.3
G
G
F
5-6
5.1
4.5
6.0
5.2
4.0
4.4
4.4
5.4
G
G
F
G
F
F
F
G
P
F
F
F
F
F
Virus, disc.
G
G
12.5
11.0
6.3
7.9
G
Virus, disc.
F
P
F
G- VG
U5
VG
VG
72
72
G
Exc
90
Virus, disc.
11.7
9.6
9.8
Discard
12.1
Discard
13.1
10.5
14.5
13.4
7.0
7.4
5.5
5.5
VP
33
P
VG
51
P
1»5
G
11.5
8.7
P
51
85
71*
3.3
5.4
5.5
3.5
Discard,1975 YF
VG
P
P
Virus, disc.
G
P
P
5.8
7.2
5.0
Exc
G
F
F
12.1
9.6
11.9
Discard
Discard
Di scard
G
F
VG
P
.5.8
7.3
8.8
Discard
8.4
7.3
4.6
VG
G
87
G-F
F
68
6.7
4.2
F
58
57
5.3
G
G
5.4
4.8
VG
71
P
10.4
6.6
F
F
P
12.4
6.0
7.6
P
36
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
F
VG
G
VP
22*
VG
81
P
53
5.7
3.3
9.3
F
VG
VG
10.1
4.6
3.6
5.6
5.3
6.1
6.1
5.7
VG
8.7
6.1
7.7
6.9
5.6
10.8
12.7
Yield estimates: VG - over 2,000 lbs/acre;
Storage:
51
7h
P
P
P
VG
P
G
P
P
P
P
P
4.9
6.5
5.4
5.1
4.3
69
P
P
VG
12.7
12.0
9.1
7.8
12.0
6U
VG
G
G
P
5.6
Virus, disc.
F
G
F
6.0
4.9
6.6
5.8
4.7
G
G
F
Discard
10.1
5.1
P
G
G
G-
P
F
11.2
8.8
P
12.4
P
Discard
P
12.2
G
12.8
G •
9.2
F
11.3
VG
8.4
G - 1600-1700 lbs/acre;
F - 1400 lbs/acre;
P - below 1200 lbs/acre.
based on 1 lb samples, stored 6 months at roora temperaturet
Excellent, very good, good, fair, poor
very poor
58
Selection 7006-311 is being increased for advanced testing in 1977, and
7005-194 may be increased in 1978,
In addition to advanced testing of selections from the 1970 nursery in
the seedless yard, a number of two-hill observation plots were grown in the
main yard in 1976 (Table 12).
These selections included the 9 zero alpha
selections (7001-13 to -123), one selection from cross 7005 (selection 7005-194)
and several selections from the cross 7006 plus a number of males.
The two
previously mentioned high alpha good storing selections 7005-194 and 7006-311
are also included in this material.
Some of the selections especially, the
8 zero alpha females and the zero alpha male 7001-50M have now received
permanent USDA accession numbers and will be transferred to the germplasm
block in 1977.
Others will be evaluated for one more year and the best ones
will receive permanent USDA accession numbers and will also be transferred to
the Germplasm block in 1978.
Germplasm Collection Nursery:
A number of valuable male and female genotypes
are grown in two-hill plots in a permanent germplasm collection (Tables 13 & 14).
This material includes genotypes with high and low alpha, high and low cohumulene,
early and late maturing material, resistance to various major hop diseases (mildew,
verticil!ium wilt,
etc.), and other traits that for some reason appear to be
valuable for future breeding purposes or genetic research,
Detailed agronomic and
quality data will hopefully be obtained from this material on an annual basis
and summarized as it has been done in these two tables.
This material will also
form the basis for the USDA permanent hop germplasm repository which will be
started in 1977,
31:5-6
34
II
35
II
36
37
H
39
II
40
II
41
42
II
43
II
44
51:7-8
19105
64007
7001-13
-39
-47
-54
-56
-67
-77
-81
-123
7005-194
54:11-12
33 13-14
II
34
M
35
37:13-14
39:13-14
43:13-14
46
49
Ii
52
7003-68M
-225M
-245M
-256M
7005-121M
21108M
7006-179M
-211M
-323M
-430M
It
II
II
65009 x 64035M
65009 x 63015M
65009 x 63015M
II
II
li
65009 x 19046M
19105 x 19046M
II
It
II
11
65009 x 64035M
65009 x 63015M
ii
H
H
ii
H
ii
•I
ii
19105 x 19046M
(LGpS x Fu-FuS)x EG-XS
LGpS x Fu-FuS
Name or Pedigree
e
6/30
6/25
22
6/28
4
16
30
18
6
4
6/25
10
4
6/28
14
30
14
6
4
8
14
72
83
23.2
10.3
47.8
47.6
28.1
25.0
50.6
32.8
29.2
50.1
51.1
20
18
18
16
8
-
22
24
22
20
-
59.6
22
22
-
-
27
18
18
-
2
2
2
2
2
67
64
38
41
33
34
62
1
64
64
78
73
72
65
27.8
45.4
50.9
63.7
2
L
L
M
M
512
725
832
832
661
672
P
G
G
P
G
G
2
45.4
23.4
24.9
23.0
22 '
36
L
M
821
60.7
22
22
20
4
2
2
4
2
3
6-12
24
30
12
24
12-24
L
G
0.5
20
16
20
12
12
3
12-20
2
5.4
5.5
3.5
5.5
4.9
6.5
18
20
0.06
9.6
9.8
12.1
14.5
12.7
12.0
12
12
12
2
24-30
24
24-30
12-24
L
M
M
M
M
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
0.5
0.6
0.7
1.3
2.4
0.9
1.4
0.07
0.7
0.2
15
26
10
18
1
9
3
a /a+8
72
20
20
20
20
30
24-30
12
24
12-24
24-30
G
VG
G
P
G
P
P
G
P
G
G
6
Quality
4.9
M
M
M
L
L
S
a
1109
2218
960
661
864
352
501
832
491
992
608
Sfpt.
Yield
Cone Harvest
size date Potential lbs/A
12.8
3
1
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
Laterals^/
0.7
13
11
19
20
20 .
20
14
16
8
10
12
12
20
14
20
6
6
Inches
Arm
length
7.3
7.1
8.5
6.6
7.2
7.3
5.5
7.9
3.3
5.0
2.8
12 July20
Most
Bl oom
1st
8
4
4
4
4
2
12
10
16
14
4 Jul y
X w1 re
1st
Most
2/ Visual rating: 1 = best to 4
- Green wt/plot x 0.213294 , for 2-hill plot
II
II
38:5-6
7001-50M
II
II
7006-74
53:7-8
II
-96 " 55
39 9-10
-273
-311
43
52
-382
-392
n
ii
ii
Lotration
Row:Hill
Accession
or Sel.No.
