Chem 652 Spring 2013 Anionic Ligands Prof. Donald Watson! Read Hartwig Chapters 3-4 Hydrocarbyl Ligands Most common types: LnM Me Me Me Me benzyl neopentyl LnM LnM phenyl LnM LnM LnM methyl SiMe3 vinyl methyltrimethylsilyl LnM alkynyl What do they have in common? All lack β-hydrides. Strength of Alkyl Metal Bonds • M-alkyl BDE’s range over ~28-70 kcal/mol. • First row metals weakest – subject to thermally homolysis. • Note: M-H stronger than M-R. Synthesis of Metal Alkyls Via transmetallation: Cp2Zr Cl O ZrCp2 Cl Me2 N Cl Pd Cl N Me2 Me3Al MeLi Cp2Zr Me Cl Me2 N Me Pd Me N Me2 + (Me2Al)2O Hard Nucleophiles with CO Ligands MeLi Co(PMe3)3(CO)Cl Co(PMe3)3(CO)Me - O Re(CO)5Br MeLi (CO)4Re Me Br • CO ligands can interfere with transmetallation approach. Via Oxidative Addition Anionic Complexes: + I– Cp [CpFe(CO)2]– + EtI Fe OC Et CO Cp* [Cp*Ir(PMe3)H]– •Li+ + C5H11OTf Me Ir Me3P H + LiOTf Neutral Complexes: (Me3P)4Co–Me + MeBr Me (Me3P)3Co Me Br Alkene Insertion Hydrometallation (hydrozircanation): Cp2Zr H Cl + Me Cp2Zr Me Cl Nucleophilic Addition of Alkene O R R P Cl Pd P R R + R R R P Cl Pd P R R + N H R O R R P Cl Pd P R R N • Note: Electrophilic metal coordinates alkene and activates it towards nucleophilic attack. R Fluoroalkyl Ligands Electrophilic (Oxidative Addition): Ir(PPh3)2(CO)(Cl)(I)CF3 Ir(PPh3)2(CO)Cl + CF3I Nucleophilic: Ar R3P Pd Br Rh Me3SiCF3 + CsF –Me3SiF F PR3 Me3SiRF –Me3SiF Ar R3P Pd CF3 Rh RF PR3 • Fluoroalkyl ligands are particularly strong and stable ligands. Reactions of Metal Alkyls α-Elimination: TaCl5 1.5 Zn(CH2tBu)3 Ta(CH2 tBu) 3Cl2 2 LiCH2tBu H3C CH3 CH3 t ( BuCH2)3Ta However, not general: TaCl5 + 1.5 Zn(CH3)2 Ta(CH3)3Cl2 2 CH3Li Ta(CH3)5 Reactions of Metal Alkyls Beta-Hydride Elimination: R3P I Pd R3P H R3P Ph Ph I Pd R3P H Ph + Ph Reactions of Metal Alkyls 2° Metal Alkyls Often Rearrange to 1° H3C + Cp2Zr(H)Cl Cp2Zr CH3 Cl CH3 Cl Cp2Zr CH3 CH3 PR3 S R2N Pd R2N CH3 S Pd S H3C Cp OC Ph3P Fe PR3 S K = 10 CH3 Cp CH3 OC Ph3P CH3 Fe CH3 • Driven by steric effects. Common mechanism: M H C R H H M R H CH2 H R M H M CH2 C R H H Reactions of Metal Alkyls • Electronic effects can override: Cp Cp OC Ph3P Fe R2N CN PR3 S Pd S NC OC Ph3P CH3 Fe CN CH3 PR3 S K < 0.01 R2N Pd S CN Reactions of Metal Alkyls • Agostic interactions can also drive equilibrium with open coordination sites: N Pd N CH3 CH3 –115 °C N Pd H H N Observed Not observed CH3 N Pd N N N CH3 CH3 N Pd CH3 NCCH3 CH3 Pd –66 °C N –65 °C Keq = 0.29 NCCH3 N Pd N CH3 CH3 Keq = 43 CH3 • Agostic interaction with 2° C–H bond stronger than with 1° C–H bond. Aryl–Metal and Vinyl-Metal Complexes Trends: • Aryl-metal and vinyl-metal bonds