Market Power and Timber Pricing January 24 2013 Imperfect Competition Market power can happen in terms of selling Monopoly Oligopoloy Market power can happen on the input side Monopsony Oligopsony In both cases tend to have lower output and higher profits than perfect competition Either P>MC (monopoly) or MRP>MC (monopsony) Monopoly Monopoly Power of Firms Single firm produces all outputs Firm faces the entire demand curve May arise for several reasons Barriers to entry (policy, regulations) Economies of scale (average costs fall as you get larger) Firm With Monopoly Power MC P What is the loss to society? Pm Ppc Qm Qp c MR Demand Q Oligopoly When a group of firms exercise market power in the output market Explicit collusion is illegal However tacit collusion/implicit coordination can happen http://www.competitionbur eau.gc.ca/eic/site/cbbc.nsf/eng/h_02760.html Price Fixing…Yes, even Beer The European commission today imposed a fine of €219.3m (£150m) on Dutch brewer Heineken for operating a price-fixing cartel with three other companies in Holland, one of Europe's biggest beer markets.... http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2 007/apr/18/7 Monopsony Total input is bought by one firm Firm faces the market supply curve for the input Barriers to entry can again be due to the same reasons Monopsony Power ME SAE Q2 Q1 D How Might This be An Issue in the Forest Sector? The Finnish Competition Authority’s Market Court has recently fined forest products giants Metsäliitto Cooperative and Stora Enso a total of 51 million euros for running a price cartel reports The firms applied peer pressure against those who 'overpaid' for wood. Image: YLE / Seppo Nykänen http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/news/2009/12/forest_companies_fined_for_price-fixing_1237358.html Trends in Apportionment in BC (March 2008) Over time the Province has undertaken efforts to make timber volumes available for smaller operators through a variety of mechanisms: Small Business Program Creating special licenses Reallocation (2003) http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hth/timten/provinc ial-map.htm But concentration has increased within the industry Ownership has changed but regional concentration has increased in past three decades http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/ftp/hth/external/!publish/w eb/timber-tenures/apportionment/aptr043.pdf Forest charges Three desirable qualities of taxes and charges: Neutrality Neutral charges do not create incentives to change behaviour Example: do stumpage charges alter firms’ behaviours? Equity Distribution of income. Forest owners capture economic benefits (rent) that would otherwise accrue to others Simplicity Refers to the ease of administration, understandability, and costs of enforcement Common forms of levies on forest resources Common form Usual method of determination Usual Method of assessment Land rent Arbitrary Annual levy Land tax % rate on land value or productivity Annual levy Timber Property tax % rate on timber value Annual levy Harvest Royalty, severance tax, and cutting fees Specific fees for volumes harvested According to harvest Yield tax % rate on value harvested According to harvest Stumpage Competitive bidding or appraisal Lump sum, annual charge, or according to harvest Licence fee More-or-less arbitrary Lump-sum or annual charge Base Land Rights Source: Pearse, P. H., 1990. An Introduction to Forest Economics, UBC Press.; Vancouver. Stumpage • Stumpage is a term used to describe the price paid for standing timber. Our focus here is on using it to denote the price paid to the Crown. Alternative Stumpage Systems • Fixed Schedules • Appraisals • Competitive Auctions Bill spoke to this Timber Pricing Source: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hva/aboutus/index.htm Appraisal or residual –based pricing – “Upset Stumpage” 1. Volumes are estimated from inventory data