Electrical Reliability Services
WHO WE ARE
Electrical Reliability Services, Inc. (ERS) has been in the business of insuring the safe and reliable operation of
complex electrical distribution equipment and systems since 1971. As such we have a huge base of field testing
and startup experience on all types of commercial and industrial facilities. For the past 13 years we have also
distinguished ourselves as a leader in the area of Commissioning of Critical Space Facilities, particularly for
computer Data Centers.
ERS acts as an independent, third party testing and verification authority, working as an advocate for facility
owners to insure that equipment and systems are designed, constructed, tested and operated to function safely
and meet the needs of the owner. We focus on parallel disciplines of field verifications and comprehensive
project documentation that demonstrate the owner’s objectives have been met.
Our commissioning experience spans a range of critical space facilities from small POP sites and remodel
projects, to large laboratories and Tier IV Enterprise Data Centers. ERS commissioning project managers and
teams are involved throughout the commissioning process, beginning at project inception. Ideally this includes
involvement in the Pre-Design and Design Phases, the Construction Phase, and the Occupancy and Operations
Phase through 1 year of occupation and beyond. This process facilitates collaboration, communication and
commitment between owners and design teams, contractors and vendors, operations personnel and facility
occupants, resulting in a critical space facility that meets the needs of the owner.
Electrical Reliability Services is a member in good standing with, among others, the following organizations:

InterNational Electrical Testing Association

Building Commissioning Association

7X24 Exchange

Rocky Mountain Electrical League
OUR ORGANIZATION AND PEOPLE
Electrical Reliability Services has 35 service locations located across the United States serving major power
users including industrial, refining, chemical, power, oil & gas, water / wastewater, food & beverage, life
sciences, data centers, education, and healthcare industries.
ERS’s team is comprised of an impressive number of registered professional engineers, electrical engineers,
technicians, and other support personnel. Our field engineers are NETA certified (Level II, III, or IV), and we
have LEED APs on staff.
Our Commissioning Project Managers and Field Commissioners have received training in ASHRAE
commissioning guidelines and the LEED rating system, and are Certified as Qualified Commissioning Providers,
QCxP, by the University of Wisconsin.
RELATIONSHIPS
Successful commissioning processes require participation by many parties in a construction or remodel project,
which is why ERS puts a lot of importance on relationships. While every participant needs to know and
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
Page 1 of 7
understand their role in the commissioning process, professional and respectful relationships are the real key to
having this process achieve all of its goals and work smoothly. Early in the process it is important to enroll
members of the design and construction groups into a cohesive and enthusiastic Commissioning Team, all with
a stake in the successful outcome of the project.
Important relationship points for a commissioning project include:





Understanding of each party’s role in the process
Defined and open lines of communication
Request from all parties for commissioning process input
Trust and understanding that all are working toward the same quality goal
Acknowledgement of the role of all parties in a successful project
ERS takes pride in the relationships we have been able to establish with facility owners, design professionals,
contractors and construction teams, and manufacturers and vendors. These have resulted in many successful
projects, repeat business, and overall satisfaction at the end of the commissioning process.
OUR COMMISSIONING PROCESS
ERS believes in a hands-on approach to Commissioning. While we play a traditional role in commissioning
administration, design reviews and documentation, our field activities include witnessing, participating in site
inspections, implementation of corrective action, and performance of functional tests and system test
procedures. Our engineers come from a field background, and we have found that a field-involved approach
gives us a thorough understanding of operating principles of the facility and whether it meets the owner’s needs
and the intent of the design.
The ERS commissioning process allows for the variable needs and budgets of our customers. A
comprehensive commissioning process begins in the Pre-Design Phase of the project and continues through 1
year of Operations. While this may offer considerable value for the investment, we understand that this model
may not fit all projects. In that event, ERS can recommend a cost-effective approach with a reduced
commissioning scope using the same thorough and technically proficient methods to insure the functionality of
the systems being commissioned. These methods will insure that the systems turned over to the owner operate
as intended, that operations personnel have been properly trained to handle these new systems, and that they
have all the necessary resources to operate the systems of the building for years to come.