Pruned, April 18; Trained, May 17.
Table 12.: Agronomic and quality data of h1gh-or low alpha acid lines grown in the 2-hill seeded observation nursery, Corvallis, 1976.
; highest alpha
EARLY
To GP
TO GP.HIGH ALPHA
"
ii
Also in Washington
" ; exc. pick
Also 1n Washington
Schlitz pilot brew
v. small cone
Remarks
vn
vo
60
Table U
j Agronomic and Quality Data for Male Genotypes grown in the Germplasm
Nursery, Corvallis, 1976.
Pruned, April 6; Trained, May 18.
Accession
or
Sel. No.
Location
Row:Hill
X wire
1st
Most
Bl
1st
oom
J
uly
June
19005M
19006M
19007M
19008M
19009M
19010M
19036M
19037M
19039M
19040M
19041M
19043M
19044M
19046M
19047M
19048M
19058M
19060M
19061M
19062M
19185M
19170M
19172M
19173M
19182M
19183M
1 53-54
II
2
M
3
II
4
II
5
II
6
II
7
11
8
II
9
II
10 .
II
11
II
12
II
13
II
14
II
15
II
16
It
18
II
19
II
20
II
21
II
22
11
23
II
24
If
25
II
26
II
27
21009M
21017M
21018M
21019M
28:53-54
II
29
II
30
1 55-56
7/10
7/6
7/4
7/8
7/16
25
25
22
30
30
28
7/6
7/12
7/8
7/2
4
28
22
28
25
22
25
30
25
25
25
22
7/12
25
25
28
25
7/4
25
25
30
30
7/14
25
7/2
7/4
7/4
7/2
30
25
7/16
7/4
28
7/4
7/2
7/10
30
7/4
7/4
7/2
7/18
26
20
18
16
18
26
16
18
18
16
15
20
20
14
16
20
22
20
20
20
18
6
12
26
26
12
Most
30
26
26
20
22
Remarks,
Quality
alpha beta a/a+B Genetic Traits
t
10.8
%
66.9
52.1
43.3
25.7
48.0
29.7
49.0
46.7
28.2
30.3
49.4
37.7
36.7
51.5
33.6
31.7
14
29
23
62
31
46
31
36
58
Iowa,highe,vigor
42.2
54.6
34.7
49.6
44.0
35.4
45.5
29.7
28.7
42
58
56
Vlate
16
21.8
13.1
42.2
22.1
25.4
22.1
25.7
38.4
39.3
22.8
21.8
39.4
11.7
45.9
41.6
28.0
33.3
22.3
41.9
29.1
34.3
37.6
33.6
41.3
36.4
18
16
24
26
53.9
37.6
25.9
38.5
68
49
alpha .yellow leaves
vigor,DM res.
8/2
8/8
14
28
8/2
22
22
28
22
22
30
28
20
22
28
8/2
28
28
28
26
12
18
8/6
8/4
-
10.7
49.9
56
32
37
52
19
58
57
36
44
29
55
37
44
51
-
-
32.4
25
low CoH
low CoH, Early
•
Vigor
DM res., vigor
weak arms,vigor,VLate
Iowa,highB,vigor , poor storage
*
vigor,lowCoH,stor,VL, yield
low CoH
Early
E,vigor
Early
DM res.,aroma,Vlate
Exc.pollinator, low glandNo.,
aroma
21058M
21059M
21060M
21061M
11:57-58
ii
12
H
13
ii
14
21064M
21065M
48:5-6
42:57-58
21067M
21069M
21070M
21071M
21072M
10:57-58
H
46
ii
47
ii
48
H
49
21075M
21076M
19:57-58
H
20
20
20
20
25
25
28
8/4
8/4
8/4
32.1
15.3
27.6
16.5
8/2
8/8
45.4
11.4
80
30
30
22
51.9
57.0
49.6
41.2
24.1
18.5
25.0
34.7
68
75
66
54
30
30
12.2
45.0
61.9
30.5
16
60
12
26
26
28
18
20
28
7/2
7/6
7/4
7/10
18
18
30
18
30
7/8
24
26
-
8/6
45.4
45.5
49.7
57.0
_
41
25
36
22
_
highs
highs,L, vigor
highs,vigor,late
highs,vigor,late
Iowa,highs
higha,Vlate
high a,low s
high a,
" c* .storagt, vigor
"<*, Vlate
ii iX
low a,high s
high astorage
61
Table 13
J
continued.
Accession
or
Sel. No.
Location
Row:Hill
X wire
1st
Most
J
21087M
21088M
21089M
21090M
211OOM
21101H
21102M
21103M
21104M
21105M
21106M
21107M
15:57-58
It
16
II
17
H
18 .
101 •7-8
105 :41-42
.
II
106
101 •43-44
.
II
106
.
tt
107
.
II
111
102 •45-46
21111M .
39:13-14
M
41:
II
54:
38: 15-16
21118M
20:55-56
21108M
21109M
21110M
21129M
21130M
21131M
21132M
21133M
7/2
28
7/4
7/4
28
7/4
25
7/12
7/8
7/16
7/12
.7/10
7/2
7/8
22
30
7/2
7/10
31:
32:
•45:
25
24
20
28
24
8/2
8/8
26
20
24
28
20
18
26
20
II
II
8/2
28
22
20
20
30
7/4
28
25
25
5:
6:
II
7:
9:
11
14
15 .
16 .
II
7/10
7/28
7/16
II
20
25
II
11
M
28
7/6
N
II
60026M
60028M
17:55-56
II
18
II
19
60031M
21 :55-56
44.0
46.2
49.5
35.8
%
20.3
25.3
15.8
30.6
69
65
76
54
Wild Yug.cf ,DM resistant, high alp;
"
"
"
"
"
"
, "sesistant , vigor
, "
•
, vigor, *
. "
»
, vigor
"
',',
" ,ME,'vigor
"
','
30
28
30
"
','
" ,VL
" ,L, vigor
,
,L, vigor
8/2
ii
Trip.2,DMres,VL, vigor
"
'•
" ,L, vigor
ii
50.6
10.3
83"
ii
ii
,
ii
ii
|
\/i
»VL, vigor
V.higha.stor.DM resistant
Higha,storage, DM resistant
"*, VEarly
22
16
VEarly
Red-purple stem'
II
2:55-56
tl
3:
II
4:
20
28
30
8/2
7
7/4
51060M
51061M
%
16
20
20
26
12
Remarks,
Quality
alpha beta a/a+B Genetic Traits
uly
20
28
II
37:13-14
52:
"
60023M
25
22
30
22:57-58
30:
21134M
21135M
51101M
51114M
52040M
52042M
52045M
52047M
58111M
60013M
60019M-
7/4
7/2
J
une
30
25
30
Bl oom
1st
Most
.
