Global Teaching Opportunities Website Analysis Rubric

advertisement
Global Teaching Opportunities Website Analysis
Name:
Instructor:
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
20
Competent
Meets Expectations
17-19
Acceptable
Meets Expectations
15-16
Synopsis of
Each Website
Synopsis of each
website (at least 5)
is complete and
detailed, and
includes url,
sponsoring
organization or
persons, teaching
opportunities
available, required
qualifications and
training, travel
documents needed,
organizational
structure and
support, and all
pertinent data to
evaluate the
opportunities
presented.
Synopsis of each
website (6) is
complete and includes
pertinent data
necessary to evaluate
the opportunities
presented.
Synopsis of each
website (6) contains
most data necessary
to evaluate the
opportunities
presented. Some
pertinent data
appears to be
missing or is
incomplete.
Critical
Evaluation of
Each Website
Each website is
clearly and
completely
evaluated for
educational focus,
ethical practices,
viable opportunities,
evidence of cultural
competence, and
likelihood of
enabling teacher to
perform
competently within
intercultural
settings. Websites
are ranked by
program quality.
Each website is
evaluated for the
quality of
opportunities provided
and support offered to
teachers. Websites
are ranked by
quality of
opportunities
presented.
Websites are
evaluated by quality
of opportunities
provided. Some
pertinent data may
be missing. They are
not ranked by the
quality of
opportunities
presented.
Points
Limited
Does Not Meet
Expectations
0-14
Synopses submitted
for fewer than 6
websites. Vital
information is unclear
or missing.
Websites are not
consistently
evaluated or
evaluation data is so
limited as to give
little explanation for
the student’s
preference for one
opportunity over
another.
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
5
All synopses are
ORGANIZATION presented in a
& NEATNESS
logical sequence.
Paper is typed and
neatly organized.
SPELLING,
GRAMMAR, &
SENTENCE
STRUCTURE
WORKS CITED
DUE DATE
___________
Competent
Meets Expectations
4
Synopses are written
in a fairly logical
sequence. Paper is
typed and adequately
organized.
Acceptable
Meets Expectations
3
Limited
Does Not Meet
Expectations
0-2
Synopses are mostly
logical, with some
omission or lack of
sequence. Paper is
typed.
Synopses are
disorganized or
incomplete. Paper is
not neatly or logically
organized.
Writing mechanics
are clear and logical.
Punctuation,
spelling and
grammar are correct.
Punctuation,
Writing mechanics are
spelling, and
clear. Few errors in
grammar are good.
punctuation, spelling
Writing mechanics
and grammar.
could be improved.
Errors interfere with
the meaning of many
sentences. Paper
seems in rough draft
form.
Sources are cited
accurately.
Some sources are
inaccurate citations.
Nearly all citations are
Presentation of
accurate.
citations is not
logical.
Sources are missing,
inaccurate or
unprofessionally
presented.
Assignment is
Assignment is
submitted on time or submitted within 24early
48 hours of time due.
Assignment is
Assignment is
submitted more than
submitted within 4872 hours past time
72 hours of time due.
due.
Total---->
Instructor Comments:
Download