The commissioning process follows project planning, design, construction and operation, with specific activities
to be performed in each phase of the project. As the work progresses and new parties become involved, it is
important to consider how this may affect project logistics. Generally, the Owner’s Project Requirements,
Commissioning Plan, and Commissioning Schedule may change at any time during the project, and these
documents should be considered for periodic revisions to reflect these changes.
PRODUCTS
A key factor to success in any commissioning project is comprehensive and concise documentation. The
written commissioning products should clearly and accurately describe the process to be followed, roles and
responsibilities, test procedures and acceptance criteria, along with many other aspects of the project. These
documents should not be overly burdensome or repetitive, and are not a substitute for proficient field work.
ERS has developed documentation for all phases of the commissioning process, and we have a variety of
templates for core commissioning documents that can be customized to fit the specifics of any facility. ERS
commissioning documentation includes:








Owner’s Project Requirements
Commissioning Specifications
Commissioning Plan
Construction Checklists
Commissioning Observation Report (COR)
Commissioning Progress Reports & Tracking Sheets
Training Requirements
Communications Plan …and more
The following are examples of ERS commissioning documentation:
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
Page 2 of 7

Process Tracking Sheet – Gives a clear indication to the Commissioning Team of the current status of the
commissioning process, progress since the last report, and parts of the process that are lagging and require
attention.
ELECTRICAL COMMISSIONING TRACKING FORM
In order to insure that electrical equipment and systems are properly inspected, tested and commissioned, the process flow for each item is generally
expected to move from left to right. All items must be complete, documented, and reviewed by the Commissioning Agent before moving to the facility
Integrated System Testing phase.

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n/a
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n/a
n/a
n/a
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
1/15 n/a
2/5 n/a
2/20 n/a
forms
recvd
% Complete
n/a
date
complete
forms
devlpd
forms
reviewed
Y
Y
Y
forms
recvd
Y
Y
Y
% Complete
n/a
date
complete
Y
Y
Y
forms
recvd
MDSA
MDSB
GPS
% Complete
forms
reviewed
Y
forms
recvd
Y
approved
settings
input
Y
Notes
1/10 n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Generator Controls
n/a
n/a n/a n/a
Generator 1
Generator 2
Generator 3
Generator 4
Generator 5
Generator 6
Generator 7
Generator 8
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unit Substation A
Sub A Transformer
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n/a
n/a
1/20 n/a
1/25 n/a
n/a
n/a
Y
Y
3
Unit Substation B
Sub B Trasnformer
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n/a
n/a
1/20 n/a
1/25 n/a
n/a
n/a
Y
Y
3
Unit Substation C
Sub C Transformer
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n/a
n/a
1/20 n/a
1/25 n/a
n/a
n/a
Y
Y
3
Unit Substation D
Sub D Transformer
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
n/a
n/a
1/20 n/a
1/25 n/a
n/a
n/a
Y
Y
3
Unit Substation E
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y n/a
1/20 n/a n/a
Sub E Transformer
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y n/a
1/25 n/a n/a
NOTES: 3. Coordinating remainder of functional tests (switching, control power tests, etc.) at soonest available time.
Y
Y
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
3/14
3/14
3/14
3/14
3/14
3/14
3/14
3/14
Integrated Systems Test 4/22/08
% Complete
forms
reviewed
forms
reviewed
MCS
Equipment / System
update on: 04/16/2009
Start-Up / Site Testing
Functional
(by vendor)
(ERS)
Pre-Functional
(by contractor)
forms
recvd
forms
recvd
Electrical Acceptance Testing
(ERS)
Commissioning Observation Report (COR) – Identifies, describes, and tracks project issues discovered as a
result of the commissioning process. These issues are regularly discussed in commissioning meetings and
status updated. Resolution is then verified by the Commissioning Agent before issues are retired from the list.
<Facility Name and Location>
CURRENT ISSUES
Commissioning Observation Report
# of resolved items: 323
Item
No.
!
