The Purpose of Business: Its Stakeholders and their Claims The Purpose of Business: Its Stakeholders and their Claims What is the appropriate role for business to play in a free market democracy? Who decides? The answer provides a “normative foundation for business”. Examples of “socially responsible” companies: Examples of “socially responsible” companies: Who are the primary stakeholders in a business and what claims do they have on it? Stakeholders Claims What does “the social responsibility of business” or “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) mean in our society? What does the contemporary concept “the social responsibility of business” mean? 1. “Social responsibility is the expectation that businesses or individuals will strive to improve the overall welfare of society.” 1. From the perspective of a business, this means that managers must take active steps to insure that society is better off as a result of the business’ existence. (From Dess, G.G. et al. (2008) Strategic Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin) “Values-led business is based on the idea that business has a responsibility to the people and the society that makes its existence possible.” Timberland's program of social responsibility What types of activities does Timberland’s program of Social Enterprise include? http://responsibility.timberland.com/ What are the costs of this program to Timberland? What are the benefits? Milton Friedman’s thesis on the social responsibility of business “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud.” from The Social Responsibility of Business is to Make a Profit, 1970 “Companies that focus on making money become more competitive, and that in turn means more economic growth, and more jobs, and all the other results that ‘stakeholders’ care about.” Robert Eaton, Chairman & CEO of Chrysler How does Friedman support his thesis that the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits? Supporting arguments for Friedman’s thesis on the social responsibility of business The responsibility of the corporate executive is to maximize profit because this is what shareholders want. (p.2) The underlying political principle of the market mechanism: “In an ideal market resting on private property, no individual can coerce any other”. (p.5) The vagueness of the term “social responsibility” as it applies to business. The appeal to social welfare: When profit-seeking occurs in competitive markets, firms direct society’s resources to their highest use as measured by the willingness of people to pay. (Adam Smith) The realities of competition. (p.3) Is social responsibility really anything other than profit maximization? (p.4) According to Charles Handy, what is the purpose of business? According to Charles Handy, what is the purpose of business? The purpose of business is not to make a profit. It is to make a profit so that the business can do something else. That “something” becomes the real purpose of the business. (p.5) “To many this will sound like quibbling with words. Not so. It is a moral issue. To mistake the means for the end is to be turned in on oneself . . . “ (p.5) “ . . . The suspicions about capitalism are rooted in a feeling that its instruments, the corporations, are immoral in that they have no purpose other than themselves.” (p.5) David Packard’s philosophy of business “I think many people assume, wrongly, that a company exists simply to make money. While this is an important result of a company’s existence, we have to go deeper and find the real reason for our being. As we investigate this, we inevitably come to the conclusion that a group of people get together and exist as an institution that we call a company so that they are able to accomplish something collectively that they would not accomplish separately–they make a contribution to society . . . ” from What’s a Business For?, Charles Handy, 2002 Summarizing: Can we find some agreement between the arguments of Friedman and Handy, some common ground that would point toward the purpose of business? What is the primary objective of this business? How do you think Blake Mycoskie would respond to Friedman’s view of the social responsibility of business? For most of the 20th century, professional managers of public corporations did not view themselves as "agents" whose only purpose was to maximize shareholder wealth. Rather, they viewed themselves as stewards or trustees responsible for steering great social institutions — public corporations — for the benefit not only of shareholders but also employees, customers and the nation. This system of "managerial capitalism" was hardly perfect. But, ironically, it produced better results for investors than the "shareholder primacy" philosophy that dominates public corporations today. from 'Maximizing shareholder value' is ill-conceived concept by Law Lynn Stout, professor of corporate and business law at the Clarke Business Institute at Cornell Law School (Los Angeles Times, 9/212) “The job of management,” proclaimed Frank Abrams, chairman of Standard Oil of New Jersey in a 1951 address that was typical of the era, “is to maintain an equitable and working balance among the claims of the various directly interested groups . . . stockholders, employees, customers, and the public at large.” The top executives of America’s major corporations had emerged from World War Two as ‘corporate statesmen,’ who had overseen defense production for the nation as a whole. Many continued to view themselves more as professionals with public responsibilities than solely as agents of private interests. Reich, R.R. (1998). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review 40:2, 8-17 Quantifying the impact of corporate social responsibility 1. A 1992 study found that employees’ morale tripled in firms that are heavily involved in their communities 2. Corporate Citizenship’s 2002 poll found that 84% of Americans would be likely to switch brands to one associated with a good cause if price and quality were similar (cited in Dess, G.G. et al. (2008) Strategic Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin) 3. 71% of store customers surveyed said they would be more likely to buy Timberland products (From Timberland & Community Involvement, HBS –5/29/98) 4. The evidence from “Does it Pay to be Good?” (Trudel, T. & Cotte, J.(2009) Does it pay to be good? Sloan Management Review. 50:2. 61-68) A Middle Way: “The Biggest Contract” (Ian Davis, Worldwide Managing Director of McKinsey & Co.) A. CSR is often a defensive, piecemeal, non-strategic reaction to social pressure B. Companies need to build social issues into strategy in a way that reflects their actual business importance rather than taking a reductionist approach of “the business of business is business” which can lead to a focus on short-term performance C. How IBM uses its expertise The business enterprise must be founded on a sense of responsibility to the public and to its employees. Service to its customers, the wellbeing of its employees, good citizenship in the communities in which it operates–these are cardinal principles fundamental to any business. They provide the platform on which a profitable company is built. We shall build good ships here at a profit if we can–at a loss if we must–but always good ships. (Newport News Shipyard, 1917) From Hopper and Hopper, The Puritan Gift, 2007 (p.116)