Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra and Geometry Volume 46 (2005), No. 2, 513-521. Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group Dorel Fetcu ∗ Department of Mathematics, Technical University Iaşi, România e-mail: dfetcu@math.tuiasi.ro Abstract. We find the conditions under which a curve in the generalized Heisenberg group is biharmonic and non-harmonic. We give some existence and nonexistence examples of such curves. MSC 2000: 53C43, 53C42 Keywords: Biharmonic curves, Heisenberg group 1. Introduction First we should recall some notions and results related to the harmonic and the biharmonic maps between Riemannian manifolds, as they are presented in [2], [9] and in [5]. Let f : M → N be a smooth map between two Riemannian manifolds (M, g) and (N, h). Let f −1 (T N ) be the induced bundle over M of the tangent bundle, T N , defined as follows. Denote by π : T N → N the projection. Then [ Tf (x) N. f −1 (T N ) = {(x, u) ∈ M × T N, π(u) = f (x), x ∈ M } = x∈M The set of all C ∞ -sections of f −1 (T N ), denoted by Γ(f −1 (T N )), is Γ(f −1 (T N )) = {V : M → T N, C ∞ -map, V (x) ∈ Tf (x) N, x ∈ M }. Denote by ∇M , ∇N , the Levi-Civita connections on (M, g) and (N, h) respectively. For a smooth map f between (M, g) and (N, h), we define the induced connection ∇ on the induced bundle f −1 (T N ) as follows. For X ∈ χ(M ), V ∈ Γ(f −1 (T N )), define ∇X V ∈ Γ(f −1 (T N )) by ∇X V = ∇N f∗ X V . ∗ The author wants to thank Professor Vasile Oproiu for his many valuable advices c 2005 Heldermann Verlag 0138-4821/93 $ 2.50 514 D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group The differential of the smooth map f can be viewed as a section of the bundle Λ1 (f −1 (T N )) = T ∗ M ⊗ f −1 (T N ), and we denote by |df | its norm at a point x ∈ M . Suppose that M is a compactRmanifold. Define the energy density of f by e(f ) = 21 |df |2 , and the energy of f by E(f ) = M e(f ) ∗1, where ∗1 is the volume form on M . The map f is a harmonic map if it is a critical point of the energy, E(f ). In [9] it is proved that a map f : M → N is a harmonic map if and only if it satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation τ (f ) = 0, where τ (f ) = trace ∇df is an element of Γ(f −1 (T N )) called the tension field of f . The Laplacian acting on Γ(f −1 (T N )), induced by the connection ∇, is given by the Weitzenböck formula ∆V = − trace ∇2 V, for some V ∈ Γ(f −1 (T N )). R The bienergy of f is defined by E2 (f ) = 12 M |τ (f )|2 ∗ 1. We say that f is a biharmonic map if it is a critical point of the bienergy, E2 (f ). It is proved in [5] that a map f : M → N is a biharmonic map if and only if it satisfies the equation τ2 (f ) = 0, where τ2 (f ) = −∆τ (f ) − trace RN (df (·), τ (f ))df (·), (1.1) where RN denotes the curvature tensor field on (N, h). Note that any harmonic map is a biharmonic map and, moreover, an absolute minimum of the bienergy functional. 2. Generalized Heisenberg group Consider R2n+1 with the elements of the form X = (x1 , y1 , x2 , y2 , . . . , xn , yn , z). Define the product on R2n+1 by n e = (x1 + x XX e1 , y1 + ye1 , . . . , xn + x en , yn + yen , z + ze + 1X (e xi yi − yei xi )), 2 i=1 e = (e where X = (x1 , y1 , . . . , xn , yn , z), X x1 , ye1 , . . . , x en , yen , ze). 