Date Noted
updated on: 04/16/2009
Responsible
118
A
03/06/08
Square D
119
A
03/07/08
HO Penn
120
A
03/07/08
RKMI
121
B
03/07/08
Liebert
123
A
03/07/08
Liebert
124
126
A
A
03/07/08
02/26/08
HO Penn
RKMI
Equipment
Issue Description /
Spec. Section
The Zone Interlock and Neutral Sensor
jumpers were found not installed for the
following breakers:
Sub CLS-C2
CB343
breaker cubicle
CB345
wiring
CB347
CB349
Recommend these jumpers be installed as
soon as possible.
Generator 7
Issue Status
Date Resolved
- Correct jumpers are:
Zone Interlock - Z3 to Z4 and Z3 to Z5
Neutral Sensor - T1 to T2
- Square D aware of issue.
- 3/13 - Reported as being completed. ERS
to verify.
Fuel fill float not operating & calling for fuel.
Fuel soleniods not operating. Generators had
Generators 4,
to be filled by hand. Require replacement - 3/13 - No change.
7, & 8
solenoids.
UPS Module
Fan motor defective & requires replacement.
A1
- Parts on order. Shoule be on site week of
Parts removed to repair UPS A equipment.
UPS Module
3/10.
Require replacement prior to testing UPS C
C3
- 3/21 - Capacitors replaced. Waiting on
System.
contactors.
Generator 7
CWP-2
Developed coolant leak at engine block
during load testing.
- Leak corrected & load testing completed.
- 3/9 - Coolant still pooled in generator
mounting wells & requires clean-up.
- 3/21 - Cleanup complete. No leak since.
- 3/13 - No change.
- 3/21 - Parts ordered.
Water leaking from pump bearing assembly. - 3/27 - Parts received.
- 4/3 - Seal has been changed, pump still
leaks.
ERS Project No. 3091649
Page 5 of 36
! prioritizes items: A=high, B=med, C=low. Bold=new item. Striked item=resolved.
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
Page 3 of 7
ERS has developed a comprehensive systems testing process for all related critical system support equipment
involving electrical and mechanical primary systems, redundant systems, backup systems, emergency and
automatic switching systems, as well as building automation (BAS) for monitoring and control of facility equipment
and environments. This process verifies the functional operation of integrated building systems under load, and will
likely be the most comprehensive test a facility ever receives.

Integrated Systems Test Script – A scripted test procedures for the integrated functional operation of completed
critical support systems, under design rated heat load. This test script is developed with input from the owner,
the design team, contractors, operators, and vendors. The document becomes the test record and shows
actual test times & durations, actual test procedures, and verification of expected test results, or detailed
information showing what occurred that was out of the acceptable range of response.
< F a c ility N a m e & L o c a tio n >
S te p
#
H rs : M in s
In te g ra te d S y s te m s T e s t S c rip t
T im e
D u r a tio n
S ta r t
A C T IO N
A c tio n
By
F in is h
E x p e c te d
R e s u lts
R e s u lts / N o te s
(s e e s u p p le m e n t a l IS T n o te s )
T e s t D a y # 1 - A p r il 2 2 , 2 0 0 8
S IM U L A T E D H E A T L O A D T E S T S
8 :3 0
1 0 :0 0
A d d a p p ro x . 2 5 % s im u la te d
c o m p u te r lo a d .
12
1 0 0 % L o a d o f 9 2 .5 W /f t
(3 ,3 9 0 k W - N o rth F lo o r
3 ,0 9 0 k W - S o u th F lo o r)
6 4 8 0 k W T o ta l
1 :3 0
2
L o a d in g p e r a r e a
3 ,3 9 0 k W - N o rth F lo o r
3 ,0 9 0 k W - S o u th F lo o r
CO M M ENTS:
1.
2.
3.
C H IL L E R S Y S T E M F A IL U R E
1 8 :1 5
127
0 :4 5
128
0 :1 5
1 9 :0 0
M o n ito r a n d d o c u m e n t o p e ra tio n o f
c h ille rs , C R A C s , c o o lin g to w e rs , a n d
c h ille d w a te r lo o p s th ro u g h th e b u ild in g
m a n a g e m e n t s y s te m . M o n ito r & re c o rd
c o m p u te r f lo o r/s p a c e te m p e ra tu re ,
F lu o r / E R S h u m id ity , u n d e r-f lo o r s ta tic p re s s u re ,
/ EC ube
c h ille r s u p p ly a n d re tu rn te m p e ra tu re s .