stronger than alkyl-metal. R BDEs: > M R M C R • β-Elimination rare from aryl-metal and vinyl-metal bonds. M H M H + BDE’s Methyl vs Phenyl R–Mn(CO)5 R = Ph vs. Me Ph > Me 4 kcal/mol O SiBut3 O SiBut3 Ti R N H SiBut3 R = Ph vs. Me Ph > Me 7.5 kcal/mol H B • Greatest difference in 3rd row. N But N N N Rh R C H R = Ph vs. Me Ph > Me 16 kcal/mol R = Ph vs. Me Cp*Ir(PMe3)R2 Ph > Me 26 kcal/mol (82 vs 56 kcal/mol) More Evidence of Strong Aryl-Metal Bonds H3C Os CH3 CH2Cl2, rt CH3 4 CH3 4 H3C B(OH)2 Br Br Os X H3C Os H3C Pyridinium tribromide Fe powder X Os Pd(0), K2CO3, DMF 4 CH3 4 • Can sometimes carry out transformation of aryl ligands with breaking M-Ar bond! Synthesis of Aryl–Metal and Vinyl-Metal Complexes Via transmetallation: Ph2 Cl P Rh N P Ph2 p-TolLi RT THF Ph2 p-Tol P Rh N P Ph2 Cl Bu3Sn Pt + PtCl2 ZrCl4 + 4 Li(PhC=CMe2) Zr(CPh=CMe2)4 Role of CO Ligands and Transmetalating Agent Cp Cp ON OC PhLi Re Cl Re Cl O Cp ON OC ON Ph Cp PhCu Re Cl ON OC Re Ph • CO ligands can also be attached by aryl and vinyl nucleophiles. • Nature of the reagent effects outcome. Soft copper complexes favor transmetallation. Synthesis of Aryl–Metal and Vinyl-Metal Complexes Via Oxidative Addition: PPh3 Pd(PPh3)4 + I Pd PhI Ph + PPh3 Ph Ph Pt(PPh3)3 + Br Ph3P Pt PPh3 Br 2 PPh3 Synthesis of Aryl–Metal and Vinyl-Metal Complexes Via Decarboxylation: [Mn(CO)5] O O + Ph Cl Ph – CO Mn(CO)5 PhMn(CO)5 Via C–H Bond Activation: hν Cp*Ir(PMe3)H2 Cp*Ir(PMe3)(Ph)(H) Via Alkyne Hydrometallation (Vinyl Only): Cp2ZrHCl + CH3 CH3 Cp2Zr Cl Dynamics of Aryl-Metal Bonds • Some Ar–M bonds have low rotation barriers. • However, Ar–M bond can have slow rotation on NMR time scale. • Steric in nature. J = 7.1 Hz N Pd H3C H3C C6Cl2F3 C6Cl2F3 = Cl F Cl F C Pd N F F F J = 4.2 Hz Cl • Two orthro fluorides are diastereotopic. Cl F Alkynyl Complexes BDEs: R M R > M > R M C R Alkynyl Complex Synthesis Salt Metastasis with Metal Acetylide: N Re OC OC HC CR BuLi, Et2O N N Cl Re OC CO OC N C C R n CO With Weak Base: N OC OC Re N N H(C C)nR + AgOTf Cl OC + Et3N THF CO OC acidic H M M R R Re N C C R n CO Alkynyl Complex Synthesis Transmetallation: PR3 Cl M Cl + 2 HC CR CuI catalyst base PR3 Via CuC CR PR3 R C C M C C R PR3 (M = Ni, Pd, Pt) Metal Enolate Complexes Types: O R MLn O R R O-bound O MLn C-bound LnM MLn R O O R η3 MLn bridged dimer Examples: CH3 H3C O H3C Ta H3C O O OC W OC CO CH3 CH3 CH3 OEt OC Cr OC O CH3 OMe O vs. C Bound L L L Ru O CH3 L CH3 L L L = PMe3 Et3P Ph L CH3 CH3 PEt3 Ph OC Rh O C6D6 Et3P Ph2 P Pd P Ph2 O Ru CO, 25 °C O Rh O L PEt3 Me CH3 PPh3 Pd vs. Ph3P O Me • Early metals favor Obound (oxophilicity). • Late metals can be Obound or