18
16
25
16
28
12
28
18
20
20
4
22
30
8/2
24
8/2
-
31.2
56.2
-
57
28
-
High Ad-Humulone
E,DM resistant, high beta
DM resistant
27.2
49.4
29.5
25.6
48
56
vigor,DM resistant
High a,Vlate
59.6
51.1
23.2
25.0
72
67
High a, Early
28
22
11.3
65.8
15
lowt\, high beta
8/2
37.9
39.1
49
9.8
11.1
12.2
32.8
21.4
47.5
39.0
68.ii
25.9
51.6
h2.1
1x2,7
13
30
19
40.4
28
8/8
—
~
8/4
22
8/4
24
26
8/4
18
6
8/4
8/10
41.9
41.9
V.high a
—
weak arms, vardigated If,mite res.
22
8/4
16
16
20
6
40.9
22.3
Lowa,high/3,V.low eo-humulone
Low* .high(3,vigor, low Co-humulone
44
WA,L,v.high CoHu roulcne
31.1
33
64
55
37.1
33.9
32.6
52
55
56
WA.highCoH,vigor
",E,v.high gland number
\'early
27.2
WA.E.high CoHumulone
WA,Vla*e
62
Table 131
concluded.
Accession
or
Sel. No.
Location
Row:Hi 11
X wire
Most
1st
J
63011M
63012M
63013M
63014M
63015M
63016M
63017M
22 55-56
II
23
II
24
II
25
It
26
II
27
II
28
64027M
64028M
64029M
64031M
33:57-58
II
34
II
35
II
37
64032M
64033M
64034M
64035M
64036M
64037M
30
1 57-58
11
2
ll
3
II
4
64101M
64102M
64103M
64104M
64105M
65034M
65037M
29:55-56
II
5:57-58
6
7
8
9
II
II
II
It
38:57-58
40:
"
22
25
7/16
30
25
7/10
30
7/4
7/10
25
30
28
22
20
25
25
25
25
28
10
7/4
7/6
22
28
7/4
7/2
30
7/12
7/2
7/8
20
25
20
25
7/6
*•
25
Remarks,
a/a+6 Genetic Traits
alphca
uly
%
18
12
18
18
20
20
12
24
18
22
26
28
26
20
22.7
60.8
44.7
55.9
59.1
53.0
39.5
48.1
23.7
29.5
23.6
23.0
26.5
28.0
32
72
60
70
72
67
58
16
18
12
18
22
26
20
26
44.7
38.8
41.3
40.3
28.5
27.1
33.5
38.6
61
59
55
51
16
16
12
16
18
12
20
20
18
20
30
20
17.7
38.8
36.5
20.6
25.4
40.6
40.3
31
46
E,DMres,low a
ii
ii
67
64
46
43
VE,
"
16
12
12
24
18
20
16
18
30
22
38.4
38.3
39.8
29.9
35.5
25.2
28.4
16
26
20
30
25.2
33.9
J
une
7/12
Quality
Bl oom
1st
Most
i
30.6
41.2
45.6
34.8
29.9
beta
%
E,vigor,low CoHumulone
E.high alpha
alpha
higha,storage, high gland No. ,vigor
" , " ,low CoH, vigor
high a
Early
high a
low CoHumulone
Early
Stor.DMresi stant, high •<,low
Early
Vert res, Wyeo
35.1
60
57
53
62
50
high*,storage, Myecf
Wyed7
46.3
50.8
35
40
weak arms
35,7
18.2
CoH,vig
DMres, 1owCoHumulone
E,vigor,vert, resistant,Wye6*
E,vert res.,powdery mild.res.
,Wye S-
TablelUi Agronomic and qua ity data for female genotypes grown in the Germplasm Nursery,
Pruned April 6; trained May 18.
Corvallis, 1976.
Accessic n Location
Row:Hill
Numbe r
X wire
Most
1st
July
19105
19110
19012
19027
19028
19120
19137
19151
19185
19200
1:49-50
II
2:
"
32:
"
33:
II
34:
3:
II
4:
It
5:
"
6:
II
7:
6/30
4
6/30
4
8
4
4
18
14
6
21001
21007
21008
21021
21023
21028
21030
4:1-4
41:49-50
42:
"
44:
"
29:51-52
36:1-2
21032
21033
21036
21054
21055
21063
"
37:
"
38:
"
39:
"
40:
'
210:1-10
212:1-10
4
6/30
6/25
4
8
2
37:49-50
39:
"
40:
"
21138
21143
21144
16:49-50
50:51-52
50024
11 49-50
II
46
"
47
II
50
II
12
II
53
"
54
31 51-52
51:
50040
50075
52013
52018
53050
54002
54003
"
10
8/1
8/10
6/25
6/28
6
12
6
10
16
16
2
20
14
20
20
14
22
30
6
20
24
24
16
20
12
20
20
8
2
10
18
12
26
30
30
20
30
20
30
30
16
14
18
4
6/28
14
10
10
14
10
12
22
4
6/30
6/22
7
6
6
4
7
2
6/25
6/28
30
10
11
4
5
6
7
"
"
61008
61011
61017
37:51-52
"
38
11
42
63008
63018
63019
63020
63021
63027
63032
11 51-52
"
12
"
13
.