H V A C e q u ip m e n t a la rm s , a n d lo a d
v o lta g e s /c u rre n ts . R o o m
te m p e ra tu re s /h u m id itie s a n d C H W
te m p e ra tu re s s h o u ld n o t g o b e yo n d th e
s p e c if ic a tio n s .
M e te re d lo a d :
U P S -A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ k W
U P S -B _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ k W
U P S -C _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ k W
_ _ _ _ _ R o o m te m p w ith in lim its
_ _ _ _ _ R H w ith in lim its
_ _ _ _ _ IR s c a n lo a d b a n k c o n n e c tio n s
R e fe r to d a ta s h e e ts f o r s p e c if ic e le c tric a l a n d m e c h a n ic a l e q u ip m e n t p e rf o rm a n c e d a ta .
T h e C R A C s o n th e S o u th D a ta F lo o r in c lu d e (e n te r n o .) o p e ra tin g u n its a n d (e n te r n o .) s ta n d b y u n its .
T h e C R A C s o n th e N o rth D a ta F lo o r in c lu d e (e n te r n o .) o p e r a tin g u n its a n d (e n te r n o .) s ta n d b y u n its .
1 9 :0 0
O p e n d is c o n n e c t o n C h ille r 1 .
RKMI /
F lu o r /
EC ube
- F a ile d c h ille r g e n e ra te s a la rm .
- C h ille r s y s te m fa ils a n d g e n e ra te s
a la rm .
- R e m a in in g c h ille rs ra m p u p to m a in ta in
c h ille d w a te r te m p e ra tu re .
R e s e t f a ile d c h ille r s y s te m .
RKMI /
F lu o r /
EC ube
- C h ille r s y s te m re s ta rts a n d c h ille rs
e q u a liz e lo a d .
Russ
E le c tric /
F lu o r /
S tu rg e o n
- L o s s o f p o w e r / o p e n e d b re a k e r
g e n e ra te s a la rm (s ).
1 9 :1 5
_ _ _ _ _ C h ille r a la rm re c e iv e d
CH W R T = ______
_ _ _ _ _ R o o m te m p w ith in lim its
_ _ _ _ _ R H w ith in lim its
CO M M ENTS:
S E Q U E N T IA L U T IL IT Y P O W E R L O S S E S
1 5 :0 0
1 5 :0 1
D e -e n e rg iz e 1 5 k V f e e d e r to
210
0 :0 1
M D S A b y o p e n in g b re a k e r 1 5 A in
M CS.
1 5 :0 0
211
0 :0 1
1 5 :0 0
212
1 5 :0 1
0 :0 1
_ _ _ _ _ L o s s o f p o w e r a la rm s re c e iv e d
A ll g e n s e ts s ta rt a fte r 5 -s e c o n d
d e la y .
- G e n s e ts w ill ra m p u p to c a rry th e f u ll
lo a d w ith in a llo tte d tim e .
HO Penn /
- B re a k e rs C B 1 0 , C B 1 1 , C B 1 2 , a n d C B 1 3
Russ
trip o p e n .
E le c tric /
- W ith 1 s t g e n e ra to r o n lin e , U n it S u b I
F lu o r / E R S
e n e rg iz e d a n d A T S D I-1 , D I-2 , E I-1 , a n d
E I-2 tra n s f e r to th e E m e rg e n c y p o s itio n .
A u to s w itc h in g p e r L o a d
A c q u is itio n S e q u e n c e .
- W ith 3 g e n s o n lin e , C B 1 9 c lo s e s
im m e d ia te ly .
- W ith 5 g e n s o n lin e , C B 1 1 c lo s e s (1 5
F lu o r / S R I /
s e c o n d d e la y a f te r C B 1 9 c lo s e s ).