C-bound or in equilibrium. • Steric crowding favors O-bound. • Trans ligand influences O- vs. C- bound. Synthesis of Metal Enolates Via Salt Metathesis: t-Bu Ph2 P Pd Br P Ph2 t-Bu Ph2 P Pd P Ph2 O OK CH3 Ph PhCH3, 25 °C CH3 Via Addition to Unsaturated Carbonyls: H Ph3P Rh PPh 3 Ph3P CO O PhCH3 + CH3 H C PPh3 3 OC Rh H O PPh3 CH3 PPh3 + OC Rh H CH3 O PPh3 CH3 Synthesis of Metal Enolates Via Oxidative Addition: Pd(PPh3)4 + Cl H3C PhCH3 O CH3 25 °C O Ph3P Pd PPh3 Cl Via Alkylation of Nucleophilic Metals: OC OC + W CO O O Cl OEt OC OC W OEt CO π-Allyl Complexes Most common types: R2 MLn R1 R2 MLn R1 an η1-allyl complex an η3- or π-allyl complex Examples: Pd Ni Ni(II) (η3-C 3H5)3Cr Cr(III) (η3-C 3H5)4Zr Zr(IV) Cl Cl Pd Br Et3P Pt PEt3 Pd(II) • η3 most common mode for early, middle and late TM complexes. The MO’s of Allyl Allyl Anion Allyl Cation η3 Allyl Bonding C3V pz py px s z y x xz yz z2 Co xy x2-y2 OC CO CO Closer Look At [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 Pd Cl Cl Pd • C-C-C bond angle:119.8° • Pd-C distances: 2.132 Å, 2.108 Å, 2.121 Å • C-C bond distances:1.357 Å, 1.395 Å • Metal bound to allyl face. • Center carbon lies above Pd-Cl axis. NMR of Allyl Groups For static η3 allyl: 1H typically 4-6.5 ppm H HH "syn" 1H typically 2-5 ppm MLn HH "anti" sheilded 1H typically 1-3 ppm Allyl Often Dynamic! Hc Hc Hb Hb Hb Hc Hb Hb Ha Ha M Ha M Ha Hc Ha Ha M Hb Hb Ha Ha M Hb • Note η3 to η1 isomerization allows for metal to access both faces of allyl. • Important in π-allyl substitution reactions. BF4 BF4 H Ph2P N Pd HA HB CH3 CH2 HC HD Dissociation to form a monodentate ligand H Ph2P Pd HA HB H CH3 Rotation H3C N CH2 HC HD BF4 BF4 N CH2 HA PPh2 Pd HB HC HD Coordination to regenerate a bidentate ligand H H3C N CH2 HA PPh2 Pd HB • Dynamic behavior also seen by rearrangement of other ligands. HC HD Synthesis of Metal Allyl Complexes • Via Nucleophilic Displacement: MgBr 2 + NiBr2 Ni • Via Oxidative Addition: Cl + Ni(CO)4 PhH 1/2 Cl Ni Ni Cl + 4 CO Synthesis of Metal Allyl Complexes • Via Insertions Into 1,3-Dienes: RCo(CO)4 Co(CO)4 + Co(CO)3 – CO R R R = H, alkyl, R(O)C • Via Nucleophilic or Electrophilic Attack of 1,3-Diene Complex: R + R Mo(CO)2 Cp Mo(CO)2 Cp H + Fe(CO)3 DX D Fe(CO)3 X η3 Benzyl Complexes L Cl Pd L H D NaBPh4 LiCl H D L Pd L BPh4 Benzylic ligands can also have η3 character. Cyclopentadienyl Ligands • Cp ligands approximately occupy three facially oriented coordination sites. • Bond Strengths: Cp2Fe (η5-Cp)MCl Cp· 3 + Cp· ·FeCp + ·MCl3 ΔH = 79 kcal/mol ΔH = 79 kcal/mol for Ti ΔH = 100 kcal/mol for Zr ΔH = 101 kcal/mol for Hf MO’s of Cp η5 Cp in Bonding C2V py px pz s z y x dyz