2n+1 Let H2n+1 = (R , g) be the generalized Heisenberg group endowed with the Riemannian metric g which is defined by g= n X n h i2 1X (dx2i + dyi2 ) + dz + (yi dxi − xi dyi ) . 2 i=1 i=1 (2.1) Note that the metric g is left invariant. We can define a global orthonormal frame field in H2n+1 by E2i−1 = ∂ yi ∂ ∂ xi ∂ ∂ − , E2i = + , E2n+1 = , ∂xi 2 ∂z ∂yi 2 ∂z ∂z for i = 1, . . . , n. The Levi-Civita connection of the metric g is given by, (see [7] for the D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group 3-dimensional case), ∇E2i−1 E2j−1 = 0, ∇E2i E2j = 0, ∇E2n+1 E2i−1 = − 12 E2i , ∇E2n+1 E2i = 12 E2i−1 , ∇E2n+1 E2n+1 = 0, ∇E2i−1 E2j = 12 δij E2n+1 , ∇E2i E2j−1 = − 21 δij E2n+1 , ∇E2i−1 E2n+1 = − 12 E2i , ∇E2i E2n+1 = 12 E2i−1 , 515 (2.2) for i, j = 1, . . . , n. We have too [E2i , E2j ] = 0, [E2i−1 , E2j−1 ] = 0, [E2i−1 , E2n+1 ] = 0, [E2i , E2n+1 ] = 0, [E2i−1 , E2j ] = δij E2n+1 . The curvature tensor field of ∇ is R(X, Y )Z = ∇X ∇Y Z − ∇Y ∇X Z − ∇[X,Y ] Z, and Riemann-Christoffel tensor field is R(X, Y, Z, W ) = g(R(X, Y )W, Z), where X, Y, Z, W ∈ χ(R2n+1 ). We will use the notations Rabc = R(Ea , Eb )Ec , Rabcd = R(Ea , Eb , Ec , Ed ), where a, b, c, d = 1, . . . , 2n + 1. Then the non-zero components of the curvature tensor field and of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor field are, respectively R(2i−1)(2j−1)(2k) = − 41 δjk E2i + 14 δik E2j , R(2i−1)(2j)(2k−1) = 14 δjk E2i + 12 δij E2k , 1 1 R(2i−1)(2j)(2k) = − 4 δik E2j−1 − 2 δij E2k−1 , 1 R (2i−1)(2n+1)(2j−1) = − 4 δij E2n+1 , (2.3) 1 R(2i−1)(2n+1)(2n+1) = 4 δij E2i−1 , R(2i)(2j)(2k−1) = − 14 δjk E2i−1 + 14 δik E2j−1 , R(2i)(2n+1)(2j) = − 14 δij E2n+1 , R 1 (2i)(2n+1)(2n+1) = 4 δij E2i , R(2i−1)(2j−1)(2i)(2k) = − 12 δjk + 14 δik δij , R(2i−1)(2j)(2i)(2k−1) = 41 δjk + 12 δik δij , R 1 1 (2i−1)(2j)(2k)(2k−1) = 2 δij + 4 δik δjk , R(2i)(2j−1)(2j−1)(2k) = 14 δik − 14 δjk δij , R(2i−1)(2n+1)(2n+1)(2j−1) = − 14 δij , R(2i)(2n+1)(2n+1)(2j) = − 14 δij , for i, j, k = 1, . . . , n. (2.4) 516 D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group 3. Biharmonic curves in H2n+1 Let γ : I → H2n+1 be a non-inflexionar curve, parametrized by its arc length. Let {T, N1 , . . . , N2n } be the Frenet frame in H2n+1 defined along γ, where T = γ 0 is the unit tangent vector field of γ, N1 is the unit normal vector field of γ, with the same direction as ∇T T and the vectors N1 , . . . , N2n are the unit vectors obtained from the following Frenet equations for γ. ∇T T = χ 1 N1 , = −χ1 T + χ2 N2 , ∇ T N1 ... ... ... (3.1) ∇T N2n−1 = −χ2n−2 N2n−2 + χ2n−1 N2n , ∇T N2n = −χ2n−1 N2n−1 , where χ1 = k∇T T k = kτ (γ)k, and χ2 = χ2 (s), . . . , χ2n = χ2n (s) are real valued functions, where s is the arc length of γ. If χk ∈ R, k = 1, . . . , 2n + 1 we say that γ is a helix. The biharmonic equation of γ is τ2 (γ) = ∇3T T − R(T, ∇T T )T = 0. (3.2) Using the Frenet equations one obtains ∇3T T = (−3χ1 χ01 )T + (χ001 − χ31 − χ1 χ22 )N1 + (2χ01 χ2 + χ1 χ02 )N2 + χ1 χ2 χ3 N3 . (3.3) Using (2.3) we get