ERS
- W ith 6 g e n s o n lin e , C B 1 2 , a n d C B 1 3
c lo s e s e q u e n c ia lly (1 5 s e c o n d d e la y a f te r
C B 1 1 c lo s e s ).
1 5 :0 1
_ _ _ _ _ 5 -s e c o n d g e n e ra to r s ta rt d e la y
_ _ _ _ _ A ll g e n e ra to rs s ta rt a n d p a ra lle l
_ _ _ _ _ C o rre c t b re a k e rs trip o p e n
T im e to 1 s t g e n o n -lin e : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s e c
T im e to la s t g e n o n -lin e : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s e c
_ _ _ _ _ "D " & " E " A T S s to C ritic a l
M e c h a n ic a l L o a d s tra n s f e r to E m e rg e n c y
- 3 g e n s o n lin e _ _ _ _
- 5 g e n s o n lin e _ _ _ _
s e c o n d s la te r
- 6 g e n s o n lin e _ _ _ _
c lo s e s e q u e n c ia lly 1 5
C B 1 9 c lo s e s
C B 1 1 c lo s e s 1 5
C B12 & CB13
s e c o n d s la te r
CO M M ENTS:
E R S P ro je c t N o . 3 0 9 1 6 4 9
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
R e v . 0 6 (4 /8 /0 8 )
Page 8 of 32
Page 4 of 7
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Electrical Reliability Services has provided commissioning services for a range of mission-critical facilities, and
in a variety of commissioning roles. Most often we act as the Commissioning Authority (CxA), but have also
been field commissioners fulfilling a contractor’s commissioning requirements, and been the commissioning
testing contractor. In all cases our goal is to ensure the facility meets the needs of the owner per the
commissioning plan.
ERS has performed commissioning on facilities nation-wide for a variety of customers. Following is a sample of
our past commissioning projects:
 National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Laboratories, Boulder, CO – Research facility
 Qwest Cyber Centers, Nationwide – @ 20 new data center and transport facilities from coast to coast
 FORTRUST Data Center, Denver, CO – New co-location data center, currently @
 DirecTV Data Center, Castle Rock, CO – New building on existing campus, @ 49,500 sq.ft. computer facility
 Ebay Data Center, Centennial, CO – Purchase and updating of an existing facility, @ 20,000 sq.ft. raised floor
 Equinix Data Centers, CA, WA, VA – New facilities, @80,000 sq.ft. raised floor each
 EchoStar Uplink facilities in VA, WA, IL, and TX
 KeyBank Data Center, Chicago, IL – New facility with @100,000 sq.ft. raised-floor computer room
 Sabre Cherokee Data Center, Tulsa, OK – New facility with @50,000 sq.ft. computer room
 Intel FCDC Data Center, Ft. Collins, CO – New data center facility, @30,000 sq.ft. computer room
 Starz Encore Headquarters Facility, Meridian, CO – New office complex and computer facility
 IBM Building 003 Data Center, Boulder, CO – New @70,000 sq.ft. data center, LEED Silver
 FedEx RMTC Data Center, Colorado Springs, CO – New 30,000 sq.ft. data center
 Standard & Poors Data Center, Centennial, CO – Emergency Power Plant Addition Project
 FedEx EDC West Data Center, Colorado Springs, CO – New 30,000 sq.ft. data center, LEED Gold
 IBM Building 022 Data Center, Boulder, CO – New @ 22,000 sq.ft. facility, plus additions to the Central Plant
 Facebook Vitesse Data Centers 1A – 1D, Prineville, OR – New facilities with @ 160,000 sq. ft. of computer rooms,
LEED Gold
 NCAR SuperComputing Center, Cheyenne, WY – New 171,000 sq. ft. facility with @28,000 sq. foot data center,
LEED Gold
 EchoStar Data Center, Cheyenne, WY – New data center facility @30,000 sq. ft. computer rooms
 Agilent Data Center, Colorado Springs, CO – New data center facility @10,000 sq. ft. computer rooms
 Chesapeake Energy, Central Plant & Data Center, Oklahoma City, OK – New facilities on existing campus
 Department of Veterans Affairs, Replacement Medical Center Facility, Denver, CO – (13) medical facility
buildings
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
Page 5 of 7
Project Highlights
.