dxz dx2-y2 Co dxy dz2 OC CO Synthesis of Metal Cp Complexes • Accessing Cp Anions: retro [4+2] H 2 H base CpM or Na "cracking" CpH Cp-dimer • Via Nucleophilic Attack: FeCl2 + NaCp Cp2Fe + 2 NaCl Synthesis of Metal Cp Complexes • With Basic Ligands: Zr(NMe2)4 + CpH Cp2Zr(NMe2)2 • Electron-rich Metals: H H + Co2(CO)8 Co OC CO Modified Cp Ligands Modulate Reactivity Larger Ligands: H3C Annulated Cp’s: CH3 CH3 H3C CH3 Cp* indenyl fluorenyl Chiral Cp’s: H3C H3C CH3 M CH3 CH3 H3C M H3C CH3 M CH3 Cp vs. Cp* Cp*: • • • • More steric protection; leads to kinetic stability. Better solubility. Better crystallinity. More electron donation: • IR: CpM-CO vs Cp*M-CO shift ~50 cm-1 • E° Cp2M0/+ vs. Cp*2M0/+ ~ 0.5 V • Drawback: synthesis. (Bergman and Bercaw, Org. Synth. 1987, 65, 42) Cp Complex Geometry • Four Classes of Cp Complexes: M M "sandwich" compound or "metallocene" = M L L L "bent metallocene" M L L L "half sandwich" Metallocene Geometry • Relative Orientation of Cp’s in Metallocenes: • • • • M M eclipsed D5h staggered D5d In gas phase: eclipsed slightly lower than staggered. Barrier to rotation usually low (< 1 kcal/mol). Ferrocene eclipsed in solid state. Cp*2Fe is staggered (Me-Me repulsion). Metallocenes with More than 18 e– C-C = 1.41Å Fe-C = 2.04Å 3.32Å Co-C = 2.10Å Ni-C = 2.18Å Fe Co Ni 18 e– D5h 19e– D5d 20e– D5d Metallocene Redox Properties Fe + e– Fe Co + e– Co E° = 0.41V E° = -0.91V Half-Sandwich Complexes Ru Ni NO Ph3P Cl PPh3 Re OC CO CO Cl Cl Ta Cl Cl Bent Metallocenes Mo CO Zr Cl Ta Cl Cp2Mo(CO) Mo(II), d4, 18 e- Cp2ZrCl2 Zr(IV), d0, 16 e- Bonding Picture empty “dx2” orbital H H H Cp2TaH3 d0, 18 e- Ta(V), X-ray structure of Cp2Zr(Me)(THF)+ Note: THF 90 ° to Me-Zr-O plane nO → dx2 Ansa Metallocenes M EBI complex ethylenebis(indynyl) M EBTHI complex ethylenebis(tetrahydroindynyl) • Cp Rings are linked with a “ansa” bridge. • Ansa ligands can force bent metallocene geometry. • Highly important in Z.N. polymerization. Chiral Ansa Metallocenes • Structure is chiral. • Can be resolved. M • Brintzinger/Jordan Synthesis of resolved (EBTHI)2TiCl2. Ph CH 3 Cl N THF Zr THF N Cl Ph CH3 X N Zr H3C Ph CH3 N Ph Li THF X + Li 4 HCl X Cl Zr Cl Reactions of Metallocenes • Electrophilic Attack: Friedel Crafts, Formylation, etc. H E+ Fe Fe E Fe – E+ – H+ E E Fe • Cp Rings Stabilize Cations at α carbon, important in chiral ligand synthesis. PR2 OAc Fe Me PPh2 HPR2 Fe -HOAc Me PPh2 Fe • Deprotonation of Metallocenes Fe BuLi Li Fe Li Me PPh2 Ring Slippage L Rh(CO)2 Rh(L)(CO) -CO L Rh(CO)2 -CO Rh(L)(CO) Rh(CO)2 16 e– slow, associative substitution substitution is 108 X faster Metal Hydrides Examples of terminal