Example 2. Value or price is determined from market information 3. Harvesting costs are assessed (including road, logging, and hauling costs) 4. Allowance for the operator’s profit and risk is deducted Source: Pearse, P. H., 1990. An Introduction to Forest Economics, UBC Press; Vancouver. Market Pricing System (MPS) in BC The MPS attempts to let market forces determine the stumpage rate Standing timber is auctioned off to establish a market value for timber. This market value is then used to determine stumpage prices for longer-term tenure holders BCTS ≈ 20% of Crown timber → Determines “market value” of timber “Market value” → Determines stumpage rates for other forms of tenure in BC http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/mof/plan/ The final equations, compared to the Benchmark Equations, are shown below. Winning Bid – Benchmark and Final Dependant Variable Benchmark Final Equation Real Winning Bid Real Winning Bid Explanatory Variable Coefficient t-Statistic Coefficient t-Statistic Constant 3.63 0.58 -23.74 -4.12 Hembal -10.09 -3.52 N/A N/A 3-Month Average Log Selling Price 0.647 10.99 0.619 11.74 Cedar and Cypress N/A N/A 9.67 2.41 Cedar and Cypress 2007 N/A N/A 30.21 6.67 Gambier Dist 400 N/A N/A -7.95 -1.58 Cruise Grades N/A N/A 6.27 3.90 Conventional Slope -0.101 -2.12 -0.103 -2.65 Helicopter Logging -26.65 -7.86 -25.63 -8.44 LN (Volume per Hectare/1000) 7.74 3.36 7.65 2.29 Number of Bidders 1.90 8.55 2.03 9.68 Distance to Gambier -0.00321 -0.76 N/A N/A 2008 Auctions -8.98 -4.59 N/A N/A 2009 Auctions -11.40 -4.91 N/A N/A 2010 Auctions -8.28 -3.52 N/A N/A 2011 Auctions -3.75 -1.69 N/A N/A Location -0.0567 -3.69 -0.0659 -4.53 LN (Piece Size) N/A N/A 2.24 1.12 LN (Piece Size) * Old Growth 3.96 1.46 N/A N/A Second Growth Fir N/A N/A 9.57 4.39 Second Growth 4.33 1.98 N/A N/A Number of Observations Adjusted R 2 Note: LN means natural logarithm 277 277 0.724 0.746 Coast Market Pricing System – Update 2012 VARIABLES AND DEFINITIONS PREDICTED BID Used in the Number of Bidders equation: The estimated winning bid for the cutting authority from the corresponding winning bid equation, expressed in $/m3. 3 MONTH AVERAGE LOG SELLING PRICE Average coniferous log selling price estimate expressed in $/m3. This is based upon a consideration of log grades and species for the cutting authority area, and schedules of log market values collected and published by the Timber Pricing Branch. SECOND GROWTH FIR If selling price zone in the appraisal data submission is 52, then 2nd GROWTH FIR is the fraction of the coniferous cruise volume that is Douglas-fir. If the selling price zone is not 52, then 2nd GROWTH FIR = 0. 2nd GROWTH FIR is in decimal form, rounded to 2 decimal places. CEDARCYPRESS The fraction of the coniferous cruise volume that is cedar and cypress. CEDARCYPRESS is in decimal form, rounded to 2 decimal places. HEMBAL The fraction of the coniferous cruise volume that is hemlock and balsam. HEMBAL is in decimal form, rounded to 2 decimal places. CONVENTIONAL SLOPE The average side slope percentage for that part of the cutting authority area that will not be helicopter yarded. VOLUME PER HECTARE Cruised volume of coniferous timber per hectare. Expressed in m3/ha and is rounded to 2 decimal places. PIECE SIZE The net coniferous cruised volume per 10 m log expressed in m3. PIECESIZE is expressed in m3 and is rounded to 2 decimal places. HELICOPTER LOGGING The fraction of the total net cruise volume, including deciduous volume, of timber in a cutting authority area that must be helicopter yarded or yarded by skyline where logs Government Forestry Revenues in BC, 1981-2012, 000’s of Canadian dollars $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 09/10 08/09 07/08 06/07 04/05 02/03 01/02 00/01 99/00 97/98h 98/99 96/97h 95/96h 94/95h 93/94 92/93 91/92f 90/91e 89/90 88/89 87/88 86/87 84/85 85/86 83/84d 82/83d 81/82 $0 Actual 3/2012 -$482 million 3/2011-$436 million