Qwest Communications - Cyber Centers and POP Sites
Electrical Reliability Services performed commissioning for Qwest data centers
across the country, from small POP sites with a relatively small amount of critical
support equipment, to large co-location Cyber Centers with over 50,000 square
feet of raised computer floor. Many of these facilities were developed in phases,
with later expansions built and commissioned around existing operating
environments. The types of systems commissioned for these projects included
electrical distribution systems, generators and automatic transfer switches, UPS
and PDU equipment, high-resistance grounding, chillers, CRAC units and air
handlers, and BAS control systems. Sites were commissioned in Burbank,
Newark, Sterling, Tampa, Denver, Tukwila, Chicago, Dallas, and Manhattan to
name a few.
IBM Boulder – Building 003
Commissioned in 2008, IBM Building 003 is a Tier IV data center with
over 70,000 square feet of raised floor computer space. Along with
having state-of-the-art critical support systems, this facility achieved a
LEED Silver rating. ERS performed commissioning of all critical support
equipment, and completed the LEED commissioning requirements. Our
Commissioning Observation Report detailed over 400 issues discovered
during the course of the commissioning project that were then resolved
by the construction team. Along with standard commissioning activities,
ERS completed a 4-day Integrated Systems Test with 6.4 megawatts of
critical load in order to fully verify system responses to loaded operation
under normal and adverse operating conditions.
Relera Communications - Data Centers
ERS performed commissioning of several Relera facilities across the
country, including:


Aurora, CO Central Data Center @ 40,000 sq. ft.
Various Data Centers Nationwide @ 5000 sq. ft. raised floor
Each of these projects included normal and emergency power distribution
systems, UPS and PDU equipment, standby engine generators, complete
HVAC systems, building automation and control systems, EPO systems,
and fire protection systems. ERS was Relera’s sole commissioning
contractor for all of their data center projects.
Fortrust LLC – Co-location Data Center
Fortrust is one of the premier co-location data centers in the Rocky Mountain
Region, with a 224,000 square foot facility progressively built to meet
customer needs. ERS was chosen to be the Commissioning Authority for the
initial build out phase in 2001, and has commissioned 4 additional projects at
this facility since then. In eight years of operation, the Fortrust Data Center
has never lost critical power or gone significantly outside temperature and
humidity parameters. Fortrust employs a comprehensive monitoring and
maintenance program to keep systems in top operating condition, and to
make adjustments for optimum environmental conditions. ERS was also
employed to manage the electrical maintenance program.
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
Page 6 of 7
FedEx Corporate Services – Enterprise Data Center West
This FedEx facility started life as their Rocky Mountain Technical
Center, and was commissioned by ERS in 2007 and 2008.
FedEx later performed a major expansion of this building into their
Enterprise Data Center, which is the primary I.T. production
facility for FedEx and houses over 50,000 square feet of raised
floor computer space, 12MW of UPS capacity, and 14MW of
emergency generator capacity. The project also achieved LEED
Gold certification. ERS provided a comprehensive commissioning
process, beginning with conducting an Owner’s Project
Requirements workshop and performing design reviews, through
construction activities and comprehensive systems testing, to
completion tasks at the 11-month post-occupancy mark, including
a pre-warranty expiration performance review of all critical support
equipment and systems.
REFERENCES
Bob Yester, Design Principal
Swanson Rink
1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1200
Denver, CO 80203-2139
Phone: (303) 832-2666
Craig Schartz, Critical Systems Manager
Fluor Facility and Plant Services
(IBM – Boulder)
6300 Diagonal Highway
Boulder, CO 80301
Phone: (303) 924-0705
Robert McClary, Vice President
Fortrust LLC
4300 Brighton Blvd
Denver, CO 80218
Phone: (720) 264-2030
Larry Muckridge, Project Manager
FedEx Corporate Services
8101 E. Prentice, Suite 100
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Phone: (303) 220-3923
ERS Commissioning Qualification Statement
Page 7 of 7