metal hydrides: Cp2ZrH2 HMn(CO)5 Cl Pt Ph3P H5Re(PMePH2)3 PPh3 H Examples of bridged hydrides: CO OC CO OC CO CO Cr Cr OC H OC CO OC – H Co Co H H (µ-H)3 up to 4 possible Note: [(CO)5Cr–H]– Cr(CO)5 16 e– 18e– 3-center-2-e– bond Note: This structure was initally misassigned as: Cp*Co=CoCp* paramagnetic; M-H hard to locate with X-ray required neutron diffaction Theopold and Casey, ACIE, 1992, 1341. Properties of Metal Hydride • • • • H covalent radius = 0.32 Å M–H ~ 1.5-1.7 Å X-ray underestimates M–H (by ~ 0.1 Å) Even simple hydrides can effect structural details: 97° PPh3 CO CO OC Mn CO OC H 83° Rh Ph3P PPh3 PPh 3 H tetrahedral • M-H BDE’s 60-75 kcal/mol. Spectral Properties • 1H NMR: Typically ∂ 0 to -40 ppm! • However bridging or other unusual structure can perturbe this: [HCo6(CO)15]– ∂ = 23.2 ppm • IR: Typically ~ 1500-2200 cm–1 M–H Synthesis • Via Oxidative Addition to H2: IrCl(PPh3)3 + H2 25 °C 1atm H2IrCl(PPh3)3 reduction of complex open coordination site: W(PMe3)3Cl4 H2, Na/Hg –78 °C, THF + PMe3 WH4(PMe3)4 M–H Synthesis • Via Protonation: Mn(CO)5 – H+ HMn(CO)5 counter-ion can precoordinate with cationic complexes. Ir H HCl PMePh2 Ir H2O PMePh2 Cl Cl– PMePh2 PMePh2 H+ (COD)Ir(PMePh2)2Cl can form cationic complexes Os(CO)3(PPh3)2 + HClO4 [Os(CO)3(PPh3)2H][ClO4] M–H Synthesis • Reduction with main group hydrides: WCl6 + NaBH4 + Cp2WH2 NaCp • Via β-hydride elimination: Cp2ZrCl2 + Me3CMgCl Cp2ZrHCl • Reduction using alcohols: K2IrCl6 CH3CD2OH/H2O PPh3 H D H3C C O Ir(III) D H3C IrDCl2(PPh3)3 O C + D D Ir(III) Metal Hydride Reactivity • Acid-Base: Despite bond polarization, some M-H “hydrides” are acidic. pKa δ+ δM H HCo(CO)4 0 H2Fe(CO)4 4.0 HMn(CO)5 7.1 Metal Hydride Reactivity • Insertions: Cp2Zr H + Me Cl Cp2Zr Me Cl Note: this the microscopic reverse of β-hydride elimination! • H-Atom Transfer: Me HMn(CO)5 + Me Me Mn2(CO)10 + Mechanisms often occur via single electron pathways. Metal Amido Complexes t-Bu Zr[N(CH3)2]4 Cp2Zr[N(CH3)2]2 OC (DPPF)Pd NRR' Ph3P R = R' = p-Tol R = H, R' = Ph Early metals: Late metals: • Stronger π-bonding • More ionic bonding • Hard-hard match • Stronger bonds • π-Repulsion common • Less ionic bonding • Hard-soft mismatch • Weaker bonds Ir PPh3 NMePh Metal Amido Bond Strengths • Early Metal Amidos: M–N BDE’s for M[N(CH2CH3)2]4 M Ti M–N BDE (kcal/mol) 91 Zr 90 Hf 95 • Late Metal Amidos: Not well tabulated: ~ M-OR Synthesis of Late Metal Amidos • Via Metathesis: OC Ph3P Ir PPh3 Cl t-Bu (DPPF)Pd LiNMePh Ph3P Ir PPh3 NMePh t-Bu HNRR' – t-BuOH O-t-Bu OC (DPPF)Pd NRR' R = R' = p-Tol R = H, R' = Ph Synthesis of Late Metal Amidos • Via N-H Activation: PCy3 F F H N Pt F F PCy3 H (PCy3)2Pt + H2NC6F5 F PtBu2 Ir PtBu2 R NH3 PtBu2 Ir H NH2 t P Bu2 Reactivity of Late Metal Amidos • β-elimination: OC Ph3P Ir PPh3 NPh OC Ph3P Ir PPh3 H NPh + Ph Ph • Reductive elimination: Ph2 P Fe t-Bu t-Bu PPh3 R Pd P Ph2 + (dppe)2Pd + N R' NRR' • Insertion: CO Cy2P Ru PCy2 NH2 Cy2P Ru PCy2 NH2 O (PPh3)nPd Synthesis of Early Metal Amidos Metathesis: MCln + n LiNR2 MCln + excess HNR2 M(NR2)n + n LiCl M(NR2)n + HNR2·HCl Early Metal Amidos • Very Reactive towards protic acids: Zr[N(CH3)2]4 + benzene reflux, 2 h Cp–H Cp2Zr[N(CH3)2]2 + 2 HN(CH3)2 54% Ti[N(CH3)2]4 + H–OtBu Ti(OtBu)4 + HN(CH3)2 Driven by Ti-X bond strength. • α-Elimination to give metal imidos: Cp* Cl Cl Ta Cl Cl Cp* ArHNLi Cl ArHN Ta Et3N Cl Cl -Et3NHCl ArN Me Cp* Ta Cl Cl Ar = Me Porphyrin and Corrin Complexes • Important in bioinorganic chemistry and some aspects of synthetic chemistry. N H N N Me Me N N H N core ring system of a porphyrin Et Me Me Me H N Me Me Me Me Me Me Me core ring system of a corrin Et Et N Me N Et Et Me Me Me LiN Et Et Et N Cl N FeCl3 Fe NLi N Et Et Et Et N N Et Et Et Et Bissulfonamides SO2Ar NH + NH SO2Ar Ti(O-i-Pr)4 O Ar S O N Ti N Ar S O O O-i-Pr + O-i-Pr • Important applications in asymmetric synthesis. HO-i-Pr Polypyrazolylborates • Developed by Trofimenko (Dupont and UD) R R N NH 3 R + R NaBH4 R • a trispyrazolylborate (Tp) • 6e–, anionic ligand • Often used in place of Cp R B N N R Na N N H N N Tp' R R [(C2H4)2RhCl]2 + KTp DMF, rt R R H B RN N N N N R N R Rh Diketiminate Ligands (nacnac) R1 R3 O R2 R2 R2 2 NH2R4 O R1 R4 R3 N HN NaOMe MeOH R4 R4 R3 N iPr iPr Me Me iPr N N N + Li Me iPr R1 iPr [Me3Pt(OTf)]4 N Me iPr • Anionic, 4 e– ligands. • Tunable steric and electronic properties. iPr Me Me Pt Me iPr N 4 R Na Alkoxide Ligands Me Me Cp*2Zr(OH)Ph Me Me Ir OPh Ph3P Me N O Ni Me N Me Early metals: Late metals: • Stronger π-bonding • More ionic bonding • Hard-hard match • Stronger bonds • π-Repulsion common • Less ionic bonding • Hard-soft mismatch • Weaker bonds Synthesis of Early Metal Amidos Metathesis: LnM–X NaOR LnM–OR LnM–X HOR base LnM–R' or LnM–NR'2 or LnM–OR' Driven by strong M–O bonds! Reactivity of early metal alkoxides is limited. Most often serve as ancilllary ligands. Late Metal Alkoxides BDE’s M–O Bond M–O BDE (kcal/mol) Co–O in Co(CO)4(OH) 55 Rh–O in octaethylporphyrin rhodium alkoxides ~ 50–55 Late TM M–O ~ M–C bond strength. Synthesis of Late Metal Alkoxides • Via Metathesis: Me Me Me Me Me Ir Ph3P Me Cl Me AgOAc Me Me Me Me Me Ir OAc Ph3P Me Toluene Me KOPh Me Me Me Ir OPh Ph3P Me THF • Via Protonolysis: N + Ni N N Me Me rt HO O + Ni N Me • Via O–H Activation: Pt(PCy3)2 + HOPh PCy3 H Pt OPh PCy3 