R(T, ∇T T )T = n X (ξ2i−1 E2i−1 + ξ2i E2i ) + ξ2n+1 E2n+1 , i=1 with n ξ2i−1 1 1 2 3 X (−T2j−1 N12j + T2j N12j−1 ) + T2i−1 T2n+1 N12n+1 − T2n+1 N12i−1 , = T2i 4 4 4 j=1 n X 3 1 1 2 ξ2i = T2i−1 (T2j−1 N12j − T2j N12j−1 ) + T2i T2n+1 N12n+1 − T2n+1 N12i , 4 4 4 j=1 n 1X 2 2 ξ2n+1 = (−T2j−1 N12n+1 − T2j N12n+1 + T2j−1 T2n+1 N12j−1 + T2j T2n+1 N12j ), 4 j=1 P P2n+1 a where T = 2n+1 a=1 Ta Ea and N1 = a=1 N1 Ea . After a straightforward computation, we have 2n X R(T, ∇T T )T = η k Nk , (3.4) k=1 with η1 = n i2 1 3h X 1 2 (T2i N12i−1 − T2i−1 N12i ) − T2n+1 − (N12n+1 )2 , 4 i=1 4 4 (3.5) D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group n n ih X i 3h X 1 (T2i N12i−1 − T2i−1 N12i ) (T2i Nk2i−1 − T2i−1 Nk2i ) − − N12n+1 Nk2n+1 , 4 i=1 4 i=1 P2n+1 a where Nk = a=1 Nk Ea . From (3.2), (3.3) and (3.4) it follows that the biharmonic equation of γ is ηk = 517 (3.6) τ2 (γ) = ∇3T T − R(T, ∇T T )T = (−3χ1 χ01 )T + (χ001 − χ31 − χ1 χ22 − χ1 η1 )N1 + (2χ01 χ2 + χ1 χ02 − χ1 η2 )N2 + (χ1 χ2 χ3 − χ1 η3 )N3 − χ1 2n X η k Nk , i=4 where ηa , a = 1, . . . , 2n are given by (3.5) and (3.6). Hence Theorem 3.1. Let γ : I → H2n+1 be a curve, parametrized by its arc length. Then γ is a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve if and only if χ1 ∈ R \ {0}, χ21 + χ22 = −η1 , χ02 = η2 , (3.7) χ 2 χ 3 = η3 , ηk = 0, k = 4, . . . , 2n, where ηk , k = 1, . . . , 2n, are given by (3.5) and (3.6). Corollary 3.2. If χ1 ∈ R \ {0} and χ2 = 0 for a curve γ : I → H2n+1 , parametrized by its arc length, then γ is a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve if and only if χ21 = −η1 and ηk = 0, k = 2, . . . , 2n. Corollary 3.3. Let γ : I → H2n+1 be a curve, parametrized by its arc length. If η1 ≥ 0 then γ cannot be a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve. In [7] the following two results for the usual Heisenberg group, H3 , are proved. Theorem 3.4. Let γ be the helix given by γ(s) = (r cos(as), r sin(as), c a s), = r2 (1 + 14 r2 ). Then γ is a biharmonic and non-geodesic curve. q √ Remark 3.5. In the case above if r = 1+2 5 , then γ is a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve with χ2 = 0. where r > 0, 1 a2 In the case of the higher dimensions, we find a similar example related to Theorem 3.1. We consider a curve in R2n+1 , given by γ(s) = (c1 cos(a1 s), c1 sin(a1 s), . . . , cn cos(an s), cn sin(an s), cs), 518 D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group where ci > 0, ai 6= 0, c 6= 0, i = 1, . . . , n. Then one obtains 0 T (s) = γ (s) = n X [−ci ai sin(ai s)E2i−1 + ci ai cos(ai s)E2i ] + AE2n+1 , i=1 P P where A = c − 21 ni=1 c2i ai . From kT (s)k = 1 we have A2 + ni=1 c2i a2i = 1. After a straightforward computation, using (2.2), one obtains ∇T T = n X [ci ai (A − ai ) cos(ai s)E2i−1 + ci ai (A − ai ) sin(ai s)E2i ]. i=1 From the first equation in (3.1) and from kN1 k = 1, we have n i1/2 hX ∈ R, χ1 = c2i a2i (A − ai )2 i=1 and N1 = n X i=1 ci ai |A − ai | hP n 2 2 j=1 cj aj (A − aj )2 i1/2 [cos(ai s)E2i−1 + sin(ai s)E2i ]. Note that N12n+1 = 0. Next, one obtains n o 1 Xn ci ai [|A − ai |(A − 2ai ) − 2χ21 ] [sin(ai s)E2i−1 − ∇ T N1 + χ 1 T = 2χ1 i=1 n i X 1 h 2 2 2 cos(ai s)E2i ] + 2χ1 A − cj aj |A − ai | E2n+1 . 