•>
14
"
15 :
ii
16
33 •3-4
64002
64003
64007
17:51-52
"
18 :
34 :5-6
19 :51-52
64008
64009
64010
64020
64026
64106
65009
20 :
21 :
44 :
45 :
"
"
"
"
46 :
28 :
"
"
M
VG
VG
VG
L
L
M
M
S
S
L
L
M
S
ML
M
L
M
ML
M
M
P
P
•
VG
G
G
G
P
VG
P
G
G
P
17
49
42
32
32
68
68
4.7
5.6
3.2
4.8
5.8
9.4
6.1
6.0
9.1
9.9
8.4
9.9
14.2
4.6
3.7
2.4
3.1
7.3
4.4
4.4
5.8
5.2
5.1
5.7
5.2
5.9
1.8
60
57
61
45
68
60
51
63
66
59
65
71
71
3.8
35
61
52
Iowa ,high 6 .vigor,Cc F 38
Vigor potential, CoF 56
Yellow leaves, alpha, CoF 26
Yellow leaves, alpha
DM res. vigor
Early,vigor, alpha ratio
Very late
Early ,susc.,DM/cone,<ratio,CoF40
Yellow lvs.,a-ratio
Yellov lvs, a-ratio
High oil, vigor, CoF 23
Alpha
Alpha
Alpha
Alpha
Alpha, vigor
Early, alpha
Early, alpha,poor storage
Early, alpha, storage; CoF40
Alpha ratio
DM resistant
2
5
6/25
L
L
L
G
G
VG
3.0
6.6
4.6
2.2
2.5
6.1
58
73
43
Vigor
Early, vigor, alpha
Early, vigor
10
12
10
6
10
10
4
4
28
18
18
18
28
28
30
18
8/2
M
L
M
M
M
L
M
VG
G
G
VG
VG
G
G
VG
6.4
3.4
4.6
3.8
6.5
0.8
4.2
4.4
3.0
5.4
4.0
5.7
3.4
1.9
2.3
3.3
68
39
54
40
66
30
65
57
Alpha ratio, vigor, late
6
30
30
4
4
20
12
28
22
22
28
28
10
20
12
6
12
14
26
16
1.7
8.5
4.3
4.3
4.6
2.4
2.7
2.4
2.6
3.5
4.1
5.3
2.0
2.3
5.7
2.6
2.9
1.9
3.3
3.4
2.7
3.5
42
60
62
60
71
42
44
47
43
66
52
57
38
5.6
2.5
4.5
8
18
22
24
24
24
8/2
8/2
8/6
28
L
16
26
18
14
20
20
L
G
VG
VG
VG
VG
G
G
P
L
H
VG
L
L
P
P
L
G
22
28
L
G
18
24
28
L
L
L
L
L
L
p
G
G
G
P
G
M
M
L
8/4
L
L
L
28
M
8/2
28
28
8/2
8/2
20
28
8/4
30
12
26
M
L
L
S
L
L
M
6/22
10
6/30
2
18
6
18
6/25
6/25
6/25
2
2
2
4
8
4
16
12
7
2
20
18
28
20
26
20
18
26
24
30
26
30
M
26
18
20
18
18
20
20
16
4
26
30
26
M
5
6/22
6/28
4
6/25
6
10
6/30
6/30
4
6/30
2
4
6/25
2
8
14
6/30
16
4
8
10
2
2
6
2
8
10
2
4
16
14
30
24
24
26
28
20
10
30
]J L = large; M = medium; S = small
II
M
M
M
6.4
5.7
3.2
2.6
5.8
3.1
3.3
4.1
2.4
4.4
1.3
5,7
2.3
1.1
2.7
6.5
7.1
2.2
20
20
22
11
II
VG
VG
G
G
G
G
P
L
L
M
Remarks L/
Genetic traits
ft
't
12
16
12
6
2
1 51-52
2
20
q jalityl/
1^2/
DM resistant
DM resistant
60029
60032
60033
60035
60037
60038
60039
20
1/ v
Cone- Yield Potential
Size
28
60014
60015
60016
60020
60021
60024
60025
60027
"
Ju ly
20
18
20
18
22
18
24
18
26
18
26
20
16
6/30
6/28
6/28
6/20
58016
58112
Most
6/25
6/20
33:51-52
13 49-50
"
14
ii
18
it
19
"
20
ii
21
"
22
(i
25
46 3-4
27 49-50
11
28
"
29
54005
56008
56012
jom
26
26
22
44:1-2
21084
21085
21086
Bl
1st
62
VG = very good; G - good; P = poor
S
L
M
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
M
P
1.8
3.7
4.1
3.2
Vigor
Vigor, alpha, late
V.
late
Vigor
Early, tripl, yield,aloha,CoF46
Late, vigor
Vigor,a-ratio, CoF 75, WA
Vigor.a-ratio, CoF41
WA, CoF75
WA, C0F8O
WA,early, CoF70
WA, CoF25
WA,vigor, a-ratio, CoF55
WA,early, C0F6O
WA,CoF60
WA
WA,CoF75
55
65
WA,2*,a-ratio,CoF57
30
42
57
27
58
WA,CoF77
WA.late, CoF63
WA,CoF50
WA,CoF66
WA,CoF48
51
Early
Early
Early
1.0
5.2
1.3
1.9
3.2
4.5
2.6
3.7
P
G
P
4.8
6.3
5.5
4.6
4.1
3.7
61
60
G
5.4
5.2
6.0
8.6
4.6
2.8
7.6
5.8
48
4.8
4.0
6.1
6.0
8.4
5.3
52
60
59
44
41
59
5.9
5.8
7.1
5.3
2.6
5.7
2.8
7.4
39
24
26
Vigor
Vigor
56
60
41
63
47
Vigor, DM res.
OM res, alpha ratio
0.8
2.3
6.1
VG
VG
P
VG
VG
VG
VG
VG
VG
VG
3.8
1.8
2.4
6.8
3.9
4.0
4.8
6.5
G
VG
VG
VG
P
G
Vigor
Vigor
CoF 30
Vigor
Vigor
Vigor, CoF 63
Vigor,high beta, CoF48
Vigor
Vigor, alpha ratio
Vigor, CoF 29
Vert,
10.1
3/
4/
8.9
53
resistance
Viqor.lupulin,alpha,poor stor. ,CoF 1*9
"as is" analysis - 5 cone samples
CoF data from AG Chem Lab Rep. Oec. 1974.
6U
Selections from the 1973 nursery;
The 1973 nursery which was field planted
in the Spring of 1974 has now been evaluated for two mature years plus one
baby year and final selections have been made (Tables 15 & 16).
Male selections from the 1973 nursery:
Major emphasis on selections in this
nursery was on high alpha:beta ratio and high alpha acid content.
A number
of crosses produced excellent offspring that met the selection criteria,
t
particularly crosses 7302, 7303, 7304, 7308, 7309, 7311, 7312 and 7314.
The
cutoff point, generally, was an alpha ratio of at least 70, although in a few
instances selections were saved with alpha ratios slightly below 70.
The
highest alpha ratio was found in cross 7309 (derived from Northern Brewer)
and in crosses 7311 and 7314 (derived from USDA 21055).
The 3 males that were
used for the 1976 crosses are also listed in this table, namely, 7303-165M,
7308-23M and 7311-141M,
Male selections were planted in a 2-hill observation
plot adjacent to the male germplasm nursery and continued evaluation will
reduce the number of these selections in the future.
Female selections from the 1973 nursery;
In this group the emphasis was similar
to that for the males, namely high alpha acid content and high alpha ratio.
A
large number of selections exceeded 12% alpha acid content for 2 years based on
5-cone analyses.