CH4 Reactions of Late Metal Alkoxides • β-elimination: H Et3P Et3P Ir H OCH3 Et3P PEt3 Et3P Cl Ir Cl H + (CH2O)n PEt3 • Reductive elimination: Ph2 P Fe t-Bu Pd P Ph2 Ph3P ArO Rh t-Bu L PPh3 PPh3 Δ O H ArO Ir O PPh2 PPh3 PPh3 Ph3P -HOAr Ph3P Ir P Ph2 Reactions of Late Metal Alkoxides • Insertion: Et3P Rh Et3P O R R' PEt3 20 °C (PEt3)4RhH + O R R' Β-Diketonate Ligands (acac) CH3 CH3 O CH3 O Mn O Fe O 3 3 O Ni O CH3 CH3 O Co O CH3 CH3 Cu O CH3 3 O CH3 2 • Anionic, 4 e– ligands. • Tunable steric and electronic properties. CH3 2 Halide Ligands F Cl Br I Ionic radius (Å) 1.36 1.81 1.95 2.16 Cone angle (°) 92 102 105 107 • Dramatic size difference between halides. Halide Ligands Dramatic Electronic Differences too: • Fluoride is most electronegative. • Would suggest iodide is best ligand. Not true! Why? F E.N. 4.0 Cl 3.0 Br 2.8 I 2.5 π-Donor Ability • Fluoride is much stronger π-donor! • Increases M–X bond strength. Ph3P Ph3P CF3SO3H Os X BDE’s: Ph3P Ph3P Os X H CF3SO3 – ΔHM (kcal/mol) I 14.1 Br 16.3 Cl 19.7 F 37.3 Cp*2ZrCl2 Zr–Clave 115 kcal/mol Cp*2ZrI2 Zr–Iave 80.4 kcal/mol Effect of π-Donation Depends on D-Orbitals • π-donation into empty orbital increases bond strength. • π-donation into filled orbital decreases bond strength. Xc OC OC Ir Xc Xt Xt Relative Binding Affinities Xt = Cl > Br > I Xc = I > Br > Cl Halides as Bridging Ligands NH2 Prn3P X X Pd X Pd X PPrn3 H3C K K: X = Cl > X = I Prn3P X X Pd NH2Ar • Larger halides for stronger bridging interactions. Hydrogen Bonding in Halogen Ligands H NH N L H Ir X L H L = PPh3 X IrX–HN(kcal/mol) I <1.3 Br 1.8 Cl 2.1 F 5.2 • Smaller halogens form stronger hydrogen bonds. Reactions of Metal Halides • Most often halogens are ancillary ligands or leaving groups. • Nature of halogen can effect reactivity. H OC R3P Ir PR3 X + H2 (16 e-) OC R3P Ir 𝑣CO (cm-1) F Cl Br I 1957 1965 1966 1967 H PR3 X H H R3P Ir PR3 CO (18 e-) X ΔG (kcal/mol) > -­‐10 -­‐14 -­‐17 -­‐19 • Fluoro complex most electron rich… would be expected to favor O.A. • However, π-donation stabilizes SM more than product. Reactions of Metal Halides k1 L X Ru X PR 3 R k2 L -PR3 Ru +PR3 X L + OMe R X k-2 X k-1/k2 Cl 1.25 I 330 X R X – k-1 Ru OMe OMe Better π-donation of Cl’s slows back reaction in first equilibrium. Not Always Ancillary Ligands CF3 Cy Cy P Pd MeO i-Pr CF3 Me Br AgF, CH2Cl2 i-Pr i-Pr MeO 74% Cy Cy P Pd MeO i-Pr Me CF3 F 90 °C, tol added ArBr i-Pr i-Pr MeO isolated, fully characterized Me F 45% (15% no ArBr) Reading on Your Own • Metal-Nitrosyl Complexes • Metal-Boryl Complexes • Metal-Phosphido Complexes • Metal-Thiolate Complexes • Metal-Silyl Complexes • All covered in Hartwig Chapter 4.