Search for new physics from + − Bs → f (→ KK )l l ' 2 decays Cai-Dian Lü (吕才典) IHEP - 中国科学院高能物理研究所 Based on collaboration with R.H. Li (李润辉), and W. Wang(王伟), arXiv: 1012.2129, PRD83, 034034 (2011) 2011/4/5 2 outline Introduction Angular distribution BR, FBA, fL. in SM ' + − 2 ( Bs → f l l ) Two New Physics scenarios Brief introduction Parameters obtained by fitting Effect on the SM results Summary 2011/4/5 3 Flavor changing Electroweak penguin operators s b t γ,Z No tree level flavor changing neutral current in SM lCD Lu l+ 4 With QCD corrections from the u four quark operators b GF = VCKM ∑ Ci Oi 2 i H eff O1 = uγ µ Lu ⋅ sγ µ Lb µ O3 = sγ Lb ⋅ ∑ qγ µ Lq q µ O5 = sγ Lb ⋅ ∑ qγ µ Rq q CD Lu s u O2 = sγ µ Lu ⋅ uγ µ Lb O4 = sα γ µ Lbβ ⋅ ∑ q β γ µ Lqα q O6 = sα γ µ Lbβ ⋅ ∑ q β γ µ Rqα q 5 Introduction Unlike b s γ or B K* γ, which have only limited physical observables b s l+l-, and especially B K* l+l-, with a number of observables accessible (exp. also easier), provides a wealth of information of weak interactions, ranging from the forward-backward asymmetries, isospin asymmetries, and polarization fractions 2011/4/5 6 About K2*(1430) and f2’(1525) Γ= 100MeV K π 2011/4/5 , 73 MeV , K K 7 * + − 2 ' + − 2 B → K l l ( Bs → f l l ) 5 polarization states: Jz= -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 3 contribute to , Jz=-1, 0, 1, because of angular momentum conservation Similar to K* mesons. formulism can be got by some substitution in formulism in pQCD approach. 2011/4/5 8 Form factors needed for the exclusive decays Definition similar to the BK* case Non-perturbative variables, difficult to calculate in QCD 2011/4/5 9 Form factors calculated in pQCD to leading order of 1/mb 2011/4/5 W. Wang, PRD83,014008 10 Branching ratios are proportional to form factors, have large uncertainties, but Angular distribution is not Partial decay width is decomposed into 11 terms 2011/4/5 11 Angular distribution Up to one-loop matrix element and resonances taken out, only contributes an imaginary part. Without higher order QCD corrections They could be chosen as the window to observe those effects that can change the behavior of the Wilson coefficients, such as NP effects. 2011/4/5 12 BRs, fL With the recent pQCD results for form factors Branching ratios: Longitudinal Polarization fractions: % 2011/4/5 13 Estimate BRs from exp. Experimentally, we have 0 * + − B( B → K l l ) = (1.09 ± 0.12) × 10 −6 * * R = B ( K ) / B ( K ) is the same for Assume 2 radiative and semi-leptonic decays, we have Compare with KC Yang, PRD79:114008,2009 2011/4/5 14 The forward backward asymmetry varies from positive to negative as q2 grows up The 0-cross point is sensitive to new physics 2011/4/5 15 Forward and Backward Asymmetry The zero-crossing point the equation 2011/4/5 of FBAs is determined by Smaller uncertainty 16 Similarly for Bsf2’ l+l- 2011/4/5 17 NP scenario: Vector-like quark model (VQM) Expanding SM including a SU(2)L singlet down type quark, Yukawa sector of SM is modified to This modification brings FCNC for the mass eigenstates at tree level. The interaction for b-s-Z in VQM is free parameter with which the effective Hamiltonian for is given as 2011/4/5 18 NP scenario: Vector-like quark model (VQM) The VQM effects can be absorbed into the Wilson coefficients C9 and C10 Lepton section in VQM is the same as in SM. 2011/4/5 19 NP scenario: Family non-universal Z’ model Expand SM by simply including an additional U(1)’ symmetry. The current is which couples to a family non-universal Z’ boson. After rotating to the mass eigen basis, FCNC appears at tree level in both LH and RH section. Interaction for b-s-Z’ is given as The effective Hamiltonian for 2011/4/5 is given as 20 NP scenario: Family non-universal Z’ model Different from VQM, the couplings in both the quark and lepton section are free parameters. Too many free parameters. So we set in our analysis to reduce freedoms. Z’ also only affects C9 and C10 phenomenally: 2011/4/5 21 Constrain the model parameters by exp. Data used for fitting Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, arXiv:1010.1589; Particle Data Group, J. Phys. G 37,075021. Definition of 2011/4/5 22 Constrain the VQM parameters Phase less constrained Constrains on the Wilson coefficients with 2011/4/5 23 Constrain the Z’ model parameters Assume Both as real and are complex numbers. with has little effect on with Combining the above results 2011/4/5 24 New Physics effects in observables In the NP effects, we choose and as the reference points. Br (10-7) may be enhanced, however, large uncertainties In this parameter space, recent measurement. 2011/4/5 SM C9 C10 is consistent with the D0 collaboration, PLB 693,539. 25 New Physics effects in observable Zerocrossing point of AFB may be changed significan tly in new physics model. 2011/4/5 SM C9 C10 26 Polarization fraction fL some changes of Polarizati on fraction fL in new physics model. 2011/4/5 SM C9 C10 27 Summary is investigated in SM. expected to be observed in future Exp. FBA, polarization fractions, etc, are investigated, with small uncertainties. Two NP scenarios (VQM, Z’ model) are investigated. Parameter space constrained with data of and . Zero-crossing point of FBA can be changed dramatically, which are sensitive to NP effects 2011/4/5 28 Thank you 2011/4/5 29