In this group are also included the 6 females that were used
as parents in the 1976 crosses namely 7303-07, 7312-36, -42, -83, -134, and
7314-12.
Approximately one third of these selections were planted in 5-hill
plots in the seedless Willamette Yard and the remainder are in a two-hill
observation plot in the main yard.
On the average, the highest alpha acid content
was found in selections from crosses 7311 and 7312 (on USDA 21055).
It remains
to be seen whether any of these selections will show substantially improved yield
levels as compared to their mother, 21055,
-149M
-153M
-159M
-165M
-52M
-105M
-135M
-138M
-28M
-46M
7303-09M
-144M
-152M
-153M
-155M
-168M
-171M
-174M
-183M
-184M
-186M
-I88M
-127M
-95M
-105M
-125M
7:19b
29a
33 a
41a
8:34a
9:15b
17a
22b
24b
27b
30b
32a
33b
35a
39b
40a
41a
42a
25b
62013x21110M
62013x21109M
4:23a
33a
41a
46b
5:20a
29a
34a
44a
45a
6:20a
24a
24b
7302-16M
-36M
-52M
-63M
-77M
62013x21108M
2:22a
3:43b
7301-81M
-191M
Comet x Bu-ZS
Comet x[(BGxEG-XS)xZS]
VE
1
VE
L
L
M
M
L
54.8
50.1
50.9
52.6
56.3
57.3
61.9
65.4
52.8
M
62.1
L
48.0
57.4
55.5
52.9
53.5
53.5
41.0
56.2
47.3
51.4
54.3
59.0
49.1
58.3
61.4
56.5
51.8
53.8
55.0
57.5
54.5
49.7
VE
M
E
E
L
L
E
L
VE
L
L
E
VE
L
L
L
L
M
L
E
M
E
L
ML
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
4
1
3
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
Vigorj^
1975;1976 Maturity
17.1
14.3
19.5
23.3
19.9
23.0
20.9
16.0
17.5
16.7
21.6
19.7
18.3
19.2
20.3
17.3
16.1
20.1
21.6
20.3
22.4
12.6
21.1
21.2
18.9
27.2
19.8
19.3
17.2
16.8
23.7
20
1975
76
78
76
69
73
71
73
79
79
76
72
74
69
72
71
82
70
73
76
68
72
74
76
77
69
74
75
73
72
76
ratio
70
71
48.
51.
52.1
52.5
59.5
57.9
58.3
56.6
56.8
44.5
60.0
57.5
50.8
41.0
59.7
58.0
51.1
50.6
60.5
58.1
62.2
57.1
53.6
61.8
57.9
54.8
50.8
48.9
~uuanty
Pruned April 12, 13, 19; Trained May 18, 1976.
Comet x[(BGxEG-XS)xZS]
Name
Location
Row:Hi 11
Hale Selections from the 1973 Nursery.
Sel. No.
TABLE l$:
18.0
25.3
19.0
25.7
17.5
19.8
19.1
16.0
17.9
20.6
19.7
23.8
19.2
18.8
18.8
17.9
19.2
23.1
16.8
19.0
19.6
19.9
21.1
17.4
18.5
21.1
22.3
22.9
6
1976
73
67
73
67
77
75
75
78
76
74
75
68
68
75
71
77
73
69
78
75
76
74
72
78
76
72
70
68
ratio
a
early, 76 cross &
early
v. high a
v. high a
v. high a
early
v. high a
yellow leaves, high a
v. high a/e, low
early
v. high a
v. high a
yellow leaves
early
v. high a
v. high a
yellow leaves
yellow leaves
v. high a
v.g. male, early
Remarks
On
!$•
19:29a
34b
20:23a
28b
30a
36a
37a
37b
21:22b
37b
43a
7308-09M
-20M
-23M
-36M
-3711
-38M
7309-04M
-34M
-45M
26:39b
43b
27:40b
28:45a
29:42b
46b
7311-12H
-114M
-122M
-87M
-20M
-46M
24:45a
7310-07M
-1C2M 23:39b
-35M
7307-24M
-138M 18:19a
;
*>
"
NBxBu-ZS
ii
ii
.
.
»
ii
.
21055x21108M
64107x21070M; NBx(BG2xEKG-BavS)
it
•I
n
64107x21111M; NBxBu-ZS
64107x21110M
64107x21109M; NBx[(BGxEG-XS)xZS]
"
64107x21108M; NBx[CBGxEG-XS)xZS]
-117M 17:42a
16:23b
7306-13M
62013x21111M; Comet x Bu-ZS
Name
62013x21070M; Comet x(BG^xEUG-BavS)
10: 18a
45b
11 24a
27b
34a
43a
12 22a
30b
36b
39a
46b
Location
Row:Hi 11
continued.
7305-101M 14:32a
-92M
-105M
-123M
-148M
-165M
-1771!
-182M
-197M
-61M
-85M
7304-06M
Sel. No.
Ir.llt
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
1
3
1
3
2
2
3
4
1
3
1
4
3
1
3
4
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
1
4
2
35.2
VE
VE
49.7
62.5
47.1
64.4
56.3
64.9
M
M
M
M
L
L
45.0
M
M
VE
M
54.4
53.5
57.1
54.3
53.6
63.7
58.8
60.0
53.5
M
M
M
M
M
58.8
56.5
54.2
59.1
55.5
57.7
56.7
63.3
50.1
56.9
50.2
57.3
53.1
55:5
52.6
60.0
49.2
E
L
L
L
M
E
E
VE
M
VE
E
M
M
M
M
M
Vigors
1975-.1976 Maturity
15.9
50.8
79
17.4
76
79
69
75
74
76
18.5
19.0
15.2
18.3
16.7
51.7
59.8
55.7
41.1
49.0
75
76
80
77
76
79
76
80
70
16.2
19.2
11.7
19.1
17.7
12.9
19.7
14.2
16.8
77
72
70
50.6
47.0
52.0
52.3
78
74
81
79
13.5
12.7
78
70
74
78
72
65
77
76
69
73
70
70
75
74
71
73
68
71
21.7
45.3
32.1
80
78
70
14.4
20.0
19.0
18.0
23.0
13.8
17.8
15.4
24.3
22.3
18.2
26.9
19.5
19.3
19.2
20.7
22
20.2
73
50.3
49.8
46.9
55.2
63.0
57.7
26.1
60.7
47.8
53.9
51
48
52
59
53
53
49.5
56.1
48.6
75
70
77
73
71
76
77
72
71
73
78
80
80
75
77
76
72
75
78
74
a
ratio
a
20.5
1976
ratio
55.5
guaiity
70
19.4
15.1
9.9
19.5
12.2
18.2
22.6
19.5
14.8
17.3
23.4
22.2
23.3
16.7
17.3
21.2
23.5
20.7
17.9
12.7
14.6
16.