2χ1 j=1 From (3.1), using kN2 k = 1 we have |χ2 |2 = kχ2 N2 k2 . In order to find a curve which satisfies conditions of Corollary 3.2 we assume that χ2 = 0 and χ21 = −η1 . From this conditions, after a straightforward computation we get Proposition 3.6. Let γ : I → H2n+1 be the curve defined by γ(s) = (c1 cos(a1 s), c1 sin(a1 s), . . . , cn cos(an s), cn sin(an s), cs), P 2 (1−A2 ) 1 where ci > 0, ai 6= 0, c 6= 0. If ai = a = A − 2A , ni=1 c2i = 4A and c = (2A2 −1)2 A3 , 2A2 −1 where h 3n2 − 1 + (9n4 + 6n2 + 5)1/2 i1/2 A=± , 6n2 + 2 then γ is a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve in H2n+1 . Note that, for such a curve and for k 6= 1, one obtains n X i=1 n (T2i Nk2i−1 − T2i−1 Nk2i ) χ1 X 2i−1 2i−1 χ1 = (N1 Nk + N12i Nk2i ) = − N12n+1 Nk2n+1 = 0. |A − a| i=1 |A − a| That is ηk = 0, for any k = 2, . . . , 2n. Also, note that the Proposition 3.6 is a generalization of the result in the Remark 3.5. Next, one obtains 519 D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group Proposition 3.7. Let γ : I → H2n+1 be the curve defined by γ(s) = (r cos(as), r sin(as), . . . , r cos(as), r sin(as), cs), where r > 0, ai 6= 0, c 6= 0. If χ2 = 0, χ1 6= 0 and γ is biharmonic then n = 1. In the following we obtain a class of biharmonic and non-harmonic curves for which the second curvature does not necessarily vanish, (see[1] for the similar result in 3-dimensional case). Proposition 3.8. Let γ : I → H2n+1 , γ(s) = (x1 (s), y1 (s), . . . , xn (s), yn (s), z(s)), be the curve with the parametric equations √ α sin(βs + ai ) + bi , xi (s) = β1 sin n yi (s) = − 1 sin √ α cos(βs + ai ) + ci , β n P (3.8) (sin α)2 z(s) = cos α + 2β s − ni=1 2βb√i n sin α cos(βs + ai ) P − ni=1 2βc√i n sin α cos(βs + ai ) + d, √ cosα± 5(cos α)2 −4 √ √ with i = 1, . . . , n, where β = , α ∈ (0, arccos 2 5 5 ] ∪ [arccos(− 2 5 5 ), π) and 2 ai , bi , ci , d ∈ R. Then γ is a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve. Proof. The covariant derivative of the unit tangent vector field, T , of γ, is ∇T T = n X 0 0 E2n+1 , [(T2i−1 + T2i T2n+1 )E2i−1 + (T2i0 − T2i−1 T2n+1 )E2i ] + T2n+1 i=1 and T is given by n sin α X T (s) = γ 0 (s) = √ [cos(βs + ai )E2i−1 + sin(βs + ai )E2i ] + cos αE2n+1 . n i=1 Taking into account the first Frenet equation one obtains χ1 = | sin α(cos α − β)| and, since we can assume, without loss of generality, that sin α(cos α − β) > 0, we have N1 = n X sin(βs + ai ) cos(βs + ai ) √ √ E2i−1 − E2i . n n i=1 After a straightforward computation one obtains that η1 = (sin α)2 − k = 2, . . . , 2n. In order to find χ2 we obtain, using the equations (2.2), ∇ T N1 + χ 1 T = 1 4 and ηk = 0, for any n n i X 1 cos(βs + ai ) h √ β − cos α + (cos α − β)(sin α)2 E2i−1 2 n i=1 520 D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group i o h1 i sin(βs + ai ) h 1 2 √ + β − cos α + (cos α − β)(sin α) E2i − sin α − (cos α − β) cos α E2n+1 . 2 2 n Then, using Frenet equations, we have χ22 = k∇T N1 + χ1 T k2 = β 2 − β cos α + 1 − (sin α)2 (cos α − β)2 . 4 Hence χ2 is a constant and, from hypothesis, one obtains χ21 + χ22 = 1 − (sin α)2 = −η1 . 