REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
AE-SPACEMGT-2016
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
RESPONDENT NAME:
WEIGHT
W
ei
gh
te
d
To
ta
l
F.
g
d
ed
in
id
en
an t
m
h
es
s c
ov
m
p s
r
ic
n
a
e
t
p
ct
es
gr
tio roje
St jec
s
a
c
o
a
t
i
r
e
c p
s
p
ic
on pro
pr s
rv
ifi
pa
rv
st
e
se
al the
de e
se
nc sity
be
vi rvic
on cts
qu ke
f
de
a
f
o
i
r
f
o
o
a
ce je
pr se
rm e
ov
n
e
t o rt
fo niv
an ro
pr
to gn
tio
dg
en nde
er U
m ep
ip
to
ty esi
le
r
m
p
r
i
u
e
l
o
t
v
i
e
y
d
sc
rf ti
st ta
ow
at to
ilit
ab d
de
st ity
pe nta
pa S
kn
's an
ab
t's abil
t's ese
t's
m
t's stin
t's
s
'
n
n
n
n
n
a
u
e ili
e pr
e
e
e
e
rm
nd va
nd re
nd
Fi
nd A
nd
tT
e
ec
po a
po
po
po
po
j
s
s
s
s
s
m
i
o
e
e
e
e
e
R
Pr
Pr
R
R
R
R
15%
5%
25%
25%
5%
10%
15%
100%
VisSpiro Strategies, LLC
Goodwin-Lasiter, Inc. DBA Goodwin-LasiterStrong
8.00
7.56
7.22
6.44
3.33
7.67
7.89
7.11
6.33
6.33
5.89
4.89
5.22
5.33
5.56
5.59
Facility Programming and Consulting
9.33
9.22
9.11
9.11
7.67
9.11
9.22
9.09 Awarded
The Lauck Group, Inc. dba lauckgroup
6.33
6.22
5.78
5.44
3.67
5.22
5.89
5.66
These are the preliminary scores calculated as of 3/24/2016. The scores reflect the ranking of firms based solely on the proposals submitted in response to the RFQ and will be
used to determine which companies were selected to make presentation to the SFA Board of Regents. For those firms selected, these scores are provided to the SFA Board of
Regents for their consideration. The scores do not reflect additional information obtained through oral presentations to the SFA Board of Regents, or the final award decision.