17.
16.
21,
17.
17.
17.4
e
1975
v. low
6
v. high a
early, v. low 6
early, v. low 6
v. high a, low e
v. high a, low 6
early
v. high a,76 cross0
v.high alpha
yellow leaves
yellow leaves
On
On
early
yellow leaves, early
v. high a
early
Remarks
39:33b
-98M
.1
21055x21070M
21055x21111M
21055x21110M
39:13-14 (BG x EG-XS)xZS
44a
-51M
M
21108M
44:34a
7315-31M
-109M 43:31b
41:33a
42:36a
46a
36b
39:43a
40:34b
37:40a
-47M
7314-04M
-19M
-23M
-48M
-86M
-106M
36:40a
46b
43b
7313-15M
-27M
-126M
-105M 35:33a
-79M
-88M
-431-1
21055x21109M
32:37a
42b
43a
45a
33:34a
34:36a
40b
7312-17M
-28M
-29M
-33M
Name
21055x21108M
Location
Row:Hill
concluded
7311-135M 30:37a
-141M
40a
-142M
40b
Sel. No.
TABLE 1$:
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
1
2
2
2
M
M
L
M
M
"M
M
VE
M
?
M
L
M
1
?
M
?
M
M
M
M
?
?
M
M
M
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
Vigor_//
1975;1976 Maturity
40.5
54.0
42.6
52.7
43.9
51.1
54.6
52.3
40.0
49.7
50.7
58.6
52.3
17.7
20.4
18.9
22.2
14.0
17.4
13.5
14.6
14.7
20.8
15.2
19.9
17.3
21.9
23.2
19.2
25.7
21.4
23.0
55.7
49.3
56.5
53.8
46.2
50.8
18.5
20.9
16.9
19.2
23.4
41.8
57.0
51.7
61.9
53.6
1975
70
73
74
76
78
75
75
74
70
71
77
75
75
72
70
71
66
72
68
74
73
75
76
70
50.6
51.2
59.0
52.7
40.0
50.6
50.9
53.8
43.
47.
57.9
45.1
52.2
43.5
56.4
47.7
58.4
45.8
10.3
23.3
20.8
19.4
19.2
26.7
20.2
18.9
19.9
22.4
15.5
18.4
16.2
23.9
22.0
21.1
25.7
23.0
16.3
21.0
17.5
83
69
74
73
60
71
73
73
66
71
79
71
76
65
72
69
69
67
76
72
77
a
ratio
ratio
1976
a
55.3
54.2
56.1
guaIity
male parent
early'
v. high o, low e
used for 76 cress c?
Remarks
On
1:15b
:16b
:19a
:19b
:32a
2:44b
3:17b
:39b
4:29b
:33b
:35b
5:38a
6:21a
:34a
:37a
7:18b
:24b
:28b
8:34b
:42b
9:46b
10:14b
7301-01
-03
-08
-09
-34
-126
-139
-183
7302-29
-37
-41
-113
-146
-172
-178
7303-07
-19
-27
-106
-122
-197
7306-05
-08
-30
-40
-42
-43
7305-05
-08
-152
7304-10
-36
-107
-121
:38a
:38b
:37a
:21a
:32a
16:19b
15:24a
13:17b
:19a
11:35a
:42a
:33a
10:20a
Row:Hill
Number
-200
Location
64107 x 21108M
62013 x 21070M
62013 x 21111M
62013 x 21110M
62013 x 21109M
62013 x 21108M
Pedigree—
0
4
3
3
4
0
0
0
0
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
4
2
4
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
4
2
2
3
1
3
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
3
3
1
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
4
1
1
1
2
1976
1
1
1975
Viqor^
11.7
12.2
11.7
14.2
15.7
12.5
10.6
13.2
14.5
11.1
14.5
3.4
5.0
3.9
5.0
5.2
5.1
5.0
5.3
2.7
4.8
5.1
4.7
3.9
4.2
3.9
13.6
15.5
15.1
14.5
3.3
4.7
5.8
11.5
13.3
14.9
15.7
5.7
4.1
15.4
9.7
12.5
3.5
4.2
2.5
4.0
8
12.1
12.9
a
1975
77
71
75
74
75
71
68
74
73
81
72
77
80
77
78
78
74
72
78
75
80
76
79
74
a-ratio
13.9
12.6
7.7
8.4
12.5
13.8
11.9
10.1
11.0
8.8
11.3
10.7
10.6
13.3
12.6
11.1
12.7
9.1
8.6
9.8
13.1
11.0
12.1
12.9
11.8
13.8
8.2
13.8
7.8
11.6
11.7
11.9
13.8
9.5
a
Quality^
5.5
2.9
4.3
5.1
4.1
4.4
6.0
4.9
4.7
2.5 •
3.5
3.2
4.3
4.6
3.6
3.1
4.0
3.3
5.8
2.2
3.6
3.4
3.6
4.0
2.5
8
1976
77
74
58
74
75
73v
68
70
66
78
70
65
56
71
72
79
75
80
75
82
71
76
74
76
74
77
78
79
78
77
78
76
71
70
a-ratio
Pruned April 12, 13, 19; Trained May 18, 1976
1
2
3
3
Cone
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
Crown
DM2-'
Female Selections from the 1973 Nursery,
Selection
Table 16:
VG set
Exc. set, storage
Exc. set, storage
Yellow lvs.
Yellow lvs.
VG set
Exc. set
VG set
Early
Tight cone
VG, tight cone
Exc. set, Early
VG set
Yellow leaves
Early, 1976 crossing parent
VG set
Exc. set, yellow lvs.
VG, large cones
Exc. set, ID 0.33
Exc. set, tight cone
ML
Exc set, tight cone, ML
Remarks
On
CO
16:39a
17:19a
:29a
:31b
:32a
:32b
:33a
18:19b
7306-44
-71
-91
-96
-97
-98
-99
-139
-148
-163
-172
-174
-182
-190
-193
-194
21:44b
22:38a
:38b
25:39a
:40a
:45a
26:44b
27 :31b
7309-48
-67
-68
7310-27
-29
-39
7311-22
'
-28
7308-34
-48
-61
-64
43a
19 28b
32a
35b
38b
42b
:31b
:36a
:37a
:41a
:45a
:46b
19:13
20 35b
42b
?1 15b
17a
7307-23
-30
-37
-43
-51
-52
Row:Hill
Nunber
:24a
Location
Selection
Tablel6: continued.