4 Since χ2 N2 = ∇T N1 + χ1 T and χ23 = k∇T N2 + χ2 N1 k2 , we obtain, after a straightforward computation, that χ3 = 0. Hence, all conditions from Theorem 3.1 are verified by γ and then γ is a biharmonic and non-harmonic curve. Remark 3.9. In the same way as above it is easy to see that all biharmonic and nonharmonic curves in H2n+1 with constant second curvature and with the unit tangent vector field, T , of the form n sin α X T (s) = √ [cos(fi (s))E2i−1 + sin(fi (s))E2i ] + cos αE2n+1 , n i=1 where fi are some smooth functions of the arc length, such that fi0 = fj0 , for any i, j = 1, . . . , n, and α ∈ R, are given by Proposition 3.8. Finally, we have Proposition 3.10. Let γ : I → H2n+1 be the curve defined by γ(s) = (c1 s, c2 s, . . . , c2n+1 s) with P2n+1 j=1 c2j = 1. Then γ is biharmonic if and only if is harmonic. Proof. We have 0 T (s) = γ (s) = 2n+1 X cj Ej , kT k = 1, ∇T T = c2n+1 j=1 n X (c2i E2i−1 − c2i−1 E2i ). i=1 pPn 2 2 It follows that χ1 = c2n+1 i=1 (c2i−1 + c2i ), and n X c2i−1 c2i qP N1 = E2i−1 − qP E2i . n n 2 2 2 2 (c + c ) (c + c ) i=1 2j−1 2j 2j−1 2j j=1 j=1 One obtains Pn ∇ T N1 + χ 1 T = 2 k=1 (c2k−1 X n + c22k ) − c22n+1 c c qP 2i−1 2n+1 · E2i−1 + n 2 2 2 (c + c ) i=1 2j j=1 2j−1 D. Fetcu: Biharmonic Curves in the Generalized Heisenberg Group c2i c2n+1 qP n 2 j=1 (c2j−1 + c22j ) That means E2i n P χ2 = 521 v uX u n 2 − t (c2j−1 + c22j )E2n+1 . j=1 (c22k−1 + c22k ) − c22n+1 k=1 2 . Thus χ21 + χ22 = 41 . But, one obtains that η1 = 34 − c22n+1 , and from (3.7) we have that if γ is biharmonic then χ21 + χ22 = −η1 = − 34 + c22n+1 . Thus if γ is biharmonic then χ1 = 0, and then γ is a harmonic curve. References [1] Caddeo, R.; Oniciuc, C.; Piu, P.: Explicit formulas for non-geodesic biharmonic curves of the Heisenberg group. E-version, arXiv:math.DG 0311221 v1, 2003, 16 pp. [2] Eells, J.; Lemaire, L.; Selected topics in harmonic maps. Reg. Conf. Ser.Math. 50 (1983), 85 p. Zbl 0515.58011 −−−− −−−−−−−− [3] Figueroa, C. B.; Mercuri, F.; Pedrosa, R. H. L.: Invariant surfaces of the Heisenberg Groups. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. IV. Ser., 177 (1999), 173–194. Zbl 0965.53042 −−−− −−−−−−−− [4] Gheorghiev, Gh.; Oproiu, V.: Varietăţi diferenţiabile finit şi infinit dimensionale. (Roumanian), vol.II, Ed. Academiei Române (1979), 294 pp. Zbl 0484.53001 −−−− −−−−−−−− [5] Jiang, G. Y.: 2-harmonic maps and their first and second variational formulas. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. A, 7 (1986), 389–402. Zbl 0628.58008 −−−− −−−−−−−− [6] Martin, M.: Introducere în teoria curbelor şi suprafeţelor în spaţiul euclidian n-dimensional. (Roumanian), Universitatea Bucureşti 1979. [7] Oniciuc, C.: Tangency and harmonicity properties. (Roumanian), Geometry Balkan Press, E-version, 2003, 87 pp. [8] Oproiu, V.; Papaghiuc, N.: Some results on harmonic sections of cotangent bundles. Ann. Stiint. Univ. Al.I.Cuza Iasi, 45 (1999), 275–290. Zbl 1011.53018 −−−− −−−−−−−− [9] Urakawa, H.: Calculus of Variation and Harmonic Maps. Am. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 1993, xiii, 251 p. Zbl 0799.58001 −−−− −−−−−−−− Received March 23, 2004