0
0
0
0
0
21055 X21108M
II
II
II
64107 X21070M
II
II
0
0
0
64107 x 21111M
II
II
II
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
64107 x 21110M
II
II
II
II
II
3
2
2
3
3
4
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
4
3
3
2
3
2
4
4
2
2
3
2
1
1
4
2
3
1976
4
3
4
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
4
3
4
4
3
0
0
o
64107 x 21109M
II
It
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
M
II
II
II
3
2
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
II
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1975
Cone
D^
Crown
64107 x 21108M
Pediqree—
Viqor^-/
•
9.7
12.6
10.2
11.4
4.2
3.6
3.1
4.5
76
67
74
72
70
2.7
5.4
4.1
4.5
5.5
8.6
11.1
12.0
11.8
12.8
77
72
73
75
75
76
70
3.4
10.7
11.3
10.1
76
2.8
9.0
4.9
3.4
72
76
72
72
4.8
3.2
3.2
3.7
12.7
10.0
8.1
9.3
76
77
74
77
67
74
76
79
75
76
76
77
73
72
73
75
74
73
Tight cone
Early
Exc. set
Early
Exc.
Early
set
Exc. Set
74
77
75
71
74
4.3
4.4
3.9
3.8
4.1
4.0
VG set, tight cone
76
Early
VG set
Exc. set
Rpmarks
81
74
11.5
11.1
10.4
11.5
11.8
10.8
75
73
80
78
75
76
74
75
77
76
1976
3.0
3.3
2.7
3.9
3.3
3.9
4.5
5.0
5.5
4.1
3.3
2.3
4.3
3.6
3.5
2.7
a
12.9
9.6
8.6
11.0
11.1
11.7
11.1
14.0
11.2
11.5
10.4
10.5
13.1
11.4
10.8
10.0
a-ratio
3.9
2.8
4.0
3.0
3.8
3.8
3.9
3.1
3.6
4.1
4.3
1.8
2.8
3.1
6
Quali ty J/
12.2
9.4
11.3
9.9
11.4
10.9
12.0
13.0
9.7
13.0
11.0
7.3
10.0
9.5
OL
1975
On
-129
-115
-116
-120
-124
-128
-111
-36
-37
-41
-42
-44
-51
-53
-57
-60
-78
-81
-83
-84
-98
-106
-26
-27
7312-06
-09
-15
-23
-56
-66
-68
-78
-95
-108
-152
-177
44b
45a
40b
42b
35 33b
36a
38a
38b
45b
41a
42b
34 35b
37a
38a
38 b
39a
38a
33b
34b
32 31b
33a
36a
40a
41b
42a
46b
33 31b
33a
27:33a
:33b
:45b
28:34b
:35b
:40b
29:33a
:39b
30:45b
31:42a
7311-31
-32
Number
Location
Row:Hill
Selection
Table, 16: continued.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21055 x 21109M
Crown
21055x21108M
Pedigree—
3
3
3
2
4
4
3
3
4
4
2
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
2
4
2
2
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
4
3
4
Cone
DM2-/
3
2
3
3
1975
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1976
Vigor^/
2.6
5.1
3.4
2.7
11.3
14.4
12.3
12.3
12.4
12.6
9.2
15.6
10.5
13.4
14.8
14.6
14.9
18.7
11.9
3.2
4.5
3.1
4.6
13.3
13.8
12.5
13.2
3.5
3.1
4.1
2.2
2.8
3.7
3.0
4.9
4.7
5.6
4.0
4.8
4.0
4.1
13.0
12.3
13,6
2L
1975
78
80
79
81
79
78
83
75
76
77
75
81
74
78
82
81
75
80
74
74
76
75
a-ratio
10.6
12.6
12.5
12.2
12.0
10.7
12.2
9.2
9.3
13.8
11.0
13.1
13.2
11.2
16.4
12.2
18.1
10.6
11.4
12.9
13.3
13.2
10.8
11.4
14.5
12.8
13.3
8.5
13.2
11.5
12.6
12.2
8.8
12.2
11.8
12.3
11.8
13.7
Qualityi!/
3.8
4.7
3.8
3.8
6.0
5.1
3.6
3.0
5.0
3.4
3.2
4.1
2.4
2.6
3.5
3.9
3.1
4.2
3.0
3.5
3.3
3.1
3.4
3.0
3.7
2.1
3.7
5.9
4.2
3.2
3.7
5.2
4.0
3.8
2.8
4.9
4.3
4.8
6
19.76
78
80
78
78
79
80
78
78
77
81
72
70
83
81
79
77
74
79
76
78
76
75
71
71
79
74
74
78
81
74
73
74
75
79
71
70
75
76
a-ratio
High a + e
Low beta
Early
Higha, lupulin;'76 crossing gpar.
Low beta, tight cone
Low beta
T.cone, '76 crossing ^parent
Exc. set, VE;h1ghesta, lupulin
Exc. set
Exc. set.T.cone,'76 crossing £par.
Exc. set
High lupulin
Exc. set
Exc. set, tight cone
Exc. set
VG set, low beta
VG set
Remarks
:46b
]_/
0
Comet x(BG x
6 hill avg.
21055
3
1
2
3
2.1
4.2
3.8
4.6
-4.6
9.3
.8.3
14.0
70
72
69
2.7
4.2
13.6
8.7
4.3
3.9
21110M 21111M = Bu x ZS
76
2/
3/
4/
4.2
8.8
69
3.8
Female parents: Comet (62013); Northern Brewer (64107); USDA 21055
Male parents: 21008M 21009M = (BG x EG - XS) x ZS
Fu - Colo 2-1)
0
Northern Brewer
3 hill avg.
64107
4
10.7
2
1
4
0
Comet
62013
3
6.2
8.5
2
1
2
1
14.9
14.2
1
19001
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.9
2.4
11.1
12.8
14.3
13.8
14.6
11.1
79
78
81
79
2.8
3.8
3.6
3.9
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
10.6
13.3
9.5
2
0
2
3
2
4
4
3
3
13.2
13.6
set
Large cones
Exc. set, low beta
VG set
VG set
High a+B,'76 crossing c>paront
Tight cone
High a+e
Exc.
Tight .cone
Early
Early
Early
Used for '76 crossing <j> parent
Remarks
Downy Mildew; 0 = best to 4
1 = best to 4
"as is" basis,5 cone samples
75
68
69
69
68
79
79
82
80
76
79
77
73
71
70
74
78
72
73
70
6.1
4.0
4.8
4.4
4.3
70
71
66
71
70
79
72
80
76
77
70
81
70
4.8
5.5
5.7
4.4
5.7
4.1
4.7
3.0
3.6
4.6
5.2
2.9
4.9
4.5
12.0
11.2
15.5
12.0
12.2
11.7
78
81
a-ratio
3.3
3.4
1976
10.5
14.0
11.4
15.9
12.0
13.4
73
70
67
5.3
6.7
4.6
3.8
5.4
3.5
14.1
15.3
9.5
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
Fuggle H
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
4
0
0
0
0
3
3
4
0
0
74
76
71
5.4
4.0
4.8
12.9
12.9
13.5
48209
21055 x 21170M
21055 x 21111M
2
1
77
73
3.4
4.2
68
73
72
75
11.0
11.1
0
4 hill avg.
43:35a
:46b
44:33b
:36a
45:34a
46:38a
39:46b
40:31a
:41b
41:31a
:38a
42:39b
39:39b
:40a
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
Brewer's Gold
-30
-35
-63
-103
7315-01
-24
-33
-44
-58
-93
-12
7314-11
-110
-111
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
3
2
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
11.8
11.3
13.7
13.0
2
1
-10
-28
-29
-32
-41
-43
-53
-83
-92
0
0
11.1
13.1
10.9
10.6
13.1
15.3
12.0
71
71
4.8
4.8
6.2
4.4
4.5
4.5
11.8
11.5
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
0
0
0
21055 x 21110M
36:36a
:37a
:37b
:46b
37:31a
:32b
:37a
:38a
:43a
38:42a
7313-07
-09
12.4
13.8
79
82
2.6
3.1
9.6
14.3
1
1
1
1
3
3
a-ratio
0
0
1976
21055 x 21109M
Cone 1975
36:31a
:31b
Crown
Quality 1/
7312- 133
134
1/
Pedigree-1-7
1975
Row:Hi 11
Vigor^
Number
DM2/
Location
Selection
Table 16: concluded.
72
Reduced tillage ~ herbicide trial with Cascade;
This trial was again harvested
in 1976 and an attempt was made to evaluate the data statistically.
Again,
as in the previous year, yield levels were disappointingly low particularly
in the non-tilled portion of replication 4, and also in the tilled portion
of replication 4.
Weed control, particularly for the combination Simaaine
(applied in the fall) and Paraquat (applied in the spring) was adequate.
Close spacing, however, seems to be not a very practical approach to growing
Cascade, since hills spread out within a row and it is very difficult to
control bottom growth in such an arrangement without cross cultivation.
In
1977 the test will be altered; the 3 foot spacing will be removed and the
plot will be cross-cultivated once in the spring; afterwards the test will
only consist of tilled vs. non-tilled treatment with Paraquat as the main
chemical for weed control.
73
Table 17=
Reduced Tillage-Herbicide Trial with Cascade 1976
(P = Paraquat; S = Simazine)
Harvest date Sept.8; Pruned, April 7; Trained, May 17)
Repli
cation
I
Location
Row:Hill
Treatment
Tilled:
Close
Close
sp + P +
sp + P
42:73b-77b
43:73b-77b
s
Normal sp + P + s
Normal, Control
Close ,Control
Normal, P
Not Tilled:Normal,Control
Close , P + S
Close iControl
Close ..P
Normal;P
Normal, P + S
II
Tilled:
Normal, Control
Close >P
Close ,P + S
Normal >P
Normal, P + S
Not Tilled:Close >P
Normal, P
Normal, Control
Normal, P + S
Close j? + S
III
Tilled:
Normal P + S
Normal
P
Close ,P + S
Close, P
Normal Control
Close> Control
Not Til led:Normal P
Normal P + S
Closei Control
Close. P + S
Close., P
Normal Control
IV
Tilled:
Close, P
Normal Control
Normal P
Closei Control
Normal P + S
Close; P + S
Not Tilled:Close, P + S
Normal
P
Normal Control
Normal P + S
Close) Control
Close; P
1/ 5 plants per plot:
~ U plants per ploti
49:73-77
50:73b-77b
51:73b-77b
52:73b-77b
53:73-77
54:73-77
4
2
2
42 :85-89
43 :85- 89
44 :85b -89b
45 :85b -89b
46 :85- 89
47 :85b -89b
49 :85- 89
50 :85-89
51 •85b -89b
52 85b -89b
53 85b -89b
54 85- 89
42
43
44
45
46
47
9;b -95b
91- 95
91- 95
91b -95b
91- 95
91b -95b
49. 91b -95b
50: 91- 95
51: 91- 95
52: 91- 95
53: 91b -95b
54: 91b -95b
f - 0.085317
f - 0.I066I4.7
6/28
2
4
49:79b-83b
50:79b-83b
51:79-83
52:79-83
53:79-83
54:79b-83b
Close ^Control
6/25^ 4
44:73-77
45:73-77
46:73b-77b
47:73-77
42:79-83
43:79b-83b
44:79b-83b
45:79b-83b
46:79-83
47:79-83
Close ,Control
X wire
1st Most
6/28
6
6/30
6/30
7
4
6/28
6/28
6/28
10
12
12
10
12
18
18
18
18
18
1237
879
1477
1199
1190
1032
8
10
8
8
6
12
10
12
12
10
10
12
18
18
18
18
18
18
1476
819
802
862
981
1049
10
6
12
10
10
10
18
18
18
18
18
18
1152
798
994
943
1118
1037
10
12
10
12
10
12
18
18
18
18
18
18
981
781
1152
933
1177
764
10
12
8
8
12
8
18
18
14
14
18
16
10
18
8
10
10
12
8
8
8
4
6
6
10
2
6
8
8
6/28
6
4
4
7
10
8
12
6/30
6
6
10
2
2
4
2
6/28
4
6
10
^uly18
6
6
6
6
10
6
8
12
12
12
12
943
1194
1006
806
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
10
10
12
10
8
o- * (?
5.7
U.5
10.2
56
5.8
lu3
10.1
58
5.6
hJx
10.0
56
5.7
U.6
10.2
55
li.9
li.2
9.1
51*
5.3
li.3
9.6
55
5.2
U.2
9.5
55
5.Ji
U.J
9.7
56
991
883
10
8
14
10
16
14
0(«- £
601
' 8
18
18
18
18
18
4
4
10
6
10
8
beta
981
1253
UOS
592
10
8
c*.
alpha
1357
' 8
8
10
8
8
10
10
10
8
12
8
10
Quality 2/
1055
14
2
4
2
2
4
4
2/ average per
YielrT
lbs/A
8
8
10
4
10
2
6
6/28
6/25
6/30
Bloom
1st Most
768
998
567
776
'682
346
606
405
752
219
205
cultivation tre atment